« first day (2360 days earlier)      last day (2585 days later) » 

Anonymous
2:01 PM
@Sumant Hi. I see you're from Bangalore :-)
 
@blue Yeah hi, where are you from?
 
Anonymous
Grade 12 if am not wrong (?)
 
11
 
0
Q: Does any non-Hausdorff manifold admit a metric tensor of signature $(p,q)$?

SlereahHicks in his book, "Notes on differential geometry", works with manifolds by specifically stating that they are not required to be Hausdorff unless otherwise stated. He then goes on to define the usual manifold structures, vector fields, connections, metric tensors, etc. In chapter 6, he defines...

plz help
 
Anonymous
@Sumant Assam
 
Anonymous
2:03 PM
@0celouvsky Another JEE'r Indian :P You're screwed...the next batch is coming!
 
@Slereah I have the papers that talk about what I'm working on this summer
do you want to check them out?
 
Sure
 
do I have your email?
 
I have too many pdfs open
I should close a few
Dunno
it's slereah@yahoo.fr
 
lol yahoo
 
2:08 PM
Same email since 2001 baby
 
I wasn't even alive then
 
Ahah
 
check your email
 
Wait you were
just
a little baby
I wonder up until what point in a GR book you could drop the assumption of Hausdorfness
probably when you start talking about curves
unless you're O'neill and do the partition of unity in the first chapter
 
@blue jesus no
 
2:11 PM
drop the assumption?
spacetimes are hausdorff dammit
 
says u
Have you seen a spacetime in the sky
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Prepare to do the march with Ocelouvsky :-D Naked is preferable.
 
i have nothing against jee
 
also, naked lunch, not naked march
 
Anonymous
2:13 PM
@BalarkaSen You told me something else in the Maths chat room :P
 
@Slereah what book is that?
 
when i say i have nothing against jee, i meant i have nothing against jee in this room
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Oh, that's clever ;-) You hardly visit this room. I like that attitude =P
 
Anonymous
But don't worry. The JEE squad will soon attack the maths chat room too, in the near future =P
 
@ACuriousMind Hawking and Israel
 
2:15 PM
Why don't JEE people go to their own room
Why do you enjoy torturing us
 
nah. people have tried before; the only hot topic in the math chat is geometric topology
 
Anonymous
@0celouvsky See, I'm the nice one. I've stopped discussing JEE questions here. Not everyone is as nice as me ;)
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen That's the calm before the storm :D
 
@Slereah Heh
 
Penrose has a brief aside about non-Hausdorff manifolds
Fairly brief though
overall I think Geroch was the first guy to seriously propose them
 
2:18 PM
why do you want to do non-hausdorff spacetime
 
Before that non-Hausdorff manifolds were like
 
what have you been doing to your life man
 
"Oops I took the wrong quotient and my manifold isn't Hausdorff"
@BalarkaSen it has been proposed by some as a model for QM stuff
basically a geometric version of Everrett
allthough from the papers you wouldn't guess it
None of them even attempt to do a single particle
I don't think it's a very good model for that
mostly they just do topology
the popular model is that the spacetime would split at points along the light cone of that point
@0celouvsky got the mail
"To all the women I have loved"
Slow down, Casanova
"Don’t try to be a good man, just be a man.
-Zefram Cochrane"
Good quote, though
 
Haha
That dedication is pretty goofy
 
quite
 
2:27 PM
Agh, my brain. Apparently one can glue two solid tori into a 3-sphere
 
How
Doesn't gluing preserve genus?
Oh wait, nevermind
 
@ACuriousMind how?
Wait, three sphere? Wtf
I saw this in knot theory a while ago
It made sense at the time!
 
Glue them by the map $T^2 \to T^2$ sending meridian to longitude.
 
I don't know how that's supposed to explain anything
 
It...does make a kind of sense. You have two solid tori $D^2\times S^1$ and you glue each $\partial D^2$ to the $S^1$ factor of the other. That gives something you can't draw in $\mathbb{R}^3$, but it's fibered over $S^2$ with fiber $S^1$ so I can accept it's $S^3$
 
2:32 PM
@ACuriousMind that's what Elven lord did
 
Here's a proof. $S^3 = \partial(D^4) = \partial(D^2 \times D^2) = \partial D^2 \times D^2 \cup D^2 \times \partial D^2$
 
I'm not sure how to see it is the $S^3$, though
 
But that doesn't make the attaching map explicit unless you do it more carefully.
 
