« first day (2920 days earlier)      last day (2050 days later) » 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

12:17 AM
@Shalvenay when prepared by a cook who knows what she/he's doing, it's pretty darned good.
 
@DavidCoffron Late response, but yeah - some of the headers on DNDBeyond have anchor links but others don't. I point the link to the right section when possible, but often when I check the source it doesn't have an an id attribute, as Carcer said
Also, question: I recall it being mentioned in meta somewhere that we should avoid single-word "yes"/"no"-type headers, because often there are multiple questions in the "question" body itself (sometimes directly opposing one another) and it's not clear which question is being addressed - and sometimes the title asks one question while the body asks the opposite. Can someone find this meta and confirm that I'm not crazy? (...well, I could be crazy anyway, but that's not important right now.)
Never mind, I found it
15
A: Are questions with title opposite to text ok?

doppelgreenerIt's not ideal when that mismatch exists, and you're right to call it out that it makes the question confusing. They ought to be edited to be brought in line. Answers should still preferably say more than Yes. at the beginning, so that we know exactly what they're saying yes to. Yes, X happens. ...

 
 
2 hours later…
2:29 AM
Sup, peeps?
(I've barely been around for a few days--any drama I missed?)
 
@nitsua60 nothing major I know of, but I haven't been around that much either. I take it things are looking better for you time-wise at least?
 
@Shalvenay A touch, yes. Saturday should be a go. (As long as none of my sheeple end up in the hospital, that is!)
 
@nitsua60 nods
 
 
1 hour later…
3:49 AM
@nitsua60 just the drama class we all took and can't tell you any details about :P
 
 
3 hours later…
6:45 AM
Hey all, according to the description for "Wish" it says there some thing as a lich's life drain Attack, but I can't see that in the monster Manuel? Am I blind or does it not exist?
 
7:18 AM
Like, you found lich but it doesn't have that attack?
 
7:56 AM
@trogdor like in the monster Manuel under 'Lich', it never says the words "life drain attack" or even just "life drain"
 
Again I find myself deleting one of my answers because the goalposts are moving :(
@Youjay Probably something lost in the editing :)
Also, it's Monster Manual ("manual" meaning a handbook). Manuel would be a masculine name, commonly associated with Hispanic cultures :>
 
8:27 AM
@Youjay more or less what I meant yeah
 
@kviiri mi humbelest apogogiss four botchering thr speeling oof tat werd
 
@Youjay No need to apologize, I just want to help people avoid possible ridicule from using possibly embarrassing misspellings in some contexts
I remember when Civ V's last expansion Brave New World was coming. There was a forum thread where they collected reveals about the expansion. The OP of that thread had misspelled "ideological tenets" as "ideological tenants" and that went contagious fast, to the point where the misspelling was way more common on the forum than the correctly spelled word
 
@kviiri the reddit for Octopath Traveller was, for the longest time, r/octopathtraveler with a single L. They made the swap just before the game came out, but it was already too late for my brain. Now I knever know wich one is the correct spelling
 
@Helwar The double l thing is really hard for me
 
@kviiri why?
 
8:40 AM
@Helwar Dunno, it's there for many words but somehow feels very un-Englishy :P
 
@kviiri oh I get it. The word Traveller is worst of all, because it's accepted both as Traveller with LL and Traveler with L. I think one of these is the brittish version
So you feel like LL is un-Englishy? Huh, I get what you mean but I feel the opposite. English is that language that likes to double letters for no reason. Like, Letters... it would be exactly the same sound as "leters", or "opposite -> oposite", or "quill -> quil", etc...
you just double up on the letters 'cause English
 
I mean, in that particular context... English usually doesn't make terminal consonants longer before suffices
Except when it does .P
Eg. "eat" becomes "eater" but "run" becomes "runner".
 
