« first day (1630 days earlier)      last day (3305 days later) » 

7:49 AM
Hi
 
Good maen
 
How can I succeed in programming in LaTeX? There are good resources introduced on site. What more can I do, besides to reading those resources?
 
@EnthusiasticStudent Read TeX by Topic
@EnthusiasticStudent Of course, it partly depends what you want to do
 
@JosephWright Should I try to write a package? Or I should write small subroutines... I am not sure where to start
 
@EnthusiasticStudent Writing a package implies you have something you want to give out to others: the programming techniques are the same as if you only want the code for yourself
@EnthusiasticStudent BTW, no subroutines as TeX is a macro expansion language!
 
7:59 AM
@JosephWright Yes!
 
@EnthusiasticStudent: It depends on the level of complexity. As a beginner, I would suggest to use the etoolbox and xparse facilities for programming
 
@ChristianHupfer I am taking a look at their manuals
 
@EnthusiasticStudent: Well, xparse is not really programming related, but provides means for more flexible macro interfaces. The programming stuff is in etoolbox ... just as some comment on my last lines
 
@ChristianHupfer Good sources to start with... Thank you very much. I have seen some codes on the site using that xparse codes. It will improve my LaTeX too....
 
 
1 hour later…
9:25 AM
@EnthusiasticStudent: I would be happy to see the packages you will publish (hint!!!)
 
 
1 hour later…
yo'
10:53 AM
Google maps gone mad: I doesn't matter there's no road, it's one-way anyways.
 
@yo' Google knows new roads will be built.
 
yo'
@egreg "will be built" is an optimism, considering it's in my home country.
 
 
1 hour later…
12:03 PM
Quaaaaaack! :)
 
12:22 PM
@PauloCereda: Oh my.... Darth Duckious ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer :) How are you, buddy?
 
@PauloCereda: Quite busy... I have an important presentation to be done till Tuesday, being part one of my promotion run: "How to teach personal training in Mathematics" ... Teaching teachers that teach... And how are you?
 
@ChristianHupfer ooh cool! :) I'm in a hurry, but fine. :) I'll travel to Spain in this Friday afternoon. :)
 
This Friday? It's Saturday.. You will be late :-P
 
@ChristianHupfer LOL
 
12:30 PM
@PauloCereda: By the way: How's your knowledge of Spanish? :-P
 
@ChristianHupfer Qué?!
:)
 
@PauloCereda: Are you going to ... Barcelona? ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer The awesome thing is, I AM! :P
 
@PauloCereda: Oh, you are in Europe already?
 
@ChristianHupfer No, I meant I am going to Barcelona. :)
It will be a couple of days in Madrid, then a couple of days in Barcelona.
 
12:35 PM
@PauloCereda: If you have some spare time, pay a visit to Germany: You're welcome
 
@ChristianHupfer I wish I could go, but for now it will be complicated. But hopefully I will return to Europe pretty soon.
 
@PauloCereda: Yes! Just give a note ... I will show you the Black Forest and provide some extra cookies ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer ooh! :)
 
1:16 PM
Till later on...
 
1:42 PM
@ChristianHupfer Actually, I have always thought about a package based on the features of Tikz and Pgfplots to draw structural engineering drawings in LaTeX documents (I have masters in structural engineering (civil engineering)). But I do not have enough programming knowledge unfortunately...
 
2:02 PM
@David: credit card is unblocked for international use. /hint
 
Installed TL2015 on my MacBook Pro, now xelatex.fmt compiles properly! :)
 
@egreg ooooh
I want a MacBook Pro too. :)
 
And there are no more \beginL and \endL in math lists!
\setbox0=\hbox{$a+b$}\showboxbreadth=1000\showboxdepth=1000\tracingonline=1\showbox0
> \box0=
\hbox(6.94444+0.83333)x21.79968
.\mathon
.\teni a
.\glue(\medmuskip) 2.22217 plus 1.11108 minus 2.22217
.\tenrm +
.\glue(\medmuskip) 2.22217 plus 1.11108 minus 2.22217
.\teni b
.\mathoff
 
2:39 PM
@egreg Yup
 
3:22 PM
@PauloCereda: I'll give you my bank account number, for immediate transfer
 
@ChristianHupfer Oh no!
How about PayPal? :)
 
@HarishKumar Those verses are the opening of the “Aeneid” by Virgil.
 
@EnthusiasticStudent: I know too little about TiKZ, about the requirements of programming requirements for such a package
 
Hi all! Is something like this even possible? (Sortable tables longer than a page.) I don't think so based on my understanding of OCG, but I might be wrong:
0
Q: multiple page sortable tables

Peter EbelsbergerLook at the following MWE. Here we have to tasks that I am trying to solve. Task 1: First. If i try to use the command dtlloadrawdb (instead of dtlloaddb) everything wents fine, until I use the first DTLrawmap command. This results in an error. Task 2: In case of long tables, I cannot produces...

