« first day (2082 days earlier)      last day (2853 days later) » 

12:28 AM
@R.Schumacher yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay
@R.Schumacher: I am so happy the duck found its way to your home! Congrats again for winning the contest! :)
@HenriMenke: I am finally online, sorry for the delay. :) How would you like the message format to be? I am a little confused. :( Feel free to poke me by email if it's a better way.
 
 
9 hours later…
9:57 AM
 
yo'
@PauloCereda that's mean!
 
@yo' poor cow :(
 
@yo' Yes, but very true
 
10:26 AM
@egreg oh scratch that, i was looking in the preamble...
 
:31000162 \show\cdot gives > \cdot=the character ⋅.
 
@egreg it depends where you do it:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle After \begin{document}, of course
 
@egreg or of course not in my case .... (but using ⊍ is better anyway so I should get the tick)
 
 
3 hours later…
1:20 PM
> How to cite in LaTeX without the citation appearing in the bibliography
Because your blood wasn't boiling enough.
Candidate for the prize for most bizarre thing to want to do in LaTeX?
 
yo'
@EmilioPisanty not necessarily bizarre, in the Harvard style for instance.
 
@yo' but why all the complication why not write ... see Smith (2016) as plain text?
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle that's another point of course
 
@EmilioPisanty compared to say, programing a mars rover?
 
@yo' But then you never give any details to Johnson (2015). What good does it do to anyone?
If you've got a full citation inline, then sure
 
1:29 PM
@EmilioPisanty let the user google for it:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Yeah, I mean, who needs bibliographies anyways, right? It's not like the author went to extra trouble to make it harder (and possibly ambiguous) to find what document they were talking about =P
 
yo'
@EmilioPisanty In a vast majority of cases, you don't have to. I have a big collection of articles in my research topics, and only handful of them have the same authors and publication year.
 
Anyways, quick question: is there a way to get bibtex to print the internal key at the end of a citation?
 
@EmilioPisanty not bibtex, but the excellent showkeys package will do that, if you just mean for draft purposes
 
@yo' Can be, but depends on the details. If there really is only one relevant Johnson who published in 2015, then sure.
@DavidCarlisle Yeah, it's a draft. Pre-draft, even. Bibliography cheat list, more like.
 
1:32 PM
@yo' who wrote that package, can you remember?
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle which one?
 
1 min ago, by David Carlisle
@EmilioPisanty not bibtex, but the excellent showkeys package will do that, if you just mean for draft purposes
 
@DavidCarlisle at least naively, it's not working very well
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle well, I have no idea what question or whatsoever you speak about :-)
 
I just want the key to be printed at the end of the citation.
 
1:34 PM
@EmilioPisanty ah well it puts the keys in the margin and you've got long keys and short margins... (showkeys tries not to change line/page breaking when added)
 
yeah
I was just wondering if there's a way to call the internal key from the .bst file
 
@EmilioPisanty yes sure there must be, but you'd have to edit every citation type to output the field. Better would be just to change \bibitem : \let\oldbibitem\bibitem\def\bibitem#1{\oldbibitem{#1} #1}
@EmilioPisanty plus some extra stuff to make _ etc safe to print
 
Yeah, that could probably work easier. They're all articles anyway, though.
 
@EmilioPisanty would put the key at the start not end as bibitems like all latex lists doesn't have an easy way to get the end of an item
 
Hmmmm. Let me just try and deal with those _s
 
1:42 PM
@EmilioPisanty \detokenize{#1} will be enough
 
@DavidCarlisle That turns _ into `
 
@EmilioPisanty only if you are using a silly encoding:-) \texttt{\detokenize{#1}} then.
 
