« first day (3943 days earlier)      last day (718 days later) » 

2:00 AM
0
Q: Name of a book about a boy playing soccer

James QuijanoThe book was about a boy who was in the school team along with his best friend. Both were the best. One was a forward the other was a midfielder I believe a girl comes into play

 
 
7 hours later…
9:01 AM
@bobble Here is the beginning of a discussion from 17 June 2020 about the difference between and . I couldn't find it yesterday.
Also:
Aug 28, 2019 at 14:54, by Gareth Rees
@Bookworm I'm experimenting with a "general interpretation" question here to see if anyone likes the format. I hope it doesn't get closed as "too broad". It's not trivial to find works that are interesting to read, complex enough to reward interpretation, and which haven't already been annotated by scholars.
Jun 17, 2020 at 17:15, by Rand al'Thor
@GarethRees created the tag last August for more open-ended "interpret this whole short poem" type questions:
Jun 17, 2020 at 17:41, by Tsundoku
@Randal'Thor That would exclude questions asking for interpretations of passages from a longer work and that really does not make much sense to me.
Jun 17, 2020 at 18:05, by Rand al'Thor
@Tsundoku Fair point, but then "interpretations of passages from a longer work" is surely going to cover hundreds of questions on this site. And would it really be full interpretations, in the sense that most of our questions are about analysing a work end-to-end and picking out details about every aspect?
Jun 17, 2020 at 18:15, by Tsundoku
@Randal'Thor According to the wiki, the scope of the tag includes "glosses of difficult passages". So it seems that tagging Interpretation of “ Time as a stuff can be wasted” in Sandburg's A Father to His Son fits the intended usage. Or am I misreading the wiki?
And that was the end of that discussion.
In academia, "interpretation" does not necessarily address all aspects of a text. I assume that "all and any aspects of the text" does not mean that all the aspects listed there must be covered.
A pure close reading will cover only some aspects, a structuralist interpretation may look at other ones, and psychoanalytic, marxist, feminist, new-historicist, postcolonialist and queer-theory interpretations will each look at other sets of aspects.
 
9:25 AM
The question about the warren of snares in Watership Down is an interpretation question, in my opinion.
Tagging Did King Richard III prove a villain because nature chose him to be a disabled person? with would make sense to anyone who hasn't read that tag's wiki.
 
 
4 hours later…
1:53 PM
@Tsundoku feel free to edit the wiki, I was just trying to give it a first go
 
 
4 hours later…
6:01 PM
@bobble Sorry. I didn't want to sound ungrateful or imply that it was all bad.
 
I really don't know how to fix it; I lack the words to explain what I see as the difference. So please do it for the site.
 
6:45 PM
Hello jello!
 
7:18 PM
0
Q: Is a book featuring a non-self aware Mary Sue automatically considered to be poor quality?

Aaargh ZombiesIs a book where the main character fulfills all of the criteria for being a Mary Sue, and where the trope is played straight rather than for illustrative or satirical purposes (For example the character is an avatar for author, fulfilling a personal fantasy of their), automatically considered to ...

 
@PrinceNorthLæraðr Hello! What uprooted you from the grove?
 
Graduation
I have... freetime for the first time in who knows how long
 
Congratulations!
 
Thank you!
 
You can blow your own trumpet now ;-)
So, what's next?
 
7:25 PM
College! Going off to study music composition
 
Walking in Stravinsky's footsteps? Sounds awesome.
 
Recommended reading: Thomas Mann's Doctor Faustus ;-)
(I shamefully admit I haven't read it myself.)
 
Oooh interesting
I shall add that to my reading list
 
The Noise of Time: a novel by Julian Barnes about Dmitri Shostakovich.
The Violinist of Venice: A Story of Vivaldi by Alyssa Palombo. I have never heard of the author, whereas Thomas Mann and Julian Barnes are well known.
I'm sure you know Peter Shaffer's play Amadeus, which was adapted into a fabulous film.
 
7:37 PM
Aye I'm aware of it
 
By the way, we have a few empty tag wikis ;-)
 
Badge progress: 577/1000 reviews done.
 
Wait there's more badges
Oh, the review badge. Duh
@Tsundoku Why are they difficult?
 
7:53 PM
It's just hard to find anything about them on the internet.
 
Ah, I see
I shall look into them after my game
 
Never mind, Gifford had already been filled in. I have also found some basic info on the other three, but not much more than years of birth and death. No works, nor anything about the language they wrote in.
I'm looking for a new job. I had a conversation with the founder of a small consultancy, hardly a formal interview. It's just a matter of agreeing on what I might get paid...
 
8:16 PM
Oooh good luck!
 
And next Monday I have a proper job interview with a different company. We'll see what they have to offer.
 
Good luck! I hope you get a good offer
What does the job entail?
 
It's consultancy, training and audits for digital accessibility, i.e. making sure that websites and electronic documents (and sometimes apps) are accessible for people with disabilities.
 
8:34 PM
Oooh
That sounds like a cool job
 
We'll see how well I manage the transition from the academic world to consultancy. Might be a bit of a culture shock.
 
@Tsundoku I've quoted that in a comment
 
With proper attribution :-)
 
Indeed
 
Strictly speaking, if there is research on how specific types of literature are received among certain audiences, the question is perfectly objective. But I haven't read that type of research yet.
Something like this, possibly: Students’ genre expectations and the effects of text cohesion on reading comprehension. Nothing about Mary Sue, though.
 
9:47 PM
 

« first day (3943 days earlier)      last day (718 days later) »