« first day (2281 days earlier)      last day (2651 days later) » 

6:04 PM
fellas
do we have any policy about mild curse words?
 
In chat or on main?
 
They're fine
 
is darn ok? can we use the q-word?
 
in Mathematics, 3 mins ago, by DHMO
@Secret Start with $\Bbb N$. Produce an algorithm to remove countably many numbers, countably many times, and end up with the empty set.
Just in case anyone is interested
 
6:06 PM
What's the q-word?
I'm gonna go ahead and say no
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Eh, there's no policy against curse words as such, but there is one against being rude.
 
@Danu Unless they are used as abuse I guess....
 
@anonymous That's right.
 
the q word doesn't seem mild.
 
6:07 PM
darn, on the other hand, is very mild.
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Was this some kind of joke?
 
even a child like me can get off with saying it =P
 
Dec 28 '16 at 16:16, by ACuriousMind
Like all cats, it seems the Fourier transformed version is also a bit of a troll ;)
 
@heather Mildness is extremely relative. Some people find the f-word to be very mild. So I think the best policy is to overlook curse words unless used as abuse aimed at something or someone.
 
6:09 PM
@anonymous fair enough.
 
oh the irony!
welcome @FuckSONGS
 
lol
XD
 
Hi @JaimeGallego, I see you're from Madrid :-)
Im from Madrid too
are you in college?
 
Not yet
 
yeah in your picture you look kinda young but I wasnt sure
and you know what you are going to study?
are you into physics?
 
6:12 PM
That's from 2013 or something :D
Yup
 
es espana se usa el verbo "oir"? @JaimeGallego @AccidentalFourierTransform
 
@DHMO yep, "hear"
 
Hi again @DHMO. Yes it does
 
@JaimeGallego nice! and which uni youre going to choose? UAM? UCM?
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform mi amiga que vino a argentina me dice que no se usa este verbo en argentina
 
6:14 PM
@DHMO we use it a lot in Spain, but now that you mention it, people in South America use "escuchar" instead of "oir"
"escuchar"= to listen, "oir"=to hear
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform si, yo lo se
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Probably UCM, though UAM is a lot closer. That's not my Plan A though, I'm planning to study in the States.
 
@DHMO without google translate and with one semester of spanish: "my friend who [something] to argentine said [something] argentina"
 
@heather "My (female) friend that came over to Argentina tells me that this verb isn't used in Argentina"
 
@JaimeGallego cool good luck with that!
 
6:16 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform se usa en espana el verbo escuchar tambien?
 
@JaimeGallego ah, okay, thank you.
 
@dbassett sure. I'll be in my office soon and might be able to chat.
 
@JaimeGallego o dios, use el verbo incorrecto. quise decir "fue" no "vino"
 
I look at online chat as an asynchronous communication protocol...
 
@DHMO Sí. But it means two different things. Oír -> hear, escuchar -> listen
 
6:17 PM
@JaimeGallego I studied physics at the UAM, and Ive been told that it is slightly better than the UCM, though both are kinda good. If you can go to the states, that's obviously the best option
@DHMO yes, I use both of them
though "oir" is more common IMO
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform It is?
 
@JaimeGallego entonces en espana los dos verbos se usan para decir cosas diferentes y en el sud de america solo escuchar se usa
 
I'm not convinced "the states" are "obviously" the better option without a lot more details :P
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform ah, gracias
 
@ACuriousMind usa is totally the better option (not biased at all =)
 
6:19 PM
@ACuriousMind better than anything in Spain at least
@DHMO np :-)
 
the temptation to speak in spanish and make a fool of myself is strong =)
 
@heather well you have me here trying to speak English
my English is far from perfect but its fun to speak other languages
BTW if you want to practice your listening, a friend of mine has a youtube channel which is kinda popular here in Spain
he makes videos about physics
in Spanish
 
@heather no puedes mejorar tu espanol si no quieres hablar en espanol
 
@ACuriousMind The colleges I plan to apply are certainly better. It's a long shot, but I will be sending applications to MIT, Caltech and others. Fingers crossed.
 
Howdy
 
6:22 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform to be absolutely honest, you seem pretty good at English
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform y "educatina" habla espanol americano
 
@DHMO ¿Lo hablas?
 
