Vyxal

« first day (625 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1150 days later) »

PyGamer0

04:26

@lyxal yes 2³×10

3 hours later…

mathcat

07:45

@PyGamer0 or 2³×5²

PyGamer0

wat

mathcat

dah no

i'm dumb

PyGamer0

lol

your mathcat

2⁴×5

mathcat

2⁴×5

ugh

ninja'd

PyGamer0

lol

4 hours later…

Vyxal Bot

11:39

Version 2.7.3

lyxal

just an aside: the vectorised printing PR can also be extended to account for global variables and global array usage in maps etc

all while avoiding a new lambda type leaving the character open for more overloads

also, it felt sloppy just leaving the output all messy in maps

lyxal

12:41

!!/'night

Vyxal Bot

@lyxal o/

mathcat

12:56

@VyxalBot wohoo

8 hours later…

user

20:31

@VyxalBot lmao chunky carried this release (yes I am calling emanresu A chunky what you gonna do about it)

grandBagel

20:59

!!/run

Vyxal Bot

@grandBagel Did you forget to put backticks around your code (`code`)? Remember to escape any backticks in your code (to type `hi`, enter `\`hi\``).

grandBagel

woops

!!/info

Vyxal Bot

grandBagel

Does anyone know the list syntax?

user

⟨1|2|3|4⟩

grandBagel

21:04

thx

How could I loop on every element of a list?

user

You could use a map lambda (⟨1|2|3|4⟩ƛ<your code>;)

The thing about map is that (currently) it's lazy, so if you want to print each element in a loop, that might not work directly

grandBagel

@user ...and that was exactly what I needed to do

user

What specifically do you want to do? Maybe I can help (no guarantees though :P)

grandBagel

this

user

Ah, not a problem, you can map and then print after the loop

Wait I'm dumb, there's literally a for loop in Vyxal

For loops are done with ( varname | forloopbody )

user

21:29

I have a 15-byter (spoiler (don't look at it yet!)), can you find it @grandBagel?

1 hour later…

grandBagel

22:52

back

how can I make the loop zero-based?

lyxal

Flags

M    Make implicit range generation start at 0 instead of 1
m    Make implicit range generation end at n-1 instead of n
Ṁ    Equivalent to having both m and M flags

grandBagel

!!/run (|nIkain+, _ 10

Vyxal Bot

[@grandBagel: 60037998]
 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1
  abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz2
   abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz3
    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz4
     abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz5
      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz6
       abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz7
        abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz8
         abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz9
          abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz10

Fmbalbuena

23:13

@lyxal what does this do?

lyxal

If the argument is 42, print the time, else print username

Fmbalbuena

!!/run λ42=[kN|`ʁß`

Vyxal Bot

@Fmbalbuena Diamond

Fmbalbuena

username?

lyxal

The dictionary has probably been moved around a bit since then

That was before the rewrite

Oh you used the wrong B

!!/run λ42=[kN|`ʁβ`

Vyxal Bot

23:17

@lyxal username

lyxal

@grandBagel just curious: why are you indexing into ka?

Also,

!!/run (nIka+, _ 10

Vyxal Bot

[@lyxal: 60038133]
 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
  abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
   abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
     abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
       abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
        abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
         abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
          abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

lyxal

@user if only there was a pull request that detected if there was a possibility that you might want to eagerly evaluate a map instead of lazily evaluate it...

user

23:48

grandBagel

@lyxal get the nth letter of the alphabet

lyxal

!!/run (nIkani+, _ 10

Vyxal Bot

[@lyxal: 60038299]
 b
  c
   d
    e
     f
      g
       h
        i
         j
          k

grandBagel

!!/run (nIkani+, Ṁ 10

Vyxal Bot

@grandBagel 0

lyxal

23:58

!!/run (nIkani+, Ṁ 10

Vyxal Bot

[@lyxal: 60038317]
a
 b
  c
   d
    e
     f
      g
       h
        i
         j

lyxal

gotta wrap the input in backticks too

« first day (625 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1150 days later) »

Transcript for