 
Guys, what's the best to way to typeset lambda calculus? Say $\lambda x . x - 1$?
 
3:29 PM
@PauloCereda Did you try $\lambda x.x-1$? ;-)
 
@PauloCereda: $$\lambda x.x -1$$ ... just to annoy the TeX Gurus here
 
@ChristianHupfer it'd be fine for TeX gurus but not LaTeX gurus... :-)
 
@PaulGessler: Booooooooooooooooooo
Too broad in my opinion
0
Q: Need a little guidance for latex document design

jnbrqI want to use LaTEX to write a fascicle. So I need some specialized design. For example a specialized design for headers, specialized edging, rearranged margins etc. So my questions are: Which document class should I prefer? Or should I start my own one? If I should start my own, could you recom...

Has anybody seen this before?
I was congratulated for ... well... nothing
 
@egreg I did. :) It looks... ood. :)
@egreg: Actually I tried some beta reduction joke which failed. :P
 
@ChristianHupfer I have no book on lambda calculus available; can you show a couple of pictures?
 
3:40 PM
@egreg: I can show you pictures of a lot of things/humans/cats, but not of lambda calculus. I've never used it so far ;-)
 
@egreg The usual ` $\lambda x.x-1$` looks great. :) I'll go with it. :)
 
@PauloCereda I'd not add spaces around the period, which is just a no-op, as far as I know.
 
@egreg You are right.
Thank you. :)
 
3:52 PM
A post from the I hate LaTeX division
-2
A: apacite error - The style file: apacite.bst Database file #1: ... is a string literal, not a function

EfficientAre you really sure that using Latex makes you faster and more productive against other text processors?? Or that makes you feel geeky and smart, and that pays off?

 
@ChristianHupfer also of the genus I don't know how Stack Exchange works
 
@PaulGessler: Yes, unfortunately.. or fortunately... depending on the point of view ;-)
 
4:05 PM
@egreg Good to know. Thanks. :-)
 
4:22 PM
@HarishKumar It's a poem written to show the glory of Rome and Julius Caesar who allegedly was a descendant of Aeneas (who in turn was allegedly the son of the goddess Venus, the Latin version of Aphrodite). It was dedicated to emperor Augustus, the adopted son of Julius Caesar.
@HarishKumar We had to study it in the first year of high school (in Italian translation, though).
@HarishKumar In the second year we had I promessi sposi, the basis of modern Italian language, by Alessandro Manzoni. Third, fourth and fifth year were for Dante's Commedia.
 
yo'
What is the license of material on TeXample.net, don't you know? @Stefan, please?
 
 
2 hours later…
6:02 PM
@yo' Creative commons (2.5) with attribution (free to share and to adapt, no restriction even to commercial use)
 
yo'
@StefanKottwitz thanks; so if I want to use any of it for my business card, I can feely do so, right?
 
@egreg only for mac users (as the mac binary was recompiled for other reasons...)
 
6:54 PM
@egreg: is your MacBook 13" or 15"?
@yo' You could use my vector duck. <3
 
yo'
@PauloCereda some inner voice tells me: Not a good idea.
 
@yo' on the other hands, some ducks say: do it. :)
 
@PauloCereda: A duck with some arrow over it's a head? ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer o.O
 
They should change this room's title to "All About Ducks".
 
7:00 PM
@FaheemMitha and cricket
 
@DavidCarlisle All About Ducks and Cricket
 
@FaheemMitha: Paulo will force us to conclude every post with No ducks were harmed producing this post ;-) @PauloCereda
 
@ChristianHupfer Suppose that is not true?
 
@FaheemMitha: Ezechiel 25,17: The path of the righteous DuckMan is beset on both sides with deeds of evil non-duck-friends... And the revenge of DuckMan will come over you ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer Well, that's very biblical. But what does it mean?
 
@ChristianHupfer Now comes Tarantino. :)
 
@PauloCereda: Finally :D
 
@ChristianHupfer eww. I really didn't like that film.
 
@FaheemMitha: You didn't? So you like it now? ;-)
 
Actually, I don't think I like any of Tarantino's stuff. Just one bg glorification of violence.
@ChristianHupfer I mean when I watched it. And no, I still don't.
Happily, I'm not reminded of it much. Except now.
 
7:08 PM
@FaheemMitha: Sledge Hammer is glorification of violence, but not Tarantino ;-) Anybody knows Sledge Hammer?
 