@kviiri oh.... I have a knack for english, I do not know why, but things feel "right" or "wrong" to me. Maybe because I'm just used to listen/read it properly. But don't even ask me to analyze the grammar if you don't want me going blank :P
 
@Helwar Me too, but then there's these few things that don't really find their way into my brain :)
 
but yeah, random rules
 
8:48 AM
My mother tongue doesn't have articles, definiteness or grammatic gender. Learning foreign languages is weird at times
 
what's your first language?
 
Finnish
 
/* Brain struggling to pinpoint that in the map. Don't tell me, let me figure it out */
done
hum, I know next to nothing about Finnish, I don't even know how it sounds
 
We don't have the "a/the" distinction which is in both Germanic languages (like English and Swedish) and Latin languages (like French), many of my schoolmates struggled to absorb when "a thing" becomes "the thing"
@Helwar Elvish, except spoken without passion or intonation
 
except spoken without passion <- this killed me
 
8:52 AM
(Finnish doesn't have intonation either - it's quite interesting how in French a statement can be transformed into a question by simply saying it in a different tone!)
 
@kviiri most languages can do that
:P
 
Yea :P
Swedish has a whopping five noun classes (possibly more and they just taught us five)
 
what do you mean by noun classes?
 
Grammatic genders, like masculine and feminine in French (and Spanish too, iirc?)
 
well, yeah, in Spanish we have masculine and geminine nouns
but wouldn't that be noun genders? instead of classes?
 
8:55 AM
Maybe? I'm not sure tbh
 
(also adjectives are modified by the number and gender of the subject)
 
Using "gender" feels funny when there's a bunch of them and they're not associated with human genders
But it's probably still correct
 
i guess so, yes
 
it is the linguistic term
 
In Swedish the main distinction is between en and ett words, and en words are further divided into three genders based on their plural form and ett words into two
 
8:58 AM
I expect it is derived from analysis of languages where the genders are masculine and feminine
 
Yea, quite ikely so
I wonder how old is linguistics as a field
 
also, today's shaping up to be a good day, I was gifted with a perfect opportunity to bust out the classic "people die when they are killed"
 
Who were the first people who started examining the language they spoke as an object that can be analyzed?
 
undoubtedly will have happened independently in lots of places
I wouldn't be surprised if the first people who did so are pre-recorded-history
 
@kviiri I dunno. I thank them for fixing up languages as much as possible, and I curse them for forcing me to learn how to analyze grammar
 
9:07 AM
@Helwar Linguistics has useful spin-offs in computer programming :)
 
@kviiri it does. IT also screws you over when you mix up the 9 different languages for programming different things that you know and don't use the proper grammar in the one you are using at the moment
but well, we need grammar analysis to solve D&D disputes so I'll take all my suffering at class when I was younger as training for good DMing
 
oh, re: earlier linguistics
as a native english speaker I would've read "leter" pronounced like "leeter" not "letter"
I'm not really au-fait with the terminology but the double-consonants are like a harder stop rather than follow through
e.g. hello vs. helo - "hell-oh" / "hee-lo"
 
9:41 AM
Finnish customs office destroying illegally imported alcoholic drinks: twitter.com/JannePoikonen/status/1045545851521839104
 
9:57 AM
@kviiri I was fully convinced that was leading up to an ending where they were pouring it into some guy's face
 
@kviiri That we know of? And on what level?
(I really like it that there's so much linguistics discussion in this chat.)
@Carcer Makes sense, according to the existing but exception-rich rules of English pronunciation.
@Helwar “Noun classes” is the generic term. “Grammatical gender” is a synonym for historical reasons, because this kind of analysis started with Indo-European languages, which generally have something based on a masculine/feminine/neuter system.
 
@Anaphory side note: unending hatred for people who try to argue "my masculine/feminine language gender is obviously totally unrelated and has nothing whatsoever to do with human genders!"
 
