« first day  last day (15 days later) » 

21:00
But it's because I'd get scared from the blender's blades, and the "fear" part of my brain would force me to take actions to avoid it
If you'd tell me about the 5ms thing, I wouldn't get scared
What if it made scary noises?
I guess yes then?
It depends on the response of the emotional part of my brain
The emotional part is what influences the thinking part to take/avoid certain actions
If it was like the 5ms thing, but instead I put atoms in the position that they'd be in if I trained a new brain on all of your experiences, would you object?
Logically, no
Logically, I wouldn't mind dying at all
But emotionally, I might get scared
@Alex Why do you call this dying?
And why wouldn't you mind dying?
21:03
I'm not calling that dying
Why don't you call this dying?
I'm not calling it not dying
I'm calling it "it's in the fuzzy boundary"
Oh.
Yeah, to be honest that's a good place to put it.
Purely logically, what's wrong with dying? It's the same as anyone else in the world dying.
Which is bad.
21:04
The future might already exist though
And the people who've died aren't in it.
But if you only use logic, then it doesn't matter if anyone dies.
Nothing matters, because logic isn't for deciding that kind of stuff
Oh, you mean what I think of as "axioms".
21:05
It's for finding solutions to problems
Problems which are generated by the emotional part of the brain, for example
It's more complicated than that, but I'm not a neuroscientist
We don't have an "emotional part of the brain".
We do
The limbic system, also known as the paleomammalian cortex, is a set of brain structures located on both sides of the thalamus, immediately beneath the medial temporal lobe of the cerebrum primarily in the forebrain.It supports a variety of functions including emotion, behavior, motivation, long-term memory, and olfaction. Emotional life is largely housed in the limbic system, and it critically aids the formation of memories. With a primordial structure, the limbic system is involved in lower order emotional processing of input from sensory systems and consists of the amygdaloid nuclear complex...
Affective neuroscience is the study of the neural mechanisms of emotion. This interdisciplinary field combines neuroscience with the psychological study of personality, emotion, and mood. The putative existence of 'basic emotions' and their defining attributes represents a long lasting and yet unsettled issue in psychology.Affective neuroscience developed at a time when cognitive neuroscience focused on non-emotional cognition, such as attention or memory. It might be called the cognitive neuroscience of emotions. However, when reading this article, please note that there are few references to...
> However, when reading this article, please note that there are few references to newer studies occurring after 2012 that have changed many of the perspectives in this article. For example, the section relating to emotions and the right hemisphere refer mainly to studies prior to 2006, and these models have been abandoned in favor of the new evidence showing interhemispheric connectivity and the role that the salience network plays in interpreting instinctual emotional responses to the world.
"It supports a variety of functions including emotion, behavior, motivation, long-term memory, and olfaction."
@Alex That statement can be applied to pretty much all of the brain.
21:08
People who have damage to the limbic system get depressed, lack motivation to do anything, etc.
It is involved in hormonal regulation; I think it contains some glands.
Damage to other areas causes memory problems, or speech problems, etc.
Anyway, that doesn't matter
> Damage to other areas causes memory problems,
Even if there is no specific part of the brain for "logic", it's still separate from "emotions"
Memory formation problems.
@Alex Why do you think that?
21:09
Logic, at least to me, is using logic rules to solve problems
Sure, we often describe it as separate, but does that mean it is?
@Alex Yeah, that's a branch of mathematics.
I want to do this, I know this. [... logic ...] So I should do this.
The process of logic is performed by the brain, and it's different from emotion.
the first part is what I call "emotions", the second "memories", the third "logic"
@Alex How aren't those just (useful) categories of thought?
I'm not saying emotions don't exist, but… it's like neurons and consciousness.
21:11
I'm not saying they're separate parts of the brain
Oh, okay. Never mind, then.
Useful distinctions are useful.
I'm saying that the "logic" category doesn't care about people dying
Okay, lost you again.
It just solves the problems given by the "motivation" and "emotion" category
Hang on. Are you saying it doesn't "care", because those categories of thought don't involve caring?
