« first day (449 days earlier)      last day (450 days later) » 
01:00 - 10:0010:00 - 15:00

1:55 AM
@snailboat No, but...that pattern is a bit scary.
Like poisonous frogs in the jungle, it screams "poison!" at me.
And like the conus marmoreus.
 
Anonymous
2:10 AM
@Cerberus Oh, yes! Aposematism!
 
Anonymous
I think it's an albino banana slug.
 
Anonymous
It is true that you shouldn't try to eat a banana slug.
 
Anonymous
They used to be used, I think, as an oral anesthetic, because their slime numbs the mouth of predators to make it hard to eat them
 
Anonymous
I don't think they're poisonous exactly, but if you lick one your tongue will go numb. :-)
 
@snailboat Exactly!
@snailboat Ohh that's pretty cool.
Touching is OK?
I think touching some of those frogs is not OK?
 
 
2 hours later…
Anonymous
3:56 AM
@Cerberus You should probably keep your distance from wild banana slugs. They could have parasites
 
Serious guys at Cornell!
 
yep
 
That kind of thing is what PhD is for.
> A 2005 study led by Margo Lillie, a doctor of zoology at the University of British Columbia, concluded that tipping a cow would require an exertion of 2,910 newtons (654.2 lbf) of force,[4] and is therefore impossible to perform by a single person. Her calculations found that it would take at least two people to apply enough force to push over a cow if the cow does not react and reorient its footing. If the cow does react, it would take at least four people to push it over.
:D
 
LOL
 
Anonymous
4:50 AM
I have a lot of anxiety right now because the fire alarm went off
 
Anonymous
It said to me in people words "HOUSE IS ON FIRE"
 
Anonymous
In addition to beeping at me.
 
> You need to draw "red line" with transparent ink. -- Wow!
 
Anonymous
I checked pretty thoroughly over the last half hour, and I'm pretty sure neither the interior nor exterior of the house is on fire.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. What?
 
4:51 AM
@snailboat It's from the sketch above.
How is your house now?!
 
Anonymous
I can't watch. I'm too busy being in a house that is not on fire.
 
Yes, I just read your messages.
 
Anonymous
I checked everywhere, checked everything that's plugged in
 
Anonymous
Finally I felt silly going in circles around the house, so I watered the lawn a second time
 
Did you check your roof?
 
Anonymous
4:53 AM
@skullpatrol Thank you for the link :-)
 
Anonymous
The roof is not on fire either.
 
Anonymous
Also, the alarm went off on its own only moments after starting.
 
Hmm... a false alarm, maybe.
 
Anonymous
I'm not used to false alarms.
 
Anonymous
I wonder what caused it.
 
4:57 AM
@snailboat I'm glad you liked it :-)
The video is too funny :D
 
If there were something really on fire when the alarm went off half an hour ago, you should have seen it by now, I think.
Is there anything smelling wrong in your house?
 
Anonymous
No
 
6:06 AM
hi @xiaodongjie
 
xiaodongjie can't talk back, I think.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. You can add users to the write access list, if you like.
 
I can?
 
Anonymous
Yes, since you're a room owner.
 
Anonymous
But in this case it's not necessary. The 20 reputation requirement is network-wide.
 
Anonymous
6:12 AM
You don't need to have 20 reputation specifically on ELL.
 
Oh, it's network-wide. I thought it's ELL specific. Thanks for the info.
 
6:25 AM
> "Stop making that noise" would be more appropriate in reference to a specific sound.
I agree that it's appropriate, but I don't like to be stopped.
> Let's make some noise.
:D
 
@snailboat Oh, what kind?
 
┏(--)┛┗(-- )┓┗(--)┛┏(--)┓
 
Hi.
 
Hi @Cerberus
I don't have slugs in my garden.
 
I don't have a garden...
 
6:27 AM
But I know that there are some snails.
It's a really, really small garden. :D
We can walk across my garden in 6 steps. :D
 
Anonymous
@Cerberus Angiostrongylus cantonensis
 
Anonymous
Of course, just touching a banana slug isn't going to give you meningitis, so you could touch banana slugs if you really wanted to.
 
Anonymous
But the slugs aren't likely to enjoy being touched, anyway!
 
Anonymous
7:27 AM
I had to clean my snail cage a couple days ago
 
Anonymous
Three of my snails made it really easy for me to put them in a jar. But Dot doesn't let me pick her up.
 