@SirCumference no, "educatina" es el nombre de un canal
 
@heather ah, I wish
 
@DHMO Ah XD
Estoy aprendiendo español. No estoy perfecto pero puedo tratar de usarlo.
Me gusta aprender idiomas. :)
 
6:25 PM
@SirCumference si quisiste decir "hablas espanol americano?", lo estoy aprendiendo
 
@heather do it. I'll join.
 
soy terrible en espanol
 
@SirCumference eso es una actitud buena
 
@DanielSank muy bien =)
 
A bit of Spanish (or other languages) is fine, but please keep the main conversation in English
 
6:25 PM
@DHMO ¿Es necesario? Español es similar en todos los países
 
@ACuriousMind is that actually a rule?
 
@SirCumference estoy aprendiendo espanol espana tambien, entonces...
 
34
A: What languages are we allowed to speak in SE chat rooms?

Shog9The short answer is: whatever language the other folks present in the room are comfortable speaking. All else being equal, if you jump into a room and start posting stuff that isn't understandable to the majority of the users there, you're probably going to get some pushback. And as a practical...

 
@DHMO ¿Estás aprendiendolo en tú colegio/universidad?
 
@ACuriousMind halt die Klappe
 
6:27 PM
@SirCumference no, lo estoy aprendiendo solo por mi misma
 
@DHMO Yo también :D
@ACuriousMind Oh come now, it's good to meet people who speak or want to learn the same languages as you
 
Well, I guess since my phone wants to autocorrect everything I type in Spanish I'll have to forget about it for now.
 
@ACuriousMind "Majority" ist ein ziemlich vages Konzept ...
 
Not to mention, there's no inherent reason anyone needs to pry into what we're saying
 
@DHMO LOL
 
6:28 PM
@DHMO You're learning German too?
Jeez
 
@SirCumference true, but at some point such conversations should move to another room.
@SirCumference could be Google translate...
 
Can't reiterate the point about not using a different language to carry on a private conversation in plain view. If you do that, you'll likely get flagged into a chat suspension. Remember, intentionally excluding everyone else in a room from the conversation you're having with another is very rude and you should not do it (since this keeps coming up). — Tim Post ♦ Jan 20 '14 at 12:19
 
@DanielSank It's not that deep of a conversation, we're just saying "hello", "how did you learn spanish", etc
It's literally just the surface of a conversation
 
1
Q: Should we have an "Answer Later" section?

PraharSeveral times when writing long and detailed answers, I am unable to find time to finish it all in one go. I know draft of unfinished answers are saved and if I visit the question again, I can continue working on it. However, I think there should be a separate section where all unfinished drafts ...

 
6:30 PM
@ACuriousMind If people actually speak spanish and care to join a conversation about it, they can. Otherwise, it shouldn't be relevant to them.
 
@SirCumference I know some basic German words and grammars but the sentence was too hard for me so I used Google translate
 
@SirCumference ...if you're holding your Spanish conversation in the middle of the main chat room of an English speaking site, it kinda becomes relevant to them.
 
@ACuriousMind Does it? Honest question, not to be rude — what makes you think anyone cares about a conversation not addressed to them?
 
@ACuriousMind I have to agree here. It's the main Physics chat after all.
 
@heather What about Ackermann?
 
6:32 PM
If two people are using a different language, it's clearly not something that non-speakers should consider relevant
A group conversation should use the language of the chat. Something not important to the majority of people need not be readable to everyone — there's really no point.
 
@SirCumference What if you're making fun of someone who doesn't speak the language? What if you're talking about a topic I would also be very interested in discussing? Conversations in this chat should, in principle, be free for everyone to join, since it is the site's main chat. If you have to have a private conversation with someone, have it somewhere else.
 
@BernardoMeurer recursive...
 
Another aspect: How are moderators supposed to moderate conversations they don't understand? I am reasonably sure that you, personally are not saying much moderation-worthy right now, but in general, enforcing English in chat is enforcing that chat can be moderated.
 
@ACuriousMind i'd honestly have to disagree - that's like me asking Bernardo about a linux error I'm having and other people who have turned to the dark side and use windows asking us to get out because we use a different OS.
 
@ACuriousMind Making fun of a person is breaking a rule in itself, that should be punishable severely if someone realizes it. Using a language is not inherently vindictive.
 
6:36 PM
@ACuriousMind google translate. ::shrugs::
 
^
There's no insult google translate shouldn't be able to handle.
 
