« first day (1207 days earlier)      last day (3718 days later) » 
01:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

Jez
7:00 PM
what there is is a bunch of idiots willing to vote for jingoistic bastards who demand independence on "nationalistic" grounds
 
What's being portrayed in the media? that the Crimea is being invaded by Russia (and the Crimeans don't like it)?
 
@GlenTheUdderboat Yes. The solution to that problem lies elsewhere. Revise the tax system. Cut subsidies. Of course there will sometimes be voices desiring to jettison, say, Wallonia, but only because they're not allowed to change the system, and it's not a majority.
@Jez That's not how I read it...somewhat lazy, it was a huge war with lots of casualties!
And it took ages!
 
Jez
The Irish War of Independence () or Anglo-Irish War was a guerrilla war fought between the Irish Republican Army (IRA) (army of the self-proclaimed Irish Republic) and the British Government and its forces in Ireland. It began with the Soloheadbeg ambush on 21 January 1919, when two members of the armed police force, the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC), were attacked and killed in County Tipperary. The Irish Republic had issued a Declaration of Independence in Dublin earlier that same day. The Irish Volunteers—later renamed the Irish Republican Army (IRA)—targeted RIC and British Army ba...
total dead: about 2000
hardly a major war. more a "please don't break off... oh fine, alright."
 
@Cerberus Say, the Netherlands are fed up with Limboland. Would the idea of getting rid of them be properly called "separatist"? Or is there no such symmetry? :)
 
Jez
second Chechen war: Total killed military/civilian: 54,402–74,402
 
7:03 PM
@Jez It is hard to say. But I'm not saying autonomy cannot lead to independence (it can), but rather that that is never what the capital intends by granting autonomy. This in order to support my thesis that states really, really hate ceding territory. Even democratic states hate it, although of course they usually would not go nearly as far in repressing a rebellion as, say, Russia.
@GlenTheUdderboat You could call it that, but the word is normally used for when a smaller part wants to separate. That is also because the capital rarely, if ever, wants to lose territory, I would say.
 
Jez
well then, you can say that Blair's government was extremely incompetent in their judgement.
if their judgement was that more autonomy would be less likely to lead to independence
why they would think that I don't know
 
@Jez Sure, not as bloody as that.
 
Jez
you described it as "huge"
 
Is Ukraine a country in Risk?
 
What's the point, really, of invading. What do you get?
 
7:06 PM
@Jez Another reason to grant autonomy is in order to prevent a second IRA, ETA...
 
Good lord! That Susan can be incredibly recalcitrant!
 
Jez
@Cerberus has Spain granted autonomy to the Basque region? and has ETA been defeated?
 
@FumbleFingers FF, ignore her. Don't let the situation escalate, her comment has been flagged.
@Jez Yes, and semi-yes.
Also Catalonia.
 
Jez
yes? the Basque region and Catalonia are part of Spain
they're mere regions.
 
Of course they are?
 
Jez
7:07 PM
the Scottish aren't batting for a region, they already are a region
 
They have considerable autonomy.
Of course they want more.
 
Jez
ok i meant independence
 
They do not have independence, of course.
And the situation seems to be fairly stable.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat Yes!
 
Jez
yeah but not in Scotland.
 
7:08 PM
But you should realise that the granting of autonomy to regions in democratic countries is fairly new, it's all an experiment. Sometimes it's enough to soothe them; at other times, it may lead to more and more audacity, possibly ending in independence, although I think that would be the first case in history, if Scotland truly voted for independence!
 
@Cerberus I've just had Kitfox in chat with the two of us trying to smotth things over, but Susan is having none of it. The stupid thing is I actually think I had a defensible position, but I've caved in on everything and she still wants blood!
 
@Jez Less so in Scotland, yes.
@FumbleFingers Ignore her, just don't talk to her.
That's the best approach at the moment, I think.
 
Jez
@Cerberus the granting of autonomy to regions in democratic countries seems to be a relatively rare event
 
@Cerberus Yes, that was your first advice, and I was going to take it. But then Kitfox arrived so I felt I had to stick around
 
Are the desires of some Crimeans to join Russia mostly opportunistic, or are some groups already repressed by Ukraine?
 
