Vyxal

lyxal

00:41

user

01:00

@lyxal You were active so far in the future that you wrapped around the beginning of time :p

lyxal

09:42

@emanresuA you should check your perms in the organisation

Because there might be a little surprise for you

emanresu A

10:05

zOoh!

What is it?

Is it something to do with this:

lyxal

11:08

N... No.

Wrong page

emanresu A

I just got that as a notification :p

lyxal

Did you see it?

Because if so, welcome to the gang :p

emanresu A

And... someone's gonna sponsor Vyxal?

lyxal

N...no

You still haven't seen it

github.com/orgs/Vyxal/people

Go there

See if you can spot what I'm inevitably going to tell everyone anyway

emanresu A

Did you make me an owner?\

lyxal

11:12

:)

emanresu A

:)

lyxal

Announcement: Emanresu is now organisation owner because I believe it's appropriate

5

Appropriate because I believe them to avidly share the same vision for Vyxal that I have

emanresu A

:)

I'll go finish documenting the single elements.

lyxal

Take a break if you want to

Actually dont work on it yet

I need to push some local changes I've made

emanresu A

Why not?

Oh ok

lyxal

11:16

I won't be able to push them for a bit

emanresu A

Not done or not on computer?

I'll just push mine in a seperate file, and we can merge the two later.

lyxal

@emanresuA not on computer

Don't do bitwise and

That's the one I was working on

emanresu A

Ok

Also, how are function testcases going to work?

lyxal

That's a good question

And I have a solution

Use the yaml to rewrite the test cases to use vyxal programs instead of input stack

emanresu A

That big brain

lyxal

11:23

That's not to say stop writing test cases in the current format

Because it'd be better to convert all at once and then go back and add function cases where needed

emanresu A

Also, do lambdas / functions have any metadata (arity, etc), or are they plain python functions?

Like, what sort of datatype are lambdas when pushed to the stack?

lyxal

11:37

@emanresuA lambdas are lambda objects that have extra attributes

emanresu A

Oh ok

lyxal

So they are actually functions

emanresu A

So no putting them in testcases

lyxal

No

emanresu A

@lyxal That's exactly how I did it with Jyxal :p

lyxal

11:38

@emanresuA Because they aren't lambdas in the sense of the lambda keyword

They are just named functions with different parameter processing

@emanresuA I mean, if it wasn't for the fact that you can change the arity of a lambda using multiplication, they'd just be functions with no additional attributes

Because arity is stored inside the function definition

emanresu A

@lyxal I forgot about that overload :p

Razetime

@lyxal great, good to know

emanresu A

BTW can we have flags for default arity = 2 / 3?

Also, is there a way to make x call the whole program with the current stack?

lyxal

:59082300

Dah frick

Hit enter too early

@emanresuA I think I've already discussed how

@emanresuA add to #160

emanresu A

@lyxal Link?

@lyxal Sure

lyxal

11:46

@emanresuA okay nvm it was more that you asked can it happen with big x and I said I think so

I never actually specified my ideas lol

One moment

emanresu A

X was meant to be break loop

Which should be easy with the new transpiler

lyxal

Ighto so here's the idea.

x and X will transpile differently based on what structure is being transpiled

so if the overall structure is a loop/function/whatever, the transpile_single function will be told to treat the two as the inside structure version

otherwise, it will know to call the whole program

or whatever the big X does outside of structures

emanresu A

So X is break in loops, return in functions, idk outside of that.

x was already transpiled differently

it prints the stack if not in a function

lyxal

@emanresuA no

it wasn't

it only worked by changing what the value of "current_function" was

emanresu A

Oh

lyxal

11:51

it was transpiled one and the same regardless of structural context

emanresu A

Oh

lyxal

emanresu A

Oh

Why is sechat not stopping that

It usually stops repeated messages

kinda sussy

lyxal

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

oooh the emoji userscript I use supports more than shrugging

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

emanresu A

ø_ø

lyxal

11:55

BORK ALERT 🚨 BORK ALERT 🚨 BORK ALERT

oh that's good

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

!!/hug

Vyxal Bot

@lyxal (づ｡◕‿‿◕｡)づ

lyxal

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

(ノ°Д°）ノ︵ ┻━┻

lol

it's actually quite a good userscript

emanresu A

I want this userscript now

lyxal

one second

I have to find link

github.com/TehFlaminTaco/TacosUserscripts/blob/master/…

there we go

emanresu A

How to use?

lyxal

11:58

/shrug

/lenny

/tableflip

emanresu A

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Oh I see

poggers

lyxal

ikr

emanresu A

ಠ_ಠ

lyxal

@emanresuA pro tip: pull the yaml file

the linter seems to have changed a lot of quotes to "

also,

!!/run 420 69⋏

Vyxal Bot

@lyxal 4

emanresu A

12:03

@lyxal Hm

@VyxalBot Chosen by fair dice roll.

emanresu A

12:20

!!/'night

Vyxal Bot

@emanresuA o/

Transcript for