@ACuriousMind I think he removed a point and showed the gluing is R^3, then argued adding back the point gives the compactification
 
Wait, how do we get $D^2 \times D^2$ from $D^4$
 
2:34 PM
@Slereah Note that all the balls are topologically the same as cubes, and that you can simply build higher-dimensional cubes from lower-dimensional ones in that fashion
 
They are homeomorphic. Think about $D^n$ as $[0, 1]^n$
 
I suppose!
 
ACM beat me to it.
 
Also I didn't know that the Leibniz rule applied to boundaries
 
It does! That's why you use $\partial$ to denote boundaries!
Well, partially at least.
Unintentional pun too
 
2:36 PM
When you have an exam the next day
 
I was about to ask whether the $\partial$ly was intentional
 
and your lab mate forgets to write the lab report
so you gotta do it
but you can't even integrate
:)
Hello darkness my old friend
 
The integral would be the interior, I suppose
Though that only works for immersed surfaces, I suppose
 
What are you talking about
 
Well there isn't really an inverse operation to the boundary of a manifold
 
2:41 PM
I don't know what the correct notion of integral is. I'd look what the correct Kronecker product in bordism theory is.
 
oh yeah i guess it could be the cobordism
integrate those circles into pants
the greatest Simpson joke of all time
 
Please don't post vile things
 
Oh right, @0celouvsky wasn't born when the Simpsons were good
Like, literally
 
@Slereah How did you go from cobordisms to Bort?
 
I just have that joke stuck in my head
Although they do sound similar
Co-bort-ism
 
2:47 PM
@ACuriousMind I don't think the simpsons are family
friendly
 
@Slereah Is that a Siamese twin where both are named Bort?
 
When @0celouvsky was 7, the Simpsons were on season 16
Tough
 
@ACuriousMind -.-
🤦🏿‍♂️
ヽ( ̄д ̄;)ノ=3=3=3
 
What the hell is that?
 
Wtf did you post
 
2:49 PM
That's what you posted!
Apparently, that's what the "man facepalming" Emoji renders as for me
The wonders of unicode
 
It renders as nothing to me
 
@0celouvsky I used to watch them with my family all the time
 
I guess I don't have emoji font
 
@BernardoMeurer you probably need the newest iOS
 
2:52 PM
Hm?
I'm on my computer
 
@ACuriousMind what the hell. They're about sex and drugs and degeneracy!
 
🤠
 
Homer is a fat slob who represents everything wrong with the west
Bart should be shot
 
aka the average american
 
@0celouvsky That's...kinda the point :P
 
2:53 PM
The girl kid should too for being a smart ass
@ACuriousMind you're cherishing degeneracy. What the hell
 
Another obvious example that @0celouvsky has never seen early simpson episodes
 
@0celouvsky I don't really recall them being particularly about sex or drugs, except in certain episodes
 
@Slereah says the person who's never been to America
@ACuriousMind they're yellow
 
Also, you do realize the show is satire, right?
 
I've been to America
 
2:54 PM
The whole show is about being on so many drugs that the people become yellow
 
Drugs don't turn you yellow
You're thinking of hepatitis
 
@ACuriousMind that stirred some unpleasant Dead Ringers memories
 
@BalarkaSen I'll beat you up
 
"Oh, the walls are melting again"
 
go see a psychiatrist
or be a cenobite for that matter
 
2:56 PM
@BernardoMeurer Hmmm? Why would you say that?
 
@ACuriousMind He called my gender dumb yesterday
 
@ACuriousMind no
I don't know what it is
It's like that Kardashian documentary
 
@Bernardo If you become a Cenobite I would definitely stop calling that
 
I am not becoming a cenobite
I am a non-Hausdorff manifold
 
(Explanation for kids: Cenobites are extradimensional sexually ambivalent sadomasochistic maniac demons. They're also pretty cool.)
 
2:58 PM
What the HELL
 
I'm...not sure I'd call that an "explanation"
 
I'm not a masochist
 
@BalarkaSen you're just a kid why do you know about those things
 
I am a sadist though
 
@ACuriousMind That's the best Clive Barker gives you
 
2:59 PM
Am I the only one who strives for Christian goodness and wholesomeness in my life?
 
