Conversation started May 25, 2013 at 18:11.
May 25, 2013 18:11
Lets start with: List Questions: do we still like them? example:
6
Q: List of anime with correct animation of the characters playing musical instrument

nhahtdhThere are quite a lot of anime showing the character playing some sort of musical instrument. However, not all of them show on close-up how the character plays the instrument. Quite a lot of anime hides it (with some other scenes, or use an angle which doesn't show the hand). Some anime just anyh...

0
Q: What is the actual dialog for this Death Note swimming meme?

EricThere is a meme created from the Death Note manga which details a character yelling at Matsuda and instructing him to swim. (A similar meme was created as a GIF from the anime.) (And a link to the manga version, since it's quite large: Clicky) I can't imagine this is the actual dialog for this...

I think that particular question is incredibly hard to make a list for. It's not something that you can collect a list from online, and it's very difficult from memory as well. You have to literally have seen every anime you're talking about, and you also have to know music well enough to differentiate good and bad.
I don't think anyone here is qualified or able (with good reason) to give a full and complete list as an answer.
would "Are there many anime with correct animation...." be a better title?
@MrPineapple That becomes a bit subjective, though. What are "many"?
lets take @JonLin 's thoughts in account, as he is on his way to Shanghai atm:
4
A: What is the status of list questions on this site?

Jon LinConcerning the question: List of anime with correct animation of the characters playing musical instrument, also related to this meta post: Do we still like questions asking for lists of anime/manga/etc.? This definitely falls into the out of universe list and it would seem to abide by the 4 cri...

