« first day (1771 days earlier)      last day (3164 days later) » 

7:26 AM
@egreg :-)
 
 
2 hours later…
9:25 AM
@JosephWright I just saw in the CTAN announcement of greek-fontenc "\lccode/\uccode corrections for Unicode". greek-euenc.def now contains a long list of lccode/uccode settings.
 
@UlrikeFischer Thanks: I know I reported a few wrong'uns recently
@UlrikeFischer Checking c.t.t. now
 
@JosephWright OK. I simply wondered if greek-euenc.def is the correct place. I checked a few and they seemed to set the same values as unicode-letters.def.
 
@UlrikeFischer They may still be wrong looking at the announcement: I read all of them in xgreek and some are not really correct
 
 
4 hours later…
1:37 PM
Yay, congrats, your majesty!
@QueenElizabethTheSecond: Congrats!
 
@PauloCereda You're early
 
1:50 PM
@JosephWright Oh no!
Wednesday?
 
2:14 PM
@PauloCereda Yes
 
@JosephWright Cool.
 
 
1 hour later…
3:16 PM
Lovely weather: sitting in the garden
 
@JosephWright Wi-fi? :)
 
@PauloCereda Yes, just bought new power line based extender kit
 
3:52 PM
@PauloCereda I'm really enjoying sending people pull requests on GitHub :-)
Not sure they are ...
@StefanKottwitz, @MartinScharrer Did my mail get to you both?
 
4:42 PM
@PauloCereda Nice tour: gorgeous day!
@PauloCereda A bit cool up the mountains.
I did a military road built during World War I, above lake Garda, on Monte Baldo.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:17 PM
I see the L3 team added \exp:w for full expansion. This, however, is different from \romannumeral-`\Q (or \romannumeral-0, I don't know what exactly is it, I never used it explicitly). Why that difference? Why now \romannumeral is “enough”?
I defined some time ago something in this lines \let \exp:w \romannumeral \def \now:w { -`\Q } and then it had to be called like \exp:w\now:w. But now just \exp:w is enough?
 
6:37 PM
@JosephWright I did noe get one
@JosephWright ah, found one
@JosephWright caught me between work and travel :-)
 
6:55 PM
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to avoid the need of \pdfmapfile?
e.g. in my package or class file, or in the map doc
 
7:13 PM
@barbarabeeton Did you have any chance yet to look at the template stuff?
 
@Johannes_B -- i have had some chance, but have not yet come to a firm conclusion. i am still struggling with the (unfortunately) widespread "belief" that document class = template. i can see some reasons behind that opinion, but strongly feel it is the wrong way to go; my struggle is at least partly with myself -- am i simply being stubborn? anyhow, tomorrow is a holiday here, and (as soon as i finish editing the tugboat proceedings issue) contemplation of templates is next on my list.
 
@barbarabeeton Take your time. No need to hurry :-)
 
7:33 PM
@barbarabeeton The question of what a template is is unclear yet and needs to be specified. In the post i used my point of view of what i think templates are. This isn't fixed and open for discussion. I just didn't knew how to express that, that's mainly why i asked for your opinion. The question of how to get the text out there and how to actually discuss needs some attention as well. But TUGboat first.
 
7:54 PM
@JosephWright Hi, no, I didn't got one. I checked just now.
There isn't one in my spam folder either
 
8:10 PM
If someone has a spare vote, tex.stackexchange.com/a/266001/4427 could be removed from the unanswered list. (Note: I'm rep capped.)
 
@egreg: It's upvoted already ;-) But not by me ... and my god, you're rep capped? ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer Yeah, sometimes it happens. :P
 
@egreg Anyway, another vote would give a Revival ... badge, wouldn't it? Oooops... ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer I have 308 of them.
 
@egreg: Now one more ... I've got only one of them, because my answers to old questions are frozen still to 1 vote :-(
 
8:20 PM
@ChristianHupfer Somebody (a duck, perhaps) should do something about that.
 
@egreg Such proceedings will be duckumented ;-) @PauloCereda (The Great Mysterious Duck)
 
@ChristianHupfer Revival badges are easy: leave a comment somewhere, wait until the next unanswered questions event and then reap the badges.
 
@UlrikeFischer Nobody noticed it so far ;-)
 
@UlrikeFischer You forget “wait for a ping from egreg"
Or @TorbjørnT., as well.
 
