« first day (1738 days earlier)      last day (2996 days later) » 

3:48 AM
Can anyone recall a question here about why a particular area of halacha (mishna maybe) goes into great detail about what sizes of various substances qualify for some prohibition, or something?
 
 
2 hours later…
5:36 AM
@IsaacMoses This is our canonical post on details:
8
Q: All the many, many details

AnneliseI understand a number of reasons why the Jewish community keeps so many rules to the level of minutiae. But why SUCH a level of intricacy in some of these laws? I looked through a large book on the laws of brachos, because this is one aspect of Jewish practice that resonates very loudly to me (I...

(don't know why no one liked my answer there. it's the only one that's completely sourced, and to a pretty authoritative primary source too.)
 
I had AFAIR never heard of this practice:
1
Q: Honey on Hallah for Newlyweds?

Noam SiennaA friend stumped me with this question: What is the earliest reference to the custom of having newlyweds dip their hallah in honey? My guess is that it's an extension from the custom of honey on Rosh haShana... Any ideas?

 
 
6 hours later…
11:57 AM
@msh210 I practiced this practice, though I have no idea where we heard of it from.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:22 PM
@IsaacMoses Did you do it for the evening? week? year?
 
1:33 PM
@msh210 year of Shabbatot
 
2:10 PM
@msh210 @IsaacMoses I did it as well
And many of my friends did too. AFAIK it's quite common
Although this might be one of those cases where everyone thinks their own community's practice is the one that everyone in the world follows
 
2:31 PM
@Daniel For a year of Shabasos also?
 
3:04 PM
@msh210 yes
 
@Daniel @IsaacMoses Interesting.
 
3:42 PM
@IsaacMoses Do you often practice practices without knowing where you heard of them from? Like did your mesadder kiddushin/chasan teacher recommend this and you can't remember whom, or you don't think there was ever encouragement? Did you think it was a religious practice or just a fun one (because who doesn't like honey)?
 
@DoubleAA AFAIK most people sometimes practice practices without remembering where they heard them from. I don't remember who taught me about eating simanim on Rosh Hashanah but I do it
 
@Daniel It wasn't your parents?
 
@DoubleAA no, my parents didn't do it
they're not religious
 
@Daniel Ah, that does complicate things in your case. (I hope my question wasn't insensitive/offensive. It certainly wasn't meant to be.)
 
@DoubleAA not at all
@DoubleAA In any case, neither my mesadder kiddushin nor my chasan teacher mentioned the dipping challah in honey thing to me
but I had attended shabbos meals at many recently married people's houses and seen it
 
3:49 PM
@DoubleAA, I won't try to defend our adoption of the practice on Halachic grounds. It's something people do. The "fun" or obvious symbolism certainly contributes to its longevity as a meme (did in our case).
 
@IsaacMoses It's an interesting question though because perhaps it's something that we should have to justify halakhically
especially if you do the honey instead of salt
which in my experience seems to be about 50/50
 
@Daniel I agree. In retrospect, adopting a practice like this without checking into it authoritatively was probably not the best choice.
 
4:43 PM
5
Q: What theoretical predictions took the longest to be experimentally confirmed?

JeremyLooking forward to Einstein's general relativity centennial in 2015, I was thinking about how cool it would be if LIGO detects gravitational waves in 1916 (centennial of Einstein's "weak field" paper) or more likely 1918 (centennial of his quadrupole formula paper). What are other examples in ph...

 
@IsaacMoses nicely done!
 
5:22 PM
@Daniel I encourage you to ask your friends whom you see doing this how they started. From my experience, I'm highly confident no one will have anything intelligent to say.
(In my experience, you will also be called a 'party-pooper', but being truthful to tradition is worth it, IMO.)
 
"To symbolize that she's my honey."
"Because d'vash has the same gimatriya as rok, and honey tastes better than saliva."
"There's a g'zera shava of 'naki yihye l'veso shana achas' (misquote?) to rosh hashana."
"Because 'not eating honey' in Hebrew has the same gimatriya as chet." Can't go wrong with that one.
 
@msh210 <stern look> "Not eating honey" also has the same gematria as "Not eating honey" <drops mic>
@DoubleAA I, for one, appreciate your steadfast defense of genuine tradition.
 
@IsaacMoses ... if you skipped salt therefore. Otherwise, who cares?
 
@msh210 Yeah, that.
 
Personally, I use salt and honey during Tishre.
... because my father does.
 
5:31 PM
@msh210 All of Tishrei?
 
@IsaacMoses No, through Hosha'na Raba. It was just shorter (and correct, though unclear) to say "during Tishre".
 
I use honey only through Simchat Torah, because my father does. No idea where he got it from.
 
@IsaacMoses because the gimatriya...
It's usually called the Tabernacle, not the Temple, by the way. — msh210 ♦ 15 mins ago
^ It took me longer than it shoulda to catch that error.
 
@msh210 Eh. More likely that he was being unintentionally imprecise in identifying the time period.
 
@IsaacMoses Either way,
2 mins ago, by msh210
^ It took me longer than it shoulda to catch that error.
 
