« first day (741 days earlier)      last day (4184 days later) » 
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 00:00

12:05 AM
The bumblebees are of the genus Bombus. I wonder what they have to do with firefighters?
 
12:17 AM
Ok, I give up: what the heck is a bumfuzzle? Well, or how does one bumfuzzle something, if a verb?
I do so need to get DARE.
> Thanks to DARE, we will always know that a “gospel bird” once meant a chicken, “long sugar” was molasses, a “toad-strangler” (a.k.a. “duck-drownder,” “belly-washer” or “cob-floater”) was a heavy rainstorm and “Old Huldy” was the sun.
> At a “waistline party,” mentioned in African-American circles, the price of admission corresponded to a reveler’s girth; at a “toe social,” a mid-20th- century term, women draped in sheets were picked as partners on the basis of their feet. (Presumably they then danced together uninhibitedly, or “fooped.”) In the 1950s, a man from the Ozarks might say his pregnant wife was “teemin’” or “with squirrel”—but not if she was around to hear him.
Sorry Jasper, but as the missus is with squirrel, she won’t be joinin’ usuns.
> Those fluffy bits beneath the bed, for instance, are dust kitties (Northeast), dust bunnies (Midwest), house moss (South) or woolies (Pennsylvania). A potluck is a tureen dinner in upstate New York or, in the Midwest, a pitch-in or scramble dinner. Almost a whole page of DARE is dedicated to “wampus,” a Southern term for a variety of real creatures (such as a wild horse) and imagined ones, such as swamp wampuses and whistling wampuses.
That, ’twould appear, is a wumpus.
Also known as a wampus.
Ooh ooh ooh! They have a quiz!
 
@tchrist Unseasonably warm, yes.
Today 17 °F above the mean.
 
12:37 AM
I’ve just learned that somehow who plays unscientific whist is known as a bumblepupper or bumblepuppist. Now, what the devil is unscientific whist? Somebody who can’t count tricks?
@MετάEd I get a Not Found.
 
@tchrist Well, I'm sure that I typed an apostrophe. So. shrugs
@tchrist I said no such thing, you silly person.
 
@KitFox Regarding that, it appears that the software has a broken algorithm for converting ASCII into curly quotes.
@KitFox And regarding that, it sure looked that way to me. BTW, I can’t find any actual examples for “Seamus’ writings”, nor, alas, for any possessive use of Seamus that way. I should think it would always have been Seamus’s, since otherwise it sounds like you have someone named Shama, or if non-rhotic, Shamer. I think that might have been a problem.
 
1:28 AM
@MετάEd Your wumpus has mysteriously resolved. My DNS seems to have been whacked out.
 
@tchrist Should've whacked out your DNA instead. Then you could be in the X-Men.
 
@Robusto Well, I did spend my junior year in college abroad.
 
I spent my junior year in a broad.
 
1:55 AM
@MετάEd we're at $2.97 today.
@Robusto rimshot
 
@cornbreadninja Nah, it wasn't kinky like that.
 
@Robusto oh, more like Fantastic Voyage?
 
@cornbreadninja No. Just no rimshots.
I suggest you look up the alternate meanings on Urban Dictionary.
 
@Robusto OIC.
@Robusto that's rim job. :P
 
Also rimshot.
@cornbreadninja That's the correct emoticon, BTW.
 
2:01 AM
@Robusto followed by :d
 
That's "licking the alphabet" for sure.
 
 
6 hours later…
8:18 AM
Hello.
Video of the world's oldest working computer restored, from 1949.
It looks cool. And it's decimal, not binary based!
It can hold several numbers in memory at once!
And it has cool lights.
And it makes fantastic clicking sounds.
 
8:45 AM
Distribution of Android versions over time.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:21 AM
What's with the typos questions today?
 
Are you saying I'm a typos question?
 
I am saying it can be see that you are as could as ice.
@Cerberus they started with five versions simultaneously? The first one never getting any traction at all?
 
