« first day (1994 days earlier)      last day (2934 days later) » 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

9:18 PM
how can mathematicians actually believe that the sum of the natural numbers is NEGATIVE..
like if $1+1+1...$ is infinite then how could $1+2+3...$ be finite not to mention negative. Makes no sense man
 
@Obliv Because they proved it :)
 
actually wait it says the sum is divergent but they somehow assigned a value to the sum anyway
 
@ACuriousMind
You can prove by using analytical continuation
even with the series being divergent
 
@BernardMeurer lol...what's up?
 
sounds like an incredibly useful/insane concept I want to learn now..
assigning values to divergent sums o.o
 
9:26 PM
@ACuriousMind You had a link for a nice proof of this, do you still have that laying around?
 
What did I just download O.o
 
Copy-paste didn't work right the first time
 
was that not the right link?
 
You probably now have my notes for a course on constructive field theory :D
@Obliv It's the right link now
 
9:28 PM
@ACuriousMind I bet they'll be useful some day hahaha
Are these your notes?
 
@BernardMeurer It's what I personally copied from the blackboard, if that's what you mean
 
Why is it not in German?
 
Because the teaching language in our master is English, only a few lectures are in German, and only if no international student is taking them
 
When did you start learning english? I'm always amazed when non-native english speakers can speak so fluently..
 
Around third grade, I think
 
9:34 PM
what language do you speak most often?
other than math :P
 
Aloud? German. I write more English than German though, I think
 
is it correct to call it german, deutsche or both?
 
yup, aloud
 
hey guys, how did i write down the right BC for this again:
 
@Obliv What do you mean? The language is called Deutsch in German, and, well, "German" in English
 
9:36 PM
(on an infinite domain and evolving in time)
 
don't europeans call it deutsche even if they don't speak german though?
 
@user507974: Uh, what do you mean by "writing the right BC"?
 
@ACuriousMind basically you do seperation of variables (sinusoidal answer in x and exponential in t) then you use BC to find coefficients right?
 
@Obliv No, they use their own names. It's awkward to switch to the native name right in the middle of a sentence
@user507974 You will have to be a bit more explicit for me to understand what you're doing. What is that picture? A potential?
 
@ACuriousMind concentration, diffusion problem
 
9:40 PM
Why do you need boundary conditions? Can you not just feed it as initial condition into the evolution equation?
 
so you start with a concentration that is 0 for all x except here at t=0 and it diffuses out
 
is $a|b$ true if $b$ is $0$?
 
my bad, i meant to say initial condition
 
@user507974 And your question is? What function describes that concentration?
 
@ACuriousMind yep, im kind of in a bit of a thinking blank and even though i should know this im forgetting
 
9:50 PM
@user507974 It's the difference of two Heaviside functions: $f(x) = C_0 \left(\theta(x-a) - \theta(x-b)\right)$
 
@ACuriousMind i know its a heaviside but how did I write that out, fourier transform the heavisides and sum them together?
 
What do you mean "write it out"?
You can determine the Fourier transform, it'll be a scaled $\frac{\sin(x)}{x}$ with some phase in front
 
@ACuriousMind its a bit different than a sinc from these starting points isnt it?
 
That's why I said "scaled" and "some phase in front". The Fourier transform of the height 1, width 1 rectangle centered at 0 is the sinc, and you have relations like $F(f(x-a))(\omega) = \exp(\mathrm{i}\omega a)F(f)(\omega)$ and $F(f(ax)) = \frac{1}{a}F(f)(\omega/a)$.
Check carefully what the $2\pi$ prefactors are in your Fourier convention
I.e. a shift becomes a phase, and a scaling, well, an inverse scaling.
 
thanks
 
10:28 PM
what does $a\equiv b~ (mod~n)$ mean? is it saying (mod n) is the same thing as saying $a \equiv b$?
 
vzn
@kevinTahN. plz drop by here for all the gory details
In mathematics, modular arithmetic is a system of arithmetic for integers, where numbers "wrap around" upon reaching a certain value—the modulus (plural moduli). The modern approach to modular arithmetic was developed by Carl Friedrich Gauss in his book Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, published in 1801. A familiar use of modular arithmetic is in the 12-hour clock, in which the day is divided into two 12-hour periods. If the time is 7:00 now, then 8 hours later it will be 3:00. Usual addition would suggest that the later time should be 7 + 8 = 15, but this is not the answer because clock time "wraps...
 
thanks @vzn
 
vzn
@Obliv cybersynchronicity, just finished bostroms 2014 book on AI... whew o_O
 
how was it :D?
I never read any of his material just listened to his talks
 
vzn
@Obliv hyperintelligent but also kind of "academic"... "jargony"
 
10:35 PM
I feel like he is an A.I. sometimes. The way he quantifies 'value' is comical but persuasive
 
vzn
@Obliv do you know what Secret was referring to, "Q3"?
are you a student? undergrad? US, elsewhere?
 
a student in undergraduate ya
in the U.S.
 
vzn
Bostrom is one of the "big thinkers"/ philosophers of our time...
@Obliv what major?
 
physics :p
 
vzn
@Obliv what area you want to specialize in?
 
10:38 PM
@vzn by Q3, I think he was referring to questions that lead to the discovery of something.
I don't know man physics is a very large field. Probably something theoretical rather than experimental. Not sure though
 
vzn
what talks of Bostrom have you listened to?
 
I listened to an interview by someone (i forgot), a ted talk, and a talk at google (I think?)
I even emailed him over the summer and he responded lol
 
vzn
cool
 
he had a big impact on me
how about you?
 
vzn
have heard of him over the years, he seems more active lately, or higher profile, or both
 
10:42 PM
are you a student?
 
@Obliv What are you majoring in again?
 
@BernardMeurer Dude, just scroll a little bit up :P
 
vzn
@Obliv BS software engr, work in industry. re "Q3," oh now see the definition that Secret gave. nice framework. most ppl dont care about Q3 level questions and they are not necessarily relevant to daily life, making money, etc, many are not. eg relativity, evolution, heliocentric universe, quantum mechanics etc....!
 
@ACuriousMind Oh, didn't see someone had asked that :p
 
On my phone now.@vzn most people don't care about things outside of their lives and community. I have little clue of how bostrom became so motivated to undertake the questions he has and dedicate his time to them
They seem totally irrelevant to his own life which leads me to believe he's an a.i.
I mean to be fair many string theorists and cosmologists study concepts that are not clearly significant to our lives either.
 
vzn
11:22 PM
@Obliv AI is a "big question" of our time & Bostrom has a lot of strong philosophical inclinations. you can see in his book wrt AI wrestle with theories of morality, a philosophy specialty. if you look at his history of writing one can see a thread. AI is increasingly relevant in our daily lives. tend to think/ feel myself, superintelligence on other hand is decades away... but even human level intelligence would be revolutionary so the term "superintelligence" may be some misnomer...
 
@vzn Hey Smithy, can you do me a favor?
Check over this code
 
11:46 PM
@vzn yes that is true a.i. is potentially extremely beneficial to our lives. I meant more so his wanting to minimize existential risk than a.i. though. I feel like that is not directly relevant to our lives but relevant to people of the future which is very selfless in a way.
 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

« first day (1994 days earlier)      last day (2934 days later) »