7:10 PM
Hello, is there a word that describes both chicken and meat? (considering meat is flesh of a mammal, by definition)
 
@Jez Maybe not. The Scots might yet go for it (if they're daft enough!)
 
@FumbleFingers Yeah, sure. But I mean now.
 
Jez
@FumbleFingers no, i'd count Scotland as already being one of those rare events (see what I said about Blair's government above)
the whole Scottish parliament has already been granted
gifted, you might say, to the nationalists
 
@GlenTheUdderboat I think they fear some (minor?) repression from the new Ukrainian government; but I rather think they have been on the fence for many decades, and now with the change in government and Russian propaganda and incitement in the Crimea (no doubt), the balance has tipped from "we will agree to remain technically part of Ukraine but in practice completely independent" (the current situation) to "we want official independence".
 
Jez
what I find funny is some Americans cheering the scottish independence movement on. I wonder whose side they'd be on if some state was trying to secede from their precious USA! USA! USA!
 
7:12 PM
@Jez Well, the Scots are a bolshie lot, so they might just go for it out of bloody-mindedness. But hopefully as the issues crystalise they'll see sense.
 
@its_me That is wrong. Meat is not defined to be mammalian flesh.
 
Jez
@FumbleFingers i think my point earlier is that the nationalists have been explicitly allowed to "go for it"
 
It’s animal flesh.
 
@Jez Texas. Texas will be the first one to go.
 
Jez
they have not forced it to happen
 
7:13 PM
@Jez If it weren't for those same misguided Americans funding IRA terrorism for decades we'd probably not have a problem over there.
 
Jez
@Mitch yes. as in, never.
 
Since dinosaurs are animals, that’s already included.
 
Never only because people are well fed.
 
@Cerberus Does Ukraine or Crimea receive the rent for the Russian bases (the fleet)?
 
@Jez A parliament in itself is unremarkable. Throughout Europe, minor regions and cities have parliaments, like Hamburg.
 
7:14 PM
@Mitch ’Gainst the Rules.
@Cerberus Or Iceland.
 
Jez
@Cerberus not one that comes with a referendum on independence.
that's a parliament set up for an independent country. madness.
 
Ha ha. I mean that as no insult to Texans in particular. I mean that everybody is materially happy so there's no need for secession.
 
Jez
at least, madness if your intention is to prevent independence
@Mitch people are materially happy in Scotland
 
@tchrist rules, just make it harder. make a consititutional amendment to allow it to go.
 
@tchrist What do you mean? Iceland is independent.
 
Jez
7:16 PM
that's clearly not the only criterion
 
@tchrist Google dic. to blame
 
@Jez The referendum is indeed unusual (not the parliament).
 
@tchrist thanks!
 
@its_me GOOGLE IS NOT A DICTIONARY
 
It tries to be...
 
7:16 PM
@Jez No they're not. Have they looked at the sky lately? It's been grey since that one day in the summer of 83.
 
@tchrist I meant "define meat"
Google gives the meaning at the top
 
Jez
@Cerberus but anyway, the idea that it was to stop the equivalent of an independent Ireland seems bogus. an equivalent to the Irish war of independence was never on the cards
 
@tchrist Uh oh.
I just did brain surgery on myself using google.
 
My previous statement remains in full effect.
 
ok :P
 
7:18 PM
@Jez Why not?
 
And all can see how successful it were.
 
Jez
@Cerberus because a) the rest of the UK has land access to Scotland b) the vast majority of Scottish had no desire for armed conflict
 
@Cerberus I see Wikipedia says the modern military in Ukraine was completely inherited from the Soviet Union. Most likely that means even if they do have significant capability, it wouldn't be easy to get them to fight Russia.
 
@its_me It depends on context. On a menu, a meat course is usually not fowl.
 
@FumbleFingers Do they have the big hats too?
 
7:19 PM
@Jez Of course the situation in modern Scotland is not the exact same as in the Ireland of the 1910s.
 
@Cerberus So in general context all flesh can be referred to as "meat", correct?
 
