People may not enjoy the answers they receive, but asking again isn't going to garner new information. Its just as likely he'll be unhappy with the answers to this new question and ask a third time or four and fifth and onward. I know we can't satisfy everyone, but what we can hope to do is collect information, and splitting this information between questions seems inherently wrong
Point is, for many people this is still an 'unsolved problem'. For those that have a solution, whether it's a game console, or a PC, or whatever, it probably doesn't replace it. For those that don't, in many cases, the primary barrier against the existing solutions was either price, or time investment, both of which TV requires substantially less of.
SC II has a uniquely deep meta game that is going to drive it to questions for a long time, well beyond right now. Most games, people are used to going to gamefaqs or whatever because the single right answer is in a walkthrough over there.
if voting trend were an indication of the value of the question then the site would be nothing but game-recs and discussions on the pros and cons of races of starcraft
Ok, I'm going to give you a crash course in Geology.
In traditional Geology there are three kinds of Rock: Sedimentary, Metamorphic and Igneous (actually that's an over simplification, but pretend its true). Dwarf Fortress is modeled on this system but it further breaks Igneous down into Igneou...
I think forcing people to have CW answers is a useful flag in a question, as it discourages too many answers in favor of collaboration. But there is no reason that means the question has to be CW