@RegDwighт plugs ears
@RegDwighт Well...what do you think?
 
Also, nobody likes honeycombs. Ice cream sandwiches, on the other hand!
 
Presumably the history of Android goes back further than the graph shows.
 
10:26 AM
@Cerberus I think that the graph is rubbish, that's what I think.
 
@RegDwighт Yes, ICS is cool.
@RegDwighт Wai?
 
Because:
33 secs ago, by Cerberus
Presumably the history of Android goes back further than the graph shows.
 
They probably measured user agents on some website.
Which is known to be unreliable.
 
Yeah.
I still get hits with IE 4.0.
 
But it will give us some impression.
Hits?
Oh, on your website.
 
10:27 AM
Yes. Wrong impression is also an impression.
 
Well, those may be real.
@RegDwighт Well, other sources seem to indicate somewhat similar distributions.
 
@Cerberus on my site they may indeed. It will work in Netscape 4.4.
 
Yay.
 
But that's beside the point.
The point is not that if someone visits my site with NS4 it will work; the point is what the heck is he doing visiting my site with NS4?
He probably can't even Google in it. AltaVista might work, but I'm not so sure.
@Cerberus also, why the hell do Cupcake, Donut, and Froyo have brackets? What for, pray tell.
Not to mention the X axis, which is labeled in a most dumb way; you can smell the graph was made by a geek with no knowledge of graphs.
 
@RegDwighт Long live Altavista! I used that all the time.
In 1999.
 
10:32 AM
Yeah. All the time, for small values of all.
 
@RegDwighт Looks neater that way.
Now you know that, say, Froyo and ICS are equals, not one a header and the other an instance, or whatever.
 
What?
I'm not following.
He even uses hyphens for dashes.
And the justification of ICS is horrible.
Verdict: he cannot pass.
 
Then go and break your silly staff, if that rocks your boat bridge.
 
I'm not in a hurry. It's not like he can fly away or something.
 
11:11 AM
Well, do you know what he looks like?
He may have—let's call them umbratic protuberances.
 
I don't understand the graph. It says 100% of people use version 1.1. that can't be true, because some people are using something that isn't 1.1
Hello!
 
You know very well that is a cumulative graph...
 
11:29 AM
so?
what does that mean?
it's still at 100%
how can it be at 100% when no one has it anymore? cumulative doesn't make sense
what is it 100% of?
the chart doesn't make sense.
cumulative means "how much so far" it's not at 100% so far
 
The percentages do not point to single versions: how could they? There are no lines.
 
so what is the y axis for?
 
So 100 % means the aggregate of all the OS versions under it.
 
Surely you have seen graphs like this before?
 
11:41 AM
maybe
I don't recall
without labels it doesn't make sense
@Cerberus there are lots of lines. they go all over the place.
 
No meaningful lines.
Only bands.
So you can't say "1.1 is 100 %" just because the upper boundary is at 100 %.
In any case, I know what you mean, but context is implied, and these kinds of graphs are fairly common...
 
fairly uncommon everywhere else but where you are, apparently
 
yep. I can't read that one either, without the y axis label
 
The fact that there are coloured bands indicates that the percentages are cumulative.
Otherwise, you would use lines, not bands.
 
11:48 AM
ok, if you say so
 
The label is the same as the title.
 
I don't read "Cumulative percentage of GDP" in the title
anyway. band graphs are news to me. they seem stupid.
 
These kinds of graphs are not really meant for reading individual values (like the percentage for discretionary spending in 1991), because you can't read those.
@MattЭллен How else to present a cumulative graph?
 
don't
it doesn't tell me anything I want to know, like how much the net interest was
 
But they can give you a quick overview.
 
11:51 AM
not if they don't make any sense
 
@MattЭллен Indeed not.
But is that what you want to know?
 
it tells me that the net interest was close to 25
which it wasn't
 
The purpose of such graphs is to easily estimate which kind of spending makes up the largest part at any given time.
And nothing else.
 
