« first day (1117 days earlier)      last day (3819 days later) » 

10:00 PM
@Cerberus Please have him write a rebuttal to the blog post I cited.
 
another thing is
 
If anything, I think it's fairly expensive in Scandinavia.
 
we will not need so much of electricity
use your imagination
please
 
The problem of waste heat is a serious issue.
 
how about food?
 
10:00 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 He seemed to indicate that the very idea was so silly it was not even to be considered.
 
do you believe we will run out of food?
 
@Cerberus Perhaps he didn't understand it.
 
Sure he does, and he agreed with what I told you.
 
I mean, it's a physicist who wrote the blog post.
 
Plasma! Electrons are free! Plasma! A fourth state of matter! Not gas, not liquid, not solid ooh ooh ooh!
 
10:01 PM
So I trust my physicist more than yours.
 
write a link to that blog please
 
Energy at one location is not the same as energy at another location.
 
what if your house will need 10% of electricity than it needs now
 
Energy can be insulated, stored, vented...
 
10:02 PM
and will be able to get 5% from sun etc....
 
You've already made me read it.
 
so you will need 5% of what you need now
today 2.7 billion people have access to internet
 
The surface of the earth is not an insulated container; nor does it have a uniform temperature; nor does it lack ways to convert heat into other forms of energy.
 
The specific post about the limits of energy growth on earth: physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/07/galactic-scale-energy
 
in 10 or 20 years... it is gonna be 6.5 billion
 
10:04 PM
@Cerberus Yes, and he accounts for that in his post.
 
You made me read it, and he did not.
 
Energy cannot be stored as easily as you make it sound.
 
in 2050 there is gonna be 10 billion peple and 99% will have an internet
 
There are other posts where he discusses the various arguments. Seriously, read the whole blog. It's more than one article.
 
.
99% or 99.9%
or 99.99%
 
10:05 PM
Is he a climate-change denier, blaming temperature changes on exhaust heat?
 
> The Earth gets rid of its energy by radiating into space, mostly at infrared wavelengths. No other paths are available for heat disposal. The absorption and emission are in near-perfect balance, in fact. If they were not, Earth would slowly heat up or cool down. - See more at: physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/07/galactic-scale-energy/…
> Indeed, we have diminished the ability of infrared radiation to escape, leading to global warming. - See more at: physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/07/galactic-scale-energy/…
 
Well, there you go.
 
@Cerberus there I go what?
 
tell me whatever is in the blog in 3 sentences please
 
10:07 PM
We can, for example, also increase the ability of the earth to radiate infrared.
 
so what is the conlusion?
please
 
@Cerberus Can we? Because if we can, scientists would love to know.
@EinsteinsGrandson The conclusion is that if we somehow maintain the current 2.3% energy use growth per year that has been sustained on average for the last century, in 400 years the surface of the planet reaches 100°C, or water-boiling point.
 
If we have all the excess energy you predict we shall have, then surely we will be able to do so.
The more energy we have, the more power.
 
The more we can do.
 
10:09 PM
what we have 90% of our energy from Sun?
then what?
 
@Cerberus See, this is the kind of hand-waving that I despair to hear. On one hand we have a basic limit of the earth's temperature, which is based on science. On the other hand, you just dismiss it based on "surely we'll find some solution".
 
It's just a theoretical answer to a theoretical scenario.
 
i know 1 thing for sure
 
It's not a theoretical scenario. It's a fundamental limit.
 
But let's not have this discussion again.
 
10:10 PM
it is possible to manufacture notebook or phone or tablet that has lower energy consumption
and it will be easier and easier
 
I think it's nonsense, you don't, and we're not going to reach consensus.
 
so the cars will need mayhbe 10% of energy they need now
as well as the whole household
we can produce food for maybe 100 billion people
 
@EinsteinsGrandson That is impossible. He has a different blog post which addresses fundamental physical limits to the future efficiency of common inventions such as cars, light bulbs, etc.
anyway I have to go. bye
 
today 30% - 50% of food is just wasted in developed world - US+ Europe ...
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Consider this: if we continue to increase our energy output, what will the input be? Solar energy and wind energy. Those methods take away more energy from the surface than they give back in usable energy.
 
10:12 PM
so then what?
they take away energy from surface then what?
what do u mean?
by that
 
Then nothing.
 
output - energy we consume?
input - energy we generate?
right?
 
That means any additional heat that we dissipate by using energy we have first removed from the surface, so there is no net increase in heat energy.
 
in 2050 there is gonna be 10 billion people and maybe 60% to 80% will have a Master degree
so,
there is gonna be 10 times more universities than it is now
so more sciences
more results
we will share all the knowledge for free on the internet
so there is gonna be much more people out there solving physics problems than today
 
Good.
 
10:16 PM
people will be living in Mars
and maybe other planets
already today 3D printers for human organs exist
maybe we will be able to make a surgery on your brain and raise your IQ from 130 to 330
as i said this is just the begining
 
@EinsteinsGrandson The dumber you are, the smarter you think you are. So an ice pick will do.
 
i dont understand, i am sorrry
Ice pick is what?
 