@DavidCarlisle Yeah, that does it.
I definitely messed with the encoding at some point
don't know if I cut it out for this file or not
anyways
it works now
Not on the bibitem, though
\def\bibAnnoteFile#1{\texttt{\detokenize{#1}}}
Don't particularly care for the annotations, or whatever it is the \bibAnnoteFile actually does.
Thanks a bunch =)
 
2:45 PM
@egreg Would you mind testing texosquery.jar from github.com/nlct/texosquery/tree/master/src/bin? @Paulo has recompiled it for Java5. I'm sorry I forgot to add the -target and -source switches when compiling it.
 
3:07 PM
@NicolaTalbot Seems good (running 1.7.0_45-b18)
@NicolaTalbot Maybe just supporting 1.6 is enough; but it seems that also supporting 1.5 is no big deal.
 
3:19 PM
@NicolaTalbot By the way, \TeXOSQueryNow returns a category code 11 D, so its result cannot really be fed to datetime, that expects a category code 12 D.
 
3:56 PM
@Manuel Essentially "the knowledge about the problems of \scantokens comes from experiences."
I don't know about such "experiences", IMHO it is clear: suppose the file aa.tex with one line:
`foo\noexpand`. Then `\edef\test{\input aa \empty xx}` does exactly the same work like
`\edef\test{\scantokens{foo\noexpand}\empty xx}`. The only difference is that the first example is possible in classical TeX too. And the result `\test` is a macro with body `foo\empty xx`. Note, that
`\empty` is not expanded despite inside `\edef`.
And why the internal file is closed without "file ended" error? Because `\noexpand` touches next
token without checking to "file ended" event. But side effect occurs: this next token is
no-expanded! So, this is very dirty trick with bad side effect.
 
@wipet True, but in practice \scantokens is used almost always \edef\test{\scantokens\expandafter{\test}} or \protected\long\def\test#1{\edef\test{#1}}, i.e. rescanning all of the tokens inside the \edef
@wipet Experience suggests \scantokens was not a great plan
 
@wipet but you start off your explanation by comparing to a file usage. If you know the implementation is basically just re-using the file reading internals then the fact that you can get end-of-file errors from \edef\test{\scantokens{foo}} isn't a surprise, but it's the fact that it works like a file that is the surprising feature. the end of file error isn't that useful for files, and for scantokens it's just weird.
 
@DavidCarlisle Indeed: \scantextokens addresses this (personally I think LuaTeX should simply have changed the nature of \scantoken, given the fact other much more important stuff has been altered)
 
Of course, \scantokens is bad implemented. But it is documented exactly as it is implemented.
 
@wipet if people read documentation, this site wouldn't be needed:-)
6
 
4:06 PM
@wipet We all agree on the first part :-)
@DavidCarlisle Good luck finding detailed documentation for a lot of XeTeX!
 
@JosephWright weave xetex.web ?
 
@DavidCarlisle Don't forget % at end of lines.
 
A short question on English usage: Is there a verb to backup (and if so, is the past tense form backed up?)
 
@ChristianHupfer Yes
 
@JosephWright Thanks!
 
4:16 PM
@ChristianHupfer yes but relatively new computer-specific use unlike the older verb phrase back up (which means offer support to, more or less)
 
@ChristianHupfer Probably. Some people just like to create new verbs, like getting a bunch of words and human-centipeding them together.
^^ oh the irony :)
 
@DavidCarlisle It's meant in sense of computer usage. I don't provide support for my package ;-)
@PauloCereda Just a few words for you: Spot the looney :-P
 
@ChristianHupfer you naughty German.
 
@PauloCereda Naughty Germanness is strong in me :-P
 
4:28 PM
@Johannes_B Sono Pazzi Questi Romani
 
@Johannes_B Definitely as old as @egreg ;-)
 
@Johannes_B That's the Italian translation of “Ils sont fous ces Romains” you find in Astérix
 
@ChristianHupfer I would prefer the spelling with the space for the verbal form and keep the spelling backup for the noun and adjective forms. So You should back up your computer but I will perform a backup now.
 
@AlanMunn: Well, yes -- I was only unsure, especially in using the passive form, i.e. 'determined to be backed up' etc.
@Johannes_B:
You are trying to use a really up to date package with your very old distribution. A complete update to 2016 would be in order.
 