@SirCumference lol
 
I have to go now, later.
 
have a good day @SirCumference
 
"This user has been temporarily suspended by a moderator and cannot chat for 3 days."
 
6:37 PM
@SirCumference Bye!
 
THE COUNTDOWN BEGINS
 
@SirCumference Google translate can't understand Hindi/Sanskrit/Arabic insults XD
 
@heather cc @SirCumference So, the existence of a tool that circumvents language barriers is a reason for erecting such a barrier?
 
Mar 18 '15 at 16:09, by ACuriousMind
Wie soll das denn gehen?
 
@heather I wrote it in an iterative manner :)
MUCH FASTER
 
6:40 PM
@ACuriousMind no, you were asking how you could moderate things in other languages that moderators don't necessarily understand. google translate is a solution to that problem.
 
also, allowing people to talk in other languages isn't erecting a barrier, but rather removing one, i think.
2
 
MY BABY IS HERE
 
I got $A(99,99)$ problems and arbitrary-precision arithmetic aint one
 
@heather Google translate isn't good enough to translate every language...
 
6:41 PM
@AccidentalFourierTransform You say that just as I post the book I got to learn more arbitrary precision arithmetic algos
 
And it is time consuming too
 
@heather You have to be able to speak English to participate on the main SE sites anyway.
 
@ACuriousMind which rule states that?
 
@BernardoMeurer i always knew you and I had some sort of mystic connection
 
@DHMO ...non-English posts are (except for the language versions of SO) not allowed on any site.
 
6:43 PM
@ACuriousMind yes, so?
 
@ACuriousMind I see. The same does not apply in chatrooms...
 
why does that ban other languages in chat?
 

 g-block elements

One does not simply speak English 24/7. (This is the german Fo...
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform It's called love
 
we need to talk
we should see other people
 
6:44 PM
@heather That was supposed to be an argument for why allowing people to talk in other languages doesn't remove a barrier in this case - they are expected to be able to speak English anyway to participate
 
its not you, its me
 
@DHMO In that case there is a German mod who can understand what's being written.
 
@ACuriousMind oh, i see. well my response to that would be there are some users whose first language isn't english, and they might be able to get a better answer if explained in another language.
 
@anonymous oh, so we can only talk in languages that the mod can understand
in this case... I am sure that the mod hier kann Deutsch verstehen
 
@DHMO And do you notice the difference between a dedicated chat room for that language (on a site where one of the mods is a German speaker no less) and starting to speak Spanish in the main chat room of a site when you have no idea how many people understand it?
 
6:46 PM
@heather Just create another chat room for the special purpose then instead of the main chat.. I believe ACM is right here
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform But, honey, I'm blind
 
@ACuriousMind when I started speaking Spanish, there were only two people talking, and they are both from Madrid
 
@DHMO Two people talking doesn't mean two people listening. There are more users in the room and it's not uncommon for them to lurk and wait for something that catches their interest. The chat room is more than "the people currently talking" or even "the people regularly talking".
 
@ACuriousMind point taken
 
@ACuriousMind Hmm, let's find out: dmkee is secretly a robot monkey.
::waits::
 
6:52 PM
@DanielSank C'mon now, we all know he's your sock ;)
 
SHHHH!
 
7:03 PM
> citation numbers :D
 
I got new socks today
 
I'm pretty sure it's mostly a matter of connections. Due to some historical events the center of (HE)P is there and therefore it's easier to get well-known/highly cited by being there and associating with the big guys.
 
@BernardoMeurer you can see in the reflection in your laptop that you were naked when you took that picture
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Actually, one of the few moments I'm not half naked while at home
 
so u naked right now?
Let me get changed into something more comfortable
 
7:07 PM
Nope, it's an exception
 
I have jeans and boots and a sweater on :P
 
this was becoming sexy
now youve killed the mood
 
I have that habit
 
-1
Q: nematic order numerical calculation

y.lelHow can I calculate the nematic order parameter as function of temperature using monte carlo either with mathematica or with matlab? Is there any code available?

^gimme teh codez
 
7:16 PM
@heather Yeah
 
So I've been working on this little project of mine
its called "quantum mechanics under the Riemann hypothesis"
you basically solve standard QM Hamiltonians using the Riemann hypothesis
its very interesting and its actually rather simple
you just assume the RH, and then proceed as usual, without using the RH for anything
you assume it holds, but then never mention it again
 
@BernardoMeurer Oh, the sarcastic comments I could write...if not for that gosh darned "be nice" policy.
 
