@userabuser yeah, I needed two things to fire one after another on FileUploaded event, but since it's magical async crap second one was running too early
@kraftner hm, actually by now webroot installer seems nearly identical. note it hadn't been updated in a long time, so my opinions on it are pretty old by now.
the most controversial thing in roots historically was rewriting URLs to wp-content. could never coherently explain why bother, but were very loud against people questioning it.
please note I do not claim they are doing something especially horrible, but they are difficult, I am difficult, so I am staying away from their things for myself :)
well once tried roots, never again. the theme is a no-go already. just had a look at bedrock because it was the only project offering a whole stack composer/capistrano/vagrant
Long time ago since I played fooled around with it. I was looking into git subtree or orphaned branches in the meanwhile. Not kool. Now I'm thinking about just using Git hooks for that. Something like removing everything in the root on a special deploy branch and moving contents from the www dir to the root.
Problem is that nearly all installs are completely different. Currently I got a repo on server one (shared between devs) and the site will live completely elsewhere.
But could as well just be a git repo outside the public folder, so having the repo just one level deeper and the deploy folder just has the same name as the public folder might do it as well...
From my point of view capistrano has some advantages to just deploying via git. Like keeping old versions (think rollbacks) and additonal tasks like automating backups or migration of DB and uploads. But I am still in the "fooling around" phase reading about how it all works. Just doing my spring, now already becoming summer workflow cleanup...
When you now push to your server: What's the easiest task to tell the server where your www folder is and where to look for the index.html or whatever file?
(aside from using a .htaccess or similar file)
My idea was to remove all contents from the root folder and just move the contents of the www to the root - on a special branch via a post-receive git hook.
@Rarst cool glad you got it sorted.. I love JS because of that very reason, all the magic that fucks you over makes it really enjoyable language to work with.
@ungestaltbar yeah! We have this awesome namespace module loader... there's so much closure magic going on I can safely say that I only understand 95% of my code, the other 5% is pure voodoo.
@Rarst aha! at least you are getting paid for the stress
@Rarst if you ever need help with it let me know because I started to make one for my website when I owned my cake shop, to do cake-toppers. Don't know if I mentioned that I owned a cake shop before to you.
I used to do the custom prints for cakes myself... great fun
I am almost done with 1.1, but most important feature to give clients way to make and order multiple version of same product... it's going to end me :\
@userabuser they took some good parts from coffee script, the module system is pretty flexible and feels way better than using browserify and such. this article is one which gives an good practical impression: http://blog.tastejs.com/rewriting-a-webapp-with-ecmascript-6
@Rarst The UI stuff for me is usually the easy part to tackle, regardless of how far off the mark the implementation is, where you really got to watch out is with Woo..
@kaiser One day Woo will fuck you too and when it does, you will join me.
I am trying but most of the stuff would be in the area of: "I had to google for that answer too." So I much rather wait for a person who has real expierence to answer... well for now.
@mebu83 I think we've all got this feeling very often. And it is okay. But if I think something is interesting or might be useful for myself at some point you could still try to solve it.
@mebu83 We all answer questions by reading through core files, google it, search source via queryposts.com or read it up in Codex. Else we would close all questions as already answered. :)
If you want to start answering, here's the starting point for your local install:
I somehow managed to register to the Warrior Forums newsletter ages ago. Now I get regular updates on what happens there. It was sold recently and the new guy really tries hard to convince people in his newsletter that "great and better times are coming" :D
@Rarst In what way? (I am not familiar with the marketplace licences) Do they have some weird trick, because afaik at least the php part of anything WP has to be GPL?
@kraftner Pagekit, Impresspages, Bolt and the other stuff @Rarst mentioned yesterday. Quite some potential replacements for WP that might keep you from trying to get into GPL mess.
okay I think you get me wrong, I do not want to get rid of GPL. I've just wondered that I haven't seen this being done as afaik this is a valid (legally) approach
people can get *really * picky on that... but of course depends on who does it. probably fine here. For someone who is already seen as right-wing it might be some cm to much upwards...
@Rarst You really just have to accept the point that this is an issue over here. Especially with a right wing party that will probably be #1 with the next elections.
@MichaelEcklund most of us (at least me) did that for some time. to give you an explanation: it's the same idea as with adding an empty index.php file to each folder. it should be a "protection" to avoid calling files outside the WP context (core files loaded).
Yeah, I guess. It's just it is fairly urgent and seeing as I (accidentally) asked the question twice and only got one response which didn't solve the problem, I had hoped that there might be someone on here who could help me?
But yeah; is there anyone in here who can help me work out what is going wrong here? Because I need to take the site live next Thursday and this is going to be a major issue if this bug persists :/
@BenWainwright If you hook in on pre_get_posts then you can check if a restricted page is being requested and redirect if necessary. Or (as @kaiser suggests ) don't redirect at all but show a log-in form. Either-way, redirecting in the template is leaving it later than required.
@BenWainwright Isn't that the expected functionality? Whether the user is logged in or not, if the user doesn't have the correct capability, you're sending them back to the login page.
@BenWainwright imagine if you tested out cars by buying them, driving them for 2 years, then running into a roadblock where it doesnt do something you need, then driving it to a scrap heap and selling it for scrap, then buying what you actually needed
or if you said to your secretary you needed a 500 page report on soil erosion, and when it was handed to you, you then said "Nope throw that away I actually want a cup of coffee", and you did that everytime you felt like coffee