@kviiri Hm, different morphology classes in not necessary the same as different noun classes. Noun class generally means that some other words differ based on the noun class; the morphology within the noun class may sub-group differently.
@Carcer I know that for my native German, I have an intuition that the noun classes are related to human genders. Also, the historical reasons are obviously related. I could imagine cases where the system is of far eroded that it is de-facto, in the now, disconnected from human genders (cf. German “Mädchen”, which is “girl”, but neuter because diminuitives are always neuter – if this went further, the categories might become lost).
@Anaphory Confer latin, which has 3 noun classes, which govern the forms of adjectives and demonstratives, but 4-or-so major morphological patterns (declensions) of nouns, which largely align with noun classes, but not completely
 
10:21 AM
@Anaphory the issue is mostly with people who refuse to accept that language shapes thought - when studies show that in grammatically gendered languages speakers tend to associate masculine/feminine stereotypes with objects based on their gender
 
@kviiri I think the first documented description of a language as object of study is Sanscrit. Probably a few hundred years BC? Cuneiform and hieroglyph scribes learnt some tables, as well, I think, so there was some awareness of that, but Sanscrit is known for early grammars taking it apart and describing it formally.
 
10:36 AM
@Carcer Me too but I guess they left it offscreen
@Anaphory Hm, in that sense I guess only en and ett are actual classes (since there's adjective concord with them)
Eg. "a small mouse" is en liten mus but "a small house" is ett litet hus
(disclaimer: I only did the mandatory Swedish classes and while I don't have the stereotypical Finnish aversion to Swedish language, I'm by no means an expert!)
 
> The actual evidence for a gender or noun class system lies outside the noun itself, as it is only reflected by way of agreement in the words associated with the given noun
(Velupillai: “An Introduction to Linguistic Typology”, p. 165)
 
@Anaphory This is a good observation that I'll try to remember :)
 
@kviiri I had to look it up to be sure, but I had the book here :)
 
I have this Russian friend who was trying to learn Finnish for his citizenship exam, and trying to explain some things in Finnish made me question the sensibility of my language :P
 
@kviiri You would have had that feeling no matter what your L1 is. It's not like any language is sensible.
 
10:46 AM
@Anaphory Quite true, although he did switch to Swedish which has been way easier for him (this is one of those occasions where I love living in an officially bilingual country)
One thing that I still haven't figured out why is a particular use of the partitive case. Partitive usually denoted partialness, or unspecified quantities, or open-endedness, a bit like some does in English. But for whatever reason, the singular partitive case is also used to express concrete numbers of things. Singular, no matter the amount
 
@kviiri your conuntry is officially bilingual, but you are not required / expected to know both languages?
 
@Helwar the whole point of being officially bilingual is that people should be able to get by using either
 
hummm but for that everyone should know both. If I just know language A and go to a store and the clerk only knows language B the system crashes
:P
 
you can get by with mime
charades
but I mean you can use any government service and expect that they will be able to cater to both languages
 
Spain is not officialy bilingual, some regions are. I'm Catalan and here we are expected and required to know both Spanish and Catalan. Both are taught at school and both are used in day to day activities, much to the chagrin of the ones and the others
 
10:59 AM
I understand the catalan situation is a bit complicated
 
it isn't, some make it complicated
but it doesn't need to be
i'll go have lunch, laterz! (we'll continue the talk later if you want, sorry!)
 
@Helwar Basically it means public services are provided in both main languages. Students have to study the one that's not their mother tongue at school, although most Swedish-speaking Finns are fluent in Finnish too.
@Helwar The clerk probably knows just enough B to get by, or at least enough to tell you to hold on for a moment while they go get a better B speaker (having strong Swedish can be an advantage on the labor market!)
There's an ongoing political discussion about whether the mandatory Swedish for middle-schoolers is still needed. There's good arguments both ways: Swedish has a history here, Sweden is an important partner country who shares our values, and of course the fact that a significant minority of Finnish people prefer Swedish as their day to day language or only know Swedish
On the other hand, the Russian language is similarly useful near the Eastern border and could help market services towards the Russian tourists
 
 
1 hour later…
12:34 PM
that requires being friendly to russians though
this seems counter to the finnish spirit
 
Heh
Russia is a bit of a stressful neighbor for a country to have but so far I've had only good experiences with individual Russians :)
 