Anonymous
And of course, when I put her in the jar, the first thing she did was climb to the edge of the jar and try to get out
 
Anonymous
Then when the cage was ready, and I put the jar in the cage, she refused to leave the jar
 
Perhaps because she is the youngest. :-)
 
Anonymous
Silly snails.
 
7:29 AM
My UHT milk smells weird. Is this drinkable!?
 
Anonymous
What is UHT milk?
 
Don't drink anything weird in whichever way.
Sterilized?
 
Anonymous
I looked it up on Wikipedia.
 
Ultra-high temperature processing, (less often) ultra-heat treatment (both abbreviated UHT), or ultra-pasteurization is the sterilization of food by heating it for an extremely short period, around 1–2 seconds, at a temperature exceeding 135°C (275°F), which is the temperature required to kill spores in milk. The most common UHT product is milk, but the process is also used for fruit juices, cream, soy milk, yogurt, wine, soups, honey, and stews. High heat during the UHT process can cause Maillard browning and change the taste and smell of dairy products. UHT milk has a typical shelf l...
 
Anonymous
Ultra-high temperature processing, (less often) ultra-heat treatment (both abbreviated UHT), or ultra-pasteurization is the sterilization of food by heating it for an extremely short period, around 1–2 seconds, at a temperature exceeding 135°C (275°F), which is the temperature required to kill spores in milk. The most common UHT product is milk, but the process is also used for fruit juices, cream, soy milk, yogurt, wine, soups, honey, and stews. High heat during the UHT process can cause Maillard browning and change the taste and smell of dairy products. UHT milk has a typical shelf l...
 
Anonymous
7:30 AM
Jinx!
 
Oops. Haha
 
Anonymous
> High heat during the UHT process can cause Maillard browning and change the taste and smell of dairy products.[3]
 
Oh, it's ultra-pasteurized!
 
Anonymous
I guess we don't have UHT milk here, really.
 
Anonymous
That's fine by me. I don't drink any sort of milk.
 
7:31 AM
Hah!
Probably true.
 
Really? Milk is good.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, really. I don't have the lactase production persistence gene.
 
Soy milk is a good alternative.
 
Anonymous
I'm not sure why I would need an alternative.
 
Anonymous
I have water and tea! :-)
 
Anonymous
7:32 AM
And on rare occasions, fruit juice.
 
Perhaps you don't need it. I just offered it, though. -- sobbing
 
Anonymous
But generally speaking, I don't need sugar water.
 
Sugar can ruin your health.
 
Anonymous
True.
 
Anonymous
Well, since I can't metabolize lactose, consuming it would mostly cause short-term unpleasantness
 
Anonymous
7:34 AM
Without production of lactase persisting into adulthood, you can't break down the sugars in milk, and so your gut flora, normally in balance, feed on it and reproduce out of control, causing an infection
 
Anonymous
Which has various undesirable effects.
 
Anonymous
You can take lactase tablets if you really want to consume milk anyway!
 
Hah!
 
I thought every human can drink milk happily ;(
 
Anonymous
Pretty much, yeah. When they're babies.
 
Anonymous
7:36 AM
After all, that's when it makes sense to drink milk.
 
Anonymous
There's no reason for an adult to drink milk. But you can.
 
Anonymous
If you don't have one of the lactase persistence genes, then your lactase production will slowly fall off as you age
 
Anonymous
And over time, it'll become more and more noticeable
 
Anonymous
When I was a teenager, milk still agreed with me, though I rarely had it since I think milk is gross.
 
Lots of people claim that it can help make your bones stronger.
 
Anonymous
7:38 AM
But now I'm 32 and having even a small quantity of milkshake murders my innards.
 
My mom and dad seem to be able to drink it just fine.
 
Anonymous
Yes, there's a lot of milk-related marketing
 
Me too.
 
Anonymous
@Fantasier Good for you! Maybe you'll be able to drink it into adulthood without a problem
 
Anonymous
A lot of people can.
 
7:39 AM
But not as much as I used to.
 
Anonymous
The genes in questions have developed independently in different populations around the world...
 
> CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support the hypothesis that higher consumption of milk or other food sources of calcium by adult women protects against hip or forearm fractures.
Jumping to the conclusion is what I do. :-)
 
I drink it just because it's tasty. I don't really care about benefits. :P
 
7:43 AM
> Caffeine and alcohol intake were not associated with hip fracture risk. Some of the results of this study were unanticipated and may be due to chance or bias. If confirmed by other studies, these results would challenge some current approaches to hip fracture prevention.
@Fantasier Oh! Which flavor of the milk that you like, then?
 