5:37 PM
@msh210 I only care if it's (mis)represented as an authentic Jewish practice. We don't particularly need any more Minhagim to deal with, and in 100 years, for instance, when honey bees are extinct I don't want people feeling bad. Otherwise you can put whatever condiments you want on your Challah. Perhaps Ketchup for Shana Sheniya?
 
@msh210 The Temple is traditionally called "Beit David," excusing both of you.
 
@DoubleAA Perhaps dill.
@IsaacMoses True.
 
@DoubleAA bees? My understanding is that you have to use date honey for it to work.
@DoubleAA "We don't particularly need any more Minhagim to deal with" is a position that's worthy of examination.
 
@IsaacMoses It depends on a chakira of the Bas Halevi.
 
@IsaacMoses Here comes another PTIJ topic
 
5:40 PM
Is it a mitzva for you to eat the honey, or that chala have honey on it?
If the mitzva is for you to eat the honey, then it comes from the verse cited in Gershon Gold's answer which refers to fruit honey, so you use fruit honey.
If it's that the chala have honey on it, it comes from a desire to be machshir the chala l'kabel tum'a, so you need bee's honey.
(That seriously needs work.)
 
(... irrespective of the honey question). I expect that practically speaking, minhagim are born and die in every generation. Ones that get written down stand a chance of living longer than they would otherwise, so there's probably a net increase over time, but I expect that without new ones being born over time, it'd be a net decrease.
I am using "minhagim" as a descriptive term, and not relating directly to any technical status.
 
@IsaacMoses So you're including going to hotel lobbies (as recently discussed here)?
 
@msh210 I think participants in that practice probably consider it more of an expedient than a custom
But fine, shidduch/dating practice in Jewish communities is definitely something that evolves over time, with some peculiar aspects getting dropped and others getting invented in every generation.
PTIJ: "How large do the skywritten letters have to be, when one proposes marriage via skywriting?" vel sim.
Hopefully, with an answer that cites rishonim on Masechet Rosh Hashana to explain concepts of angles of observation, parallax, etc.
 
5:55 PM
@IsaacMoses Does that meet the requirements of the proposed refresh of the PTIJ policy?
 
@Daniel It certainly could.
 
Speaking of which, should "misinterpret"in that post be "misinterpret or misapply"?
 
@msh210 Application is interpretation
@msh210 Seriously, fewer words is better, but if you think that'd be clearer to readers, please go ahead and make the edit.
@msh210 Speaking of which,
> I suggest that once the community has had a chance to write, edit, comment on, and vote on drafts, the moderators make the final decision about how to edit the policy post, since it has official faq status.
 
@IsaacMoses I dunno.
@IsaacMoses We have discussed it and decided to forbear for now and decide a little later. The more eyes on it for longer before that decision, the better. (courtesy ping @DoubleAA @MonicaCellio )
In case anyone's wondering where we discuss such things, we take turns hosting weekly moderator meetings in one of our homes or another. Stack Exchange pays the airfare, first class.
 
@msh210 Cool. If there are any specific open questions that you want to see community input on, please let us know. I guess there's not a ton of value to editing the actual policy many days before R"Ch.
 
6:05 PM
@msh210 So is that the main perk of the diamond over 20k user? First-class airfare instead of economy?
 
@Daniel Exactly. It's enough we volunteer our time, you can't expect us to also fly like sardines.
 
@msh210 That actually sounds like fun
 
@msh210 But when you go to the 20k meetings do you still get first class tickets if you're a mod or is it just economy because it's not the mod meeting?
 
@Daniel There are no 20K meetings. You need 30K to get invited to the meetings. See judaism.stackexchange.com/help/privileges .
 
@Daniel We get first-class tickets. And at the meetings we get to wear special hats. For some reason, they made them conical.
 
6:16 PM
@msh210 Kind of like the flying tiger?
 
@Daniel I was thinking more like flickr.com/photos/kmakice/4713798045
 
@msh210 Yeah but there's no winter bash hat that looks like that :(
 
@Daniel We'll have to put in a request for next year.
 
how and where can I translate a hebrew text into hebrew with latin letters?
 
@IsaacMoses That may have been true in the past but nowadays in the "information age" (and the age of 100s of sefarim documenting little detailas of everything) people tend not to forget things as fast
 
6:23 PM
@Eagel Transliterate, not translate, and I don't know. But if it's just a word or two, you can try asking us here.
 
@Eagel Just Googled this up: alittlehebrew.com/transliterate
 
@IsaacMoses I bet you wish there was someone more authoritative with that mentality 600 years ago when Ashkenazim stopped eating corn on Pesach...
 
@msh210 wait, you get first-class? I must speak to Tim about this.
 
@Eagel ... but it's not very good.
@MonicaCellio Won't help. They made a special rule that people who are mods on more than 12 sites at the same time have to fly economy.
 
@IsaacMoses That's a fair rule. Flying people all over the country to meetings for so many sites on first class would be expensive
That rule must have been made specifically for @MonicaCellio!
 