May 25, 2013 18:14
well, at least it wouldn't have to be a canonical list of them
@MrPineapple but it might be hard to maintain
That's true
> This doesn't mean that someone can't answer such a question by posting a link to an already completed list, but if such a list hasn't been created, and assuming nobody has watched every anime ever made (or a satisfyingly large percentage of them) and remembered enough details to create a list, this is going to be answered by committee, and people are going to list the shows that they've seen that match the criteria.
^ This.
BTW if we're talking about my post here, then I was only discussing questions asking for lists of anime, authors, etc. In-universe list questions are fine with the existing standards IMO.
I don't think it's a bad idea to have a CW answer for it, but doesn't that fall more under a resource post than a list question?
May 25, 2013 18:16
@LoganM nice new av btw :3
@MrPineapple Please try to stay on topic during chat casts.
@Eric well a resource post can be considered a variation on the list
@Eric but it's so secksee~
I assume self-answered posts are okay? or are they included in this also?
@Krazer But isn't a resource post generally decided upon and contributed to by the community? Or are we considering all questions which are answerable with resources?
May 25, 2013 18:18
@MrPineapple: After reading the post by Logan, that question is in-universe list
So I think it should be OK
That's definitely not an in-universe list. An in-universe list (basically) means that if you asked a character in the story, they'd understand it. (At least from what I understand as in-universe; if it's not this, we need to change the word we use.)
I misunderstood "in-universe" then.
@Eric yes, this is 'in-universe'
@Eric lets set that aside for another time.
Okay.
May 25, 2013 18:19
Anyway I think Jon Lin pointed out the problem with these pretty well. To come up with a complete answer, at least in principle you would need to know about every anime ever. That isn't feasible, so every answer on such questions would necessarily be incomplete.
2
Exactly. ^
Should it be allowed as a resource question?
So we're saying that lists that branch over possibly several series is a bad idea? Indeed, Someone might know one or two, but not enough to answer fully
I think it would make sense as a CW resource request as long as the list is reasonably scoped (3-5, but no more than 10)
Why would we limit the length?
If we're going to allow it, I don't think it's fair to restrict the answer.
May 25, 2013 18:23
@Eric yes, this makes sense
We need to make sure people don't just post a new answer just to repeat most of the existing content, though...
I'm not sure we'll be able to cover all the bases, ppl will naturally congregate on the series they are most familiar with
@Krazer But if 100 people each contribute 1 series, we have 100 anime in that list.
IMO if the asker can reduce their question to asking about a reasonable number of anime which are well-defined (e.g. everything by Osamu Tezuka before 1980) then it's a workable question. If they can't, then it's essentially a question about every anime ever.
"list of shounen anime"
May 25, 2013 18:26
That changes too rapidly, I think.
@MrPineapple this would need to be updated as new shounen anime pop up
The point is that the burden of demonstrating that the list is reasonably scoped should be put on the asker. There has to be a reasonable way to judge when the list is complete. If not, then we run into subjectivity problems pretty quickly.
well if I modified it to "list of shounen anime pre-2012", it's an answerable question, but it is awfully long.
I agree with what @LoganM said here
@JNat Which part?
Can you quote it here?
May 25, 2013 18:29
tl;dr "These sorts of questions aren't very interesting, and they lead to debate even among high rep users. Rather than allowing them in certain complicated situations, we should ban them altogether to avoid conflicts of opinion and simplify the rules."
regarding out-of-universe list questions
Yeah, I tend to think that's a good way to go, too. We've been discussing this since the inception of the site, and still haven't come to a decent conclusion.
the fact that the terms 'objectively' and 'reasonably scoped' are subject to different interpretations and debate
@Eric precisely
Like Logan said, I also haven't seen an interesting list question yet. I might see the answer, nod, and say, "That's cool." But none that I really thought were fascinating, particularly to a wide audience.
I think in situations like the one Jon Lin mentioned ("How many Lupin III movies/specials didn't have Fujiko?") it is reasonable to keep the question open, because it's only drawing from a small set of anime in the first place. But we don't have to include that in the official rules. If the rules are strict, we can be lenient in applying them from time to time when they don't need to be applied, but if they're too loose we're in trouble.
I also think it's okay to let questions like, "Are there any _____?" which is like a list question requesting 2-3 items (just as examples).
May 25, 2013 18:33
^Agree
This question comes to mind.
@Eric but how does the OP know that the answer will only have 2-3 items?
@JNat By asking for only 2-3 items.
@Eric That still has problems with subjectivity if multiple people post answers with different examples.
@Eric "would "Are there many anime with correct animation...." be a better title?"
May 25, 2013 18:34
The question "are there" doesn't really require the answer to be a complete listing
@LoganM and I agree that it would be better for the rules to be stricter
I agree with @nhahtdh, with a question like that there is room for an answer to just contain even one entry
@LoganM: For in-universe list, the same problem of subjectivity also applies
@nhahtdh but in in-universe questions, although some answers may be better than others, there is a correct answer
the problem with in-universe question would only be the 'reasonably scoped' part
@nhahtdh For an in-universe list, a person only has to be an expert on a single series to tell when the list is complete. For an out-of-universe list, a person has to know about every anime ever.
May 25, 2013 18:37
but I don't think we have problem with in-universe list questions
@LoganM and this, yeah
I don't mean to compare between in-universe and out-of universe in term of subjectivity of the answer. In an in-universe list type of question, if the scope is slightly broad, or the current answer is incomplete and not maintained, the question might draw in other answers which are equivalent in correctness.
@nhahtdh if the scope is slightly broad, we'll tell the OP to better scope it
@nhahtdh Yes, that is a problem. But that can happen even for non-list questions. If the answer is different in the anime and the manga, for example, we could get 2 answers. Some level of subjectivity is inevitable, but we don't want it to get to the level of comparing anime.
@JNat So how would one scope a question like "List of anime with correct animation of the characters playing musical instrument"? in fairness it has been pretty scoped, but it still asks more of the user than should be expected
7 mins ago, by Logan M
@nhahtdh For an in-universe list, a person only has to be an expert on a single series to tell when the list is complete. For an out-of-universe list, a person has to know about every anime ever.
it is as well scoped as it can be
since that is an out-of-universe question, it is hard to better scope it
but still, it is hard to have one correct answer
May 25, 2013 18:45
why not redirect out-of-universe lists to the reviews and recommendations room?
@Krazer yes, I agree with this
Is there going to be anyone there?
@nhahtdh yes
I'll try to be
when we closed the question, we'd leave a comment telling people to go there
so anyone that sees the post and thinks he'd have an answer to it can go to the room and reply to the user
it's a matter of 'educating' the users in that sense, I think
May 25, 2013 18:48
Q&A format really isn't fit for list type of question.
so, have we come to a consensus? In-universe questions stay the same, out-of-universe are 'banned' completely?
IMO this is exactly the sort of thing which TVTropes tends to answer pretty well. A wiki site like them can create such lists, with the expectation that they'll be relatively complete after enough people visit and contribute. But we're not really a wiki site, and our activity isn't high enough to be able to do that.
@JNat I'm not seeing any objections to that at this point.
TVTrope is not that "complete" per se
We know a show A has this property P
@nhahtdh Not really, but it's better than what we can do.
But we can't get a list of shows that has property P
May 25, 2013 18:52
we're approaching an hour so we should wrap up here and not keep ppl for too long.
@LoganM: Agree about that. Since the answer is tied with rep, people are going to focus on activities that produce reputation over those that don't
@JNat In any case, if there are no objections to this, we should move on to the next topic.
@nhahtdh I think you can
@Krazer Wow it's already an hour. lol
ok, so list questions are settled
we'll need to create a meta post (or update the ones that exist)
and update our FAQ and /about page
May 25, 2013 18:54
If you guys want to continue, we can... but I don't want to force anyone to continue.
@Krazer I can stay for some 15, 20 minutes more
(Actually, the wiki is there, just that very few people actually make use of it)
Do we move on to "Non-anime culture questions: Do we like'em? Should we keep'em?", or do you people wanna leave this to the next session?
@JNat That topic will take a while.
let's leave it for next session, or meta it
May 25, 2013 18:56
I've got nothing planned for 4 more hours, but I suspect everyone else has things to do.
and the next topic was the 'anime-production' thing, which will most likely take some time too
@Krazer Meta is a good idea for this one, since I don't think we've discussed the topic broadly on meta yet.
ok, I think we can meta the "Non-anime culture questions" thing, and next week (maybe) we can see what people think about this
which means we're done for the day, right?
unless someone feels there's something short that he'd like to bring up
8
Q: How far along is the One Piece anime compared with the manga?

