« first day (1932 days earlier)      last day (3008 days later) » 

12:02 AM
@Kaveh1000 Sorry, but a two line announcement is not what I'd call “common knowledge” of what's really happening.
 
 
2 hours later…
1:56 AM
@JosephWright — messing around a little in l3build, what do you think of the idea of a "verbose" option that prints things like "Unpacking XYZ.ins" and so on every step of the way? I'd be happy to start adding a few things, but don't want to muck up your code if you think that would "gum up the works" with additional lines of code to have to wade through.
Looking over Kaveh's letter. You know, I'll never read "egregious" the same way every again.
@egreg ^^
 
2:51 AM
Can someone explain to me why TUG is stuck with equally useless websites such as rivervalley? With dash and without? They are absolutely amateurish websites and have nothing to do with typography
No offense to the president or else but this is just nonsense to start with. The web is crawling with open source websites (and youtube, vimeo for that matter). I think TUG is to blame here also. Why do they let commercial companies host TUG material?
 
3:41 AM
@percusse What do you mean with the connection TUG website and river valley?
@percusse And which TUG material is hosted by commercial companies?
I could imagine you mean videos of conferences taken by an employee of a third party company, which would not be TUG material I think
 
 
2 hours later…
6:02 AM
@percusse Kaveh films and produces the videos (as far as I know). I think he can host them where he likes.
 
 
1 hour later…
7:25 AM
@ChristianHupfer orange book updated on the template site.
 
@percusse The TUG website is I think hosted by the University of Aarhus. The design is quite 'classical' certainly, which I suspect reflects the workflow.
@percusse If you mean the videos, they are made by Kaveh so are not owned by TUG (copyright is owned by the producer of a video/image/...)
Oh, I see @StefanKottwitz already said that :-)
@WillRobertson I added a 'quiet' option a while ago: does that help?
 
7:48 AM
@JosephWright latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=58&t=27130 Maybe you can give better hints.
 
7:59 AM
@Johannes_B Not much you can say, really: in all cases, any demos are just that, and you are meant to start from '\documentclass{whatever}' and add your own content
 
@JosephWright There is a template available, you can just fill in the blanks.
 
@Johannes_B Possibly, but REVTeX is I think quite 'tight': everything is in the class so there is really nothing other than the standard LaTeX mark up needed
 
8:15 AM
@JosephWright Is it common knowledge how to open a file called README?
 
@Johannes_B I guess not nowadays: most people are used to the idea that files work with only one program
 
@JosephWright Can't you just double click and it opens?
 
@Johannes_B Doubtful: what's it going to open with?
 
@JosephWright I seem to recall that Windows dialog box asking: what program to open that file with?
 
@Johannes_B Exactly: most users won't know what to do
 
8:19 AM
@JosephWright :-(
@JosephWright On the other hand, i wasn't able to answer a call on a friends smartphone.
 
@Johannes_B :-)
 
@JosephWright The only way to make me answer would have been torture, sliding my finger from the pain. I was just tipping on that button and nothing happened.
 
@Johannes_B Oh, it was locked so you had 'slide up to answer' or whatever (my sister has a smartphone)
 
@JosephWright Something like that. I think it was a white smartphone.
 
9:15 AM
The links are correct, they navigate to the correct pages. The only problem is the contents references the linked pages incorrectly. It seems as if the figures are not included in the page counter. — palmer10101 1 min ago
I don't understand what the OP means. Can somebody step in?
"On Mac OS: MacTeX and TeXWorks, both are good editors." (LaTeX basics for Theses on Youtube)
 
9:47 AM
@Johannes_B Nope, no idea
Hi @WillRobertson
 
10:09 AM
@egreg The board said "unbeknownst" to them I was taking legal action. The statement on my site clearly said I was taking legal action. If I should have done anything differently I will take your advice, and I will pay very special attention to your advice, @egreg. ;-)
@percusse Hi @percusse. The videos that I have recorded are all on YouTube. Our web site, Zeeba TV, is just a front end. Anyone, including TUG, can just link to the YouTube videos.
 
@Kaveh1000 I have no advice; but if the board says “unbeknownst to them”, would you not believe them? I think it's quite dangerous going this way.
 