Yes.
I'm more of a Moloch fellow
that's where it's at
 
@0celouvsky they used to sell cenobite toy models to 8 year olds
when the movie got out in the 90's
 
They did that for everything, really
 
The intergalactic demons are SO EVIL
They are poisoning our children
 
There were alien toys, predator toys, robocop toys
Robocop was pretty brutal a movie
 
3:03 PM
it's pretty good tho
 
Also a lot of people get thrown through glass
 
the robocob dude, peter weller, also acts in naked lunch
hence my favorite actor
 
Have you seen Robocop 2
It is great
Robocop 2's title isn't just to indicate that it is a sequel
 
Ya I have
 
The movie is literaly about robocop 2
 
3:04 PM
It's curious
Kids nowadays genocide entire races in their video games, but are upset over some wars in the middle east
 
Well, u know
The issue of reality and all
 
fantastique and reality and etc
 
@Slereah what happens 10,000 miles away isn't any more or less real than a video game
 
Damn you and your local realism
 
reality is only real in sufficiently small balls
 
3:07 PM
@Slereah heh
 
it's a good argument tho
 
Where "good" means "completely bonkers" :P
 
How could you tell that some war in syria is real
 
exactly right
 
By going there
hence you need locality
well?
no argument?
 
3:09 PM
Is this also a good argument
 
@0celouvsky I'm not in the mood to take your bait :P
 
they're forgetting the luminoferous ether
 
I wonder if there's an ether version of GR
After all the Lorentz ether theory is the same as SR
 
ok that's messed up
 
3:11 PM
I'm guessing ether GR would have to be Pauli-Fierz GR
 
@Slereah I was just about to propose that
 
after a loop we come back to physics, and time for me to duck out
 
This second paper my prof sent me has a shitload of typos
who the hell proofread this
pretty embarrassing
idk how to tell him
missing ", missing spaces
on every page
There it is
The holy grail
 
Is it
 
almost
it's for closed manifolds
for boundaries, who knows
It's funny. PDE on closed manifolds is quite easy actually
It's boundary conditions that make everything hard
 
3:22 PM
If it's so easy try solving a nonlinear hyperbolic PDE on the torus
 
@JaimeGallego What cruise trip?
 
Apr 11 at 20:52, by Jaime Gallego
Some of my friends are going on a cruise next week
 
Ah
Ah yes
The ones that made the mistake of going to Slovakia
 
They have money for a cruise?
 
I ain't shelling out 1200 bucks for that
It is supposed to be a school trip
 
3:26 PM
1200€ for a cruise with kids?
Why don't you tie me up to a rock and put me to swim
 
What kids have 1200???
 
@BernardoMeurer Tie you to a rock and throw you into the sea? Have you been going out with a mafioso's girlfriend again?
 
@JohnRennie Sadly no
Honestly that was better than the stuff going on currently
 
@0celouvsky Their parents do. They believe it will be an educational experience because they'll be two hours in Pompeii
 
1200 for two hours
 
3:28 PM
@JaimeGallego I believe there are some educational wall paintings there ...
 
Scratch that. People flag for prostitute jokes.
 
Date women whose boyfriends can, and will, try to kill you. That's my advice for the day folks
 
Ah, and Malta. But you know what kind of destination is that.
 
@ACuriousMind does dim_c mean anything to you?
Context of Hilbert spaces
Small c
 
@0celouvsky It's a variable declarator in VB.NET
 
3:30 PM
Not complex numbers C
 
What a shitty language
 
Wait
Does Steenrod even assume manifolds to be Hausdorff?
"We shall restrict attention to manifolds which are separable, metric and connected"
I suppose he does!
Man there's almost nothing on non-hausdorff manifolds
There's like 3 good sources, and they don't amount to much
 
Why exactly do you care?
 
Well there are some causality-related theorems with respect to non-Hausdorff spacetimes
let's investigate this paper
All topology
Where are the differential geometry papers on non-Hausdorff manifolds
 
@0celouvsky He's studying my sexual behavior
 
3:47 PM
Do the foliation sheaf manifold things have bundle structures on them?
 
I don't know what you're talking about
 
Hi, everybody.
@BernardoMeurer do you still need calculus halp?
 
Wtf he asked you before me?
 
@0celouvsky Uh, yeah. Are you surprised by this?
 
Foliation of manifolds are one of the rare fields where people commonly use non-hausdorff manifolds
 
3:51 PM
Everything is measure theory to you.
 
Do people define common bundle structures on them?
 
It is not
 
Tangent bundles and such
 
@DanielSank Later today
 
@0celouvsky Should I flag that?
What do you think?
 