For example, let us diagonalise $H=\frac12 P^2+\frac12 X^2-\frac12$. First, assume the RH
Next, introduce the ladder operators. Finally, use $[H,a]=-a$.
Congratulations! you've shown that, under the RM, the eigenvalues of $H$ are $0,1,2,\cdots$.
Well, you just do this will the rest of solvable Hamiltonians
so in the end you have shown that the RH implies the typical results of QM. Neat, right?
 
extremely weird result in cardinals (to be checked by maths guys): We can take real number of things out of a countable set and it will still be countable:
in Set theory, 27 mins ago, by Secret
in Mathematics, 9 mins ago, by Secret
Consider the dedekind cut 0. This gives the subset $\mathbb{Q_{\leq 0}}$. Therefore the rationals are being partitioned by 0 into the nonpositves and the positives. Similarly for the naturals, there is also a partition of even and odd integers.

Since a bijection exists between rationals and naturals, dedekind 0 cut maps to $2\mathbb{N}$

Now consider some real number $s<0$. This gives a dedekind cut of $\mathbb{Q_{\leq 0}}-X$ where $X$ is the set of all rationals between s and 0, which is countable.
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform uhhhhhhhhh
 
7:19 PM
@heather I'm never nice
 
@ACuriousMind That's simply a solution for the problem you mentioned. There are certainly better reasons for it than against it. You speak German, so you probably know, but being able to speak in a shared language with someone else is an amazing and fun way to get to know them.
 
@ACuriousMind c'mon, it is neat ;-)
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform That's pretty lame.
 
How the hell with the Riemann Hypothesis imply a physical result such as QM?
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Do you know there's actually some people working on connections between the RH and QM? I recall someone (Connes?) wanting to recast the zeroes of the zeta function as the spectrum of a Hamiltonian; then the RH becomes equivalent to its self-adjointness.
 
7:21 PM
You're just saying "vacuous truths are cool"
but they really aren't interesting.
 
Being "excluded" is a nonsense thing to take offense to, especially when it's not directed to that person.
 
@BernardoMeurer Just look at the truth table of implication.
 
@Danu Hum?
 
@BernardoMeurer Look at what happens when the conclusion is known to be true.
 
@ACuriousMind We're not talking about making this a language center. But interfering simply because people want to speak in a different language, under the belief that other people necessarily care about the conversation, is not needed.
 
7:23 PM
@ACuriousMind yeah I know, I was reading about that a couple of days ago
 
@Danu I'll just go back to computing $10^9!$ :P
 
@ACuriousMind we're gossiping about you
 
it is actually very interesting
 
@MikeMiller oO
 
Guys quick question: is Fermi's constant the same as the weak coupling constant? Both determine the strength of the weak interaction right? :D
 
7:29 PM
they are related
but they are not exactly the same thing
 
How large a factorial can I compute?
Anyone has a computer with 32GB RAM to help?
:P
 
@JannikPitt Fermi's constant is G_F
and the weak coupling constant is g_W
they are related through G_F=\sqrt{2}g_w^2/8m_W^2
where m_W is the W-boson mass
 
okay awesome thank you!
 
I like your name haha
very original
 
7:32 PM
well thanks, I chose it myself!
:-P
 
0
Q: Is this a question for Physics or Engineering community?

Ryan GriggsI have a question about forces required to lift weights, and I need someone to look over my math. Should I ask this in Physics or Engineering community?

 
7
Q: Positive frequency solutions in a stationary spacetime

gj255I'm studying the basics of QFT in curved spacetime, and for the simplest case of real scalar fields we can define the Klein-Gordon Hermitian form by $$ (f,g) = i \int_\Sigma \mathrm{d}^3x \sqrt{h} n^\mu ( \overline{f} \partial_\mu g - g \partial_\mu \overline{f}) $$ With $\Sigma$ a spatial hypers...