@egreg I wonder why expl3 chokes on that one: \def\month#1{\gdef\Zmonth{#1}} ;-)
 
@JosephWright o hai
 
@Johannes_B \def\box{...}
 
@JosephWright I was thinking the opposite of quiet! Does that mean you're okay with me adding the code? I guess I could do it in a branch and then merge in if appropriate.
 
10:18 AM
@WillRobertson It's a team product, you can do whatever :-)
 
@egreg :-)
 
@JosephWright hahahahahha
@JosephWright be careful what freedoms you allow me
 
@WillRobertson With -q/--quiet I mean that with it off you do get more noise than required already, so I wonder where you are seeing a new option helpful (will need to work with -q as they set the same thing)
@WillRobertson BTW, -v is 'taken' (or would have to be overloaded for different targets), so I guess just --verbose with no short option or -V/--verbose
 
@JosephWright I was literally thinking of things like
  for _,i in ipairs(unpackfiles) do
    for _,j in ipairs(filelist(unpackdir, i)) do
      verboseprint("Unpacking file "..j)
with an appropriate definition of verboseprint
@JosephWright I'd be happy with either just --verbose or with -V as well (-V is used in some other places, off hand)
 
@WillRobertson I guess adjust the internals so optquiet is a case rather than boolean variable (all of the user settings are opt...)
 
10:23 AM
@JosephWright Yep, I'd noticed them. I did wonder whether they should be optquiet = optquiet or userargs["quiet"] but I think I've decided that you don't want to ignore the user request :)
 
@WillRobertson The idea at present is that for the 'big' targets everything is as quiet as possible (as it is there is far too much printed to the terminal for my liking)
 
@JosephWright I completely agree! The idea is you only want or need --verbose when debugging
I wouldn't change anything about l3build's default settings... they're pretty perfect
 
@WillRobertson I can adjust if you want, or you can go ahead (I'd alter optquiet to something like optinfolevel, which can then be used to pick up if the verbose option is on or not)
 
@JosephWright No need to address immediately… I'll be looking at the code as I work on a build script for this unicode maths stuff. Hopefully later tonight
 
@WillRobertson OK, cool
 
10:35 AM
@egreg Not a question of not believing the board, most of whom have been friends of mine for years or decades, but I am just scratching my head thinking how they could not have known. My letter to board give examples of how it would have been obvious to anyone, let alone some of the most intelligent people I have come across!
 
@percusse ????? don't you mean why do they let commercial companies offer a free service of providing the equipment and manpower to record the talks and making them available for people who can not travel to the meeting?
 
@WillRobertson Any idea if \pdftracingfonts and \XeTeXtracingfonts are the same?
 
@JosephWright I would suspect so. . . . I don't think I've ever used them! (oops)
 
@WillRobertson Context: LuaTeX is renaming \pdftracingfonts to \tracingfonts, so I'm tidying up more names
 
morning all
 
10:46 AM
@DavidCarlisle Hello
@DavidCarlisle Nearly worked out which primitives I've not got so far from LuaTeX: list is now quite short
@DavidCarlisle Still think Hans is on the wrong track with some of these
@WillRobertson Ah, now I remember: they don't seem to do the same thing
 
@JosephWright yes probably but if extra functionality gets in, a few pointless primitives would be in tex tradition.
 
@JosephWright so what do they do? :)
 
@WillRobertson The XeTeX one tells you where fonts are found, the pdfTeX one adds stuff to box tracing
 
Waaah, MathJax is rendering all my \phi symbols as "J"
 
@DavidCarlisle :-)
 
10:50 AM
@JosephWright well that's quite different!!
 
@WillRobertson Oops
@WillRobertson Indeed
 
@JosephWright I don't think it's my fault. I don't really understand why I can't just publish static MathML rather than using all the javascript stuff. But I'm just using what's easy, not what's correct.
 
@WillRobertson if wikipedia had done that, everyone would be able to by now (as the browsers would have made it work) but as is if you do that you really rely on firefox and safari a bit
 
@DavidCarlisle damn wikipedia.
@DavidCarlisle always ruining our fun
@DavidCarlisle I guess I can see what their point would have been though
 
@WillRobertson XeTeX version leads to
Requested font "[lmroman10-regular]:mapping=tex-text" at 10.0pt
 -> /usr/local/texlive/2015/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/public/lm/lmroman10-regul
ar.otf
 
10:54 AM
@DavidCarlisle I read about KaTeX with some interest — they use CSS to do glyph placement, just like William Hammond was talking about at TUG
 
pdfTeX version to
....\OT1/cmr/m/n/10 (cmr10) H
....\OT1/cmr/m/n/10 (cmr10) e
....\OT1/cmr/m/n/10 (cmr10) l
....\OT1/cmr/m/n/10 (cmr10) l
....\OT1/cmr/m/n/10 (cmr10) o
@WillRobertson Ah
 
@WillRobertson having half the worlds population mail you every day saying the site is broken until browsers out of their control got updated wasn't an attractive proposition. I can't see why.
 
