@ManishEarth Well, you can understand the "sensibility" of that from the following quote:
Anonymous
> In order to make sure HUT holds absolutely, we operate over non-temporal, unitless and quantities with derived units only.
Anonymous
Also:
Anonymous
> geophysics is largely due to the magnification of mass resonance; etc. HUT can be extended to multiverse (10^17) and string scales (10^-67) too, providing a constraint to String Theory. HUT is the unifying theory as it demotes classical forces to states of stringdom. The String Theory's paradigm on vibrational rather than particlegenic reality has thus been confirmed.
It seems there are the beginnings of an edit war going on with how can counting the number of cracks in glass tell you about the speed of imact?.
Now the question has a few problems:
It doesn't stand particularly well on its own, requiring reading an external link for background.
It doesn't di...
I added the homework tag in to that question because it appears to classify so under the homework policy.
The phrasing of the question (v1/v2/v3) heavily indicates that it arose from a context like this:
Mr OP sees/thinks/hears about glass crack. Mr OP sees a lot of cracks in the gl...
@UV-D No problem -- it's okay if you don't agree, it's possible I'm not correct too since that's the kind of question that could have multiple "correct" answers based on definitions and viewpoints
One could also define mass based on the amount of energy in the bolt if it were stopped
@DImension10AbhimanyuPS You'd win a lot more arguments if you didn't have an attitude that you are far superior to others and that when people disagree they must be flat out incorrect
I'm just being honest. All this hostility creates a very unwelcoming, and frustrating environment. It's not conducive to growing the community, any community, nor is it conducive to the scientific approach we try to take here
@tpg2114 very true words, and on another site I belong to, it got out of hand, and in a space of 4 days 3 2K+ members had enough d left, now the site is recovering, but far quieter
Particularly on meta, the conversations should be structured like a debate, not an argument. Present your case, defend your case using facts and appropriate language, and win or lose, be gracious in your language. We're not out to knock each other down, prove each other wrong, it's all about finding common ground and moving ahead.
3
There's a huge difference between "You're obviously wrong" and "I disagree." Even if neither is backed up with any evidence at all, they are two wholly different approaches that communicate the same thing. The latter being much more appropriate to a structured, civil debate; the former to domestic disputes and schoolyard fights.
@ManishEarth Should we remove my comment in here that started all this? It's probably on the border of appropriate for civility we try to keep in here...
Back in physics world, if anybody has any suggestions on why a 3D simulation of a detonation would have lower heat release than a 2D simulation, but still generate the same wave speed, pressure, temperature etc., I'd like to hear it
Or why said 3D simulation transitions from a shock to detonation faster than the 2D one despite the lower heat release...
good night - have a great day/night/evening/timewarp
Anonymous
5:13 PM
@tpg2114 I meant evidence for me having considered myself "superior". :
Anonymous
...
Anonymous
@tpg2114 I didn't. I know, though, that not having any valid argument, and not even staying on - to0pic, is an indication that the "argument" is gibberish.
user54412
--- @UV-D btw, `\ll` (those are lowercase L's) and `\gg` work in mathjax, so you don't need `<<` and `>>` /* back to work; chat can now return to its previous discussion that I don't have time to read atm */ ---
@aufkag It is a rotten sentence, but it probably means to associate the name of each condition with a mathematical expression. For example "irrotational" goes with \nabla \cross v = 0.
It seems there are the beginnings of an edit war going on with how can counting the number of cracks in glass tell you about the speed of imact?.
Now the question has a few problems:
It doesn't stand particularly well on its own, requiring reading an external link for background.
It doesn't di...
I added the homework tag in to that question because it appears to classify so under the homework policy.
The phrasing of the question (v1/v2/v3) heavily indicates that it arose from a context like this:
Mr OP sees/thinks/hears about glass crack. Mr OP sees a lot of cracks in the gl...