1 a Food in general; anything used as nourishment for men or animals; usually, solid food, in contradistinction to drink.
1 e The edible part of fruits, nuts, eggs, etc.: the pulp, kernel, yolk and white, etc. in contradistinction to the rind, peel, or shell.
2 A kind of food, an article of food, a ‘dish’.
3 a The flesh of animals used for food;
3 d Applied proleptically to living animals such as are killed for food; in early use chiefly in wild meat = ‘game’. In modern hunting use (U.S.) one’s quarry or prey.
 
Jez
@Cerberus it's not even similar
 
@its_me Yes, even fish sometimes, and even fruits!
 
Does anyone remember the ELU question about Sherlock Holmes and Watson saying some 'ungrammatical' thing like 'were' when 'was' is the usual?
 
7:20 PM
Ah!
 
@GlenTheUdderboat no idea. I thought Russians had little hats (the ex-Russian army hat I once picked up at a Microsoft trade fair was tiny - I put that down to the fact that they have too many kids in the army)
 
or pointy heads
 
@Mitch no
 
@tchrist Thanks. I'll stop using Google
 
Jez
@Cerberus You ever play Europa Universalis 3? Blair basically clicked on "create vassals", clicked on Scotland, then clicked on Scotland and clicked "end vassalization"
 
7:21 PM
@tchrist Thanks.
 
@Jez Haha, yes, I have played it.
 
@Jez They can do that? It seems too easy.
 
And, no, that is not at all what Blair intended, I believe, even though the effect may possibly be that (although currently it seems far more likely that Scotland will not vote for independence).
 
Jez
i don't see why. if you want to give a region independence you can generally find a bunch of nationalists who want power and are willing to take it from you
 
1
Q: Strange use of the past tense by Dr. Watson in the Sherlock series

alenaI’m trying to correctly identify the reason why the past tense of ‘’to be’’ is used in the following context: Sherlock Season 3 Episode 3 The scene: Dr. Watson is about to enter a drug den. His wife spots some kind of weapon tucked into his trousers and the following dialogue takes place: ...

 
7:22 PM
@Jez But a bunch of nationalist are not enough for independence.
You need a majority. And that you usually do not get.
 
Jez
do you need a majority?
 
So. Strategy? Let Crimea go right away. Then the "European" support will be substantially larger (%) than the remaining "Russian" support in the East. At least keep the east, if they want to. ???
 
Jez
or do you just declare that an area is independent
 
I'm hearing 'were' -all- the time now in down-market BrE.
 
@Jez Yes, more or less.
 
7:23 PM
(on TV)
 
Jez
@Cerberus why?
 
@Mitch It’s were because loads of crackheads is plural.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat my scheduled movie for tonight is Come and See, so I'll doubtless know more about the Russian military by tomorrow!
 
@Jez That is not at all realistic in this scenario.
@GlenTheUdderboat I believe the European support is already greater in the country as a whole, if that's what you mean.
 
@Cerberus Has history ever recorded an occasion on which the majority has actually been right in their tyrannical overlording of minorities?
 
7:25 PM
"Right"?
 
@Mitch Huh?
 
Define right.
 
Ethically correct.
 
Winners are always right.
 
@tchrist Sure, in the quotation, but having accidentally heard that exact scene, I don't think the transcript or what I heard sounded grammatical at all. there was definitely a 'mistake' and I'm hearing it a lot.
 
7:25 PM
Or quite simply, ethical.
 
@tchrist I think that is a paradox, tyrannical right?
Or just a plain contradiction in terms.
 
Winners define ethics.
 
If it be a paradox, you'd better explain it.
 
No, it’s a loaded question.
 
@tchrist so I'm guessing you aren't hearing the same.
 
7:27 PM
Just because one more person votes for something to happen compared with the number voting opposed does not make it a right thing to do.
 
Of course.
What about it?
 
Is this one of those occasions?
 
Example. If you kill everybody who think something isn't right, then that thing is right to everybody remaining.
 
Solved!
 
@tchrist I'm not entirely sure what the Crimeans fear Kiev will do to them, and the interests of humanity at large and of the Crimeans themselves may not be aligned. But, yes, it seems likely that it would be better for humanity and the Crimeans if they remained autonomous within Ukraine and not let the Russians in c.q. vote for independence.
 
