« first day (1055 days earlier)      last day (3878 days later) » 

1:20 AM
Chat session tomorrow! (15 hours from now)
 
1:34 AM
Cool ;-)
 
1:56 AM
Random physics history trivia du jour: Ernst Mach's name has a rough ancient Germanic meaning very close to "Rigorous Mechanics". As a fan of his works in the history and philosophy of classical mechanics, this is amusing me to no end at the moment. =D
 
 
2 hours later…
user54412
3:49 AM
@tpg2114 omg I <3 latex
 
I like it when I do normal things with it
I don't like it when it fights me
 
user54412
@tpg2114 also, if you find an answer to this, welcome to thermonuclear supernova modeling - at which astro department would you like your Einstein fellowship?
 
@ChrisWhite I found an explanation so I'll submit my resume ;)
 
user54412
just make sure you account for neutrino transport ;)
 
That's too complicated for my work... thank goodness
 
user54412
3:55 AM
@CrazyBuddy I have a new mistress - her name is "thesis research" and she is quite high-maintenance
 
user54412
@tpg2114 would you believe that Type Ia supernovae (the very ones certain people got the Nobel prize for using to prove the universe's expansion is accelerating) are still unknown in terms of what they are?
 
What do you mean? Like the materials they are made of? Or how they form? Or what they do?
 
user54412
by process of elimination, we say "probably a white dwarf involved" but then no one is sure whether the explosion is pure deflagration, deflagration->detonation, mostly detonation, etc
 
user54412
or if there are two white dwarfs or just 1
 
user54412
or what they are made of
 
4:03 AM
How can they not tell if it's deflagration or detonation? Isn't it possible to observe the reacting material and the speed it is moving?
 
user54412
ahh - nope ;)
 
But not because of temporal resolution limits right :)
 
user54412
lol no
 
user54412
Type Ia's only become visible many days after exploding, when the ejecta fills a larger volume and is heated by Ni-56 -> Co-56 -> Fe-56 decay
 
How is it not visible? There's gotta be some energy emitted that's observable during early times
 
user54412
4:06 AM
well, if one went off in our galaxy, sure
 
user54412
problem is, that may only happen once every century or three
 
user54412
but you can bet if one did, every telescope on Earth and in orbit would point at it for at least 2 months
 
So it's more an issue of lack of observation... We'd have to happen to be looking at the right place at the right time
Or have already mapped that region of the sky so we could go back and see which star exploded if we happen to notice it later
 
user54412
indeed, and we're trying to get better on both fronts
 
user54412
actually, one of the collaborations I work with recently got a paper on arxiv while the supernova was still getting brighter - that's pretty much a first for these things
 
user54412
4:09 AM
and what's more, there are some Hubble images of the host galaxy
 
user54412
but while we can see massive stars in nearby galaxies, it's nearly impossible to see a white dwarf even in Andromeda
 
So you're where I am in some ways -- cook up artificial initial conditions in the hopes you get a later state correct and use those fake initial conditions to speculate what the real processes are
 
user54412
exactly :)
 
I'm scrambling to get all my work done, not going so well
I was living in my lab for 3 days, nowhere near enough time though
Didn't help I spent my morning arguing here... haha
 
user54412
the internet - such a trap
 
4:19 AM
Indeed
 
4:38 AM
Can anyone recommend me a good book on advanced topics in Combustion?
 
@l3win How advanced? And from what perspective? Theoretical, numerical, experimental?
Are you looking for turbulent combustion, laminar?
 
4:59 AM
I'm looking for something that covers chemical kinetics in details actually.
I guess it should therefore cover turbulence as well
 
 
7 hours later…
12:23 PM
@ChrisWhite Well, I can make her go in less time... Just ask away your question (and don't forget to add the bounty) :D
 
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
1:31 PM
-2
A: Radio-dating and the age of the earth

Erap estradaTo A1. HAHAHAHA. Kung Nuthead people's orange. I think Hindi obtained you take my what sort of award I go to candle?

 
Anonymous
-2
A: Radio-dating and the age of the earth

Erap estradaTo A1. HAHAHAHA. Kung Nuthead people's orange. I think Hindi obtained you take my what sort of award I go to candle?

 
Anonymous
-2
A: Radio-dating and the age of the earth

Erap estradaTo A1. HAHAHAHA. Kung Nuthead people's orange. I think Hindi obtained you take my what sort of award I go to candle?