Lobotomy (: "lobe (of brain)"; τομή – tomē: "cut/slice") is a neurosurgical procedure, a form of psychosurgery, also known as a leukotomy or leucotomy (from the Greek λευκός – leukos: "clear/white" and tome). It consists of cutting or scraping away most of the connections to and from the prefrontal cortex, the anterior part of the frontal lobes of the brain. While the procedure, initially termed a leucotomy, has been controversial since its inception in 1935, it was a mainstream procedure for more than two decades, prescribed for psychiatric (and occasionally other) condition...
 
so?
make patient smarter not dumber...
i want to do the opposite
 
"The dumber you are, the smarter you think you are."
 
10:21 PM
So you think you know all this.
What does that say about you?
And why are you a robot with a Santaclaus hat on?
 
@Cerberus It says nothing: I think I'm smart, but that could be either because I am smart, or because I am dumb.
 
i know one thing for sure
 
@Cerberus YOU WILL KNEEL BEFORE THE DALEK COMMANDER
 
stupid people don't have imagination
for them its hard to imagine new things
or understand hard topics like maths or quantum physics...
 
life is hard -- but life is hardest when you're dumb
 
10:24 PM
@MετάEd Are you sure? Doesn't it also work the other way around?
 
no joie de vivre, just endless hours of tedium
 
The Dalek who?
 
when you are dumb, life is great
you don't need much
 
thoughts you don't have remain unheard
 
sex, TV and food
 
10:25 PM
because you cannot find the words
life is hard, but life is hardest when you're dumb
 
that's all stupid people need
so they are happy when they have these 3 things
 
Phew, Bitcoin is on the rise again.
Buy now!
 
once i buy all the Bitconins, what will happen?
 
The very best Bitcoins! One for the price of 800!
@EinsteinsGrandson Then...you will be bankrupt?
 
@EinsteinsGrandson Earl Butz lost his job over a similar comment.
 
10:26 PM
i can sell it for 10 times higher price than for which i bought them?
what do you mean with Earl Butz ?
 
If it sounds too good to be true ... it probably is.
 
imagine, I am Bill Gates and I buy all the bitcoins
then what?
i can dictate the price right?
;o)
 
@EinsteinsGrandson I mentioned a fact about Earl Butz. If you are unfamiliar, you can almost certainly find it on his Wikipedia bio page.
 
or on the other hand i will lose all the money i invested into it
 
@EinsteinsGrandson Not even Bill Gates could do that.
As soon as you start buying en masse, you will drive up the price.
 
10:29 PM
Is there a big market for masse?
Is it zero carbon?
 
No.
 
ok , but what if i somehow manage to buy all the bitcoins?
 
The computer transactions will create some CO2.
 
i will lose all the money i invested into it right?
 
10:31 PM
Hard to say. They may lose all value, if everybody loses interest.
But I doubt everybody would be willing to sell his bitcoins to you. Or able.
 
ok
what if all the money of the world will cease to exist
and only bitcoins will exist
banks will go bankrupt
;o)
are they not shaking already?
;o)
 
@MετάEd Dalek Santa is so adorable!
 
@aediaλ YOU WILL HAVE A HAPPY CHRISTMAS SEASON
 
10:51 PM
For Latin lovers:
Is this a correct translation?:
Deo pro nobis
Thanks :)
 
@Mitch Noted.
 
@TimTimmy A translation of...what?
@TimTimmy Nope, that's not correct.
 
You could say Deus favet nobis.
"God favours us".
 
@Cerberus Thank you! Anyway Microsoft did a strange underline:
 
10:56 PM
> făvĕo, fāvi, fautum, 2, v. n. [perh. root φαf-, φάος, φῶς, light, safety; cf. also foveo], to be favorable, to be well disposed or inclined towards, to favor, promote, befriend, countenance, protect (class.; syn.: studeo, foveo, diligo, amo).
 
Right, that looks odd.
 
@Cerberus I'm making this Armada medal to celebrate the English victory over the Spanish.
 
@RegDwigнt ??
@Cerberus Thanks for your help!
 
11:04 PM
@TimTimmy Cool!
 
> Even Jeff Atwood has given me honorable mention, and recently he has hired a full time staff member to send me T-shirts.
That's good to know.
I am now 100 % certain he is a (non-communist) troll.
 
@Cerberus "Now?"
Not a year ago or more?
You're a hard man to convince!
 
It seemed possible that he was merely crazy.
But to some degree sincere.
 
11:35 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Is Canada secretly trying to tie itself to ACTA after all?
> Canada may be about to pass some laws to effectively tie itself to ACTA's ridiculous requirements. The bill was originally introduced back in March, but was never considered by the Canadian Parliament. However, in late October, it was reintroduced under a new code, C-8, and it looks like it's moving forward, despite almost no public discussion of it anywhere.
 

« first day (1117 days earlier)      last day (3819 days later) »