@egreg or Johannes, or ...
 
8:32 PM
@UlrikeFischer: Did you get my mail with the images? ;-)
 
@UlrikeFischer You called?
 
@Manuel \exp:w = \romannumeral but with a defined expansion purpose. There's also now \exp_end_continue_f:w` = `^^@ ~ -`\Q
@Manuel You can\t avoid needing \exp:w\exp_end_continue_f:w for cases where the first token is hit by \exp_after:wN and must force expansion in one shot
@MartinScharrer I'll resend
@Manuel We are (once again) fixing inconsistencies in expl3: here we'd been using \tex_romannumeral:D rather too much for comfort, and a name reflecting the use was needed. Expect changes in the case changing area for the same reason.
 
8:50 PM
@ChristianHupfer Yes. Thanks ;-)
 
9:26 PM
@JosephWright been out all day, did I miss anything exciting?
 
@DavidCarlisle I was out all day too!
 
@DavidCarlisle No
 
@JosephWright phew:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle I've done a CTAN update, see request from CTAN re. dates
 
@JosephWright saw that:-)
 
9:28 PM
@DavidCarlisle l3build has had some minor updates to support babel
@DavidCarlisle Any idea why \Ucharcat doesn't like catcode-13?
@DavidCarlisle I was cycling this morning :-)
 
@JosephWright and I changed \newluachunk -> \newluachunkname
 
@DavidCarlisle saw that:-)
 
@JosephWright No there wasn't really any discussion, it just got added on the back of a comment I made while failing to fix \Uchar's surrogate pair handling.
@JosephWright seems like a better name
 
@DavidCarlisle I'm happy: we are actually ahead of the feature requests, more or less :-)
 
@JosephWright seems that way.
 
 
1 hour later…
11:01 PM
So quiet.
 
@PauloCereda No quack.
 
@egreg Let me fix that. :)
Quaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack.
Does it echo? :)
 
@PauloCereda Yes! Did you have a good Sunday?
 
@egreg I did, thanks. :) I had fun with friends, and now I ate a banana cake. :) And how was your Sunday? :)
 
@PauloCereda Gorgeous tour: two new mountain roads!
6 hours ago, by egreg
I did a military road built during World War I, above lake Garda, on Monte Baldo.
 
11:07 PM
@egreg Wow! How lovely! First time there?
 
@PauloCereda Yes. Quite crowded place, actually: it was a splendid day. But I did the narrow road when almost everybody was having lunch, so not much traffic. :)
 
@egreg Picnickers?
 
@PauloCereda Mostly. But also the restaurants were filled.
I just had ice-cream. :)
Good night!
 
11:31 PM
@egreg oooh! :)
@egreg Buongiorno, pal! :)
Oh my, I meant buonanotte!
My Italian is awful!
 
11:45 PM
@PauloCereda: Already in Buenos Aires?
 
@ChristianHupfer Oh I don't know if my paper got accepted yet. :) Only tomorrow. :)
 
@PauloCereda: Ah, a one-day-trip to Argentina?
 
@ChristianHupfer No, I will get a notification about my paper tomorrow. :) If it gets accepted, I will go in October. :)
 
@PauloCereda: I have misunderstood you apparently. I thought you would leave SP on Sep 7th
 
@ChristianHupfer Oh no worries. :)
 
11:49 PM
@PauloCereda: Thumbs up for accepting then :D
 
@ChristianHupfer Si Señor Hupfer. <3
 
@PauloCereda Please sing Don't cry for me, Argentina, when you leave Buenos Aires in a few weeks then :-P
 
@ChristianHupfer You gotta be kidding me! :)
Is Madonna British, by the way? No she isn't.
 
@PauloCereda: American, with Italian background ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer :)
 
11:53 PM
@PauloCereda I would never always kidding you
 
@ChristianHupfer No llores por mi, Argentina!
 
@PauloCereda Excellente!!!
 
@ChristianHupfer Danke! :)
 
@PauloCereda Ah, das (!) Dankeschön :D
 
@ChristianHupfer Ja, und das böse Ente! <3
 
11:59 PM
@PauloCereda das böse Ende or das böse Ente :-P
 

« first day (1771 days earlier)      last day (3164 days later) »