Useful rule of thumb for good design: Use two typefaces, one serif and one sans serif. Switch between them to indicate a significant change in meaning or mode.
Three typefaces is legit if there's an important need to signify many mode changes in a small space, but the more typefaces that get used the more likely it is to just become noise.
(Using typeface modifications like bold or narrow is a useful compromise.)
@BESW That's correct. And in this case the unusual change of font was intended to emphasize the change of perspective. Usually, I would only use one or two fonts in a document.
Walden; or, Life in the Woods by Walter David Thoreau is not a normal book in many ways. However, I have often seen it characterised as an uncategorizable book that will not fall into any of the normal categories into which texts are sorted. However, while it has many different elements, it also ...
I have been reading the Legend of Drizzt series by R. A. Salvatore. I am currently half way through Stream of Silver, which is in book two of the collection. While reading this, I noticed that it almost reads like a novelization of a dungeons and dragons campaign.
If we assume that the main pa...
@Valorum Re Poirot's age, this sort of contradiction is way more obvious in G. Szabó Judit's books about Anikó. The first book was written near 1981, the last near 2009, and while they needn't be real time, they are approximately real time in the sense that they happen in a world close to when they were written. The first book happens before the fall of the Iron Curtain, in the last books Anikó uses a mobile phone and high speed internet.
This is perhaps so that readers understand them easier. But Anikó has a consistent character and ages only a few years between the books, because her being a teenager is what makes for interesting stories. (Also, she is sometimes called Andrea.)
She and her family are clearly incarnations of the same people in the same family relationships, magically incarnated in multiple points of time.
So, about my answer, when someone asks about what order to read the Poirot books, and there are over 40 of them, and I've only read about a dozen, then is it bad to answer that question?
Should I wait for some expert who's read most of those books?
It's not like I've only seen the original trilogy and arguing for Machete order or something, right?
@b_jonas The Stack doesn't care if you're drawing on your own experience or someone else's, provided you can support your solution with some reasonable experience or similar evidence.
But even if the answer is no, a longer answer pointing out which parts of his works are written in iambic hexameter and which aren't would probably be nicer than just one counterexample.
@HDE226868 Something for them to cut their teeth on? Still, it seems likely that at least one or two will already have mod experience from other sites (or even from Lit.1, if DForck is chosen).
In school, students are often taught about iambic pentameter via Shakespearian examples. These, however, were based on the Received Pronunciation (RP) reading of Shakespeare's works. In reality, Shakespeare used an entirely different pronunciation, replete with differences which removed syllable...
Example.
I think they might be too broad, except under certain scenarios.
I am not discussing just this question alone (although it is certainly what made me ask this), but I want to know, in general, what do you guys think about these kinds of questions?
@Randal'Thor Sounds like a good idea, but we would need a stock-pile of articles that could be drip-fed (at least one a week). There's nothing worse than a stale blog.