Anonymous
@Fantasier That's about the same reason I don't drink it.
 
Anonymous
I think milk is really gross.
 
Anonymous
But I think some milkshakes are tasty. Don't ask me to reconcile these judgments--they're my gut reactions, not something rational I can explain :-)
 
Anonymous
But I can only have a very small amount of milkshake, maybe a tenth of a glass, even with lactase pills.
 
@DamkerngT. Just plain milk with no artificial flavour. I prefer pasteurized one to UHT.
 
Anonymous
7:45 AM
So I never get or make a milkshake myself, but sometime I steal a little bit of someone else's. :-)
 
I see. Plain milk is the best.
 
Anonymous
Plain meaning from a cow?
 
Yup.
 
Anonymous
I also think ice cream sandwiches are tasty.
 
Anonymous
But they're really terrible for you so I don't eat them.
 
7:46 AM
They are!
 
Anonymous
Or ice cream, really.
 
@GATA This might be interesting for you: books.google.com/ngrams/…
 
Why is any point of doing missing? Or there's no match?
 
Oh, I forgot it!
 
Anonymous
No you didn't. It's in the query field.
 
7:48 AM
Strange.
 
Anonymous
Having no results doesn't surprise me, though I thought Google showed a message explaining when that happened.
 
> Ngrams not found: any point of doing
 
Anonymous
I wouldn't be surprised if the few results for any point doing had false positives: "Was the suspect at any point doing anything suspicious?"
 
nods
 
Anonymous
I'm going to click through to some of the results, though unfortunately the graphs always give different data than the raw book searches...
 
Anonymous
7:50 AM
I'm curious to see where "any point to do" showed up
 
Anonymous
A-ha! "...deemed it necessary at any point to do so"
 
Anonymous
Kind of like my hypothetical example for "any point doing"
 
Anonymous
False positives all around.
 
nods (again)
 
hi guys
 
7:51 AM
Hi!
 
Just point of doing did appear a lot though.
Hello!
 
Anonymous
Some false positives for "any point doing", but a few genuine positives, too.
 
Anonymous
So "any point in doing" is the clear and obvious winner, while "any point doing" is far behind but also a possible choice
 
Anonymous
"Any point to doing" is also possible.
 
Anonymous
But also far behind.
 
Anonymous
7:53 AM
That all squares with my intuition
 
Oh, I just have realized one thing.
 
"Is there any point in doing this?" sounds natural to me.
 
I don't know what those % in Google Ngram charts mean.
 
Anonymous
@skullpatrol Me too.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Yeah, they're a pretty silly unit of measurement.
 
Anonymous
7:55 AM
They should put them in occurrences per mil.
 
Relative to all the books, or only the books within that year?
 
@snailboat probably because I ask it a lot :-)
 
opm sounds better to me.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Numbers per year are per year.
 
Anonymous
It wouldn't make sense to do it otherwise.
 
7:57 AM
what are they using "%" for?
 
Anonymous
So, to turn theses into results per million (like everything except Google)
 
Anonymous
Divide by 100 to get rid of the %
 
Anonymous
Then multiply by a million
 
So 10 hits in a year having 1m words is about the same as 1000 hits in a year having 100m words, then?
 
% = 1/100
 
Anonymous
7:59 AM
Yeah, so 1% = 0.01, so to get rid of the percent, you divide by 100.
 
50% divide by 100?
 
Anonymous
50% = 0.5
 
Anonymous
50 / 100 = 0.5
 
nods
 
-_-
 
8:01 AM
-_-?
 
sleepy
 
I see.
 
Anonymous
z-z
 
Anonymous
Sleepy eyes.
 
some countries write 50% like this %50
 
Anonymous
8:03 AM
Where do they use that convention?
 
Huh? Do they?
 
Iran
 
Anonymous
I had occasion to point out recently that some English-speaking countries use a decimal comma
 
Anonymous
There was an answer where it was claimed that using a decimal comma instead of a decimal point was incorrect in English
 
Anonymous
Which is more or less true in many English-speaking areas, but not all. (It does correspond to something with linguistic significance: we say point here for the decimal point when reading aloud.)
 
Anonymous
8:05 AM
It's just a convention, of course, and different people can use different conventions without it being "wrong"
 
I had that a lot: 123.456.789,00
 
they switch the rolls of . and ,
 
Anonymous
@skullpatrol IIRC in South Africa they use spaces for thousand separators, so: 123 456 789,00
 
interesting
there can be confusion with $7.25.2
7 dollars and 25.2 cents
 
Is that common?
 