I suppose
 
In a graph where the total is always 100 %, the above is all that you can use it for.
In a graph like the spending graph, you can also read the total spending in all three categories combined.
So you should only use such graphs if a quick historical overview of proportions is what you want to provide.
If you want people to be able to read actual values of the components, then you need to use another type of graph, with (intersecting) lines—but then you lose the advantage of the quick proportional overview.
So it depends on what you want.
 
11:55 AM
Is it correct ?: "It is my fault, I change the words meaning. I can't imagine how hard to manage thousand of students."
 
@Cerberus Yes. sorry, I was very frustrated by the chart. I'm better now.
 
@MattЭллен Haha it's OK.
It wasn't my chart.
@flatronka Hmm sorry, but no.
What do you mean by "I change the words meaning"?
 
yeah I wan to apologise because I change 2 words meaning application and nomination
my story: I write a letter where I use application instead of nomination and application instead of application. Now I want to apologise
 
"I used the wrong word", "I swapped two words", "I got two words confused".
And the second sentence is wrong.
"I can't imagine how hard it is to manage" and "a thousand" or "thousands".
 
I agree with Reg (obviously).
 
12:05 PM
thank you
 
12:49 PM
Hola.
 
Morning.
 
I must have a door in the back of my head.
 
Why do you say that?
 
Maybe he's having a Malcovich moment
 
12:54 PM
@MattЭллен That's what I was thinking.
 
Malkovich.
 
Milky witch
 
Speaking of milky witches, how's the story coming?
 
> I'm thinkin' blah-de-blah-blah-blah to your trip.
 
@KitFox Pretty good. I'm trying to write about what happened in the missing 8 hours. How's yours coming?
 
12:57 PM
Someone's writing a story about milky witches?
 
well, ghosts
 
Do they make those with the same process used to make milk chocolate?
 
@MattЭллен Surprisingly good, except I realized that her sister's going to get whacked in the next scene.
It's very upsetting.
 
@KitFox :( nothing can save her?
 
They don't even see it coming.
 
12:58 PM
@Robusto similar, only with more cats
 
Because I sure didn't.
 
:D
Well, what's got to be's got to be.
 
Just goes to show my gut reaction toward sibling closeness.
 
That you're upset?
 
That I'm extremely anxious about bad things happening to them.
Well, to one of them anyway.
It is freezing in my house this morning. WTF?
I guess the stove must have gone out last night because it is about 60 degrees in here.
 
1:03 PM
lets hope it wasn't stove in
 
It's not stove up, don't be silly.
How would that happen?
Someone break into our house and hit it with a sledgehammer a few times?
 
with some sort of brute force
 
Want eggs?
Coffee?
 
or someone's coffee was laced with hallucinogens that caused you to have some sort of out of body experience or something.
 
Sorry I have no bacon.
 
1:08 PM
I have bacon.
 
Eggs sound good!
 
Fried? Scrambled? Um...poached?
 
@MattЭллен Eggs don't make any sound. They have to turn into chickens first.
 
fried!
 
I've got one here. How do you like them, easy or hard?
Wow. That sounded completely wrong.
 
1:10 PM
easy, with toast
 
In a lesson about Knowledge and Wisdom the author says, "We are told on Sundays that we should love our neighbour as ourselves. On the other 6 days of the week, we are exhorted to hate him. You may say that it is nonsense since it's not our neighbour whom we are exhorted to hate. But you will remember that the precept was exemplified by saying that the Samaritan was our neighbour." -- Does the bible say something like this?
 
@KitFox it's OK, you weren't talking about sausages
 
I like mine scrambled hard with ketchup.
@its_me You might check the Christianity room.
 
@KitFox I actually want the meaning of the sentence if anyone knows
 
which sentence?
 
1:12 PM
Is the author saying that by urging ourselves to love our neighbour on sunday, we are thereby pressing ourselves to hate him on the other days?
 
@its_me It means "don't be a hypocrite."
 
