« first day (792 days earlier)      last day (4135 days later) » 

6:00 AM
No, we were the bath. Or I should say "you", now that I have climbed out of the bath.
 
@Cerberus I still don't understand the necessity of a separate site for beginners. The same purpose could be achieved with a "beginner" tag assigned to the beginner questions. That's it!
 
@DavidWallace Thanks.
 
@Cerberus for?
 
@Meysam First, I agree. The only reason for ELL is that many people here really don't want learner's questions here, sadly. Secondly, learner's questions need not be beginner's questions! Learner's questions can be extremely advanced, and they can be interesting.
@DavidWallace For calling me specifically the bath.
There is also the aesthetic quality of language to consider. Everyone benefits from using beautiful language instead of ugly language. As to stopping the tide, significant and fairly-long-lasting results can be achieved. Consider for example how some of Cicero's prescriptive rules were respected during most of the Empire, and picked up again in the Renaissance! Consider also that interest in prescriptive rules in other languages has become stronger and stronger since ca. 1800, and we still stick to certain rules first propagated a century or two ago. All is not hopeless. — Cerberus 2 mins ago
 
What was that sleigh? I suppose this festive feature should be gone by now. Is it a bug that it's still there? Or is it still xmas?
 
6:11 AM
It was a plural you. Not you specifically.
 
I don't know why it is still here.
 
@Meysam "Beginner" would be a meta tag, which aren't supposed to be used. Tags describe the content, like "word request"
 
Perhaps they have decided it represents winter, not Christmas?
@DavidWallace I know. But it sounded funny.
 
@Cerberus Because 99 percent of them are shitty and have no effort
 
Then can I have it in June, July and August please?
 
6:12 AM
@simchona I don't know, I don't feel that way.
@DavidWallace Look.
 
Still, if I can have a special Chanukah hat for Islam, I suppose I can have a winter sleigh in the middle of summer.
 
See how impractical this upside-downness of yours is? Why don't you just rotate and be done with it?
@DavidWallace Yay! Is there also a nice Ramadan hat for Christianity?
 
If everyone were on the same side of the world, it would tip over.
@Cerberus It's probably a Ramadan ham.
 
What if we put the ants on the other side? I believe all ants taken together weigh a lot more than all humans.
@DavidWallace A ham, verily?
I must disapprove.
 
I should have complained to TPTB, rather than whinging about it here occasionally.
 
6:15 AM
@Cerberus I don't get it. Who is a learner? The only thing I know is that a question (any question, even advanced questions as you put it) is asked by a learner. How is it possible that someone who is not a learner asks a question? Tell me. how is it? If that's the case, 92% of questions should be moved to ELL then.
 
@DavidWallace Complained about what? About your side of the world?
 
@Meysam My point exactly, but you have expressed it far more clearly.
@Cerberus about being given a special Jewish hat for a posting on Islam.SE.
 
@DavidWallace That's supposedly bad?
 
It's the only hat I earnt :-(
 
@Meysam A learner is someone who is said to be in the process of learning English. Now you could say everyone is always learning, but the idea is that native speakers have already learned their language. Or something.
 
6:17 AM
@Cerberus The idea is that explaining subject-verb agreement over and over is a waste of time
 
@DavidWallace What's wrong with that?
@simchona Then duplicates can be pointed out.
We don't need ELL for that, nor will we use it for that, probably, unless duplicate policy changes...
 
Many of our "gen ref" would likely go there
 
@Cerberus Am I the only person in the room who finds it offensive?
 
@Cerberus That's it!
 
@simchona Yes, but those are not the same question repeated.
 
6:18 AM
@Cerberus They're mostly crap. We close crap. We would like some place to be nice to crap.
 
@DavidWallace How can a hat be offensive? I truly don't understand it.
@Meysam Is it, hmm?
@simchona Tsk, you are not espousing the philosophy of ELL very eloquently.
 
@Cerberus shrug
 
A simple question isn't crap, if that's what you mean: it is merely simple.
As to careless formatting, I would vote to close such questions on ELL.
I won't want those.
 
We don't do simple. It's a waste of time telling someone "just learn how to conjugate"
 
Why is it any more of a waste of time than the rest of the site?
If people don't understand certain aspects of conjugation, perhaps someone else will enjoy explaining it.
Of course the scope of ELL is still very unclear.
And how GR questions will be handled.
I mean true GR.
I say close it if it can be looked up in a dictionary or if not enough context is provided to answer it.
 