@JosephWright that would probably come in handy for some of my fontspec tests!
@JosephWright When I actually write them properly, that is...
 
@WillRobertson so does mathjax (mostly) especially in the new "common html" output which generates much quicker html/css that is not tied to the particular browser window.
 
@DavidCarlisle KaTeX claims to be faster than MathJax I think
 
10:57 AM
@JosephWright it claims lots of things:-)
 
@WillRobertson If we could get it into XeTeX too ...
@DavidCarlisle, @WillRobertson Oooh, bug report for unicode-data
 
WHAAAAAAAAAT?????????
@JosephWright Hans on hyphenation^^^^
 
@DavidCarlisle Oh my goodness
 
@JosephWright I'm replying now (but will probably edit the text a bit before sending)
 
@DavidCarlisle I'm tempted to reply too but I guess I'll hold off
 
11:06 AM
@DavidCarlisle nice reply :)
@JosephWright What have you gotten yourself into with this? :)
 
@WillRobertson I'll check the behaviour versus unicode-letters.tex: whatever the latter does holds
 
Couldn't Hans just have \language=-1 or something ?
 
@WillRobertson yes
 
@DavidCarlisle This plus the no-testing stuff is really beginning to annoy me
 
@JosephWright I am not involved but seeing the messages here in chat and reading some of the mails from the list, i am quite annoyed. Feels like every other day you have to fix fomething in the format to keep LuaTeX supported. Feels like a change is made, and the discussion about it is taken out later. Thank you guys for your efforts.
 
11:15 AM
@Johannes_B Oh my, my contribution to a template -- I will be in the pillory soon ;-) (Thanks!)
 
@ChristianHupfer I am not and i have done more silly things, don't worry :-)
 
@Johannes_B Please provide some examples :-P
 
@ChristianHupfer Ah, rather not. ;-)
 
I have to prepare a Physics 'lesson' for my pupils on Gravitational Waves ..
 
@ChristianHupfer Post the slides :-)
@Johannes_B We do get some heads-up on some of this stuff in advance
 
11:21 AM
@JosephWright Ok, some is better than none :-)
 
@JosephWright Which slides? I've to do this tomorrow and have not started... I feel like @PauloCereda -- procrastinating all the time ...
 
@ChristianHupfer Once you've got them ready ...
@ChristianHupfer Chalk-and-talk?
 
@JosephWright Well, partially anyway. I've to explain curved space time first a little bit ;-)
@JosephWright: I remember the lectures in General Relativity back in 1999 -- the lecturer needed two hours to reduce Einstein's field equations to the linearized case and all boards (there were six of them, really large) were full of symbols with covariant and contravariant indices -- I am not sure that I wrote down everything correctly that time :D
@ThomasF.Sturm: Ah -- I did not remove the tcolorboxes so far. Well, it's a feature (as David Carlisle would say, others call it a bug ;-)) of animate then? — Christian Hupfer 3 mins ago
 
@ChristianHupfer don't. I'm not in a good mood.
 
@DavidCarlisle \let\bug\feature ...(I am sorry!)
 
11:28 AM
@ChristianHupfer just don't mention luatex
 
@DavidCarlisle :-)
 
@DavidCarlisle No, I won't -- I don't use luatex so far ... In case of finding 'features' I blame @JosephWright then ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer This may be a good plan ...
 
@JosephWright I was planning to fix up bm and the packaging of amsmath for the Umathchardef stuff, but I really can't be bothered today now, it'll have to wait.
 
@DavidCarlisle Indeed
@DavidCarlisle Distract yourself with github.com/latex3/unicode-data/issues/2 :-)
 
11:33 AM
@JosephWright phew that link goes to unicode-data, I feared you were linking to xor
 
@DavidCarlisle No, wouldn't do that to you
 
@JosephWright That's what I'd have done if roles were reversed:-)
 
11:51 AM
@DavidCarlisle Sounds like a nice day for beer and a movie.
 
yo'
@egreg @Kaveh I agree with Enrico on this. Even after being a member of TUG for almost 2 years, participating in TeX stuff actively online and participating on a TUG meeting where I met you and all of the board in person, I had no idea of the case. That's just my two cents.
 