@egreg Never read those comics. I first thought of Sebastian.
 
4:32 PM
@Johannes_B: Says the man who still has TL 2013 on his old ubuntu distro
 
@ChristianHupfer Yes?
 
@Johannes_B I too!
 
@Johannes_B The crab from Ariel?
 
@ChristianHupfer Ok (because in your original query you asked about the verb to backup (no space)).
 
@ChristianHupfer TL2015 to be correct.
 
4:32 PM
@AlanMunn Oh, ok, yes, a typo ;-)
 
@PauloCereda No, author of graphicx and other stuff.
 
@Johannes_B TL2015, how comes? When did that happen? ;-)
 
@Johannes_B Oh. I thought we were all going to sing Under the sea. :(
 
@ChristianHupfer About a year ago. ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer In English we like our separable affixes separated. :)
 
4:33 PM
@Johannes_B SPQR ... never heard of this? ;-)
 
@PauloCereda Oh no, no the sond is in my head. :-)
 
@ChristianHupfer No.
 
S.P.Q.R. (auch: SPQR) ist die Abkürzung für das lateinische Senatus Populusque Romanus („Senat und Volk von Rom“ oder „der (römische) Senat und das römische Volk“). Dieser Schriftzug war das Hoheitszeichen des antiken Rom und ist heute immer noch als Leitspruch im Wappen der Stadt zu finden. Die Legionen des Römischen Reiches führten es auf ihren Standarten. In Rom sind viele Schrifttafeln, Kanaldeckel, Mülleimer und öffentliche Einrichtungen mit diesen vier Buchstaben versehen. == Übersetzung == Wörtlich übersetzt bedeutet Senatus Populusque Romanus eigentlich Der (römische) Senat und die Gesamtheit…
 
@PauloCereda This was not at all the song that was in my head.
 
4:35 PM
@AlanMunn Which one?
 
@ChristianHupfer I am not really a person with a wide horizon.
 
@AlanMunn Believe me, @PauloCereda knows worse songs ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer > no I don't <
 
@PauloCereda It involved an octopus's garden.
 
@AlanMunn oooooh in the shade
 
4:39 PM
@PauloCereda I don't click on that link, it's scratched
 
@ChristianHupfer do it :)
 
@PauloCereda No, I don't trust you ;-)
 
5:28 PM
@Johannes_B -- oh, my! well, the spqr i knew wouldn't have had to ask questions like that. (brief memorial in tugboat 37:1; much nicer one in the komödie 2016/2; and an interview with himself in the tug interview pages.) greatly missed and lamented.
 
@PauloCereda I have evidential proof: 1 < 0 < 201 < 200
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh is it home? :)
 
5:53 PM
@egreg Thank you :-)
Also, thanks for flagging up the D catcode. I've fixed it on github. Will upload v1.1 soon.
I originally intended writing it in Lua. It was originally just for fetching the locale information. Windows unfortunately stores the locale in the registry not through environment variables. The results from reg are too fiddly to parse in TeX and reg can modify the register so it's not safe to use in restricted mode. Lua's setlocale(nil) returned C for me both on Linux and Windows, which wasn't useful, so I decided to write it in Java.
 
@PauloCereda we'd better keep it a secret, don't want people calling foul play and demanding a re-run of the referendum
 
@DavidCarlisle and @JosephWright Barbara suggested I ask you. Do you think texosquery is safe for restricted mode? I can't think of a way in which it can be abused, but maybe I don't have a devious enough mind ;-)
Hello @PauloCereda! :-)
 
@NicolaTalbot Hi! <3
@DavidCarlisle Brexit 2: Brexit harder
 
@PauloCereda Thank you for your email :-)
 
@NicolaTalbot aww <3
 
6:01 PM
@NicolaTalbot when they last added something to the restricted shell list for the gregorio thing they had to answer a lot of queries about safety against buffer overruns etc but probably java is anyway safer for that sort of thing than C
 
@PauloCereda What do you think? Your Java knowledge is greater than mine.
 