@kviiri on my first read (just woke up mind you) I read "individual Russians" as contrary to "conjoined Russians" and was like "Are conjoined Russians any worse?" before realizing you meant Russia as a country
 
As opposed to the roving hive-mind Russian gatherings
 
1:03 PM
@Carcer all individual russians I've met in my life (spoiler alert, you can count them with one hand) have been awesome people. Still, their goverment I would go touch with a 10' long pole
 
@Helwar I'm not sure if I've ever actually met a russian
I know plenty of Eastern Yurops (side effect of having a romanian partner)
 
@Carcer the last one I met invited me to go to Moscow for christmas. Has an appartment at the red plaza, and everything. I was pretty hyped up to go until she said it's -60ºC in the winter there. I start hibernation at -2º or die. I can't handle even the mention of -60ºC
 
uh
it is not possibly -60C in the winter there
that's insane
that's like north pole levels
 
i don't know. That's what she said.
 
casual googling suggests -10C is the very cold end of the scale
 
1:09 PM
Average temp on XMas in Moscow is -8 C
January and February is usually colder than December tho
 
The coldest day of Finnish winter are usually below -20C, but Moscow is way further inland (continental climates have colder winters than coastal) and Finnish winter is somewhat tempered by the warm flow of the Gulf stream West of Norway.
 
I don't see why someone would edit this to be wrong
 
I'm pretty sure she said -60, that was the whole point of the conversation for hours after that. It might have been sensation of -60 but not actual real -60? But still it would be pretty low
I dunno maybe she slipped on that
 
@Helwar Could have just been hyperbole. I know I've said it's like 100 degrees outside (F) when it was actually just like 80
 
might have
she actually got me to say no to the trip though with that hyperbole haha
 
1:16 PM
@DavidCoffron Note that the chart has average minimum temperature though
 
I said in summer I'll go wherever, but I don't like cold
 
Oh disregard that
There was a record minimum in the text itself x)
My brother was in the army starting from January 2010, I started in June of the same year. About 50 centigrade degrees of temperature difference between the days of our military vows.
 
gasp
 
It was a rather intense Summer. Like, temperature-wise, not just because of army stuff.
 
@kviiri moscow is at much lower latitude than finland though
 
1:20 PM
@Carcer That's true
Luckily, we got an actual winter too because snow is soft to crawl on and any mud is frozen :)
and snow can be just wiped off one's clothing, while water... can't.
 
I live in London mate, don't complain to me about rain
 
I'm usually rather positive about rain
 
london hardly knows the meaning of rain
 
But being forced to live an outdoor lifestyle makes even our fairly tolerable amounts of rain a pain :>
 
well, the inner city regions anyway
 
1:26 PM
well, I spent half my life in the midlands
 
where are the midlands?
(i've only been living here for a couple of years)
 
birmingham and derby regions
 
ooh
gotcha
in the past couple of years living in inner London I've seen less rain in than in Australia, which doesn't even rain for half the year
it's light and rare
i consider myself lied to about how rainy london is :P
 
climate change mate
the weather these days is notably drier than I recall from childhood
and warmer
but we've got it ingrained in the consciousness that Britain is a damp, rainy place
 
@Carcer I've been to Great Britain once, a bit under two weeks, during the Rihanna curse. Did not disappoint!
 
1:33 PM
@kviiri which bits did you visit?
 
Near constant downpour, exactly what we wanted to see!
@Carcer Started with London, toured around a bit, then went to Cornwall
London is a massive place
 
didn't fancy visiting Salisbury and its famous cathedral with beautiful 123 meter spire?
 
@Carcer I would if I went today. I was in my teens and travelling with my parents
I've read Rutherfurd's novel about Sarum, it was a good read.
 
Putin assures us it's a very popular tourist attraction
 
I don't remember much about the novel though. London ingrained itself in my head far better.
 
1:37 PM
greater london is very large though yeah
 
Although London the novel had one rather unpalatable quality - Rutherfurd decided to have one family be the villains of the novel. From the Norman era to the 1900's, it's always the Silversleeves family who's screwing everyone up.
 