@its_me that's not a sentence, it's a passage, or extract.
 
@MattЭллен :P
 
Don't go to church and glorify Jesus by saying how much you love your neighbor and then spend the rest of the week persecuting others because they are not of your faith or don't do things the way you would.
That's what it means, as far as I can tell.
Or as near as I can tell.
 
okay
 
1:13 PM
@its_me the more accurate your question, the more accurate the answers
 
@MattЭллен (below)
> Is the author saying that by urging ourselves to love our neighbour on sunday, we are thereby pressing ourselves to hate him on the other days?
 
> Does the bible say something like this?
> I actually want the meaning of the sentence if anyone knows
@its_me if you'd said that first, it would have taken less effort on all our parts
 
@MattЭллен Since it says "Sundays" I thought it's related to Christians
 
Yeah. "Love thy neighbor" is a Christian tenet.
 
@MattЭллен Will do that next time, sorry for the trouble
 
1:16 PM
@its_me no worries :D
 
@KitFox Ah, okay
 
The problem, of course, comes when one can't tell between love and stalking
 
hehe!
 
There's a difference?
 
Well, I didn't want to say anything...
People tend to let the restraining orders speak for themselves
 
1:21 PM
Oh, is that what those are about?
 
Stalking is when two people go on a nice, long, romantic walk together, but only one of them knows about it.
 
Hahaha
Laundry, dishes, drywall, pies, lasagna.
 
, writing
 
, getting the kids somewhere to run around.
Damn it.
Maybe my friend wants to bring her kids over.
 
@KitFox or maybe your friend wants to watch your kids
 
1:31 PM
She'll take the eldest on occasion, but that wouldn't help today. I'd have to drop him off, so I'd lose 40 minutes and then I'd be stuck entertaining the youngest.
 
or maybe you should set up an elaborate experiment where some of the kids are gaolers and some are inmates, and have your friend monitor the behaviour to see what develops...
 
Maybe i'll give them cake.
 
sounds easier, I'll grant you that
but it won't give me time to catch you up
 
Actually it probably would.
 
@KitFox Actually, “Love thy neighbor” is Judaic, and appears in many other cultures. “Love thy enemy” is a Christian tenet. It is . . . different.
 
1:35 PM
shrugs Whatever. It's all Greek to me. I suggested he ask in the Xianity room anyway.
 
haha, so my wife changed cell phones a week ago, and her old one finally ran down its battery and then did it's "vibrate and beep" song and dance to alert the inside of the desk drawer that it was shutting down.
It was a bit startling.
 
@tchrist And since I wasn't the one asking and I don't care, you might direct your comment to @its_me.
 
@tchrist are you sure? kingjbible.com/mark/12.htm
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 why do they do that? Using a bajillion battery points to tell me the battery is almost dead is not a good plan.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 That's funny. You know how batteries spontaneously discharge when they are dying? About a week after my dad died, one of his battery-powered fire engine toys started going off in the middle of the night. It freaked us all out.
 
1:39 PM
@MattЭллен yeah I dunno.
 
also, yeah, it makes me jump a mile
 
@its_me You are better off asking in the Christianity room.
 
@KitFox I was only providing some clarification. Anyway...
 
@KitFox THAT's odd. Actually I don't see how the battery's state should matter. The battery should be discharging whenever the rest of the circuit wants current. So something else in the toy is responsible for the noise. Maybe a poltergeist.
 
maybe something was acting like a capacitor
 
1:41 PM
@MattЭллен Esp since I didn't know this phone was on, or still charged, or even where it was. Good ol' dumbphones: battery lasts forever.
@MattЭллен Yeah that was my other theory, after "poltergeist".
 
I'll ask my husband. He'll know.
 
He's an expert in the paranormal?!?
 
Maybe they had a group hallucination!
 
He's an electrician.
shakes head You guys are weird.
I barely knew him then anyway.
 
weird, or ... interesting?
 