6:22 AM
@Cerberus If people don't want to see learner's questions here, there is already a good facility for them on here. "ignoring a specific tag". So tag learner questions with "learners" tag or whatever, and tell people ignore this tag if it's bothering them. That way, we will end up with a site with 92% of its questions being ignored by people.
 
@Cerberus Wouldn't it have been better to remedy this BEFORE getting to 91%?
@Meysam Won't work. The learners won't know to use the tag.
 
@DavidWallace That's largely what private beta is for
 
@Meysam I agree, and this is what I proposed—but there are Rules that we cannot change, alas.
 
@Meysam Also, that's a meta tag. Highly frowned upon, like
 
@simchona I'm sorry. But I see carts and horses running in all directions.
 
user19161
6:24 AM
So is it true that ELL will accept all questions?
 
@DavidWallace If it fails in private beta, it fails in private beta
 
@DavidWallace Some efforts have been made to this effect. But I think it will only become clearer once we get to handle practical situations.
 
@DavidWallace Likewise learners don't know whether to ask their questions on here or on ELL.
 
Look at how policies changed on ELU.
 
user19161
@Meysam I always believed in having only ELU, unless ELL is open to all questions literally.
 
user19161
6:25 AM
@Cerberus Oh, what has changed?
 
@Meysam My first choice would have been to keep everything here and allow learner's questions. But apparently people have become less and less tolerant of such questions over the years. They are whining and closing all the time. So the second-best thing seemed to me to have a separate site for those questions, in order for the whining here to stop.
@JasonBourne Consider the institution of GR.
The third alternative was to simply disallow learner's questions and close them all. Then they would have had nowhere to go.
 
I think somebody threatened to kill me, on another web site.
 
@DavidWallace Eh?
 
user19161
@Cerberus Oh, I find it weird that this site has GR and not math.
 
@JasonBourne But Math is the ELL of MO already.
 
user19161
6:29 AM
@DavidWallace Nope, I think Linguistics is to ELU as MO is to MSE.
 
user19161
How is ELU about research level questions? I doubt it.
 
No. MSE was created to keep low-level questions off MO. It's exactly like ELL is to ELU.
 
@JasonBourne I suppose...
@DavidWallace Huh? Who?
 
user19161
@DavidWallace Oh, you mean the purpose. Well, but not the level.
 
ELU would like to be like MO. But the learner questions get in the way.
 
user19161
6:31 AM
Well, no. I don't see research level questions on ELU at all, not that I would know well what they look like.
 
@DavidWallace Was it merely a curse? Or did she utter specific threats?
 
@DavidWallace As long as she doesn't know where you live...
 
Ignore her. Block her.
 
I don't care. It's kind of funny. And she's too far away to actually hurt me.
 
Okay.
Weird.
 
6:32 AM
"Far away" isn't always enough. There's always the threat of travel.
 
@simchona Nah, she's not going to come all the way here just to do me in. And if she does, I'll see her coming!
 
@DavidWallace Who?
 
@Meysam Don't worry, you don't know her.
I hope.
 
@DavidWallace What kind of hope is that? You better hope I do (did?), so that I can possibly prevent your death.
 
No, I had better hope that you don't. Because you and I are alike in some ways. We have certain things in common. This person has met me, and wanted to kill me within a couple of weeks. If she meets you, who's to say that she won't react similarly?
 
6:37 AM
Err, what was that festive feature sleigh stuff? Shouldn't them be gone already?
@DavidWallace How is it possible that she met you? (Unless you have been at the same time in the same place)
 
Oh, on a web site somewhere. I meant "met" in the online sense. I met her about two weeks ago, and already have made her angry enough to threaten to kill me.
 
@DavidWallace Oh oh! that's all I can say.
 
@simchona Have you read Prudence's latest, about the child-molesting dentist?
Quite shocking.
And a very difficult situation.
 
@Cerberus I did. Read it earlier today.
 
OK.
If the child had truly forgotten, and were very unlikely to ever find out, I wouldn't tell him.
 
6:49 AM
Yet what if he remembered later, and was repressing it? That would lead to future issues that, if not spoken up about given the chance, may have never been resolved
I had an ex who repressed a molestation, and when he finally spoke up he found out his sister had too--by the same person. It was fairly freeing.
 