@Kaveh1000 Your attachments link gives me a "forbidden" message, at least using wget.
> ERROR 403: Forbidden.
 
@Kaveh1000 Imho you are showing a certain lack of political thinking. You can't look at the case as if it is discussion about some scientific theories where only one can be objectivly correct. You also can't handle it as a legal dispute where a jury at the end decides who wins the case. What would you gain if you "win"? Do you want the board to step down then?
The board said that they didn't know and that they think this is important. A president/leader can't dismiss such a view as untrue or irrelevant even if he doesn't share it. You must find a solution that takes it into account.
 
12:24 PM
@yo' But in any case the legal dispute is unrelated to TUG so should not matter.
@UlrikeFischer I have tried everything, Ulrike. Please let me know what solution you have in mind.
 
yo'
@Kaveh1000 As I say, this is difficult when we speak about the president. You can like it or not, but for this type of positions, everything matters. Even the size of one's shoes could matter.
@FaheemMitha you have to go through the web interface on google drive
 
@yo' Please see my second post with direct link to the files
 
yo'
@Kaveh1000 that's for @Faheem I suppose...
 
@DavidCarlisle Wrong wording on my side. Why does TUG let river-valley host the videos and making the website relate to TUG to the outsider?
Why are these personal websites closely linked to TUG as if there is an organic connection?
 
@percusse well they are their videos, they took them they edited them they let you view them.
 
12:30 PM
personal as in "personal"
 
@yo' Damn. I knew it. I forgot to put my shoe size. :-(
 
yo'
@Kaveh1000 I truly don't mean anything personally against you. I just try to state what I feel is true (note: true, not right. Right is not to have to have courts of course.)
 
@DavidCarlisle I think this pretty wrong to let it slide. If TUG is making a fuss about making this lawsuit between individuals to define its president, then this is a big deal. You can't record a game and broadcast it without permission.
 
@Kaveh1000 Yes, that's the one I tried.
 
Content matters.
 
12:34 PM
@percusse sorry I don't follow you, I've not been involved in tug in any way, but clearly they had permission do you think they sneaked in unseen and took secret footage of the conference?
 
@Kaveh1000 To be clear, I tried the direct link (nothing to do with Google as far as I can see) and it gave the error message above.
> ERROR 403: Forbidden.
 
@DavidCarlisle Exactly so why not putting on youtube instead of placing as a stream(!!) in one of the members commercial company website?
 
/me wonders when Youtube became a community thing.
 
@percusse I have put them all on YouTube. My site (zeeba.tv) is just a convenient interface to those YouTube videos. Anyone can access them directly, or have another interface to them. Let me know if I have done anything wrong
 
@percusse It doesn't seem unreasonable to me, Ok so the company gets a bit of free advertising but if someone offers to travel to the conference, record and edit all the talks and make the results feely available, a bit of recognition doesn't seem unreasonable (or related to the separate issue about the president)
 
12:38 PM
@DavidCarlisle My point is if TUG is so rigorous about having this dispute as a matter of internal suspension, then it cannot allow such advertisement. I don't get the whole thing at all.
 
@percusse Permission to film \neq ownership transfer
 
@percusse I don't see any connection
 
@JosephWright doesn't automatically grant advertisement rights
 
@FaheemMitha I just tried but by clicking through a browser. Not sure there is a wget problem. Anyone?
 
@Kaveh1000 Ok, I'll try it in a browser. Give me a sec.
 
12:39 PM
@percusse I don't see an advert, I see that the TUG website links to where videos can be watched
 
@Kaveh1000 No I don't claim anything like that. I was trying to make another point by using the videos
 
@Kaveh1000 It is not likely to work with wget basically drive is set up to use the google permissions API so even when it is shared publicly you have to use a browser 9or use curl to post the authentication stuff from the commandline (which is possible but a pain as I recall:-)
 
@Kaveh1000 yes, it works via a browser.
 
@percusse I think you are carrying this a bit too far. I really don't need any advertising rights. As I said, you can create a web page and link direct to the videos and not mention my name. I don't make any money from these. I actually pay out of my pocket every time I do them.
 