7:29 PM
Unless they're not sure...
 
what is 'c.q.'
 
@GlenTheUdderboat You have an unusual definition of "right".
@Mitch Casu quo.
I believe it is less used in English, but I couldn't think of an laternative!
 
what is that?
 
Shoot me.
"Which means, in this case, ..." — something like that.
 
in such a case..
but I don't get what the case is.
 
7:31 PM
@Cerberus Oh? Aren't morals an evolutionary solution becoming convention?
 
I'm not able to resolve the anaphora well.
 
@Mitch Voting for independence means more or less switching to the Russian side in this case.
@GlenTheUdderboat From an objective perspective, perhaps. But "right" is from a very subjective perspective.
There was a vote for independence planned in May. Now it has been advanced to March, I believe.
The Crimean government has also decided to let the Russians in and collaborate with them against what remained of Ukrainian control and support for Ukraine.
 
@Cerberus No, I just told you: it isn't really.
 
What isn't what?
 
Morals, subjective.
 
7:35 PM
Uhh.
I don't know what you mean.
 
Right, in the long run, is what works.
 
When you say, "x is morally right", you are speaking from your own, subjective point of view.
 
Now that the Olympics are over, I guess they have to find something to do.
 
If you use "right" in a different way, it is a confusing word game that would fare better with a different word and exact definitions.
@Mitch They're skipping the Paralympics in Sochi, some world leaders.
 
@Cerberus I don't say such thing. But I could (but won't) say "reproduction is right".
 
7:37 PM
The word is confusing me.
 
@Cerberus the Paralympics too? well, the usual Olympics is what everyone knows about.
 
@Cerberus Many ethical rules observed in many societies can be explained by evolutionary game theory. They tend to be stable.
 
Jez
@Mitch pushing the envelope. they got no punishment from the IOC (morons) or the West in general (pussies) for their homophobia and general anti-freedom policies, so they see how far they can go in annexing territory
 
@Mitch But!
@GlenTheUdderboat Yes, of course.
Or by evolutionary theory, perhaps.
 
@Jez Why do they care so much? just leave things alone.
I think the military is bored.
 
Jez
7:40 PM
care about Crimea you mean? why does any dictatorship care about increasing its territory?
 
Is Tymoshenko a possibility or is she not well enough to try for leadership?
 
Jez
conquest seems to be a fundamental human desire
 
@Jez I know it's sort of a stupid question, but still.
 
@Cerberus Evolutionary theory alone isn't enough really. The ethical rule needs to be resistant to defection.
 
@Mitch She represents only one factions of oligarchs, and she has said that she will not run for president.
 
7:41 PM
@Jez Sure. But why don't people read history and realize it just comes out bad in the end.
 
She is going to Germany for an operation, I think, but I think she could theoretically rule from her wheelchair at some point.
 
Jez
does it always? Russia had to become a big nation somehow; by the people who originally won out in that region
the US conquest of the native Americans isn't seen as turning out badly... by the victors
 
@Jez It was only a conquest from the native point of view. From the Americans, they were an annoyance.
 
Jez
so?
 
The maps (that they had laid out) were already laid out.
 
Jez
7:43 PM
that's just terminology
 
@Jez Interestingly, that makes any discussion of right and wrong moot. Just make sure you win or die.
 
SUre.
 
Jez
the Russians could see Crimeans who don't support them as "an annoyance"
 
@GlenTheUdderboat and label the things how you like.
@Jez it may turn out that way.
 
So, is this a linguistic conflict??
 
7:45 PM
BUt for the US, the population numbers don't really make it look to the US like they were conquering or colonizing, just inhabiting.
@GlenTheUdderboat war of words.
 
Jez
@Mitch huh? the population numbers?
millions of natives were killed
that's bigger than the Holocaust
 
Is it?
I think 3 million Jews were killed?
How many Indians?
 
Does the situation in Ukraine require comparison to other historical situations, I wonder?
 