@NicolaTalbot I think we could run the code against a lot of those convergence tests in order to ensure good practices and lack of potential traps. I can take a closer look. :)
 
@PauloCereda Thank you!
@DavidCarlisle Thanks.
@PauloCereda Should I just upload v1.1 now or shall I defer it?
 
@NicolaTalbot Gimme five minutes. :)
@NicolaTalbot: I need more minutes, my connection is slow. :)
 
6:17 PM
@PauloCereda That's okay. The oven timer's beeping, so I've got to go for a bit as well :-)
 
@NicolaTalbot Thank you
 
@NicolaTalbot ooh cake
 
6:29 PM
@PauloCereda No, fish :-)
 
@NicolaTalbot :)
@Nicola: I am running PMD. Most of the rules are covered, maybe we could try to implement some suggestions in order to have a higher overall score. :)
 
@PauloCereda Sounds good :-)
 
6:54 PM
@NicolaTalbot I will update the code later on tonight, leave it to me. :)
 
@PauloCereda Thank you! :-) You're a duck star!
 
7:20 PM
@NicolaTalbot /blushes
 
8:09 PM
@PauloCereda On a scale from 1 to 10, how much do I dislike Wagner?
 
8:25 PM
@egreg -- i'm not paulo, and i'm guessing ... how about 12? (i suspect you don't like stravinsky either, but would you please make an exception for pulcinella?)
 
@egreg Robert Wagner? Cool actor! ;-)
 
@barbarabeeton No exception, sorry. The grade is, at least, 20. The radio had the Tannhäuser Ouverture: after hearing this extremely boring piece of sh… er, music, how can people survive several hours in a theater?
 
@egreg -- well, wagner did do better than tannhäuser, for example meistersinger. (and anna russell does a really fine job of cutting the ring cycle down to proper size.) but you won't accept pulcinella? the themes and songs are allegedly cribbed from pergolesi, and it's about as non-20th century as one could imagine, and they're just lovely. i'm desolate!
 
@barbarabeeton I much prefer the original. ;-)
@barbarabeeton The proper size of the Ring? Well, I have an idea…
 
8:43 PM
@egreg -- if you have never experienced it, the whole thing is on youtube. i think you'd find her views very close to your own.
 
@barbarabeeton Zero minutes?
 
@egreg -- yes, i know that. borge presented something very like that at the newport music festival a few years before his death (he was a good friend of the festival impresario) -- lots of fun. actually, i'd been familiar with this since high school; another legacy from my sister.
@egreg -- a little longer, but wagner distinctly comes off much diminished.
 
9:30 PM
Is there anything wrong with defining a new environment with a number in the name, such as "2cols"?
 
@ahorn no, although it's rather uncommon
 
Why should I not do it?
@DavidCarlisle
 
@ahorn It's just uncommon, not wrong by any means
 
@ahorn as I say it's not wrong, just uncommon so people may be surprised and of course it does make it harder to use the sometimes useful \foo, \endfoo form, although that is also true of * forms like tabular*
 
@DavidCarlisle thank you, I didn't know about the \foo \endfoo form. Is it uncommon because other computer languages tend to steer away from numerals in names?
 
9:43 PM
@ahorn no, simply I think because tex doesn't allow them in command names normally so you can't have \2col you can have \begin{2col} because it constructs \csname 2col\endcsname which would be the same as \2col if 2 was a letter (catcode 11)
 
@DavidCarlisle alright, thanks for the advice.
 
@StefanKottwitz Delete if you want to. Had to got it out of my head golatex.de/viewtopic,p,85256.html#85256
@ChristianHupfer ^^^^
 
 
2 hours later…
11:54 PM
@egreg 9. :)
 

« first day (2082 days earlier)      last day (2853 days later) »