3:51 PM
Go for it
I don't care
 
Hmmm
 
@0celouvsky Be Nice.
 
@0celouvsky y u jealous? I can explain stuff pretty well. Ask @heather.
 
I don't know why but non-hausdorff manifold papers are always about random boring stuff
Homogeneity and whatnot
 
rob
Papers about homogeneity seem to be all alike.
 
3:58 PM
heyooo
 
@rob Do you just watch the chat and wait for a chance to make a pun? :D
 
rob
@ACuriousMind I live my life waiting for chances to make puns.
 
Fair enough
 
how does Steenrod prove the existence of a Riemannian metric, anyway
Let's check
 
rob
Once I sent a list of a dozen puns off to some magazine for a contest. At the last minute I removed the two silliest ones from the list. I thought for sure they were good enough to win, but unfortunately no pun in ten did.
 
4:01 PM
he proves it by the use of other theorems I don't know
;w;
@rob old one
 
rob
@Slereah Guilty.
 
4:13 PM
I guess worst case scenario
I can just not care about the structures on the manifold itself and just use the ones on the Hausdorff submanifolds
 
4:41 PM
@ACuriousMind how about Hitler Gets Angry videos?
 
Those are fine, I guess
(Although I don't find most of them funny :P)
 
I hadn't seen that Der Untergang trailer, though, it's fantastic
@ACuriousMind I guess it's harder if the words actually make sense when you hear them
I really like this one, though
though non-Spanish speakers will struggle with it I guess
@AccidentalFourierTransform and @DanielSank might enjoy it
 
@EmilioPisanty Could be
 
I really liked the meta-video where Bruno Ganz was angry about Hitler gets angry videos.
 
@ACuriousMind I think these started after I had learned most of my German
it wasn't enough to make the dialogue out directly
but I did at some point look it up, and I can follow it now
and they definitely became noticeably harder to enjoy
@BalarkaSen that one is good too
 
5:00 PM
@EmilioPisanty I'll watch this when I get to a desktop
Have you seen the Wolfenstein one?
 
@DanielSank nope
what's wolfenstein
 
the hell is a kizomba?
 
"As I'm sure you know, the category of smooth (topological?) manifolds is one of those categories where the objects are very nice but the category itself is terrible. I cannot describe the number of times I've heard the algebraic geometers curse the smooth category."
nooo
not categories :(
 
:36861931 I imagine he means this
 
Wolfenstein 3D is a first-person shooter video game developed by id Software and published by Apogee Software and FormGen. Originally released on May 5, 1992, for MS-DOS, it was inspired by the 1981 Muse Software video game Castle Wolfenstein. In Wolfenstein 3D, the player assumes the role of Allied spy William "B.J." Blazkowicz during World War II as he escapes from the Nazi German prison Castle Wolfenstein and carries out a series of crucial missions against the Nazis. The player traverses through each of the game's levels to find an elevator to the next level or kill a final boss, fighting Nazi...
 
5:04 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform this and similar
 
Wolfenstein 3D was the first real time first person game I had ever seen. At the time it was astonishing. It looks, well, rather quaint now.
 
so... cheap electro-latino?
no wait, its from Africa
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform effectively, yes, though it's originally from Angola and if you do it right it's relatively different
but for all the fancy schmaltzy stuff, as always
 
cheap electro-afro then
 
5:08 PM
ಠ_ಠ
cant say its inaccurate
 
@EmilioPisanty yep
 
5:24 PM
> Concentration made by a small thing
 
@DanielSank What sign did you eventually print on that PCB?
People here suggested those interesting hieroglyph characters
@JohnRennie I played this around 2004
Return to Castle Wolfenstein is a first-person shooter video game published by Activision and originally released on November 19, 2001 for Microsoft Windows and subsequently for PlayStation 2, Xbox, Linux and Macintosh. The game serves as both a remake and a reboot to the Wolfenstein series. This single player game was developed by Gray Matter Interactive and Nerve Software developed its multiplayer mode. id Software, the creators of Wolfenstein 3D, oversaw the development and were credited as executive producers. The multiplayer side eventually became the most popular part of the game, and was...
 
@Mostafa The board is not done yet.
It's really, really close.
@G.Bergeron Cheesy?
 
The mission was to destroy Hitler's paranormal division of SS.
@EmilioPisanty They don't really feel original....real speeches are another thing ;)
and I think virtually everything would be okay to post here if it's for research purposes.
 

« first day (2360 days earlier)      last day (2585 days later) »