8:09 AM
only in calculations
 
Anonymous
Milles are fairly common in certain contexts.
 
Anonymous
They're generally written without another decimal point, since they're considered a third place beyond the decimal
 
Anonymous
Here in the US, the most common place everyone runs across them is at gas pumps. Gasoline prices usually have three digits past the decimal
 
Anonymous
Often there the mille is written as the fraction 9/10, rather than as a third place past the decimal
 
Anonymous
In other situations they're usually written as a third place, I think
 
Anonymous
8:13 AM
 
Anonymous
There you can see the prices written in normal style...
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
Here the milles are written specially.
 
Oh, 9/10s are cute!
 
Anonymous
Here I type 9/10, but I really want to type it with a vinculum.
 
Anonymous
8:14 AM
Why? Because vincula.
 
I bet that Unicode has it.
 
Anonymous
Unicode has dumb fractions.
 
Anonymous
 
No 9/10?
 
Anonymous
They have 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 in the denominator.
 
8:16 AM
Oh, I lost my bet!
 
Anonymous
I suppose you could compose one out of superscript and subscript numerals.
 
Anonymous
Although I'm not sure how you'd go about centering the 9.
 
Anonymous
Honestly, I don't know that much about Unicode. Even though at times it's been my job to know about Unicode.
 
Anonymous
Unicode is... complicated :-)
 
Anonymous
Honestly, I don't know why people assume I know stuff sometimes.
 
Anonymous
8:22 AM
At one point, it suddenly became my job to know all about databases.
 
Anonymous
Which is funny because that's totally not what I was hired for, and because I didn't actually know what I was doing. :-)
 
You should have, I think.
:D
 
Anonymous
Yeah, everyone thinks stuff like that.
 
trying to continue fighting some programs...
 
Anonymous
Well, I mean, I learned. I am capable of learning
 
8:24 AM
You sure are!
 
Anonymous
Yay me!
 
8:53 AM
> In a conversation between A and B,
A: You must've thought she (A) set me (B) up.
B: Yeah, no kidding.
Is B still thinking that A did a bad thing to her?
 
could you replace the A and B with names please?
 
I heard it on a reality show: Wife Swap or something.
A is very famous, I think, but I don't know her name.
 
say Alice
 
@skullpatrol Hi
 
I've seen her once in Donald Trump's show.
 
8:57 AM
@xiaodongjie hi
 
Anonymous
Yeah, that might be easier to parse with names inserted.
 
Say Alice and Barb, maybe.
 
@skullpatrol Sorry. I forgot you, who are you?
 
Hi @xiaodongjie
 
Fine thanks @xiaodongjie, how are you?
 
8:58 AM
@DamkerngT. Hi
 
Anonymous
Hello! Welcome to ELL chat
 
@skullpatrol fine thanks. And you?
 
@xiaodongjie Fine.
 
A was the nearest one.
I wonder about this line because the first time I watched the programme in Thai, they translated "Yeah, no kidding" as [I think]. And Thai has no tenses, so it's unclear.
By default, [I think] would imply that she still feels bad.
But judging from B's face, it was more like she had felt bad, and better now (because she knew that A did it out of A's good intention).
I noted the line, and waited until the show reruns. Now I know that B said "Yeah, no kidding" in English.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Reran, I think.
 
9:07 AM
Oh, I used it as conditional, but I thought in present tense!
Agree. It should be reran.
I expected B to say either "I thought" or "I think".
So it was a little surprise. ("No kidding" has no tense, I mean.)
 
Anonymous
Yeah, it's tenseless.
 
9:23 AM
0
Q: Must and subjunctive

AngelaI do not know whether I can use the form of must in subjunctive: The participation subjugated to the constraint that, the car must be new the car be new Must expresses the duty, but it is not a verb. Does have to have to be used ?

> The car must be new.
 
Anonymous
Must has only one form.
 
I think it's not a subjunctive in English. Maybe it is in other languages.
(Not that I know what those languages are.)
 
Anonymous
> ... the constraint that [ the car be new ]
 
Anonymous
In CGEL's analysis, that's the plain form of the verb used in a subjunctive construction
 
We still don't have a good answer to another question on English subjunctive, I think.
Out of nowhere, saying "The car be new." would sound strange.
But suppose that someone claimed "It's a subjunctive"...
I don't know if it's absolutely correct to say that "The car be new." is an incorrect usage.
 