@simchona Perhaps.
@simchona Hmm yes. Was this a once-only molestation, or on-going? And was this anybody close to them?
 
@Cerberus I believe it was ongoing. It was a family member.
 
In any case, if this kid was drugged, he probably won't remember.
@simchona Yeah that's way more serious, I should think.
But if you get fondled or whatever in your sleep, and you don't remember...
Argg what did Prudie just do!?
She spoiled Downton Abbey!
She said something about it in her video.
I quickly paused and skipped it, but I couldn't unhear what I had heard.
I do hope this is about some old season or something.
 
7:15 AM
Hi
@Cerberus Has it ever happened to you. This thing reminds of Family Guy.
 
@Noah If it did, I wouldn't remember!
And, no, I have no memories of any such event.
 
It must have then.
QED
 
Yes, that follows.
 
I am dont remember the exact story, but one of the guys gets fondled when he is in some sort of coma.
Hi Dave.
 
And I wouldn't care if it had happened, because then apparently it would not have harmed me in any way.
 
7:18 AM
Welcome to ELU
 
@Noah Nice.
Perhaps all children should be drugged and given to a paedophile for twenty minutes every year, in order to quench their thirst.
It wouldn't take much time, and they would get paid for it.
And they wouldn't remember.
 
@Cerberus I would. And I would probably go kill the paeudophile.
 
How would you remember? You weren't conscious.
 
@Noah Greetings, my brother.
 
@Cerberus Maybe I would. I have a special talent for that.
@DavidWallace How are you? Havent seen you for quite some time. Hope things are great.
 
7:23 AM
Many things are great, yes. Thanks for asking.
 
@Noah How does it work?
 
@Cerberus You just have to tickle yourself. :)
That's great. @DavidWallace I am happy that you are moving ahead.
I am sure things will be much better in a couple of years.
 
Yes, well when you're on the bottom of the ocean, the only way is a mixed metaphor.
 
@Noah If it isn't already done for you.
 
@Cerberus Yeah.
 
7:26 AM
@DavidWallace Haha!
 
@DavidWallace And things seem a bit fuzzy at the beginning.
 
@JSBձոգչ There may be an unprecedented flu wave going on in your country at the moment, if we are to believe GoogleFlu.
They track how many people search for flu and try to estimate the severity of the epidemic.
@tchrist Apparently, Denver is rated as "flu activity: intense".
 
Googleflu! What will we see next? Yahoogonorrhea?
 
At least it's not same old Google Fu.
Apparently, we're in the red too.
It doesn't seem to work for NZ or Australiar.
Even Zeeland on the Dutch map is grey!
 
8:10 AM
Hi.
 
8:20 AM
 
I want to write a 2-page letter as if it were written by two random people. Is there any institution that can help me?
 
8:37 AM
@Ahmad is this some sort of question?
I dont understand the motive behind this. Maybe you can fill us in and see if we can help.
 
9:13 AM
Hello guys, may I ask you some questions? What do they mean by "... worn out", "cut that chad / shad" (it sounded like chad or shad)
 
9:41 AM
Impossible to tell without context. Always provide context.
 
10:18 AM
Hello
 
Hello David. How are things?
 
Mostly good at the moment. Survived my first week back at work, just. How about you?
 
That's good to hear. Pretty good. We're meant to be demoing the software I've been working on to the rest of the team later on. That should be exciting.
 
Did you practise the demo?
 
10:21 AM
sort of. I'm not driving, it's the tester who's doing the work
but we've checked that everything works this morning
 
user19161
@matt Any further news from OED?
 
Are you scrumming?
 
no, we don't do scrum
@JasonBourne nothing so far
hopefully I'll find something waiting for me when I get home
 
user19161
@MattЭллен Haha, they can't be on holiday for so long!
 
@DavidWallace we do try to be agile
 
user19161
10:23 AM
Maybe they're all nuts as well.
 
Most people try to be agile.
 
especially at the moment where we're trying to get beta stuff to customers in the next few weeks
 
Do you think it is possible for software to validate English grammar of a sentence 100% accurate?
 
user19161
I suddenly feel an affection for CentOS, I think I should try it again.
 
10:23 AM
or near perfect?
 