Jez
The population figure for Indigenous peoples in the Americas before the 1492 voyage of Christopher Columbus has proven difficult to establish. Scholars rely on archaeological data and written records from settlers from the Old World. Most scholars writing at the end of the 19th century estimated the pre-Columbian population at about 10 million; by the end of the 20th century the scholarly consensus had shifted to about 50 million, with some arguing for 100 million or more. Contact with the New World led to the European colonization of the Americas, in which millions of immigrants from t...
> Most scholars writing at the end of the 19th century estimated the pre-Columbian population at about 10 million; by the end of the 20th century the scholarly consensus had shifted to about 50 million, with some arguing for 100 million or more
 
Is the historical record predictive of current situations?
 
7:52 PM
@GlenTheUdderboat Does any situation?
@GlenTheUdderboat To some extent. But human society is infinitely more complex than, say, some physics experiment, or a computer program.
 
@Cerberus I object to 'infinitely'.
 
In a manner of speaking.
A figure of speech. Hyperbole.
 
@Cerberus I object to that manner of speaking.
 
shrugs
 
@Jez sure. The great proportion of those were in central and south america.
 
7:56 PM
@Cerberus How is this not some physics experiment? :)
 
Hah.
 
Jez
@Mitch OK then, well switch US for Spanish nations
 
I mean an experiment carried out by physicists.
 
@Cerberus I hope not. But then there is the simulation argument.
 
Jez
like Argentina ("the Falklands are so ours, I mean they're closer to our land we stole a couple of hundred years ago than Britain")
 
7:58 PM
> Two studies have been conducted that attempt to number the natives killed by the United States. The first of these was sponsored by the United States government, and while official does not stand up to scrutiny and is therefore discounted (generally); this estimate shows between 1 million to 4 million killed. The second study was not sponsored by the US Government but was done from independent researchers. This study estimated populations and population reductions using later census data. Two figures are given, both low and high, at: between 10 million and 114 million Indians as a direct
@GlenTheUdderboat Well, who knows? We could all be dreaming anyway.
 
@Cerberus More likely: just you.
 
Of course it is all a bit vague and uncertain. But let's all agree on "many".
@GlenTheUdderboat Even more likely: just you.
 
Indian woman dressed up as Kali.
 
So, what's the likely outcome in Ukraine? A bit more fuss, Crimea going from autonomous in Ukraine to autonomous in Russia? Or what?
 
8:04 PM
Wow that's quite a lot.
30 million noncombatant Russian were killed in WWII.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat I think the latter.
 
@Cerberus The latter? "Or what"?
 
@Mitch Yeah WWII was possibly the worst tragedy in human history.
@GlenTheUdderboat If I say "the latter", that means I'm choosing between two things.
 
@Cerberus What metric for worst? Not most death per day for example.
 
Total deaths and destroyed buildings.
But what other 5-year phenomenon caused more deaths per day?
 
8:13 PM
@Cerberus Conflict or tragedy? Tsunami?
 
Phenomenon, then.
A tsunami does not last five years.
 
@Cerberus When did 5 years become a criterion??
 
Otherwise you cannot compare it.
It becomes meaningless.
 
@Cerberus That's sort of my point.
 
If you count the number of people dying in a period of 200 milliseconds, I'm sure you can get other (meaningless) records.
 
8:16 PM
Indeed.
 
But WWII as a phenomenon is far from meaningless, it is coherent.
But I need to go to Hema now and AH.
 
lol. hurry.
 
Besides, I don't think a natural disaster is as much a tragedy as a conflict is.
WWII was brought upon humanity by itself.
Later!
 
8:53 PM
The Collie is a distinctive type of herding dog, including many related landraces and formal breeds. It originates in Scotland and Northern England. It is a medium-sized, fairly lightly built dog with a pointed snout, and many types have a distinctive white pattern over the shoulders. Collies are very active and agile, and most types have a very strong herding instinct. The collie type has spread through many parts of the world (especially Australia and North America) and has diversified into many varieties, sometimes with mixture from other dog types. Some of the collie types h...
I thought those were supposed to be cute.
 
Jez
damn dogs
i still have a noisy one yapping outside most days
 
9:08 PM
Three days ago, I got an email asking if I could return a phone call to a user whose name was garbled and left a message three days before that.
I am sooooo glad I don't really work there anymore.
"She said her name was something like 'Migeday'. Can you help her?" "..."
Uh. No.
 