Anonymous
9:30 AM
But must doesn't have a "plain form", so it can't appear in subjunctive constructions.
 
Anonymous
(Again, in CGEL's analysis)
 
But that doesn't mean "The car must be new." is ungrammatical, I think. It just means something else.
 
I don't think it means something else. It's just not a subjunctive construction?
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Main clause subjunctives are limited in distribution in modern English
 
Anonymous
They appear mainly in fixed phrases: "God bless you"
 
9:31 AM
Yes, what I meant was that I couldn't think of "must be" as a subjunctive.
If a native speaker insisted that "The car be new" was supposed to be grammatical, I would need to understand it as "May the car be new."
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Native speakers (and non-native speakers) can insist anything they want
 
Anonymous
But me? I don't think "The car be new" as a complete sentence is really grammatical modern English. But to resolve that, you might say not that it's ungrammatical, but that it's not modern English
 
Anonymous
We can get around quibbles like this by saying things like "not a sentence of modern English"
 
Oh! That's a nice way to put it.
 
Anonymous
"The car be new" to me, as a complete sentence, has no particular meaning.
 
Anonymous
9:35 AM
You try to repair it by inserting optative may
 
Anonymous
As in "Long live the king" = "May the king live long!"
 
nods
 
Anonymous
Which seems reasonable, but my internal parser doesn't get that far
 
Anonymous
That is, the grammar I natively acquired gives no meaning to it, even if I can try to puzzle one out intellectually
 
Anonymous
For whatever that's worth.
 
Anonymous
9:37 AM
> Must expresses the duty, but it is not a verb. Does have to have to be used ?
 
Anonymous
What?
 
Anonymous
What theory of grammar says that must is not a verb?
 
Anonymous
I'm not sure how to respond to that.
 
The question perplexed me because I think they use a completely different set of grammar from mine.
 
Theirs, apparently.
 
Anonymous
9:38 AM
Well, yes, but :-)
 
The OP's username doesn't tell anything about their L1.
Latin related, maybe.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, I'd believe that someone named Angela spoke a Romance language.
 
Anonymous
It's plausible!
 
1
Q: How to understand the preposition of " for" in "She is Miss Asia for 2006"?

user48070 How to understand the preposition of " for" in "She is Miss Asia for 2006"? Why not say "She is Miss Asia in 2006"? What's the usage of "for" here ?

I think to understand that, we need to be sure that "She is Miss Asia for 2006" is a good usage first.
My instinct tells me that it sounds odd.
Perhaps from.
Or just Miss Asia 2006.
 
Anonymous
It sounds okay.
 
9:50 AM
In 2014?
Or in 2006?
 
Anonymous
In 2006 or earlier.
 
How could we say "She is Miss Asia for 2006" in year 2000?
 
Anonymous
It would be okay as a future description too.
 
Oh, I see.
 
Anonymous
You might pick them ahead of time. Maybe the contest is rigged :-)
 
9:52 AM
You are talking about running for Miss Asia.
 
I think "She is Miss Asia in 2006" sounds weird. "She was Miss Asia in 2006" is better.
 
Yes. And I think "She is Miss Asia 2006." is more likely.
 
Anonymous
Well, I was just talking about the grammar, not the likelihood that you can say someone is Miss Asia for 2006 years ahead of time.
 
lol I see
 
Anonymous
Yeah, in the past I'd use was and in
 
9:54 AM
So that's what you mean? :D
 
Anonymous
They've given no indication that 2006 is in the past relative to speaker time
 
Anonymous
The sentence implies 2006 is not in the past
 
Suppose that it were 2014, not 2006.
> She is Miss Asia for 2014.
 
Anonymous
Uh-huh?
 
I'm not sure if it would sound okay. It sounds rather okay to me.
 
Anonymous
9:57 AM
The sentence sounds okay to me
 
Suppose that it is a good usage. Let's assume that we are in year 2015.
> She is Miss Asia for 2014.
 
Anonymous
Now it's weird
 
But She is Miss Asia 2014 is still okay, I think.
 
Anonymous
The year 2015, by the way. Maulik's answer did the same thing--he wrote year 2014 with no article
 
Anonymous
Yeah, I suppose so.
 
9:59 AM
I doubt that (about the article) myself too, but I wasn't sure.
 
01:00 - 10:0010:00 - 15:00

« first day (449 days earlier)      last day (450 days later) »