@TemporaryNickName it's not possible for humans
 
85% perfect?
 
user19161
@TemporaryNickName No way. Forget about Word grammar checker. It sucks big time.
 
user19161
@TemporaryNickName Forget about the grammar checker. There are too many questions on this site where the grammar checker failed miserably.
 
10:25 AM
how accurate do you think MS Word grammar checker is?
 
@TemporaryNickName How would you measure that percentage?
 
do you mean 85%?
 
user19161
@TemporaryNickName Forget about it, very inaccurate. Nobody can give you a number, so forget about asking for a number.
 
user19161
If you are the guy working for Word grammar checker, I would ask you to forget about your job.
 
user19161
The grammar checker should be abandoned.
 
10:27 AM
@JasonBourne I see you've got a bit of a New York accent
 
user19161
In fact, don't trust the spelling checker either. Check a reputable dictionary.
 
user19161
@MattЭллен Really? Hmm... I am not sure what accent that is. Anyway, I am not of this world.
 
I think it is good for students who want to correct their grammar error but cannot be with their teachers all the time
 
fuhgedabowtit
 
user19161
@TemporaryNickName It is NOT good. They will learn the wrong things, so my advice is FORGET about it.
 
user19161
10:29 AM
Also, the spelling checker is NOT good. Check a REAL dictionary.
 
@TemporaryNickName I disagree.
Matt ... -dit not -tit.
 
most spell checkers are OK. they don't know all the words and often mistake contractions for misspellings, but they are far better than grammar checkers
 
user19161
Why do I say so? Because I have seen too many questions on this site about the spelling and grammar errors arising from using these checkers.
 
user19161
So as a first step, you can use the spell checker, but not the grammar checker.
 
10:31 AM
But just using the spell checker does not guarantee that you have spelt every word correctly.
 
The grammar checker only tells you what, not why. So a) it only gives you a fish rather than teaching you how to fish, and b) since it doesn't explain its reasoning you have no idea if its reasoning is actually correct.
 
user19161
As a second step, use a real dictionary and learn more grammar yourself.
 
yeah. If you're unsure about the verdict of a spell checker, check a dictionary
 
And often you end up with a fish when you slaughter a cow.
 
user19161
@RegDwighт Even the what can be wrong.
 
10:32 AM
@JasonBourne that's what the b) part is about.
 
user19161
That is because there are many complicated sentences parsed wrongly.
 
btw I will be back in an hour, going for an exercise
 
user19161
Computers are not as smart as me you know.
 
Today, I was in a supermarket. The aisle where they sold pens, pencils and exercise books was labelled "stationary". I wept.
 
user19161
@TemporaryNickName Walking is the best exercise for the body, says Linda Evangelista.
 
10:33 AM
@JasonBourne Though at least they read both parts of a sentence.
 
user19161
@RegDwighт Yes, I usually read half of it only.
 
user19161
Ouvert et haut !
 
Although, it was truthful in a sense, because the aisle itself did not move.
 
I have no idea what the aisle with pencils is usually labeled.
 
10:37 AM
pen aisle
 
Well, it sounds a lot like "stationary".
 
stationary adj. 7. Also in form stationery. Of or relating to a stationer (in various senses of stationer n.1). Now rare
 
@MattЭллен that reminds me of Pen Island's official homepage, penisland.com.
 
interesting tidbit from the OED
@RegDwighт then my allusion worked!
 
@Reg - watch out, Gigili will flag you, like she did last time someone said that.
@MattЭллен No way!!!
Not rare enough, if you ask me.
What dictionary are you citing? That looks OED-ish.
 
10:40 AM
@DavidWallace indeed. if English weren't confusing enough
@DavidWallace yeah, I pulled it from the OED
if people lived in the aisle with pens, you might call it a pen aisle colony
 
Jez
11:19 AM
@DavidWallace The aisle wasn't moving anywhere, though
 
11:36 AM
who is linda evangelista?
 
A model.
Linda Evangelista (born May 10, 1965) is a Canadian model. She has been featured on over 600 magazine covers. Evangelista is mostly known for being the longtime muse of photographer Steven Meisel, as well as coining the phrase "We don't wake up for less than $10,000 a day". She holds the record for her multiple appearances on the cover of Vogue Italia, all of which were photographed by Meisel. Early years Evangelista was born to Italian parents who emigrated to Canada and was raised in a working-class, traditional Roman Catholic family in St. Catharines, Ontario, near Niagara Falls, w...
 