1:46 PM
haha, Kit calls US weird. At least we're not married to the Ghostbuster.
 
Probably Venkman. He has a way with the ladies.
 
There's something strange / in your neighbourhood / who you gonna call? / Kit's husband!
 
What’s the deal with people voting to delete questions closed as dupes? I thought we weren’t supposed to do that, so that there would be more ways to find answers. Ok, not encouraged, if you would. But still.
 
I think I've done it accidentally before. In haste, before realising it was a dupe. but only once or twice
 
1:48 PM
US electricians are experts in the paranormal? How is that different from US not-electricians?
 
@MattЭллен He was always my favorite.
 
@MattЭллен Yes, exactly. I have, too, and felt bad about it. I just wonder whether our new deleters are aware of the general SE viewpoint regarding the matter.
 
@RegDwighт You'll be shocked by the explanation.I'm not sure you have the capacity to understand it. You'll certainly resist it. Etc.
 
@tchrist yeah, that. No idea. You see a deleted dupe, bring it up here. I don't think you can flag it.
 
Hi fluffy owl friend.
 
@RegDwighт Oh, I think I could flag it if, if only I could find it. There is little you cannot flag.
 
Note that many dupes are deleted automatically. That should probably be reversed, too.
 
They are?
I had thought they must be excepted.
 
No answers, less than 100 votes, and a score of minus 1 or lower = you're killed with fire after a month.
 
That gets in the way of the many-paths thing.
 
1:52 PM
@tchrist I haven't been monitoring it closely by any means, so I dunno. But I thought I saw one or two occasionally.
I'm not camping in the "recently deleted" tab.
 
I don’t think the autodeletes show up in the recently deleted queue that I can see, do they?
Maybe they do. The Community ones do.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Oh my god, I completely forgot about the cartoon.
 
@KitFox That's a new cartoon
 
There was a meta question about it, in fact.
It's a dupe.
So QED.
 
1:53 PM
And dead.
 
@MattЭллен No, it's from the 80s
 
Now let's see if the deleted queue goes that far back.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 but the 80s one had venkman, spangler, ray and winston. No gorilla, purple chick, ray and blond guy
 
The tab says 30 days. And actually it only goes back 2 days. So we'll have to check some other time.
 
@MattЭллен No, this was Filmation's Ghostbusters. The Ghostbusters movie licensed the name from them, and after the movie was released, Filmation made a new cartoon. The Venkman/Spengler/etc one was called "The Real Ghostbusters"
 
1:57 PM
@MattЭллен Permission denied. But I notice the URL says TV Tropes. I would thus like to thank God for denying permission to access TV Tropes.
 
The tab is the last 50, up to 30 days old. If there are 50 over the last hour, those are all it shows. Right?
 
Guess so.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 oh! well that never made it to the UK :D
 
@MattЭллен btw I get "referral denied" for that image
 
well, I can't edit it...
 
1:58 PM
I’m not sure why those queues have no “next 50” button.
 
Ghostbusters (later called Filmation's Ghostbusters) is an animated television series created by Filmation and distributed by Tribune Broadcasting and launched following the success of Ivan Reitman and Columbia Pictures' 1984 film Ghostbusters. It ran from September 8 to December 5, 1986 in daytime syndication and produced 65 episodes. The cartoon was based on a live-action television show from 1975 titled The Ghost Busters. It is not to be confused with the animated show The Real Ghostbusters, which was based on the 1984 film Ghostbusters. Columbia Pictures had to obtain the rights to ...
 
I undeleted it, but I guess it will be autodeleted again in thirty days.
Or sooner.
Sooner in point of fact. The script runs every week.
 
Well . . . I bet locking it stops that. Or at least, I should hope it would.
But it doesn’t really merit a lock.
But we use what tools are available, I guess.
 
It doesn't merit an upvote, either. But that's what the system invites us to do. Upvote crap dupes.
 
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 00:00

« first day (741 days earlier)      last day (4184 days later) »