BTW, you should set it up to extract into a subdirectory. Also, you have an empty __MACOSX directory in there.
 
12:41 PM
@Kaveh1000 Again, I didn't make any such claim. Also you can put it on youtube, vimeo, dailymotion or whatever and save your money.
 
@DavidCarlisle David, do see the second post I put up. Direct link. No Google Drive
 
Why do you prefer hosting them?
 
@Kaveh1000 whatever, doesn't matter 99% of people will use a browser anyway:-)
 
@percusse There are many other publishing related conferences on the site, so it is useful for others to learn about TeX too.
 
@DavidCarlisle The link that is giving me an error does not appear to have anything to do with google. Just a direct link. But wget is giving an error regardless.
 
12:43 PM
@FaheemMitha That's just how the default Mac "archive" command words. Unfortunately :)
 
It's not obvious to me why.
 
@JosephWright @Kaveh1000 Exactly my point. Nothing else.
 
@WillRobertson Huh. Live and learn. Thank you.
 
@FaheemMitha haven't checked but robots.txt for example would have exactly that effect.
 
@DavidCarlisle Hmm, I was not aware of that.
 
12:45 PM
@FaheemMitha wget is a web crawler so blocked by default if you block anything with robots.txt , you may think you are asking for just one file but it can (try to) download the entire site
 
@DavidCarlisle I see.
 
@DavidCarlisle Well I have learnt something too. :-)
 
@Kaveh1000 Is the information about your lawsuit public? This is sheer nosyness, but I can't help wonder what went wrong...
 
@FaheemMitha It a long story, Faheem. I don't think all the details are public, and probably best I don't discuss them here, or my big mouth will get me into trouble. ;-) Anything legal is not nice for anyone, but a last resort and that was the case here.
 
@FaheemMitha @Kaveh1000 note that robots.txt comes from an earlier age of the internet, it's only a polite request to be nice not any actual security. If you tell the server you are not wget, it believes you. this works wget --user-agent=Mozilla http://uncle-kaveh.com/tug/Appeal.pdf
 
1:00 PM
@Kaveh1000 If it isn't public, that's fine. I understand if you don't want to talk about it.
And yes, I totally understand about legal not being nice. :-(
 
@FaheemMitha A couple of beers usually helps lubricate my jaws though. ;-)
 
@Kaveh1000 Heh
Sometimes legal stuff can be public. I don't know how common that is, but I've certainly read case stuff online.
I remember once reading a very interesting case study about this guy who was editor of some academic journal.
It was a well known publisher. And he really abused his position. The publishers got rid of him with some difficulty, and then he sued them.
The case was held in London. I was quite impressed by how well written the case decision was. Very through and fair.
This was quite an unusual case, I think.
Though I have to wonder how he became editor to start with.
@DavidCarlisle I see. Well, lying to servers is Not Nice. So I won't. Though browsers regularly do, alas. Apparently MS was originally to blame. For screwing with browser strings, I mean.
Wow, this was really easy to find - pressgazette.co.uk/node/44545. So, Nature.
 
@Kaveh1000 Like @egreg I can't offer one. It would probably have been easy at the begin but now it is getting difficult. But a letter full of paragraphs, sectioning and an overall "legal" language is imho the wrong way.
 
Lawyers, ugh.
 
Well, no one likes legal language. Please look at my emails prior to that. There are plenty of those. That is more my style. It would have been easier to find a solution using that kind of exchange.

After 30 years of building a reputation in publishing, it is not nice to be the first "suspended" president of TUG, and advertised on the TUG web page too. Please put yourself in my position.
 
1:45 PM
Can somebody check en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=LaTeX/…, especially for the very last sentence on autocite (latest draft)?
 
Hi Kaveh. I agree, it is definitely not nice. I have no knowledge of the case nor of the discussions between you and the board. I am sure this situation is just as difficult for the board to address. As a simple TUG member, I am worried what effect this trouble is causing the organisation in terms of its current members and the moral of the people who are volunteering their time to help run it. I hope you are not fighting for a pyrrhic victory.
@Kaveh1000 ^^. Apologies, I now must retire for the night.
 
@WillRobertson 'Night
 
@Kaveh1000 Chomsky says somewhere (I forget where) the biggest waste of time and money is in a courtroom. Or something like that. I think he's exaggerating, but not by much.
 
