« first day (568 days earlier)      last day (4371 days later) » 

11:00 AM
@Hugo You're right. Do they want us all to help them?
 
0
Q: No one or nobody? Someone or somebody?

Olly Price Can "no one" and "nobody" be used interchangeably? If not, when is the correct time to use either one? The same but for "someone" and "somebody".

13
Q: Is there a subtle difference between "somebody" and "someone", "anybody" and "anyone"?

RegDwight ΒВBẞ8Are there any subtle differences between "somebody" and "someone", or can they be used completely interchangeably? Similarly, can you imagine a situation in which you would prefer "anybody" to "anyone" or vice versa?

 
I feel that if one is to re-invent the wheel, one had better have a clear idea of what is wrong with existing wheels.
3
But then, being on the Mockito development team, I'm biassed.
 
I, on the other hand, feel that if one is to re-invent the wheel, one had better have a clear idea of what is right with existing wheels :D
2
 
which, IMO, amounts to the same thing.
 
Me too.
Half full or half empty :D
 
11:05 AM
In any case, if they feel that they should be writing a brand new mocking framework, the first thing they might do is study the source code of the existing frameworks, just to see how others have solved the problems.
The makers of Mockito freely admit that they based their efforts on EasyMock, and endeavoured to improve upon it. They succeeded, of course.
Apart from the ghastly name.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 seems dupey enough to me
 
Frankly, I think Reg's question should be closed as a duplicate of Olly's.
 
Honestly, I think Olly's should be closed as a dupe of Frank's
 
Reg has a frightfully low accept rate, to be asking a question like that.
 
69 dude!
 
11:10 AM
Is that why he doesn't ask questions any more?
 
I doubt it :D
@DavidWallace is it inspired by the drink Mojito?
 
Partially, maybe. But it happens to mean "little gob of snot".
 
yuck! Is that NZ slang?
 
Spanish.
I just looked at Reg's most recent question. Hugo's answer is far superior to the somewhat pathetic one that has +39 votes. He deserves some upvotes.
 
11:20 AM
Their logo looks nice though (actually, I should probably say "our logo").
 
89
Q: What is the origin of ZOMG?

RegDwight ΒВBẞ8I have looked in a number of places, with contradicting results. The Urban Dictionary provides a whopping 73 "explanations", of which I will quote just a few. (Original spelling and punctuation preserved.) ZOMG is a varient of the all-too-popular acronym "OMG", meaning "Oh My God". ZOMG...

I agree :)
 
Huh, that's not the most recent one.
On the most recent one, there are barely 39 votes on everything combined. Including comments.
 
that's the highest voted
if you take time to be the inverse of the number of votes, then it's the most recent.
 
Oh, crap, sorry. I didn't realise there were different ways of sorting, or that I had picked one that was different from what I picked last time. That WAS the question that I meant though.
 
I'm partial to the "zoh my god" explanation
z is more likely to s, x, y or w because it's better
 
11:27 AM
My goodness. I contradicted God, in Reg's second-most-recent question. What was I thinking?
 
Can God contradict himself?
 
user19161
@skullpatrol Wrong verb form.
 
@ClarkKent No, he might have meant the God of aluminium drink containers.
in which case the original version of his comment was perfectly grammatical.
 
@DavidWallace heh, well you have more credence, God's not from New Zealand.
 
Upvotes welcome.
 
11:31 AM
+1
 
I'm trying to imagine saying /fʊʃ/.
 
@DavidWallace that is how it sounds when Bret from Flight of the Conchords says fish
to me, at least
 
Really?
I'm going to have to make a recording, I think.
 
yeah, but I think Canadians say aboot
they all beg to differ
 
I'm trying to imagine if God can create an aluminium drink can that he can not contract.
 
I'll have to listen in a couple of hours - no sound at work
 
Why do work places not allow sound?
 
@skullpatrol No, an omnipotent being cannot create a can that an omnipotent being cannot contract. There's no such thing.
 
oh, mine does, but I prefer not to use it, plus I'd need speakers
 
I'm listening to Mario Paint right now.
 
11:38 AM
(I mean, no such thing as a can that an omnipotent being cannot contract - I don't mean no such thing as an omnipotent being).
 
@DavidWallace So he can not create a can he can not contract?
 
Nor could a woodchuck chuck wood.
 
if a wood chuck could...
 
"Omnipotent" doesn't imply ability to do the logically impossible.
For example, God cannot create a square circle. Nor can He make 12 into a prime number.
He CAN however create purple unicorns - this is not logically impossible.
(Although, I suppose, if every person in the world suddenly sprouted an extra thumb, then 12 would represent a prime number; but that's not what I meant).
 
user19161
@reg Did you delete the diehard fan question?
 
11:50 AM
I thought we dealt with it adequately here yesterday!
 
me too
 
user19161
OP asks about it on meta. He could not read the comments.
 
@ClarkKent no.
 
My G spot broke and fell off, and now I keep getting a line of b's when I try to use it. It's very annoying.
 
user19161
Maybe we should leave it there for a couple of days so that OP can read the comments.
 