@kviiri with such a fanciful name, it's like they were chosen by destiny to be the bad guys
 
troll question trucks on. Does anyone think it should be protected? It's attracted a lot of answers saying basically the same thing
 
@Helwar Yea. The first SIlversleeves, if my memory serves me right, was named by some unlikeable fellow who among other nasty things wiped his nose on his sleeves x) gross
The first ones to have an impact on the story are collaborating with the Norman occupation of England and are basically slave drivers to get the Tower built.
 
@Carcer thing is, it's almost all people who would be able to post regardless of Protected status
 
1:44 PM
@Carcer wich question?
 
@doppelgreener speaking from personal experience, seeing the protected marker on a post disinclines me from answering it even though I am well able
at the very least it ensures I read the existing answers very carefully to ensure I'd actually be adding something by answering
47
Q: Are Trolls immune to all instant death effects?

DeltatheduckPart of the Troll's Regeneration feature says: The troll dies only if it starts its turn with 0 hit points and doesn't regenerate. Does this case beat instant kill effects, such as Divine Word or Power Word Kill? Divine Word says: [...] On a failed save, a creature suffers an effect ba...

 
@Carcer hmm. [marks protected then]
 
aw, you've stolen my thunder now
 
oh, I first thought you meant it was a troll question win the generic, internet-wise meaning of the word troll. Not an actual fictional troll
 
I was all ready to press that button for the first time
 
1:48 PM
Lots of terrible answers on that question
 
yeah... a lot of people seemed to miss the point, reading the troll's ability intuitively rather than literally
 
I hate correcting the same misconceptions on every post
 
@Carcer oh! shoot, my apologies
 
"But it doesn't reduce the troll to 0 hit points, it kills it" <-- 0 hit points is a condition for the troll dying, not a condition for the regeneration kicking in
 
It's difficult sometimes for me to vote for something that RAW is correct but is in my opionion not RAI nor RAF
 
1:51 PM
"But the troll dies so it doesn't have the ability anymore at the start of its turn" <-- by that logic the regeneration wouldn't save the troll ever
 
@SirCinnamon RAF? that's new to me
 
A lot of people are overlooking the important part of the wording "the troll only dies..."
@Helwar Royal Air Force clearly. Nah "Rules As Fun" AKA how I would play
or more strongly, how I would recommend it be played. Which is subjective obviously
 
oh, gotcha
 
@SirCinnamon Yeah, if you ask me the RAW reading is that the troll indeed can't be killed even by instant death effects but I didn't write an answer for it - first, because @Carcer wrote it well already, and secondly, because I think giving DnD a Talmudic level of examination is pointless when it isn't written with a Talmudic level of care :>
 
@kviiri or "but the troll has an ability that says it can only die in these conditions, which this spell doesn't meet, so this spell cannot do this thing to the troll in the first place"
 
1:53 PM
hmmm, yo make me google too much today
 
@kviiri I agree with all of that
 
@kviiri i agree with this
@SirCinnamon in fact i also agree with sir cinnamon agreeing with all of that
 
@doppelgreener Well, that is ok as long as there's good justification to consider one of the two conflicting rules having priority :P
 
@kviiri talmudic just means that refers to the talmud, and it's the first time i encounter that word in my life soooo the meaning is lost in me :P I just know it's a jew book
 
the question and self-answer the guy wrote suggests to me quite strongly that it should have the raw tag, as I commented
since it is an extremely literal analysis he seems to be looking for
 
1:59 PM
Mentally, I approach the troll contradiction by taking it more extreme: Let's suppose the troll has a trait that it can't be killed at all. "The troll never dies." I'd rule no instant death thing works on that, and I think most'd agree. We can loosen that to get "The troll never dies unless it is at zero hit points and doesn't regenerate" --- equivalent to the current rule, without a clear point of demarcation in between that one and "immortal" where instant death starts applying to it.
 
