« first day (708 days earlier)      last day (1067 days later) » 

05:05
For practical programming purposes, it'd be cool to have an "apply to variable" modifier
Also, cursed idea: HTML with embedded Vyxal
Might be a bit tricky to parse
Because stuff like
<% for i in range(5){ %>
<li> <%=i ** 2 %> </li>
<% } %>
You've created a horrible mix of python and JSP and I don't know how to feel about that
 
3 hours later…
08:44
I do
Emanresu, I’m sorry but it’s time for you to leave
09:02
wow its only me and the vyxal bot in this room rn
!!/status
@PyGamer0 I am doing spectacularly.
 
5 hours later…
13:39
!!/status
@BgilMidol I am doing you.
 
1 hour later…
14:51
wooo Jyxal more than 2x faster than C
3
wha-
@Seggan what is the program?
 
5 hours later…
20:10
@Seggan Hm, Jyxal must have way better stdout handling because Vyxal's primality testing is sympy bindings written in C
14 messages moved to ­Trash
 
1 hour later…
21:43
@user both
@emanresuA I dont think its stdout, i think its the fact that push-pops are optimized away and because the jvm constantly optimizes hot code
4
A: High throughput prime numbers

SegganJyxal 0.4.1, 46 MiB on my computer {500(&›¥æߥ)W⁋₴ Read the README to see how to run this For reference, the example program outputted 21.8 MiB on my computer. I had a blast micro-optimizing the compiler. The old Jyxal answer was disqualified because it considered multiples of 5 prime. The new v...

Okay :P
If you implemented sympy's primality test it'd be even faster probably
i tried
didnt work out for some reason
stopped printing primes after like 28000
Miller-rabin tests are fairly simple to implement
but not 100% accurate
the challenge asks for 100% accuracy
Sympy uses a set that's known to have no false positives for n ≤ 2^32
21:49
but the challenge requires accuracy for 64 bit nums too
up to 10,000,000,000,000,000
so technically, vyxal is possibly disqualified
No counterexamples to sympy's primality test have been found
ima need to actually test that lol
if it returns true for all numbers under 2^64, then ill take another shot at implementing it
problem is my computer aint fast enough

« first day (708 days earlier)      last day (1067 days later) »