11:50 AM
OP was here in chat. I thought we answered his question.
 
We wailed and gnashed teeth.
 
user19161
My 1000 downvotes looks so nice I shan't spoil it.
 
2 mins ago, by Matt Эллен
me too
 
user19161
I wanted to stop at 900 if you recall, but 1000 is a nicer number.
 
You could try for 10000.
 
11:53 AM
@ClarkKent what kind of number is that? It ain't even round. Get to 1024 first.
 
Or 1001. Did you know that 1001 is the smallest positive integer that's divisible by 3 primes greater than 5?
 
Perhaps I did. I forgot.
 
user19161
I have a feeling that Kris sensed that I downvoted his posts so he downvotes mine now and then.
 
People don't understand the purpose of downvotes.
 
user19161
Actually, downvotes are used for revenge, it's true.
 
11:56 AM
Yes, I had one recently. In fact, I commented on it here.
 
user19161
You just need to make it not too obvious.
 
Mine failed!
 
user19161
I mean the revenge.
 
So do I.
 
user19161
I confess that I do revenge downvoting sometimes.
 
11:58 AM
I downvoted someone's answer, and commented as to why. A few hours later, my answer to the same question got downvoted, at the EXACT SAME TIME as the person whom I had downvoted earned the "critic" badge. Reg described it as "a rookie mistake". Which it is, by definition.
 
user19161
But as I have resolved not to downvote anymore, revenge downvoting is impossible.
 
No it's not.
All you have to do is show up here, say XYZ deserves a downvote, and someone will rush to the rescue.
Good night everyone.
 
user19161
@DavidWallace Night.
 
user19161
I love pinging people to sleep.
 
CU @DavidWallace
 
user19161
12:01 PM
I am thinking, if I say I slept with XXX, does it mean sex was involved?
 
user19161
I could just be lying on the bed beside XXX.
 
0
A: No one or nobody? Someone or somebody?

Stefana FrateanSomeone refers to a specific person we have in mind, while somebody is more general (it could be any of the persons). The same applies for no one and nobody.

Is this actually true?
The other answer says basically the same thing.
 
user19161
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 I disagree with the answer.
 
user19161
In fact I am not even sure what the answer means.
 
user19161
Now I feel like asking my sleep with question on the main site. It will hit the MC!
 
12:05 PM
Both answers are completely wrong.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 No, I don't think so.
 
user19161
Any comments on sleep with???
 
"I sleep with X" only implies sex when X is a person
and only then when it is normal for those two people to have sex
 
user19161
Suppose now you come over and sleep in the same bed as me. I can also say I slept with Matt?
 
Advice please folks.
 
12:08 PM
"I sleep with my brother" does not imply sex
 
Fumblefingers has downvoted my "please yourself" answer. Can I post a link to prove him wrong, if the target of that link is inappropriate? If not, how should I approach this?
 
how is it inappropriate?
 
I haven't clicked on it yet, but the title is "how to please yourself down there".
It's a Youtube video.
 
user19161
@DavidWallace To me, my answer says it all. Please just means give pleasure.
 
I'm not expecting it to refer to the South Island.
 
12:10 PM
@DavidWallace I would go for it. I agree with you.
 
user19161
It can be used in any context, usually not sexual, but sexual is certainly permissible.
 
And in answer to "sleep with", Clark, if you said you slept with Matt, this would definitely mean that sex was involved.
 
you're talking about masturbation, so it is appropriate
 
user19161
@DavidWallace lol
 
12:11 PM
The parent of a small child could say something like "I slept with my son last night because he wouldn't stop crying".
 
user19161
I really feel like posting on main now!
 
But this is just about the only context I can think of where "slept with" doesn't imply sex.
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 Jawohl!
 
@MattЭллен You're just trying to get me banned, aren't you! I was hoping @Reg would answer my inquiry, so I could say "a moderator said...", but never mind.
 
I'm Reg's sockpuppet :D
 
12:15 PM
Um what now?
Sorry was busy commenting.
 
@MattЭллен Is that his hand up your arse?
 
@DavidWallace The modern lingo is "co-sleep" precisely to avoid that implication.
 
Pfft, people would look at me funny if I said that!
 
@DavidWallace I can't bend that far to look!
 
@DavidWallace go ahead post it. Add "NSFW" if you must.
YouTube already has all kinds of nazi filters in place. If they let it be, then it's perfectly appropriate.
 
12:16 PM
It's OK. I reached a mature decision by myself. But everyone's input here is appreciated.
And good morning, @KitFox.
 
Morning!
 
@RegDwightΒВBẞ8 But you are one of said filters, oh Owley One.
 
Time to go!
 
later
 
I am so confused. @Reg, can you explain what happened here?
Didn't this question get migrated to Writers a thousand years ago?
Why am I being notified that I earned a badge on it when it is deleted?
 
12:23 PM
@KitFox Shh! He'll take away your badge.
 
I'm guessing Writers migrated it back or something?
 