(I hope @PauloCereda doesn't take to posting animated gifs of Samuel L. Jackson.)
@ChristianHupfer What, the song?
 
@FaheemMitha: No, not the song. The (unfortunately) short-lived comedy series, from 1986...
@PauloCereda: Amazon sells everything ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer They surely do. :P
 
@PauloCereda Oh, no. More About Ducks.
@ChristianHupfer Never heard of it.
@ChristianHupfer I thnk films like Pulp Fiction do glorify violence.
And gangsters.
 
7:10 PM
@DavidCarlisle: You know, I am a lazy guy...
 
They make them seem more more interesting and less disgusting than they really are.
I wonder if those HW directors who make films about hoodlums have actually met any.
They might not be so keen to make films about them if they had.
 
@PauloCereda: In my point of view , Death Proof is Tarantinos worst movie, apart from his own appearance in FDTD...
 
@ChristianHupfer That might be Knuth in disguise. Perhaps he is looking for guidance in writing his next fascicle.
 
@ChristianHupfer The plot is very messy indeed.
 
@PauloCereda: There's a plot in that movie? ;-)
 
7:16 PM
@ChristianHupfer There's a car. :P
 
@PauloCereda: The best actor in the movie ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer Exactly. :P
 
@FaheemMitha: @PauloCereda is actually obsessed (he call's it fascinated) by ducks... We've tried everything to cure him of this, but his powers are strong ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer Yes, the quack is strong in that one.
 
@FaheemMitha: May the Quack be with him ...
 
7:28 PM
@ChristianHupfer Amen.
@PauloCereda I didn't know you were a Futurama fan. No ducks in Futurama, unfortunately.
 
@FaheemMitha I am a fan. :) There's actually only one duck I can remember in the whole series: it's when Bender asks what if he were a giant robot. Fry is near a pond, feeding a duck. He looks at the duck and says, "Do you want to be my friend?" And the duck bites him. :)
 
@PauloCereda sounds like an appropriate reaction.
I've liked the bits of Futurama that I've seen. But I haven't seen much.
 
@FaheemMitha The whole series is great, but I always recommend people watching it from start. :)
 
@PauloCereda Ah. Well, that's sounds like work.
I much prefer it to its cousins like the Simpsons.
 
@FaheemMitha It's up to you, of course. :) But at least you get all the jokes.
 
7:47 PM
@ChristianHupfer but sadly you won't be an unsung hero as I got you off 0.
 
yo'
@PauloCereda Are you on e-mail?
 
@yo' Hold on, I will be. :)
Guys, how to I make the page containing \chapter to use a different page style? I'm using memoir. So far, I could not find something relevant in the main site. This has been asked a million times now, probably...
 
8:05 PM
@PauloCereda \def\chapter{\pagestyle{foo}hello} should work
 
@DavidCarlisle: I am unsung enough, regarding my badges count :D
 
@DavidCarlisle oh thanks. :)
 
@PauloCereda the optional argument defaulting to empty here is the page style used somewhere in memoir \newcommand*{\newleadpage}[3][empty]{%
 
@DavidCarlisle oh
 
@PauloCereda found it, it uses \thispagestyle{chapter} so you just need to define the chapter page style. (\ps@chapter)
 
8:15 PM
@DavidCarlisle Thanks. Apparently it's the chapter style which is offending my layout.
 
@PauloCereda \let\ps@chapter\ps@empty
 
@DavidCarlisle I give up. :) It doesn't work for the starred one, and I cannot make it work. :)
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{memoir}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{imakeidx}

\copypagestyle{mystyle}{ruled}
\makeevenfoot{mystyle}{}{}{}
\makeoddfoot{mystyle}{}{}{}
\makeevenhead{mystyle}{\thepage}{}{My book}
\makeoddhead{mystyle}{My book}{}{\thepage}

\makeindex

\makeatletter
\let\ps@chapter\ps@empty
\makeatother

\begin{document}

\chapterstyle{verville}
\pagestyle{mystyle}

\chapter{foo}

Some text.\index{Apple}\index{Apricot}

\printindex

\end{document}
I would like mystyle to be applied in all pages, including the ones starting chapters (index uses the starred version IIRC).
 
not tried it yet but in that case you want \let\ps@chapter\ps@mystyle
@PauloCereda oh there is a chapterstyle command? I suppose I could look at the manual or documented source one day instead of just memoir.cls
 
@DavidCarlisle Should we blame Lars for that? :)
 
Hello chat!
Do you know in which font encoding is the ū character (u with macron)?
 
8:30 PM
@Manuel do you really need it to be a single character or \={u}
 
Do I need? No, I don't. But I was curious. If it was available, to load that encoding.
 
