The Factory Floor

Main chat room for http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com
2d ago – Trish
Trish: 2d ago, 160 posts (0%)VLAZ: 2d ago, 231 posts (0%)AndyD273: 11d ago, 20824 posts (7%)mechricson: 61d ago, 1 posts (0%)Shalvenay: 423d ago, 8475 posts (2%)AncientSwordRage: 831d ago, 226 posts (0%)
502

export all events for this room

Starred posts

1 86 87 88 89 90
Nov 5, 2014 12:38
By the time the superiors can react, you have grown too powerful for them
Nov 5, 2014 12:09
You can't control an area of several million lightyears across if you could only ever travel a few lightyears (or even thousands of lightyears) in your entire life
Nov 5, 2014 12:07
But this is exactly why commanders at greater distance NEED to be of a larger scale
Nov 5, 2014 11:59
if a large enough area defects then they would be able to hold out against the areas around them
Nov 5, 2014 11:59
and a new faction would form
Nov 4, 2014 15:41
C# is microsoft's cheap knock-off of Java
Nov 4, 2014 10:52
@overactor You may also be pleased to learn that typing [chat] in a mainsite comment creates a hotlink to the list of active site rooms for whichever site you're leaving a comment in.
Nov 4, 2014 08:52
That assumes I was up :-)
Nov 3, 2014 11:55
if a question is trivial then it shouldn't be on here
Nov 3, 2014 11:00
Silver badge ahoy
Nov 3, 2014 10:59
Eh its chat. We can ramble.
Oct 31, 2014 00:00
a) Handling "What happens if I do this?" ( I have START and CAUSE, give me RESULT )
b) Handling "Where did I come from?" ( I have RESULT and CAUSE, give me START )
c) Handling "How would I cause this?" ( I have START and RESULT, give me CAUSE )
d) Handling "What am I asking?" ( I have PROCESS, give me CAUSE and RESULT )
Oct 30, 2014 23:38
11
Q: Back It Up! policies

KRyanThe Good Subjective/Bad Subjective guidelines talk a lot about what make for great questions and answers for subjective issues, and it primarily falls around Back It Up!: answers need to cite some kind of relevant material (scholarly works, authoritative discussions, relevant personal experience,...

Oct 30, 2014 22:01
Just dropping in for a second to say that the What topics can I ask about here? is now live.
Oct 30, 2014 18:46
The two moons question, I think, is fine......you have A (science as we know it), you have X (two moons instead of one), and you're asking for B
Oct 30, 2014 16:58
@Fulli Overactor has the first 2 gold badges - he has 2 questions with over 10k views now
Oct 30, 2014 15:55
I pushed my Deadpool comment off the favorite list :-(
Oct 30, 2014 13:43
I'm going to write it in MathJax :-)
Oct 30, 2014 10:31
a) i) I have A, give me X and B (bad)
a) ii) I have A and X, give me B (cool)
b) i) I have B, give me X and A (bad)
b) ii) I have B and X, give me A (cool)
c) I have X, give me A and B (Too broad)
d) I have A and B, give me X (cool)
Oct 30, 2014 10:22
I want to add:
d) I have A and process X, what is the resultant B?
Oct 30, 2014 10:05
I think for questions on the second form, we'll need something more like "I have this starting point (however loosely defined) and I want this outcome, how do I get there?". Because otherwise it becomes "propose any X where f(X) = 1 for your proposed f()".
Oct 30, 2014 10:00
> a) I want this to happen, how could I cause it?
> b) It starts a question with a proposed start point and is clear about what you start with, but the intent is also clear "survive", but a bit more open ended
> c) Is simply "I have no idea what to do, I just want cool ideas"
Oct 30, 2014 09:40
If we can find some sort of consensus that idea generating questions are off topic, we can certainly add a site-specific close reason covering that. It would help make the site's scope more clear.
Oct 29, 2014 19:44
Even if I really think more than 0.4% of people viewing should have upvoted! :p
Oct 27, 2014 15:06
@overactor That, however, is perfectly normal.
Oct 27, 2014 13:52
@Liath So far you take the cake, I'm curious to see what others will write up
Oct 27, 2014 13:36
If a question is closed and then reopened (or even approaching reopening) without significant changes, that's usually a sign that it needs to be brought up on Meta for further discussion.
Oct 27, 2014 12:04
That said, Afrofuturism does sound like a wonderful Cards Against Humanity card.
Oct 27, 2014 11:52
@Mourdos AS YOU WISH, SO IT IS DONE.
Oct 27, 2014 09:45
@Liath I left them as separate comments so they can be upticked independently if people feel differently about each.
Oct 27, 2014 08:50
Putting it out there to see how the community feels and what the reasoning goes like.
Oct 25, 2014 07:35
Oct 25, 2014 07:32
Oct 23, 2014 14:22
We're working through accumulated flags, by the way. It'll take a few days more, I expect. But just wanted to let y'all know that those are moving now.
Oct 23, 2014 13:28
Almost certainly. I've had a diamond for almost a year on Amateur Radio and I don't think that's something you ever "fully learn". Every situation is slightly different.
Oct 23, 2014 09:15
Now that your a mod, can you get the community ad featured? :-)
Oct 23, 2014 08:58
@overactor Indeed. Community moderation is supposed to be what drives the majority of moderation; moderators (elected or appointed as pro tems) should be pretty much the last line of defense. On a healthy site, very few things should require diamond-level access.
Oct 23, 2014 06:29
Thanks :)
Oct 22, 2014 11:09
@TimB Truth. The Rule of Cool is paramount
Oct 22, 2014 11:02
Oh. Found this today. Really cool blackhole physics
Oct 21, 2014 23:36
0
Q: MathJax render failure in Suggested Edit queue

githubphagocyteNow that we have MathJax, people are editing old posts to replace compromises with clear mathematical notation. I just approved an edit to this answer. In the Review Suggested Edits queue, selecting "rendered output" did not display correctly rendered MathJax. After I approved the edit, I looked ...

Oct 21, 2014 12:13
I'm going to leave the bounty open for a bit - I want to give it the chance to rise to the top but so far you're the highest contender
Oct 21, 2014 11:52
if someone is hitting you and you can't even find them to hit back that's so frustrating to deal with
Oct 20, 2014 23:34
worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/2906/… Have them rebuild themselves :-)
Oct 20, 2014 18:28
Hi. The "what is your process for creating a city" question feels a little like an opinion poll to me; it's asking 'what do you do" more than focusing on the problem to be solved. I proposed an edit that I think fixes it without damaging anything else; I'd appreciate it if people who can review edits would take a look: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/1882
Oct 20, 2014 15:26
I think it can be made on topic
Oct 20, 2014 15:22
ignito canonballum!
Oct 20, 2014 14:55
You'll get no argument, price hikes, "I'm just not interested right now" from your average cannon
Oct 17, 2014 12:58
I'll ask again. One problem is that we don't know who specifically is the liaison for our site, so I can either ask the room in general (what I've done so far) or start calling out individual CMs who might or might not be the right ones. I guess it's time to try the latter.
Oct 17, 2014 12:57
@TimB I've asked in the SE-wide mod room a few times and so far gotten crickets. Most recent was Wednesday afternoon, when I dropped a link to the human-sacrifice question (when it was still pretty young) and said I could imagine stuff happening there that would get flagged -- so could somebody mind the flags? I don't know if flags happened and, if so, if they were handled.
1 86 87 88 89 90