@Robusto Isn't that an extreme pronunciation of the o like an a, even for an American?
 
Not for our neighborhood.
 
A barder callie?
 
The emphasis is on the wrong syllable though.
 
Or even a bahrder kahli?
 
9:11 PM
No, more like boohder callie.
I can't write out the o sound. It's like water dropping.
 
I would pronounce the goddess as KAH-lee in English.
 
Oh. I've heard it Kah-LEE.
 
I'm not sure.
 
oo-ah. b(oo-ah)der callie.
But mashed together.
 
Odd.
 
9:12 PM
Yep.
 
posted on March 02, 2014 by sgdi

She said that I couldn’t go Despite this I’m sure and I know One of these days I’ll get my way And she’ll be the one who I show

 
@Matt Interesting limerick.
 
Jez
@KitFox that seems like some kind of Yankee accent
@StackExchange "she'll be the one whom I'll show" presumably
 
The one to whom I'll show
@Jez Could be because I'm a Yankee.
 
Jez
Neuww Yoowak
 
9:19 PM
Oh god no.
 
Jez
that's Yankee innit?
 
Sort of. That's New York yankee. They do all sorts of horrible things there.
 
Jez
heh
 
@Cerberus Kali and collie are certainly homophones for most native English speakers in North America.
 
@Robusto What is wrong with you? That's not cute?
 
9:39 PM
@tchrist Remarkable.
 
Jez
10:22 PM
Hey in US English, what name do you give to a place that sells new cars?
 
What do you call it?
A car seller?
 
Jez
i know what i call it
i wanna know what they call it
 
I won't tell them.
 
10:40 PM
@Robusto I'm watching your video, and this guys says an American outpost in Georgia led to the war of 2008? That's not the story I've heard.
The cause of the war was a Georgian attack on South Ossetia, possibly provoked or instigated by Russia, but at least seized upon by Russia.
> The European Union said to Ukraine, you must choose between Europe and Russia.
How did they say this? All they did was offer an association agreement, which, by the way, means very little. Some more trade.
His comparison of the protesters in Kiev to people throwing molotov cocktails at the White House is not entirely relevant: of course we do not consider the latter acceptable, because we consider our own governments to be legitimate.
His point stands, though, that blindly encouraging a pro-European revolution is perhaps not the wisest thing to do for the West. But I'm not sure what we have done made much of a different anyway to the protesters.
 
10:58 PM
@Cerberus Unless I were going for an exaggerated Indian accent, the pronunciations of Kali and collie would be identical. That is the "standard" Midwestern accent, the American version of BrE RP.
@Cerberus Listen to the Dan Carlin podcast I linked before that.
@Mitch Collies are cute. Kali is not.
 
I can't listen to everything!
 
Clearly that is an exaggeration.
 
@Robusto The American version of RP, really?
 
Yep. It's what the anchormen on TV news use.
 
Is it at the top of the class chain?
 
11:01 PM
I'm speaking figuratively, of course, but there's truth in it.
@Cerberus You get a job more easily with that accent.
 
That doesn't have to mean the same thing...
It seems unlikely to me that old money should all speak with a Midwestern accent?
 
It's not the same to six decimal places. But it is similar.
@Cerberus More people than the rich speak with RP in Britain.
In fact, such people have served me tea at the Savoy.
 
I did not mean to reverse the implication.
Not all fruits are apples.
Even though Iphones are gay.
And typically white, ew.
 
What about iPhonemes?
 
I don't know what colour they are.
 
11:06 PM
Anyway, the point is, collie/Kali are exact rhymes in my accent, which in America is considered to be mainly unaccented.
 
Right.
My main point was the picture.
It's scary, isn't it?
 
Pictures don't have accents, last time I checked.
 
I'm sure she will have an Indian accent.
Possibly even a divine accent.
 
Looks like she hangs around with thugs.
 
how do you say when carA refuses priority to carB? 'refuse priority' is fine?
or 'carA fails to give away' looks weird to me
 
11:15 PM
 
but I guess that's the right expression, in france we say "refuser la priorité"
 
01:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (1207 days earlier)      last day (3718 days later) »