ah, op's readded the raw tag
 
If I had to rewrite that bit of the MM, I'd rewrite it as "A troll doesn't die when reduced to zero hit points. However, it dies if it starts its turn with zero hit points and doesn't regenerate."
Note that this permits instant death - my rule starts from the assumption that the troll dies normally, adds an exception and an exception to the exception. The current troll rule tosses the normal dying rule entirely by saying trolls can't die, then adds an exception.
 
agreed
I do believe the rule was intended to be about preventing a troll's death due to hit point damage, not in all circumstances, but if read literally it's the latter
 
@Helwar Forgot to respond to this - Talmud is basically a large and ancient collection of Jewish philosophy, interpretation and debates concerning the law. Debating the law and using logic and careful textual analysis to arrive to conclusions are an important part of Rabbinical Judaism
 
yeah, my understanding of judaism is that it's basically worship through religious rules-lawyering
oh, we can't move things outside the house? We'll just redefine house to be this arbitrarily large area so as long as we can delineate a clear border for it"
it's very weird to the outside perspective
 
2:13 PM
omg, quick dirty question (i'll make an actual question of it if it isn't quick), my players are preparing a trap for an aboleth with an accumulation of Contingency + Glyph of Warding + Symbol + prepared actions. The idea is that they use the wizard as bait, and when the aboleth gets near everything starts: One spell should destroy the column holding the underwater cavern, 2 fireballs, a spell i don't remember but that gives disadvantatge on X saves, then a dominate monster and a word of healing
 
@kviiri Maybe borrow the wording of Relentless Endurance or Undying Sentinel? "when this creature is reduced to 0 hit points and is not killed outright, this creature only dies if, at the start of its next turn, it does not get Regeneration and is at 0 hit points."
 
now, the debate is if this all solves instantaneously at the same time, or spell by spell
 
The culture of debating based on a given source is peculiarly similar among DnD players, although I think DnD is, in addition to more pointless, not really written with the same level of care as these traditional texts are :>
 
@Helwar Xanathar's suggests that when multiple effects happen at the same time you resolve them in an order as determiined by whoever's turn on the initiative it is when they went off
 
@Helwar 5e doesn't do simultaneous stuff so I'd say spell by spell.
 
2:15 PM
the.... selection of spells is slightly confusing to me
 
they want it to work as MTG, so there is a pile of actions resolving one by one, so even if they hurt the thing too much the word of healing would bring it back to positive hp
 
@Helwar the saves one is probably bestow curse
 
ah - they're trying to hurt it enough that they can dominate it without killing it?
 
@kviiri D&D 5e asks us to run based on real-world logic, which says two things could happen simultaneously
 
yes
they want it super hurt in case it shakes of the domination, they can finish it quickly
 
2:16 PM
Ah, wrote that incorrectly: should have been "this creature does not die unless, at the start of its turn..."
 
Can't they just declare their spells to be non-lethal?
(I can't remember if AoE can be declared as such)
 
kviiri: melee attacks only IIRC
 
@kviiri only melee attacks work that way
 
well yes, theyr damage yes, but htey plan on bringing down the cave on him
the ycan't do a "non-letal" avalanche
:P
 
@DavidCoffron Oh, right
 
In 4e you could do non-lethal anything iirc
 
so I will tell them that the spells go one by one even if the trigger is the same
 
@Helwar well. I'd let them trigger simultaneously in world but resolve them one by one for simplicities sake
That's how rounds work
 
What's the actual problem there, though?
 
well I meant mechanically :)
we tend to overanalyze things
 
2:21 PM
If you want this construction to work, no need to look too close. Just let it happen.
If you don't want it to work, well... depends a bit on your table culture I'd say :P
 
brb
it's not that I don't want to, they themselves presented the pros and cons
thing is we overanalyze things haha. The idea is: bring down the cave, damage it further, just in case, curse it so it's weaker to domination, dominate it, heal it a little, interrogate, possibly capture and bring back to employer
so spells need to go one by one
but htey themselves said things like, if all goes at the same time, it won't work
 