 
2 hours later…
3:24 PM
@egreg could you explain what is happening here ^^^
 
3:46 PM
@DavidCarlisle Ask a question on the site
 
@egreg probably would be voted off topic
 
4:03 PM
@DavidCarlisle They are crushing a poor ball near some foam flag while some bloke is diving to be one with the grass.
 
@PauloCereda s/They/England/ , s/ball/Italy/
 
@DavidCarlisle You should write a book on how to solve problems with regex. :)
 
@PauloCereda s/luatex/xetex/
 
@DavidCarlisle ^^^ See <3
I rest my case. :D
 
4:23 PM
@PauloCereda Something better happened yesterday. :)
 
@egreg poor Napoli. :)
@Alan, o que é um pontinho amarelo no meio da savana, um pontinho azul no céu e um pontinho vermelho no rio? :)
 
4:38 PM
@PauloCereda O primeiro eu sei: um yellowfante. O resto não.
 
@AlanMunn oooh. :) Um urublue e um jacared. :)
I deserve a beating. :)
 
@PauloCereda For the second, I was thinking Uma bluvem.
 
@AlanMunn ooh I like it. :)
 
@PauloCereda But I like urublue too.
@PauloCereda jacared is the weakest of the three.
 
5:14 PM
user image
3
factor(451657)
%1 = [451657 1]
 
@egreg You are using computer programs? Oh my!
:)
 
@PauloCereda Pari-GP, very nice
 
@egreg pari gp used to have an excellent emacs interface
 
[paulo@cambridge documento] $ sudo dnf install pari
[sudo] senha para paulo:
Last metadata expiration check performed 2:26:21 ago on Sun Feb 14 12:55:45 2016.
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
 Package        Arq.             Versão                 Repo               Tam.
================================================================================
Instalando:
 pari           x86_64           2.7.5-1.fc23           updates           2.1 M
@egreg: ^^
 
yo'
5:29 PM
A poll to the chat people: Any idea for a good length 7 (La)TeX snippet for the PCG post?
 
@yo' \halign
 
yo'
@egreg too technical IMHO. It need not be a single macro. Maybe some cool math? Ah I see we need also a length 8 snippet :)
 
@yo' $$a+b$$
 
yo'
@egreg sounds good!
 
@yo' In LaTeX it's the same length: \[a+b\]
 
yo'
5:40 PM
@egreg I could do both at once I think!
 
@yo' a\over b for the eight character example
 
yo'
@egreg oh, that's TeX, not LaTeX :) But I think it's better anyway :)
 
@egreg or \def\x{}
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle oh!
Sorry @egreg, @David's solution was better this time, exceptionally.
 
@yo' s/, exceptionally//
@PauloCereda ^^
 
yo'
5:55 PM
@DavidCarlisle ufffff, this time is left intact
 
@DavidCarlisle <3
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle is that really you? :-O
 
@DavidCarlisle YOU SIR ARE A LEGEND
 
I also did the first pari gp implementation on windows (although you won't find my name on that, it was a secret:-)
 
5:59 PM
@DavidCarlisle: (Janet): Give me your electronic address, I need to include it in the notes. (David): no, so people won't bother me with bugs, as there are none. (Janet): Got it.
 
@PauloCereda that actually was exactly why I didn't want to be named for making a windows/dos implementation:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle <3
 
0
Q: What's wrong with this code?

jack1I just saw this one on the book. It just required to print the statement and change some things on the printf but I don't know what's wrong. #include<stdio.h> main() { int x=2, y=3; printf("%d", ++(x+y)); return 0; }

Off-topic
 
@PauloCereda I didn't have a dos machine I just spent an afternoon in the maths department with one of the first releases of djgcc port of gcc to msdos (which the pari gp people hadn't seen) once I told them the compiler worked enough to re-create the base results of the test file they took it on, so I asked not to be mentioned:-)
@ChristianHupfer perhaps it's on topic, but really bad TeX?
 
@DavidCarlisle Not in your wildest dreams ;-)
 
6:12 PM
@DavidCarlisle There's even a comment there!
 
