Conversation started Jul 10, 2014 at 14:26.
user116848
Jul 10, 2014 14:26
"I knew we shouldn’t have involved with that guy"-------> Here why not "I knew we shouldn’t involve with that guy"
Neither of those are correct.
I'm not sure whether you mean "got/been involved with" or just "involved"
I knew we shouldn't have involved that guy or I knew we shouldn't have been involved with that guy are correct.
user116848
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 So what would be the correct form?
@Arrowfar The first one minus with is correct if you mean to say that he shouldn't have been a part of it.
The second one would be better stated as "I knew we shouldn't have involved that guy"
user116848
Jul 10, 2014 14:30
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Right. So in first one can I say------------> "I knew we shouldn’t involve that guy"
Wy are you making such long arrows?
You need "have" in there.
Don't begrudge a man his arrow length.
His name is Arrowfar, after all.
user116848
@KitFox I can't?
user116848
:)
You can say "I knew we shouldn't involve that guy."
user116848
Jul 10, 2014 14:31
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 You are a good ninja too yourself haha
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Fair enough.
@KitFox You don't think have is necessary?
thinks
user116848
@KitFox Yeah so "have " isn't necessary?
I agree with Kit
Jul 10, 2014 14:32
I know we shouldn't involve that guy.
I knew we shouldn't have involved that guy.
I told you we shouldn't have involved that guy.
Ima go do some work and eat some blueberry biscuits.
user116848
@MattЭллен So guys there are two opinions here now. So which is it?
"Who are we going to involve?"
"Matt, Andrew, Kit, and Reg."
"No, I think Matt is out."
"He's fine. ... Oh, actually, he's in prison."
"See? I knew we shouldn't involve that guy in our activities."
I knew we shouldn't involve that guy -> that guy is currently causing a problem
I know we shouldn't involve that guy -> that guy will cause a problem
Oh yeah. That's better.
I knew we shouldn't have involved that guy -> that guy caused the problem
user116848
Jul 10, 2014 14:34
I see. So both Kitfox and ninja are correct.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Nice work if you can get it.
although the "knew + involve" and "knew + have involved" are pretty close in meaning and could probably be interchanged in some cases
user116848
okay...
user116848
Jul 10, 2014 14:39
@MattЭллен And here: "How did you know I was with Kenny?" Can I say "How did you know I am with Kenny?"
user116848
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 You eat that? :D
@Arrowfar They are tasty.
user116848
I see haha
@Arrowfar Are you with Kenny now or not?
user116848
@KitFox If yes, then can I say "am"?
Jul 10, 2014 14:41
If you say "How did you know I am with Kenny?" and he is not physically in your presence, you will give the impression that you are dating Kenny.
user116848
Oh, I see.
It is more natural to use "How did you know that I was with Kenny?" even though he might still be with you.
Unless maybe you are talking on the phone.
user116848
Yeah, if on the phone. Then?
"Hey, Mom. Uh. How did you know I am with Kenny? Oh. OK. Yeah. I'll put him on." hands phone to Kenny
Even then, was works fine there.
user116848
Jul 10, 2014 14:44
I see :) Now I get the picture.
"I'm with the Connor group." "I'm with the senator."
Come to think of it, the present tense tends to imply some kind of affiliation.
user116848
So to be with someone doesn't necessarily mean dating, right? I could be sitting with the person, playing tennis etc. Yes?
That's right.
Existing near someone else.
user116848
Yeah
 
Conversation ended Jul 10, 2014 at 14:46.