@Helwar they could make the triggers based on the previous spells to ensure sequentiality
 
because if (for example) You have 30 hp, i do 100 damage, bring you under 0, and heal 5. You are at 5. But if I do 100 damage and heal you 5 at the same time, I did 95 damage to you, so... still under 0
and if the curse and dominate work at the same time, dominate wouldn't benefit from curse
things like that
 
ah
things don't happen simultaneously like that in D&D
 
they've been going on all day on the whatsapp group planning for tomorrow ^ ^
 
2:26 PM
@Carcer they do but the game uses initiative to decide what things affect the world first
 
if multiple instantaneous effects happen at once you resolve them one by one in some order
in the fiction it may all happen at once but mechanically there is an order
 
@Carcer yes but what order? If it were me I'd give each time with the same trigger an initiative relative to the other. Then I'd let the caster chose the modifier for the initiatives up to twice their Spellcasting modifier in either direction
So the caster can set them up to have "slight delays" from each other but there's a chance that once the aboleth gets there it doesn't work quite as planned
 
@DavidCoffron it's quite a big margin, 8 or 10 numbers to choose from in most optimized builds. You might just say "choose the order" at that point
 
@Helwar shrug it's the middle ones that become a question. Sure the initial fireball and dominate arent gonna swap places, but what about the curse and the fireballs. They might
Just a suggestion. Never actually uses it so I'm not sure how it would play out
 
yeah, I get it's something from the top of your head :)
nah, just knowing that doesnt happen simultaneously at all helped
thanks
we have to see if the cave-in damages it enough, or if it outrights kill him.... I'll have to look how to rule cave ins in sea floor environments :P
 
2:40 PM
20
Q: How might the weight of a falling object affect the damage it causes?

QuiescatFall damage is 1d6 per 10 feet. What adjustments if any should I make for objects falling on a player character? (e.g. a bear) Assuming the objects are meaningful threats but not instant character death, should the weight of an object change the calculation, e.g. more then 1d6 per 10 feet. Or i...

4
Q: Dropping objects/creatures on monsters

KillerKellyIf a character who was under the effect of a growth potion (double height and 8X its weight) and was 2,400 lbs was able to say, Dimension Door 400'+ in the air, directly above a huge sized monster, and fell on it, how much damage would the falling creature - and the monster take? I would assume ...

 
oh thx!
i was worried about the underwater part, more than anything else though. Maybe it doesn't affect mechanically
 
@Helwar There is some mention in Xanathar's where it specifies that if multiple things are likely to happen all at once (or nearly at the same time), the person who's turn it currently is should be the one who decides how everything plays out. But it's more of an optional rule than anything.
And if this hinges on the fact that it's an activated trap for the Aboleth, the players will definitely not like that decision process.
 
@Helwar umm... Is the cavern submerged? Bc fireballs are not very effective in water
 
@DavidCoffron RAW they are
 
@SirCinnamon no they deal half damage RAW
 
2:46 PM
p. 198 of the Player's Handbook: "Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have resistance to fire damage."
 
@DavidCoffron like I mentioned before, Xanathar's rules have it that when things happen simultaneously, you resolve them in an order decided by whoever's turn it is when they happened
 
it's in the bottom of the sea, they are underwater. They went down on a magically DIY submarine, and now have a merfolk blessing to be able to sustain the pressure and breathe
 
> Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have Resistance to fire damage.
 
@DavidCoffron Oh, huh. I guess that's never come up before. Now i know!
 
@DavidCoffron I know, haven't said anything to them yet. They have lightning bolt but they fear to zap themselves underwater
 
2:48 PM
Is what I'm saying not showing up in chat? Because it kinda feels like people are repeating the same stuff I'm putting in here.
Testing, 1 2 3? Anyone read this?
 
I read you @DanielZastoupil
 
we're just very repetitive today
 
I might've not acknowledged it in text but I do!
 
Thanks. Wouldn't be the first time that something flash-related started acting funny on my PC.
There's an acid spell that might work. It deals slightly less damage than Fireball but it's roughly similar. Melf's Acid Arrow, I think?
 
