@lyxal bruh

lvyxal moment

Such a war profiteer smh

> Change is not given, you must bring it yourself

- rude cashier at Wendy's yesterday

I was like "sorry bro the smallest I have is a $42069 note" and the cashier was like "stfu i ain't got no change"

lmao

🤔

@user and that's why you need to bring your Dankman Sachs high limit credit card everywhere you go

Steffan153 opened issue #1413 in Vyxal/Vyxal: `x` after a modifier prints the stack instead of recursing

@VyxalBot We broke it again?

@VyxalBot the labeler removed the bug tag

i am not sure if that’s intended

@Niko welcome back! o/

Long time no see :p

@lyxal oh ok

It's been fixed :p

ok

Lyxal created branch Vyxal/add-split-on-truthy-indices

Lyxal opened PR #1414 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:add-split-on-truthy-indices → Vyxal:main): Add partition after truthy indices and partition before indices elements

Steffan153 approved on PR #1414 (Vyxal/Vyxal)

Steffan153 commented on PR #1414 (Vyxal/Vyxal): "actually why do you have these as helper functions? no one's gonna use them as helpers"

Steffan153 requested changes on PR #1414 (Vyxal/Vyxal): "^ and also you ned to use `@lazylist_from` to make sure infinite list state is preserved."

@emanresuA yep

it's been broken for several months

@VyxalBot And even if they are later, they can be moved to helpers later then

(I'd review stuff myself but for reasons I can't sign in to GitHub)

type your review in chat and I'll create a sock and post it for you

👍

@Steffan Review for #1411: (grudging) approval. I don't like two separate changes being put together but both are minor and I'm not enough of a jerk to make you make a separate PR for the labeller

@lyxal Regarding #1373, to quote Steffan: TESTS WHEN

@Steffan Review for #1407: it'd be nice to have a check even when the user is running the program instead of an assertion that only shows up when we're testing or whatever. That way we could provide an error message so the user knows their digit is too big. I don't understand the big string you've modified at the end in the elements dictionary but the function itself looks good to me

(approval)

ysthakur approved on PR #1411 (Vyxal/Vyxal)

let's go my main account's still part of Vyxal

Wait what I requested changes on 1407

VyxalBot, how dare you ignore me?

Oh wait I don't have any power in Vyxal anymore

sad

ysthakur is ur sock?

No, cgccuser is my sock

ysthakur is my...glove? It's my main account

I use cgccuser when i want to go incognito and do immature things I don't want associated with ysthakur (like Vyxal)

But I'll just start using ysthakur now because it doesn't matter anymore

I sent an invitation to ysthakur

Thanks, accepted it

!!/status

@Steffan I am doing poggers.

Do y'all have any really good answers you want bountied?

I feel like burning through some of my rep today

@user fizzbuzz in Vyxal :p

@lyxal have been inactive for so long because of school :/

the schedule is getting tighter

@user link btw

@Niko I get that

I may still come back once in a while and try to help

Lyxal approved on PR #1412 (Vyxal/Vyxal)

Lyxal approved on PR #1411 (Vyxal/Vyxal)

Lyxal merged PR #1411 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:yeet-kn → Vyxal:main): Yeet `kn`

Lyxal deleted branch Vyxal/yeet-kn

@lyxal Bounty started

I have 3 going right now but once those end let me know if you have other answers you want awarded

... why tho

Getting rid of my rep

You're probably gonna regret this

Oh yeah also go post Prolog answers so I can bounty those

n*100 for your nth Prolog answer

@emanresuA I won't

@user Limit?

I literally don't even edit other people's questions anymore

@user lol thanks! I want to get the number of bounties as much as possible on there :p

@emanresuA Oh wait I forgot to specify. n = 5 I guess but if no one answers I could maybe go higher with some double bounty shenanigans

@lyxal Alright, I could start another after this one is done. Although if I'm unable to give out Prolog bounties, I would appreciate it if you used the rep I gave you to fund Prolog bounties (I know you don't actually need rep anyway, just Vyxal marketing :P)

I can do that if need be

Thanks

And probably don't start another one on it after this one

@user it won't need be though

Because I don't want to renege on a promise I stupidly made lol

@lyxal I thought you wanted as many bounties as possible

@user I do

But not back to back

Ah okay

That might raise suspicions

So it doesn't look sus

If we're laundering rep, we gotta do it in a way the IRS doesn't notice :p

lol

IRS being the internal reputation service

It's a "gift" which is totally legal