 
Anonymous
-2
A: Radio-dating and the age of the earth

Erap estradaTo A1. HAHAHAHA. Kung Nuthead people's orange. I think Hindi obtained you take my what sort of award I go to candle?

 
Anonymous
-2
A: Radio-dating and the age of the earth

Erap estradaTo A1. HAHAHAHA. Kung Nuthead people's orange. I think Hindi obtained you take my what sort of award I go to candle?

 
Anonymous
-2
A: Radio-dating and the age of the earth

Erap estradaewan ko. HAHAHAHA. kung natulog ka nalang edi hindi sasakit ulo mo kesa inaalam mo to diba?

 
Anonymous
1:35 PM
-2
A: Radio-dating and the age of the earth

Erap estradaewan ko. HAHAHAHA. kung natulog ka nalang edi hindi sasakit ulo mo kesa inaalam mo to diba?

 
Anonymous
-2
A: Radio-dating and the age of the earth

Erap estradaTo A1. HAHAHAHA. King Nuthead is people's orange. I think that Hindi found out that you took my some sort (my question is which?) of award I go to candle.

 
Anonymous
....... v
 
Anonymous
ssnxjnxjbcjxbvuhhvvbvsidvnd
 
1:47 PM
@DImension10AbhimanyuPS: Why are you looping it here now..???
Isn't one enough?
I've flagged it -_-
 
0
Q: Why aren't badges removed?

M.TarunWhy aren't badges removed in some cases? For example,when I downvote a question and remove the downvote I get the critic badge.

 
Anonymous
2:34 PM
@CrazyBuddy Wanted to get all the versions.
 
Anonymous
2:45 PM
Why aren't the "Recommend Deletion"s displayed on the profile.
 
Anonymous
One can still see it:
 
3:05 PM
user image
4
 
Now, where can I find @ChrisWhite & his mistress here? :P
 
3:36 PM
Chat session everyone!!!
 
Anonymous
\end{chatSession}
 
@CrazyBuddy Isn't there half an hour before it starts?
Also, /me is sick.
 
3:56 PM
@ManishEarth That... was just a reminder (just in case) :D
(now, only 4 mins left) ;-)
 
hey there
 
hey :)
 
Hey ;-)
 
soo... chat session. Anyone have something to talk about?
 
yesterday, by ManishEarth
 
4:06 PM
arrgh, typical media sensationalism
 
I think @DavidZ tweeted about that a week ago...
 
Probably
 
(another page, not this one) :D
 
@DavidZ I thought so too. Nature=legitimate. Usually.
 
@CrazyBuddy true. I never would have tweeted that headline.
 
4:06 PM
I know... :D
 
@ManishEarth Nature the journal? Yeah, that link isn't from Nature, it's some random news outlet
 
@DavidZ I know, but the paper is in Nature
 
Right, and the article (esp. headline) has little to do with the actual content of the paper.
 
Which means that there's some legit stuff going on there.
@DavidZ Yep. Seen that too often
One every month on Quantum teleportation
 
4:08 PM
Spend enough time reading science journalism and you'd be surprised how often news stories about science are outright false.
Anyway, there is of course some legit science; basically this group is postulating a mechanism by which the expansion of our 3+1D universe could have started.
 
Yep. I try to stick to sources like The Nature news page or arXiv.
 
The big bang theory a.k.a. big bang cosmology, which actually is about what happened after the "bang", is still alive and well.
 
I have a question, who is the greatest Physicist alive today?....Hawking?
 
(without looking) The 4D star collapse ?
 
@DavidZ yep
 
4:10 PM
@ManishEarth yeah, that's reasonable.
 
@Hennes yep, him
 
Two new fellas... ;-)
 
Well, I just dropped in to see what would fly over my head.
 
@cyberskull I dunno, it's really a matter of opinion. Each person can pick their favorite physicist but it doesn't really tell you anything useful.
I guess I should write a blog post about the 4D brane thing
wish I had more free time though
 
@DavidZ You've given your word that you'll be covering lots of stuffs... :D
 
4:13 PM
It was a blog promise ;-)
Like a campaign promise. Doesn't mean I'm actually going to do it.
although I will try
 
ha!
 
o_O
 
@DavidZ Einstein, Newton, and Galileo are usually considered numbers 1, 2, and 3, right?
 