@DanielZastoupil sorry. I'm on mobile so while I'm typing I don't see what people say
 
2:50 PM
they would have to have it to use it :P
they know that specific aboleth is terrified of fire and I think they wrongly assume he's vulnerable to it, but well, that's on them
 
Sounds like a good time for Phantasmal Force.
What's the intelligence on an Aboleth?
 
18 on the common ones
 
Oh, lol, nevermind.
THAT'S not gonna happen
 
Aboleths are very smrt
 
this one is the "dragon" of the bbg, and it's a little bit tougher
 
3:00 PM
Would be a good time for the Pyromancer from the Kaladesh Article. Level 6 feature is that they ignore enemy resistances to fire.
Not sure what they're gonna do now that they're down there, though.
Aboleth's are a massive pain in the rear to deal with. What level are they?
 
I had an unusually feelgoody RPG scheduling moment yesterday
 
5 lvl 13 characters
 
One of the players in my group approached me and thanked me for being active in scheduling our games
(I'm usually the scheduler, even when not GMing)
 
that's nice
+10 schedule points
 
I was happy for a while but our GM still hasn't answered my question whether next Monday is ok :>
 
3:09 PM
That's good. If i'm not scheduling noone does it. THe most that can happen is that they just whatsapp the group things like "we play today? my home in an hour"
wich gives me plenty of time to prepare, as you can see
 
@Helwar Sometimes someone else conjures up a Doodle for two months or so, which no one fills until the first month is up and the second month is inaccurate because it's too far away to be sure
 
doodles don't work at all, ever. With any group
I had one friend that kept sending doodles for everything he wanted to organize and I remember feeling it was a pain in the ass to go and answer them, and COMMIT to them. And he always complained: IT's just a few clicks! not even a minute!.
nowadays I send doodles for somethings when there is too much people to handle
and he's the first to complain: "you are making me open things! Isn't my word enough!?" etc...
 
Yea well, I think doodles are fine for some things
Choosing a date over a month in the future is not among them
I make a short one so people actually fill it mindfully and hope it works out
 
the most useful thing is give a definite time and place and just ask if yes or nay
 
3:26 PM
I've started doing that more
Usually I start by asking "Anyone available next week?" and then someone chimes in that they've got stuff to do otherwise but are free on Tuesday and Thursday nights
Then I ask the rest if either of those is ok
 
what's that cleric spell that lets you make a zone "sacred", and becomes permanent if done enough times?
 
@Helwar Consecrate?
 
maybe, let me check
 
Sorry, it's Hallow in 5e
 
i don't know if it's that.... I remember it different, but my memory is not a trusted source
 
3:30 PM
Druids get a cool similar spell (in Xanathars I think)
 
Private Sanctum and Guards and Wards, along with Teleportation Circle also become permanent if cast every day for a year
@SirCinnamon Druid Grove. yeah
 
I found it
Forbiddance
6th level, I can do it :P
 
@Helwar Are you worried about extra-dimensional visitors?
 
I'm interested in: "In addition, the spell damages types of creatures that you choose when you cast it."
 
neat
 
3:37 PM
it's not gonna affect the players, and probably won't even notice it if they don't summon a celestial to help, but since aberrations and celestials are sworn enemies in my campaign, it makes sense that the aboleth protect their nest against them...
It's more fluff than anything but I like it
 
@Helwar I've done that before and it killed one of my player's familiars... whoops
 
haha
well familiars ain't that difficult to bring back
 
@Helwar true and we all had a good laugh. (The player in question wasn't using the familiar for combat anywat)
It was a chicken based on the one from Moana. I narrated it as it's head exploding. Of course, it ran around a bit like a chicken with its head chopped off
 
hahahha
our warlock has an owl, she doesn't want to give it a name but I call it popcorn, because everytime she remembers she has an infernal owl is to send him to die doing what noone else wants to do
the poor thing is counting the days until the warlock patron takes her soul away to be free to return to hell, wich would be a lot nicer than being at her service
 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (2920 days earlier)      last day (2050 days later) »