I'm not familiar enough with Pathfinder's intricacies to be useful here, but you might get more eyes on it if your request for proof-reading included a link to the thing you want people to proofread.
@MaikoChikyu Unsure about formatting mistakes, but from the question and title, it was confusing what you were trying to ask. The title says "without money expenditure", the question refers to the resources of an 18th level player character, and the answer doesn't have any math other than how to maximize the strength ability score. I was confused but you self-answered, so maybe it's ok?
@BESW Interesting point. Though I think players rejecting authorship powers in Fate is akin to players rejecting the very notion of using violence to solve problems in D&D - they can do it, and the system still functions well enough, but you're probably better off with a different system anyway.
Hmm. What system would you recommend for open-ended descriptive-phrased-driven mechanics where players' agency is largely confined to character agency?
@Helwar I know of a great many systems, and about a good several handful of them. The systems I've actually read are even fewer, and the systems I've played fewer still--especially if you count all the minor variants of a system as a single system.
And since "a system" can range from several thousand pages and many years of play like D&D 3.5 to a single sheet paper and an hour of play like Honey Heist...
would the question "is there ever a reason to not choose the highest modifier on a Finesse weapon attack" be on-topic?
or something similar to that
Essentially, the rules for Finesse say you can choose the modifier you want to use, but it seems weird to give that choice when at a glance picking the highest modifier always seems the best choice
@Nzall I think you can use your free object interaction for that, but yeah, ok there might be some very specific situations where you don't want to do that
I think there are several effects where there is a choice but you mostly just choose the highest one. Take a look at the Lucky feat for example: "You choose which of the d20s is used for the attack roll, ability check, or saving throw." Of course you are going to choose the highest most of the time
@SPavel I am aware of that; being Russian or Finnish won't change physics. I am also aware of the various Walrus Clubs in northern climes (we have them in the US); take whatever risks you are comfortable with.
@nitsua60 With regard to section headings...I'm wondering/hoping (haven't checked) that DNDbeyond organizes things the same way. You can search (which is great), but i'm not sure the results give you all the informatin you'd need to properly direct people to a location in a book.
@SPavel Oh man that is a good bargain on Science... it is almost never that cheap.
@NautArch Sometimes it does, but other times it is harder. And it depends. For example, if you search for "Bard" you can find the Bard section of the PHB but also "Bard (class)" a section in DnDB that Brings together all the Bard class information from all the sources and doesn't say where to find those particular sources.
@DavidCoffron good idea. Kind of a pain to search and then have to go back to the compendium to see how it's actually organized. But that's my digital burden, I guess.
@NautArch Interesting to note however, there are actual page citations at the bottom of pages on magic items (unless they make them up like the Guardian's amulet :-|)
@DavidCoffron so about your meta: it seems to me that the most obvious solution is just to watch posts for this behavior, and roll back changes that OP makes in response to answers and comment telling them that that behavior is not good. Is there any reason you see us needing a system beyond that?
Yeah. See here. Seems to imply that answers should change rather than questions. Making an exception for question-changes of this nature does make sense though.
Yeah though even in that answer they kind of alluded to this issue "If the question was changed because the OP has refined what they wanted to ask as a result of feedback on their question... That's a grey area, and we'll have to deal with it on a case-by-case basis. In some cases it'll be appropriate to revert the change and ask a new question; In others, to let the edit stand and update or downvote and delete old answers."
While our policy on homebrew-critique questions makes a lot of sense as the questions are certainly able to be answered effectively by experts and fit all the criteria for an on-topic question, these questions often take a sharp turn fast.
Soon after the answers to these questions come in we of...
If it disappears after 144 miles regardless, they'd be no reason to ever mention how far it could travel in a day. While you argument is axiomatically logical, I'm not sure the conclusion makes sense of the full wording. — Tiggerous21 mins ago
Heheheh, in fun with rocs thinking, what if the party flies only 140 miles, thinks it has the roc for the next day, but the roc gets hungry and goes off hunting for breakfast. 4 miles later, POOF! RocBeGone! (It ends in tears, as do so many great ideas ...)
@NautArch I have this visual image (similar to my golden retriever's love of doggy snacks) of the roc eagerly snapping up a boar for his morning snack...
> And then giving me "that look" when I offer up a panther.
If you are playing a mix of all the editions (which are not compatible and require some work to be "mutually-intelligible"), it might be better to ask your DM, which will know better than us what rules they choose for your case. — Luris7 mins ago
So I looked into this before, but regarding that question: there is nothing stopping a wizard from using an ioun stone to give every party member their own familiar is there?
@Yuuki Yeah I can't see any reason why it would not work. Seems like an interesting use of it. If we didn't have so many creatures around already I might bring it up to our wizard and do it in our campaign lol
Plus I wouldn't want to steal his familiar spotlight.
Assuming that attunement doesn't wipe the ioun stone's memory. And given that there's a rule that an ioun stone you find might already have spells in it, that's not the case.
A Reserve Ioun Stone can store up to three levels worth of spells and can be used by anyone.
