« first day (226 days earlier)      last day (3587 days later) » 

12:02 AM
Darn.
Heh, could we feature request one?
 
12:25 AM
@hichris123 that wouldn't happen :)
K back
So @hichris here's my concept. I want to see what you think about it:
It takes a comment in. It then goes through and separates it into individual thoughts (i.e. I like cats, but I like dogs better -> array(I like cats, I like dogs better)). It then makes everything capitalized so I can ignore the capitalization of each section.
Anyway, I'd remove some common words, like "like", "he", "she", etc. so it'd just be a few keywords
I'd then search a database for different "thoughts" that are whitelisted/blacklisted to see if it has any value.
If no value at all, delete. Else, leave.
 
We need something like that.
Posts too, preferably.
 
@hichris123 It'd just be a huge keyword analytics data thingy
@hichris123 creating a PHP file to include in any project we want
 
@AnnonomusPenguin That's the only troublesome part, filters don't work. We need to do some by hand, and get data from that.
Otherwise, there's false-positives.
 
But probably separate databases
 
Because most comments containing the word "edit" and are short should be deleted.
 
12:33 AM
@hichris123 Yeah... :/ that's the only good way to do it
 
But also the ones around that comment.
And not all of those comments.
 
@hichris123 yeah, that's why I had separate it into multiple parts so if one part is good, even if it does have "edit" in it, the comment is left alone
@hichris123 like you mean destroy context?
@hichris123 For collecting data, I think that if there's an unindexed string, it will be pulled for a review. Not the whole comment, just that snippet of text.
@hichris123 Yeah, like "can you edit that into the post?" might be deleted. We'll just require it to be a near perfect match to consider it "good"
The concept is a great idea IMHO, but it'll need a ton of tweaking to be accurate. This isn't just a quick keyword search thing.
@hichris123 As far as data, we might be able to collect some comments that got deleted and pull the most commonly used "thoughts" from those comments and put them in the database manually
So what do you think of it? Could it work?
 
@AnnonomusPenguin Regarding chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/16357806#16357806, when you have a comment like that there's usually ones like "edit plz" then "done" then "it still doesn't do anything1!11" and "oh, fixed that, try now" "it works!"
@AnnonomusPenguin Yes, but it would take a lot of work.
 
@hichris123 not as much coding as one might think
Another idea I have is replacing any word that's a tag with $TAG so it'd cover a lot more comments than just C++. What do you think about that?
@hichris123 confused... what does that have to do with Chat.SE?
 
@AnnonomusPenguin Regarding that message.
 
12:42 AM
@hichris123 whoops, didn't see the ... part :)
@hichris123 do you just mean deleting only some of the comments? Or do you mean some of them are okay until they're replied to?
 
@AnnonomusPenguin My point is sometimes you need to delete more than one comment.
 
@hichris123 so? Wouldn't it trigger it on multiple of them?
 
meh, not always...
 
@hichris123 Still a little confused. I understand you'll have to delete multiple sometimes, are you just concerned that not all will be deleted, leaving a "fragmented" conversation?
Hmm... I hope that by that point that most of these things will be whitelisted/blacklisted
we might need to get some junk data to feed into it from a SE admin
 
@AnnonomusPenguin yeah
 
12:48 AM
@hichris123 (read comments below that)
I guess that was true with Charcoal, too
But a diamond would look at it :/
Hey, I'm just going to work on the code a bit. It might be better used for SmokeDetector where that wouldn't be an issue
 
I wish one of us were an SO mod.
Because then we could nuke a ton of comments.
 
@hichris123 I more wish that 6 flags on a comment would delete it if not spam :)
True, not as efficient, but hey!
 
1:16 AM
@hichris Only wrote four lines of code that doesn't have a comment... going to take a bit :P
Actually, I'm just writing a bit about the concept so I can publish an incomplete project if others want to work on it.
Yay ASCII art!
 
1:37 AM
Five lines of real code, way to go penguin!
 
1:49 AM
Pretty decent half hour(ish)
Going to go now, bye
 
2:02 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: PARA QUE SERVER UM SELF JOIN? on pt.stackoverflow.com
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: PARA QUE SERVER UM SELF JOIN? on pt.stackoverflow.com
 
2:12 AM
Bot-fight!
 
2:55 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: MS WORD BACKGROUND IMAGE on webapps.stackexchange.com
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: MS WORD BACKGROUND IMAGE on webapps.stackexchange.com
 
Well that changed.
 
Studio?
Yep.
 
3:06 AM
like the number of options doubled.
 
Because they announced Wear, TV, new Glass activities...
 
3:21 AM
~~stappit
Now it's gonna be fairly false-positivy, in response to the beauty spam.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started (@Undo)
 
I borked it :(
 
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started (@Undo)
 
okay, unborked
 
@hichris123 yes I know.
 
 
1 hour later…
4:59 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] anti-aging spam: Is the human body composition real? on biology.stackexchange.com
 
 
1 hour later…
6:34 AM
@ProgramFOX got his first bug fixed! :D :D
Congrats!
 