@cyberskull Probably. I think there might be some debate on whether Galileo is really considered a physicist, depending on who you ask, but many people will identify Einstein and Newton as #1 and #2 (in either order).
 
looks left
looks right
 
4:16 PM
If you talk to anyone who works in quantum field theory, especially particle physics, Feynman might take the #3 slot.
 
no @ChrisWhite in sight
Galileo was an astronomer/astrophysicist. Not one of us :p
 
hey, that rhymes :-P
 
haha
 
@ManishEarth Go on... Do you still have the paper? Throw it here :)
 
?
oh that
 
4:17 PM
Galileo discovered inertia, more or less. And he did that thing with gravity. I'd say that kind of counts.
 
details, details.
 
and then there was the church
 
And he was one of the first to really push the idea that theories about how the world works should be based on observation, not on traditional wisdom
Personally, I'd say there's no one physicist alive today who has the larger-than-life reputation of Einstein or Newton. But there are many who do equally interesting work.
 
Newton never fought with the church did he?
 
He fought. But not with the church
 
4:19 PM
Nothing major, not like Galileo, at least not as far as I know
ooh, Amazon has TBBT DVDs 65% off ;-)
 
Einstein's theory corrects Newton's so he should be place above Newton, no?
 
@cyberskull well if you take that approach there are hundreds of later physicists who place above Einstein
 
Not exactly
Yeah that
Newton's theory was perfectly valid given the cruddy experimental precision at the time
And he was one of the first to start thinking that way
 
I would go in terms of how much the person's contribution revolutionized physics relative to what it was like before them, and by that standard I'd put Newton first
 
Of course, he did make some mistakes (I'm looking at you, light corpuscles) that didn't gel well with experiment and still stuck to it
 
4:23 PM
meh, most good physicists do that sometimes
 
yep
 
"good" \neq "getting everything right"
 
Well, this is not so much getting it wrong as refusing to change
Newton was pretty respected at that time so his word was paramount in many cases
 
@ManishEarth Feynman teased him a lot in his QED lectures :)
 
sure. But that kind of depends. If you refuse to change your belief because you believe in the evidence that shows it, that's generally good for science. If you refuse in the face of contradictory evidence because you're just stubborn, that's bad.
 
4:25 PM
yeah
 
OK, so this is funny: on the Piazza discussion board for the class I'm TAing, someone posted "Where do I find Piazza?"
 
There was no experimental evidence for corpuscular light, though, was there?
lol
 
ok guys, I have to run off and do research
see you later
 
c'ya later ;-)
 
have fun! :)
 
4:26 PM
later
 
user54412
4:47 PM
hi all
 
user54412
sorry i'm late
 
hey :)
 
user54412
fwiw I'd put Newton 1st, then Einstein, and I think Galileo is overrated
 
Hey ;-)
 
user54412
not that these ranking mean anything
 
4:49 PM
ha!
 
Now, why does Galileo come in? o_O
 
user54412
Galileo is often pointed to by bitter scientists as fighting religious establishment
 
Hah!!!
 
user54412
but honestly, he had just as many Church supporters as detractors, he was intentionally abrasive, and his heliocentric ideas were not vindicated by the observations of the day
 
user54412
@ManishEarth quite an excellent diagram - I think I'll end up on the "dark astronomers" branch
 
4:51 PM
lol
 
@ChrisWhite Hey..!!! that's where I am will be :)
 
user54412
Hmm, there doesn't seem to be any paper discussion - let's see what I can dig up
 
/me is trying to play youtube.com/watch?v=dQiNVk_u0po on flute
 
Whaaaa... o_O
 
4:53 PM
extremely relaxing. LOTR FTW
 
user54412
ok no one's interested in the orbital stability of satellites it seems
 
heh
nah, me busy
and sick
 
What's the difference between bond enthalpy and lattice enthalpy?
 
1
Q: Why does the community allow or even encourage seemingly meaningless edits to questions and answers?

Pranav Hosangadi For example, editing the (long inactive) question to add trivial tags, like faq Change tags to synonymous tags, e.g. Classical Mechanics to Newtonian Mechanics Correct insignificant grammatical errors, e.g. Why did the Earth cooled down to Why did the Earth cool down Removing ...

 
5:16 PM
Okay, I'm off to sleep (today, pretty early though)... Dunno what happened to my body... -_-
 
See you later @CrazyBuddy
 
@ChrisWhite You'll be around anyway... I'll ping you ;-)
 
@ShuklaSannidhya I'm not sure, but perhaps someone who knows will wander in here
Or you could ask on the main site
 
C'yall later :)
 
hi
hello @DavidZ
 

« first day (1055 days earlier)      last day (3878 days later) »