@heather By adding sentences that exhibit the thread of logic between them? You must have a reason for wanting to write down these statements, after all.
@ACuriousMind well, yes, but the thing is, I already described what I'm doing in a different section, and it seems rather redundant to rewrite it all for the mathematical statements.
so the first section definitely wasn't too detailed because it was kind of important i need to describe the simulation, and the second section also seems important.
@BernardoMeurer @KristinaL The equation is not $W = F s$, but $\mathrm{d}W = F\mathrm{d}s$. Taking total work as force times distance only works if the force is constant over the distance, but in this case it increases with the distance.
user228700
@JohnRennie Is that really you?! :-o I find this picture absolutely adorable!
I pray that you forgive me, @Bernardo. If you identify as a computer nerd, then I respectfully retract the statement that I made above. It's 4 AM, pls.
@ACuriousMind "banged" his cousin...i thought i read somewhere he hit his younger cousin or something when she was born. am i misunderstanding something?
@AccidentalFourierTransform srsly? how about someone photoshop it with a red circle & lets all star it :) ... maybe there is even more correlation to easy rider than was previously known! o_O
@AccidentalFourierTransform hey since youre around can you update the physics meta post with heathers session? after we fully finish the "maryj" thread ofc :P
A universal asynchronous receiver/transmitter (UART /ˈjuːɑːrt/), is a computer hardware device for asynchronous serial communication in which the data format and transmission speeds are configurable. The electric signaling levels and methods (such as differential signaling, etc.) are handled by a driver circuit external to the UART.
UARTs are commonly used in conjunction with communication standards such as TIA (formerly EIA) RS-232, RS-422 or RS-485. A UART is usually an individual (or part of an) integrated circuit (IC) used for serial communications over a computer or peripheral device serial...
Purpose
The user base of Physics Stack Exchange is rather diverse in terms of cultural background, career progress, field of expertise, and personality.
While the discussion in hbar is lively, it is mostly focused on physics, with some side conversations on a variety of topics from cooking to fa...
@AccidentalFourierTransform ok, plz continue to mull over chat session, am sure youre a natural, & feel free to do it before finishing the masters 1st... :)
@heather The conclusion of your paper should contain the outcome of what you're writing; the "so what?" effects of the purpose. Basically why your reader should give a crap about what you just wrote.
@KristinaL also interested in dark matter, just noticed a Physics question on topic that indicates its ~80% of milky way galaxy. what level of physics class was it?
@heather Well, really depends on what you have done. If you plan on further investigations of some aspects (or don't plan on them, but think they should be done), mention that. If you have future applications in mind, mention those.
If there is something to be said in summary that you haven't said before, also say that. If some important takeaways are buried in the midst of not so relevant stuff, stress them again
@heather yes, not a summary. You should mention the main topics you discussed in your paper, but don't just restate them. Mentioning future research (and why it would matter to the audience or to your subject) is a great idea. :)
@heather If it is not relevant to understanding what is going on in the paper and not the basis for it, I would not expect it unless it's a review article