Just in case anybody knows of a command that, no matter what, would only be used at the end of a program, ' followed by EOF gets interpreted as a command
I'm noticing that in the REPL, something like "abc"3i will wrap around when indexing out of bounds, whereas in the online interpreter, it errors. Is that just due to Java and JS differences, and if so, should we fix that?
For reference, Vyxal 2 behavior was to wrap around
[lyxal ♦️] so ofc jvm is going to recognise the specialisation as an instance of the regular one because that's how polymorphism works. Fundamental oop
[lyxal ♦️] Scala.js doesn't seem to respect the inheritance chain
[lyxal ♦️] or at the very least, related objects are considered separate to the rest of the collections
@Bridget [lyxal ♦️] my money's on whatever image uploading solution SE comes up with
[lyxal ♦️] which I guess it will have to be actually
[lyxal ♦️] now that I think about it
[Ginger] that's not happening yet, and I intend to still be around in April 2024 to switch it over :p
[lyxal ♦️] oh dang that means the paste to upload userscript(s) are going to need updating
[Ginger] probably not
[Ginger] they hijack the normal upload button code (in a really cursed way), so they'll still work most likely
[lyxal ♦️] assuming the layout isn't changed
[lyxal ♦️] SE is going to have to shudders update chat for this
[lyxal ♦️] who knows what they'll touch
[Ginger] likely just the backend
> [lyxal ♦️] > image hosting by imgur.com
[lyxal ♦️] they're gonna have to touch chat
[Ginger] chat image uploads POST to a chat endpoint (which I think is a relic of when you could upload arbitrary files to chat), so they'll probably just change that
[Ginger] and remove that subtext ig
[lyxal ♦️] as well as the imgur logo
[lyxal ♦️] and that might even lead to a partial redesign of the classes/ids involved
[lyxal ♦️] I hope when they make the imgur changes enough is learned about how chat works to have more devs available to work on it
[Ginger] :doubt:
[Ginger] it's probably best if they change as little as possible with chat
You know how we always make the joke "at least 3" when we're talking about an obviously large number? Well the number of devs who know how to change chat yet alone access it is roughly "at most 3"
> [Ginger] > You know how we always make the joke "at least 3" when we're talking about an obviously large number? Well the number of devs who know how to change chat yet alone access it is roughly "at most 3"