6:29 PM
@DoubleAA 600 years ago, did Ashkenazim have corn? Columbus was a sefardi, I think.
 
I dont want the text to be in english I want it to be hebrew in latin
 
@IsaacMoses It's impossible to completely accurately machine-transliterate Hebrew without trop because sometimes two words look alike even with vowels, like chach'ma ("she was wise") and chochma ("wisdom").
Maybe not even with trop.
 
I cant read hebrew when its not in latin
 
@Eagel I can't read Latin when it is in Latin.
2
 
@msh210 It should be possible to do a better job than that engine does
 
6:33 PM
Song text,hebrew song in english: Gila Bashari Tfila
 
@IsaacMoses well forrtunately, I'd need 8 more (maybe 9 more, depending on what happens next week) to trip that.
 
מים עד ים
מכאן לשם
את כולי תפילה
זה יהיה ככה
ואני מוכן לחיות ככה
יהיה מה שיהיה
ו בסערה
(00:48) הנשמה
לְשַׁבֵּחַ
הנשמה עולה גבוהה כמו כנף (x 20
(1:18) מים עד ים
מכאן לשם
אני נושא תפילה
תפילה טהורה, תמימה
האם להרים אותי
(1:30) התקשר היום ובכל יום ...
כל מי שמתקרב
בזוהר של אושר
 
@IsaacMoses Yes, for sure. I tried כלו and got Chlv. That's... terrible.
 
Sorry,its in hebrew there
 
@Daniel no, that would be ChrisF and/or Rory Alsop, both in the vicinity of 7 or 8 diamonds.
 
6:36 PM
@msh210 haha so it just blindly substitutes English consonants for Hebrew consonants?
 
@Daniel Well, to be fair, without vowels, there are so many things it can be. It did get לְשַׁבֵּחַ correct: Leshabbeach (in "Sefardi (simplified)"). So it's not that bad, I guess.
 
@IsaacMoses BTW It looks like the creator of that site is a MY user
 
So I spoke too hastily when I said "Yes, for sure".
 
A user with the same name as appears in the copyright notice used to use the image that appears in the site header as a gravatar
@IsaacMoses Do I get to take the "creepy" title now?
 
It gets חָכְמָה as "Chochmah"... must be special-cased.
 
6:41 PM
hmm שלום gives "shlvm"
@msh210 why do you say that?
 
@Daniel How else would it know it's not "Chachemah"?
 
@msh210 well it must have rules for determining whether a kamatz is katan or gadol and likewise whether a shva is na' or nach
 
@Daniel I would hope so, but I can't think of any such rule that could apply to חָכְמָה. Can you (anyone)?
... especially since there's a homograph with the same n'kudos where it's chach'ma.
 
7:26 PM
 
7:51 PM
@Daniel How quickly can you answer this?: What is the most recent allusion to Pirkei Avot in Stack Exchange chat? Go.
(Previous to this challenge, of course)
 
@IsaacMoses I'm getting this
but I didn't see that message right away
 
@Daniel Sorry. You can't have the creepiness title.
 
@IsaacMoses what was the answer?
 
in Worldbuilders' General Chat, 4 hours ago, by Monica Cellio
@bowlturner or @James, I have a a blacksmithing question that arises from, of all places, Judaism. Is it true that you need tongs to make tongs?
 
@IsaacMoses oh I thought you meant explicit mention of pirkei avot
 
8:03 PM
@Daniel Sorry. The game was unfair in other ways too.
 
that one would have come up with your standard creepy search that you have made well known
but I had no way of knowing that it would work :)
 
@Daniel It did. That's the only reason I knew about it. For that matter, for all I know, some obscure chatroom is carefully dissecting the 48 kinyanei Torah right this minute.
 
8:23 PM
@IsaacMoses I wondered if that's what you were thinking of, and whether your creepy search had found it yet. :-)
 
8:52 PM
@MonicaCellio I think that yes, as a general rule, it is if nothing else significantly easier to make tongs with tongs
 
@NoachmiFrankfurt the two people I pinged in that comment were having a discussion about the tongs that one of them had just made, which is what prompted the question.
 
9:22 PM
@msh210 Isn't it more like "she became wise" or "she wisened"? Your translation is more of an adjective than a verb.
 
9:42 PM
@DoubleAA I'm not sure what the translation of chach'ma is -- "she became wise" or "she was wise" -- but the latter is certainly plausibly a verb in Hebrew. Compare e.g. yash'na, "she was asleep", which also translates as an adj in English; likewise sam'cha, "she was happy".
@IsaacMoses Very likely.
@IsaacMoses I see you edited this question but it has no closure vote:
This seems to be a question about English words and answerable only by standard methods of answering "what does X mean?" where X is any word. This can include reference to a dictionary or encyclopedia or corpus... but appealing to a Q&A site about Judaism wouldn't seem to be the way to go: Judaism has nothing to say about the definitions of English words. I move to close this question therefore. — msh210 ♦ 3 mins ago
Can you (or anyone here) argue for its retention?
 
10:00 PM
... or closure?
 

« first day (1738 days earlier)      last day (2996 days later) »