Haha, maybe there's a Lazarus badge.
 
Looks like Reg's edit on one of my old questions yesterday earned me yet another badge, too.
 
http://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/3082/how-can-i-reword-this-sentence-such-that-it-is-not-as-redundant
migrated from english.stackexchange.com Jun 11 '11 at 23:34
closed as off topic by Neil Fein♦ 22 hours ago
 
The universe can be kind.
@Hugo Why do I always misread that man's name? I keep expecting the singer from Crowded House to show up.
 
12:30 PM
@Hugo Well, that's annoying.
But thanks.
 
I can't see Kit's association to this question, other than in Cerby's comment.
 
That's because my answer is deleted.
In fact, all the answers on EL&U are deleted and only one answer on Writers remains.
 
So you got a badge for a question getting deleted in which you had a deleted answer. Intriguing.
 
Well, I think when Writers closed it, it must have reverted to EL&U sort of.
 
I never quite understood the purpose of badges. They seem to be awarded for the most random things.
 
12:34 PM
Since I had over 10 votes on it, I got a badge even though it was deleted.
 
I bet there's some orphaned row in some database somewhere.
 
I can see the deleted answer here: english.stackexchange.com/a/29291/9001
 
@KitFox But only the first ten were displayed, right?
 
At most, yes.
 
At most! Of course - that answer is by far the best.
I would upvote it too if I could.
 
12:36 PM
looks archly @David
 
But Reg deleted at least one answer manually.
 
I am being sincere. I used to be a TW, and it didn't occur to me when I saw the question.
 
A what now?
 
technical writer
 
12:38 PM
@Hugo David doesn't have the reps to see deleted answers.
@DavidWallace Oh, I see. Yes, I still am frequently and I value concision.
 
It's OK. I shall take everyone's word for it that you posted the answer with "at most".
@KitFox and that's a word I've never heard before.
 
Conciseness.
 
Oh, I'm not asking it's meaning; it was kind of obvious. It seems really quaint. TIL.
And NZOD has it, so I shan't accuse you of regionalism.
 
You could try
"Only the first ten entries of the table will be displayed."
Or if you want to make sure the reader knows that fewer than ten are possible you could write
"At most, the first ten entries of the table will be displayed."
That's the gist of my answer.
@DavidWallace Oh really? And here I thought I made it up.
 
+1 then.
@KitFox Now, I honestly can't tell whether you're being ironic.
 
12:41 PM
The rest was a war over whether I was conveying less information than the OP had in his sentence.
@DavidWallace No, I'm serious. I thought I made it up.
brb
 
I always imagine BRB standing for "bathroom break". Of course, I know it doesn't.
 
In that case, yes.
 
Good. Yours?
 
Yes, really good. Of course, they're both asleep, bless them.
 
12:46 PM
What time is it there? Is it tomorrow already?
 
@DavidWallace When I first saw "OH: [something stupid]", I thought of OH = "other half". Why are all these people telling us all the really stupid things their partners said?
 
Yes, it's tomorrow. Quarter to one actually.
And winter, of course :-)
 
Damn literacy teachers who don't capitalize or use punctuation. shakes head I am just going to have to home school my children.
 
There's something to be said for it. Two days ago, I wrote a slightly rude letter to my son's Spanish teacher. She has no idea how to pronounce anything in Spanish.
 
@DavidWallace What would be the difference between "concision" and "conciseness"?
 
12:49 PM
I learned German with a thick Southern drawl.
 
I think the school thought that because she has taught French in the past, she must be able to teach Spanish. But the fact that she didn't even learn to bother the basics of pronunciation points to a real attitude problem. And this woman has been teaching since the beginning of time. I mean, she taught my older sister, back in the day.
This woman says "Roe yoe" for rojo.
 
user19161
@KitFox Wow, you truly are the expert on all sleep matters!
 
@KitFox I assume you mean Southern USA, not Southern Germany.
 
@DavidWallace I don't think they drawl in Southern Germany, do they? In any case, there's only one South.
 
Hehehe, of course.
 
12:57 PM
@ClarkKent Perhaps. I co-slept with my eldest, but the youngest preferred to sleep on his own.
 
But just so long as you don't start calling it "South America", I don't mind.
 
That reminds me, you also hear "sharing sleep."
 
user19161
@DavidWallace I thought you had gone to bed. Did you come back because someone was wrong on the internet?
 
Sounds nicer and a little less technical.
@ClarkKent Hahaha. Good one.
 
user19161
@KitFox Or we can simply say "I slept beside Matt last night".
 
12:58 PM
@ClarkKent I think I did, actually. Two someones. I commented on it at the time.
@ClarkKent Interesting that you always use Matt as your example.
 
Or "I snuggled with my schmoopy last night."
 
@KitFox That actually sounds like a soft toy, not a person.
 
user19161
@DavidWallace Well, I am not gay, in case you suspect.
 
snickers
 
54 mins ago, by David Wallace
Both answers are completely wrong.
 

« first day (568 days earlier)      last day (4371 days later) »