@ManishEarth Thanks!
 
@ProgramFOX now let's find you a harder bug :p
 
7:08 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] anti-aging spam: Include link to task in task notification email body on sharepoint.stackexchange.com
 
What's the bad keyword here?
Ah, body.
 
7:24 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: DIVO RCE PROBLE M/CH ILD PR OBLEM SO LVE 9001340118 on english.stackexchange.com
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: DIVO RCE PROBLE M/CH ILD PR OBLEM SO LVE 9001340118 on english.stackexchange.com
 
Two smokedetectors?
 
7:40 AM
@ProgramFOX Undo is setting up a tweaked one for TL
 
Ah, nice!
 
@SmokeDetector /cc @Undo you should probably restrict this to MSE
 
8:31 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: AJAX GO TO PAGE PASSING DATA on stackoverflow.com
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: AJAX GO TO PAGE PASSING DATA on stackoverflow.com
 
 
1 hour later…
9:31 AM
@undo!!!
Where's the source for your smoke detector?
 
This room is almost like my home; the smokedetector gives a lot of false alerts.
 
I'll refine the aging regex
Where's the source for your smoke detector?
You can restrict it to mse
Pahaha
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: SQL PROCEDURE PERFORMANCE RECOMMENDATIONS on codereview.stackexchange.com
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: SQL PROCEDURE PERFORMANCE RECOMMENDATIONS on codereview.stackexchange.com
 
 
3 hours later…
12:27 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: TRAVEL TO USA FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT FROM UK on travel.stackexchange.com
 
 
1 hour later…
... wow
 
that.. looks like spam.
but it's not.
 
10 messages moved to Trashcan
5 messages moved to Trashcan
 
Why is that a private room?
 
2:07 PM
It's a trashcan. I... have no idea why it's private.
3 messages moved to Trashcan
Okay. Wow
I'm... so glad that wasn't a TLBot.
Although they would have probably just suspended it :P
 
3:06 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] anti-aging spam: large body width without horizontal scrollbar on stackoverflow.com
5
 
Oy, @ProgramFox, sorry, forgot to tell you: we don't use this. That was our old method. We use this now.
Now that's star worthy.
 
@SmokeDetector sigh
 
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started (@Undo)
 
anti-aging thing killed
 
@hichris123 Ah, ok, thanks for telling me!
 
3:55 PM
@Undo because things are moved there from private rooms too
 
 
1 hour later…
5:14 PM
Gonna check out Android L in the emulator :D
I think.
 
6:05 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: SSIS: CANNOT ACQUIRE CONNECTION TO EXCEL on stackoverflow.com
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: SSIS: CANNOT ACQUIRE CONNECTION TO EXCEL on stackoverflow.com
 
7:04 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] @Manishearth
 
 
3 hours later…
10:12 PM
Um...
 
o..kay?
 
@hichris123 fixed it myself, sorry
I'm working on the whole PHP script thingy
 
10:52 PM
So now I have to figure out what part of this makes my div not center.
 
@hichris123 div name/id?
Lol, div identification, please.
Also just came here, what is a character that's never used (literally never, including in meta)?
 
... what do you mean?
 
@hichris123 I need a delineator character...
 
@AnnonomusPenguin hmm, I think I found the problem.
 
@hichris123 wat?
Oh no, this is turning into the xy problem... let me properly explain
 
10:55 PM
Yup, but now everything is... messed up.
The problem was: position: absolute. ;P
 
@hichris123 normal CSS, doesn't ever look right
 
Oh, found the other problem.
Wondering what it was?
position: absolute
 
@hichris123 two of them, or one just messing everything up?
 
Two.
And more!
Eeek!
 
Ouch!
But @hichris I need help with something here:
I have a string going in. Let's say this is it:
> I love Arduino. I hate PHP and CSS.
I want to create two strings out of that: I love Arduino and I hate PHP and CSS.
(No punctuation)
My problem is the number of parts being split up into is unknown, so I can't just do $str1, $str2 and then an $arr=array($str1, $str2);
 
11:03 PM
Yeah, explode() it. That should create an array in which you can do array[0] and array[1].
 
So I could then make the string into this: I love Arduino+I hate PHP and CSS and then use explode("+", $str);
@hichris123 BUT this might be used on Meta SE, which many odd characters are used on a roughly basis (read messing around in comments)
Thus, there is no "safe character" AFAIK. Ideas?
I was thinking about something like a null character. Would that work?
 
Maybe. I'm not sure.
 
Line breaks would suffice on comments since I'm pretty sure SE weeds out linebreaks in comments. However, that renders this code useless if we want to use it for questions/answers.
@hichris123 Confusing, huh?
I think I'll just ask a SO question.
At least I got it typed out easily :P
Related questions lol:
5
A: Is there php written in php?

Dave ChenPHPPHP by ircmaxell <?php // ?>

 
11:41 PM
Sigh @hichris found the answer to my problem:
 

« first day (226 days earlier)      last day (3587 days later) »