21:12
Yes
As in, by definition caring isn't logical?
Almost by definition
Logic is just problem solving to me
Implied by the definition, whatever. That, I have no objection to.
I keep conflating what you're saying with the wrong stuff other people use the same words to say.
We should invent a new language, where nobody says anything wrong so all the words mean right things.
Yeah :)
Or just stick to math where everything has a precise definition
See also: Objectivism.
(WARNING: do not get involved with Objectivism.)
21:14
Anyway, what I'm saying is that whether or not I'm ok with a certain form of "death/not-death" depends on my emotional response
I either immediately know I'm scared or I want to do it
@Alex Okay, but what should your emotional response be?
i.e. when should you care?
What do you mean what should it be?
For what goal?
For good things to happen and bad things to not happen.
The current response is what's best for the human race. The responses were selected through natural selection
"good things" depends again on an emotional response
Thou Art Godshatter.
Your morality matters, regardless of where it came from.
(This is the first time that essay's been useful to me. I never really saw the reason he wrote it until now.)
21:18
If you give me specific examples of things, I'd be able to tell you "good" "bad" or "neutral"
You dying.
bad
Okay. So, you care about not dying.
Yes
Is that a goal of yours?
21:19
Yes, I intuitively know it's bad
If you ask me why, I'd start talking about neuroscience
So, when should you care that this thing will kill you?
(For some value of "this thing".)
always, if it will "kill me"
the reason I say "bad", is because of the word "dying"
or "kill"
So, does the 5ms thing kill you?
21:20
I associated that word with "bad"
You're regressing.
It doesn't matter why you care about not dying, for now.
Will this kill you?
I don't know
If I saw a button that would do that, I wouldn't press it
If it also gave me a million dollars, I would
Like, I'm not very scared of it
But I don't want to do it
If you did it once, would you do it again?
do it again for nothing in return?
no
Enough to make it worth thinking about, but not much.
Enough that you could get $100 in half an hour by spamming the button.
21:23
Probably
I probably wouldn't mind "dying" and being reassembled 10 years later either
It's just not something I'm instinctively scared of
Apart from people missing you and the world changing, of course.
Yeah, of course
But what about the memory thing?
But if everyone did it (let's say, we have to do this to prevent global warming), then I'd do it too rather than live alone
Memory thing?
You mean training a brain?
Destroy your brain, play your life experiences into a new one.
21:26
yeah, probably
it's a bit more scary
so it will take more
I wouldn't.
I'm just not very scared of it
Babies are different to each other.
Oh
Well if there wasn't a guarantee to be exactly the same
Womb experienced aren't all that different, so why are babies?
21:27
Then I wouldn't
@Alex What do you want to be exactly the same?
Everything I'm consciously aware of
Like, no lost memories, no problems with thinking ability, etc.
Are you aware of the process that brings memories to your attention when you try to remember stuff?
No
Would you be okay if it had different weighting (e.g. came up with different songs when you tried to think about songs)?
21:30
I don't know...
But what's the point of these questions? I could do this to you too, and pick worse/less worse forms of "death" depending on your answer until I find the fuzzy boundary
What about the process of recognising your friends?
For sure not
@Alex Except… in my experience, this isn't a fuzzy thing.
Would you do the 5ms thing?
21:31
Would you do the 10 year thing?
Given the guarantees of exact placement.
(assuming everyone's still there)
Yes.
Well…
Heat death would be closer, but apart from that, yes.
Even if it involves putting your brain in a blender?
So long as the new one was identical, yes.
I'd lose… maybe a second?
I'd need a small incentive.
21:33
10$?
[just pretend I kept going up or down until I found the fuzzy area]
So it's a fuzzy thing for you too
Yeah.
But much sharper, I think.
I'm reluctant about a lot of things, like moving books that have been somewhere for a while, because that's Where They Go; it's that kind of reluctance.
I feel loyalty to my brain; that's all. Sentimentality.
Anyway, I have to go. Nice talking to you, and thanks for your answer
You too. Bye!

« first day  last day (15 days later) »