While the spell uses the same stats as the original caster (DC, spell attack, and ability modifier, slot used if upcast) the follow up text says that the spell is treated as if cast by you.
Does this ...
Some idiot pinged @ everyone in a discord I'm in for a bot that I don't use anymore. Then when I asked him about it, he just said "reasons, scroll up and read it yourself"
There are a few spells and other features that can automatically deal damage, but it's very rare. The most common example I can think of is magic missile, which strikes unerringly and deals its damage with no attack roll or saving throw involved. Some area effect spells like cloud of daggers also...
Magic Missile does ~10.5 damage total Burning Hands does ~3.75-7.5 damage to some number of targets. I think balance design assumes two targets for balance. so 7.5-15 damage. I think average Dex saves for level 1-2 monsters +2. So, they have a 50% chance of success Which gives us 11.25 expected damage Chromatic Orb Deals ~ 13.5*.5+.05*27 = ~8 damage, but is very versatile.
@Helwar Ugh, there you go again, assuming states of existence. Why must we consider everything as "being"? Why won't you recognize that I'm definitely "wasing" or "will-being"?
As for by my point of view, of a sentient being flowing through time, you either are or you arent, and as I was interacting with @Sdjz, he clearly was at the moment. So... Being. There.
Or Sdjz was wasing, and simply set up a bot at that time to exact their will on these moments. Or they were will-being and actions taken in your concept of "future" came to enact changes in your present or past which led to a message being sent your way
Hey, I know we're being silly (and I was have being a fan of time travel tenses), but let's avoid that "stop oppressing me by assuming my [x]" meme because it makes folks uncomfortable to genuinely and humbly ask for their preferred pronoun. Thank you, @Helwar, for remembering the existence of non-men in the chat.
these ideas should all be checked for validity, but off the top of my head: clear tape, some sort of resin or apoxy, ignore it, cover it with some sort of plexiglass sheet when you use it
Rubber cement is an adhesive made from elastic polymers (typically latex) mixed in a solvent such as acetone, hexane, heptane or toluene to keep them fluid enough to be used. Water-based formulae, often stabilised by ammonia, are also available. This makes it part of the class of drying adhesives: as the solvents quickly evaporate, the "rubber" portion remains behind, forming a strong, yet flexible bond. Often a small percentage of alcohol is added to the mix.
== Composition ==
=== General ===
Rubber cement is simply a mixture of solid rubber in a volatile solvent that will dissolve it. When the...
@SimonH. I used to use Clear Shelf Paper to preserve our game board, which was a cardboard sewing pattern board with 1" squares. (I think I have an answer on that somewhere). Works like a champ, and you can use water soluble markers to draw on it if needed and wipe off.
@goodguy5 The amount of terrible advice form those days would fill a large book. Maybe I ought to write one ...
Why not just go for a trilogy? Then they get a cool name. For bonus points, on each one give a different name to the trilogy (Volume 1 of the Korvin's Bad Advice Trilogy, Volume B of the Bad Advice Trilogy feat. KorvinStarmast, Final Volume of Korvin's Trilogy: Terrible advice).
@Delioth I think you are on to something. Stretch two into three, just as was done with the hobbit movies. 8^D
@SimonH. Shelf paper in question ... that might help you, since you can cut it to wrap around the edges, protecting them, and then tape them to the bottom.
@KorvinStarmast Yeah, but the salient part is that they were still mortal (ish). For some reason, I never connected Gollum and Bilbo being "stretched" by the Ring with the Ringwraiths despite it literally being in the book.
I just always thought "ooo, they're ghosts of human kings that were cursed to serve Sauron after they died because of their rings".
Thinking of them as ghosties won't really ruin any interpretations, though it might bring up questions of why they e.g. didn't walk through walls or anything. Depending on your understanding of the abilities and limitations of ghosties
(to which the obvious answer is <<they ain't ghosties, they're still "alive">>)
The human kings, not being hobbits, were beyond stretched. They were kept "alive and dead" by the power of the rings that they wore, and that Sauron wore. What is unique about hobbits is how resistant they are to the Ring, as compared to a Human.
@Delioth I was kinda hedging around the depiction of the Ringwraiths in The Hobbit movies. That the Witch-King was killed at some point in the past and buried in an unbreakable vault.
Yeah, because the conjecture around the Ring is that it amplifies one's desires. Men and Elves are ambitious and desire power. Hobbits are lazy and desire nice gardens and full bellies and naps.
AFAIK it's kind of a duality - amplify the bearer's desires and ambitions, and turn them towards fanaticism for the ring. Hobbitses are less effected by the ring over short times because their ambitions and desires are super mundane and don't often lead to attempting to overthrow anything
Gollum's self imposed isolation was in part due to a severe faux pas in a tavern along the Gladden waterways near a hobbit settlement. After a few pints, he observed to the barmaid that he liked his women the way he liked his fish: raw and wriggling. She was aghast, and word soon spread that he was a class A creep.
You've been in a relationship with your current significant other for several years now and they're getting tired that you haven't popped the question yet.