@ACuriousMind @Danu how come this didn't get any answer?
Im awful at diff. geom.
but the question seems (?) rather simple
or is it?
any of you know the answer? the question is still in its grace period, if you post something now you can get the bounty
you have an hour
 
7:55 PM
Ugh, QFT in curved space :P
 
well the question is simpler
the inner product $(f,g)$ on-shell is independent of $\Sigma$
therefore, it seems to me that one may take $n^\mu\propto k^\mu$, for $k$ the Killing field
acc. to OP this can only be done if the Manifold is static
but why?
cant you always take $n\propto k$? after all, you can choose the surface $\Sigma$ at will, right?
 
If you are in fact free to choose $\Sigma$, then you are right. The question is not particularly clear on how $\Sigma$ is chosen.
 
yes, if $f,g$ satisfy the KG eq. then $(f,g)$ is independent of $\Sigma$
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform perhaps OP is not aware of that fact? I think their problem is that, in a stationary but not static spacetime, the foliation into hypersurfaces induced by the notion of time given by the Killing vector has hypersurfaces where the Killing vector is not orthogonal
(where by "foliation induced by the notion of time" I mean the spatial slices you have in the coordinate system where the Killing vector is (1,0,0,0))
 
I guess I'll leave a comment
 
8:20 PM
I HATE FONTS
also, texlive is a mess
 
8:50 PM
@DavidZ @alarge I've moved to Gnome on Xorg. Wayland has a debilitating bug happening to me where some Xwayland applications will lock all other windows and make them unclickable at random
 
@BernardoMeurer and so we try to break mathjax again
 
@heather No more breaking mathjax
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform wow
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform I thought starting the text with "physics" was a nice touch :P
 
@ACuriousMind and the tags... I dont know what to say
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform Was that a new user ?
 
9:10 PM
@anonymous yes, member since today
 
It was so funny that I forgot to laugh O:}
@ACuriousMind Me too...I felt that is was comprehension based question like in SATs and all :D
I read the whole post and then realized that I am a fool :P
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform ouch
 
Yo @DanielSank, you may be interested in this: github.com/episanty/TheYoungManTheStation
feedback welcome
 
 
1 hour later…
10:46 PM
This is pretty interesting. The TeX.SE top users seem to have taken a pretty significant User Removed hit recently.
 
@EmilioPisanty Wow, I thought users with many votes usually had their votes transferred to community before deletion
 
@EmilioPisanty How do you know that was a "User Removed" hit and not negative reputation gained due to downvoting by others?
Negative rep is usual on Stack Overflow also
 
11:05 PM
@anonymous Go to the reputation tabs of the individual users. Normally, you will find that most large losses are due to offered bounties, and that downvoting is insignificant (not even I downvote enough answers to get to significant rep losses in such a short time). On tex.SE, there's a "user removed" on each rep tab.
 
@ACuriousMind Oh I see. Thanks. I didn't look at their activity tab earlier. However I do know some users who mainly downvote and hardly upvote on Math SE and Stack Overflow :P
 
Downvoting questions doesn't cost any reputation; only downvoting answers.
 
chaps at TeX.SE just like upvoting
 
@ACuriousMind I did not know that.
 
11:10 PM
@EmilioPisanty Feedback given.
 
@DanielSank Now you know ;) It wasn't like that from the beginning, there's an ancient meta.SE post about abolishing the cost to downvote questions to get users to actually downvote bad questions.
 
wheres that meta post?
I want to downvote it
cause, you know, its free
 
@anonymous uh... because it says that on the rep pages for the affected users?
@DanielSank yeah, both planned, this is in draft stage at the moment
 
Anyone knows why the StackOverflow site is much smoother than the StackExchange sites ? Or is it only me?
@EmilioPisanty Yeah ACM told me :)
 
@anonymous what do you mean by 'smoother'?
 
11:15 PM
@EmilioPisanty I mean the page loading speed...
You will understand only if you have a slow net speed :P
When my net speed goes down to 100 kbps then it is quite apparent
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform too lazy to search for it :P
 
solid math right there
 
@EmilioPisanty Also, FWIW, the name is really confusing ;-)
TBH, simple descriptive names -> other people use your stuff.
 
At least it taught me the name "garden-path sentence" :D
 
@ACuriousMind Me too.
 
11:22 PM
L'Hospital
 
@DanielSank yeah, well, Naming Stuff Is Hard
So I just went for broke
I'll link to the Tom Scott youtube video on garden-path sentences when I add bibliography stuff to the template
worth a watch
 

« first day (2281 days earlier)      last day (2651 days later) »