@DavidCarlisle Exactly! When I talk about "bad language" in my intro class, I often say (as I'm speaking English) that I'm speaking really bad French. Which is true... :)
 
 
1 hour later…
yo'
@AlanMunn italian tower is italic :)
 
Regarding the TUG presidency issue, is there a short, duck-friendly, version for me to follow? I am almost literally drowning with paper and I am sure this legal document exchange nonsense won't make any easier for me to understand what is going on.
 
@yo' You mean the Italic Tower of Pisa?
 
yo'
@AlanMunn :)
 
@AlanMunn The haven't loaded fontspec...
 
yo'
7:42 PM
@PauloCereda no, they have loaded it, but they should have avoided...
 
@yo' No, they put the tower inside mathmode by mistake.
 
yo'
@AlanMunn $Pisa$
 
@yo' LOL
\rotatebox{85.5}{\pisatower}
 
@yo' You have another vote. I suggest \noexpand
 
yo'
@AlanMunn Thanks :)
@AlanMunn I would, however, prefer to go for some more obscurities...
Oh the answer could get a community ad here to gain some upvotes! @Paulo @Alan What do you think of the idea?
 
8:02 PM
@yo' I'm not sure that's in the spirit of the voting system...
 
yo'
@AlanMunn well, promoting your own language? ... :)
One for meta maybe? (But even that is a "promotion", right? ...)
What does our mod hero think of this? :) ^^ @Joseph
 
 
1 hour later…
9:18 PM
Could someone help me. I've a latex table that renders well on stackexchange but isn't rendering well on latex.
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{cc|c|c|c|}
* && e & r & r^2& r^3& r^4& r^5& f& rf& r^2f& r^3f& r^{4}f& r^{5}f\\
&&&&\\
\hline
e && e & r & r^2& r^3& r^4& r^5& f& rf& r^2f& r^3f& r^{4}f& r^{5}f \\
\hline
r && r & r^2 & r^3& r^4& r^5& f& rf& r^2f& r^3f& r^{4}f& r^{5}f & f \\
\hline
r^2 && r^2 & r^3& r^4& r^5& f& rf& r^2f& r^3f& r^{4}f& r^{5}f & f & rf \\
\hline
r^3 && r^3& r^4& r^5& f& rf& r^2f& r^3f& r^{4}f& r^{5}f & f & rf & r^2f \\
\hline
r^4 && r^4& r^5& f& rf& r^2f& r^3f& r^{4}f& r^{5}f & f & rf & r^2f & r^3f\\
You see it renders perfect on here but when I enter it on latex I get lines and stuff all over the place. Apologies that this takes so much space on chat, btw .
 
yo'
@user276387 You should really make it a proper question on the site.
 
@user276387 MathJax is not LaTeX. You have way too many & for the number of columns in your table specification,
 
@AlanMunn Ah, that makes sense. How do I fix this?
@yo' Does it fit the standards? I thought it might too simple/soft.
 
@user276387 Well I'm not sure what you want the table to look like, but e.g. if your array specification is {ccc} then a row will look like `foo & bar & foobar \\`
@user276387 So each column is separated by &, so three columns -> two &. etc. Also, in LaTeX you should use \[ ... \] not $$ ... $$ for displayed math.
 
@AlanMunn Thanks. I'll try to fix those.
 
9:31 PM
@user276387 If you've mainly been using MathJax, it might be best to read a good introduction to LaTeX, so that you can see the differences. See tex.stackexchange.com/q/11/2693 for some good suggestions.
 
@AlanMunn Thanks for the link. I needed something like that.
 
@user276387 Rather than the top voted answer, though (the WikiBook) I would recommend the online introduction by Nicola Talbot dickimaw-books.com/latex/novices
 
10:05 PM
@DavidCarlisle Olympic qualifiers: Italy-Great Britain 6:2 :)
 
@egreg Is this in bocce?
 
@AlanMunn Ice hockey! Did you know GB had a team?
 
@egreg I was expecting fencing ...
 
@egreg No I didn't. In hockey, only Canada, US, Sweden and Russia are any good. :)
 
@AlanMunn I bet @yo' disagrees
 
10:08 PM
@JosephWright In that sport, there's no competition. Italy has some of the best fencers in the world. Although amazingly (given history) the US also has some top fencers.
 
@AlanMunn 'Nah, in hockey India are very good ;-)
 
@JosephWright Only when the ice melts and grass grows. :)
 
10:29 PM
@DavidCarlisle — I hope you got that beer in the end.
 

« first day (1932 days earlier)      last day (3008 days later) »