Walking doesn't sweat me at all
I have to run in order to sweat. I think she is wrong about that she thinks walking is the best for body
 
@DavidWallace How's the weather where you are?
 
11:59 AM
— Do you know where I'm coming from?
— I thought we discussed the policy about masturbation in the work place last week.
2
 
that's interesting heh :/
 
@Noah It's been sunny but very windy.
 
12:33 PM
15 out 50 questions closed. What’s the threshold for when Meta gets all het up?
 
1 and above.
 
Can piranhas ever count as ankle-biters?
 
Can alligators ever count as anything but ass-biters?
@MattЭллен Peter brings up a good point here, but I am not enough of an expert on r-droppers (arguably, r-movers :) to say. I assume you are One of Them; if so, what might be your perception of the matter? Do you swap in phonemic length for a dropped r? Reminds me of how some Spanish speakers swap in phonemic aspiration (actually, an open vowel for a close one) for a dropped s in the same syllabic-final position. Hm.
While phonemic vowel lengths are clearly dead in AmE, are they really dead in BrE? It seems to me (although I'm not an expert) that in some dialects, length is the main distinction between bid and beard, between shed and shared, and between tusk and task. — Peter Shor 18 mins ago
@PeterShor I actually wondered that, and was wondering whether someone might bring it up. It seems possible that non-rhotic speakers mark r-deletion by adding length, but I am no expert on such folk, since for me, such speakers in the Am. South sound like they are actually adding a new “uh” syllable, which changes the equation. About tusk/task, I am unsure that is an actual length distinction even for those on the other side of the TRAP/BATH split. Seem like height is involved, too. — tchrist 13 mins ago
Wow, Barrie actually looked for a dupe!
 
Not last I checked, no.
2
A: Why does "I ain't doing nothing" translate to "I am doing nothing"?

Barrie EnglandMultiple negation has long been a feature of English. It continues to be so in nonstandard dialects, but is no longer allowed in Standard English. It isn’t a case of one negative cancelling another. Rather, the greater the number of negatives, the greater the force of the negation. If you think i...

8
A: "I ain't got no money"

Barrie EnglandMultiple negation has been a feature of English for centuries and is found in the work of at least two of the language’s most revered writers. Once again, we must blame the eighteenth century grammarians for proscribing this most natural of English constructions. Such has been their influence tha...

 
12:48 PM
We don't need no education since I can't get no satisfaction...
 
This has been asked before, but I can't locate the question. Perhaps someone else can. — Barrie England 11 mins ago
 
@RegDwighт Didn't Prof. Lawler give a definitive answer about negative concord somewhere? Or was that in a comment?
 
No idea.
 
Barrie’s search fu is not very good. I got it in one, and in fact, it was the only hit for my query.
 
At this point everyone has given a definitive answer about negative concord. Three times.
 
12:51 PM
I didn't answer none of them.
 
Morning.
 
Eventually.
 
If I can't get no satisfaction, then we don't need no education.
and vice versa...
 
A double negative is a half-assed litotes.
 
No, it isn’t.
 
12:54 PM
It's a full-assed hyperbaton.
 
It isn't not a half-assed litotes.
@RegDwighт @Matt already covered masturbation, it seems.
 
@tchrist yours asks for the name, this one asks for pronunciation.
 
I get the null set when I try to interset Lawler postings with .
 
It isn't isn't?
 
@RegDwighт Drat.
 
12:57 PM
How can it not be not true?
 
Related, but not a dupe:
14
Q: How do you correctly say large numbers

ZoredacheI saw a post on The daily What which links to a video where a person counts from 1 to 100,000. Is he saying a large portion of the numbers wrong? Back in high school my algebra teacher was extremely picky. If we where going to say the number 135, we would say one hundred thirty five. If a per...

Better:
4
Q: How to write decimal values in words

The KingI have 1210.802 units in a mutual fund. How do I write it in words? "One thousand two hundred and ten..." How do I write the decimal units here?

And answered by Barrie. No wonder he thought it a dupe.
 
OK, enough of this neg-head stuff. Let's only talk in positives. No negatives allowed! Negatives need not apply!
 
Police arrested two kids yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one - and let the other one off.
4
 
groan
 
ignores lame joke, builds LEGO helicopter instead
 
12:59 PM
No frogs were pithed off in the making of that joke.
 

« first day (792 days earlier)      last day (4135 days later) »