Ricardo ValerianoI'm Brazilian and I'm having a hard time locating the manga. I'd like to know how far along the anime is compared to the the manga, or if the anime will give spoilers to the story (in the manga).

how should we deal with this one?
meta?
That one's problem is the phrasing
so modifying the question would require for the answers to be edited too
May 25, 2013 19:00
@Krazer Didn't we already have a meta post on questions like this where the answer changes frequently?
and since the OP got his answer already, maybe we'd leave it as is
@LoganM we have this
5
Q: How do we deal with answers that become obsolete as the plot advances?

Deidara-senpaiThis question Does Zetsu have a word soul? received some good answers a few days back. However, with the Naruto chapter 618, these answers became obsolete or even incorrect. Nothing personal against the people who answered them, but how do we deal with such cases? Clearly, we cannot restrict que...

@JNat Doesn't discuss the case when the answer is continually changing, so it's a different question IMO.
@JNat I'm fine with leaving the post closed but undeleted. It doesn't seem like it harms anything to do so.
@LoganM yes, I think the same
I think we just need to have the asker be specific in what point if time they are asking
@Krazer Yes, in the future we should do that.
May 25, 2013 19:04
@Krazer you've done that in your latest comment there
if he edits it, we'll decide on what to do
until then, I think it should stay as is
@JNat I'll edit the bookmark and make the meta, and you take care of the faq and about. Sound good?
@Krazer ok, that's fine by me
Just want to make sure, are the question asking for existence "are there" allowed?
@nhahtdh only if in-universe
anything else that needs clarification?
going once...
May 25, 2013 19:07
out-of-universe are generally and by rule closed as off-topic, and occasionally one that's good and can be well answered may 'slip through'
A bit sad that those questions are no longer allowed, since some of them are quite interesting (are there any anime out before manga)
36 mins ago, by Logan M
I think in situations like the one Jon Lin mentioned ("How many Lupin III movies/specials didn't have Fujiko?") it is reasonable to keep the question open, because it's only drawing from a small set of anime in the first place. But we don't have to include that in the official rules. If the rules are strict, we can be lenient in applying them from time to time when they don't need to be applied, but if they're too loose we're in trouble.
instead of "banned" I'll just mention that they are "discouraged"
@Krazer or off-topic, no?
@nhahtdh Maybe this should be considered separately. It does seem like a bit of a different issue.
May 25, 2013 19:09
@LoganM: What do you mean by "This"?
@JNat NC seems to be more appropirate
@LoganM: Existential type of question?
@nhahtdh "Are there any ___?" questions
@Krazer yes
it is on-topic
we just don't want them
so Not Constructive is better, yeah
May 25, 2013 19:12
I'll take the summary of the meeting as "Questions that asks for an out-of-universe list are discouraged/likely to be closed as NC"
I'll make a note and link/quote to JonLin's answer in the meta.
anything else?
@nhahtdh more like "Questions that asks for an out-of-universe list are discouraged/*sure* to be closed as NC" in the "rules", but occasionally one might slip through
@Krazer I think that's all
So concludes the chat cast. Thanks to everyone for participating!
 
Conversation ended May 25, 2013 at 19:14.