@DavidCarlisle: I solved it thanks to one of @egreg's package. :)
 
@PauloCereda probably not really solved then
 
@DavidCarlisle I was expecting this. :P
 
@Manuel not T1 or OT1, obviously it's in Unicode so anything loaded via fontspec in lua or xe tex
 
8:36 PM
@DavidCarlisle But I'm in pdfTeX :P (I'm really considering a switch to ConTeXt in this book, but the problem is the non-existent-aged-documentation…).
 
@Manuel so \=u it is then. Makes no difference unless you need hyphenation of words with that.
@Manuel pdftex or pdflatex?
 
@DavidCarlisle pdfLaTeX.
@DavidCarlisle \=u is it then (more exactly \DeclareUnicodeCharacter{016B}{\={u}}).
 
@Manuel switching to lualatex is rather less drastic change than switching to context in that case:-) although as I say doing as you suggest above should be fine.
 
@DavidCarlisle Apart from small issues, I think one of my greatest fears is tex.stackexchange.com/questions/150186/…
 
@Manuel the answers there seem to fix that don't they?
@Manuel and doesn't that apply to pdftex in the same way?
 
8:43 PM
@DavidCarlisle It's a messy question with tons of comments. And it has evolved along time. So I cant' really be confident here but: IIRC, last time I checked, it didn't work correctly.
@DavidCarlisle In pdftex it does work.
 
@Manuel It's kind of a trivial issue really, you just want to make sure that there is a \nobreak\hspace{0pt} before teh dash which can't take more than a line of code however you look at it.
@Manuel by default in pdftex you could not enter a character anyway so it just depends what the active utf8 characters encoding that are defined to do.
 
@DavidCarlisle Well, I think none of the answers did solve the issue perfectly (which is a problem, since revisiting it now is difficult, lots of changes, lots of comments).
 
@Manuel as I say, if I understand the issue (and it's possible that I don't) I can't see how you could only half solve it if you solved it at all as I wouldn't expect more than a line of code
 
@DavidCarlisle I will put some time right now to see what was the problem exactly.
@DavidCarlisle Okey, firstly, the minimal example there.
If you compile (without fontspec) with pdflatex, with ligature em-dash (i.e., --- three dashes) it doesn't hyphenate the word.
So, that is a problem by itself. Now, I can accept to input unicode-em-dash (in fact, not only accept, but that's the way I input it). If I use that (with inputenc) it does hyphenate.
With lualatex (fontspec loaded) it works only with the unicode em-dash. With xelatex (and fontspec) it doesn't work (nor the --- nor the em-dash).
@DavidCarlisle So, problem is: it never works with --- (which would be nice to have a solution); but in my particular case I do input the unicode em-dash, and there, there's a problem with xelatex.
 
@PauloCereda 15" Did you see the match?
 
8:58 PM
So the question is still open until, at least the xelatex one is fixed (and I think it didn't work with luatex when I asked, because that now it works). Feel free to add the two line answer.
 
@Manuel there's always the possibility of just making the emdash active and defining it to allow hyphenation, but I want to understand xetex/luatex differences so I'll look at that, might be tomorrow
 
@DavidCarlisle Now thinking, may be I didn't check with LuaTeX because I wasn't aware of it at that time (just XeLaTeX), and, in fact, ConTeXt solution worked from the beginning. So the end problem is that it doesn't work out of the box with XeLaTeX.
 
@Manuel especially as luatex has gone off to do whatever it does luaotfload | db : This can take several minutes; please be patient.
@Manuel context is using luatex of course so it comes to the same thing.
 
By the way, what should I/we do with that (kind of) question? I mean, it has TONS of comments, lots of messy edits, etc. And in the end there's no clear solution. I would like to remove all, and start from zero.
@DavidCarlisle Yep, that's what I mean.
@DavidCarlisle As an aside, shouldn't with xelatex and lualtex not only work with the unicode em-dash, but also with the ligature ---? I mean, they are supposed to be more intelligent, aren't they?
 
@Manuel Ok I can confirm that lualatex hyhenates the word with the emdash and xelatex doesn't, but I've been out all day and I'm tired so I may not look at why at this point, I could take the easier route of pinging @egreg and @JosephWright and see if they want to look instead....
 
9:07 PM
@DavidCarlisle It seems to be like you're saying.
 
@Manuel don't assume intelligence in computer programs.
@Manuel it's rather deeply built in to classic tex that it doesn't hyphenate words with a - (or ligatures made of -) so not hyphenating --- isn't a bug or lack of intelligence, it's a deliberate design decision. doesn't babel have a "- shortcut in some languages to provide a dash that does allow hyphenation?
 
@DavidCarlisle But I somehow expected a more intelligent approach, which would eliminate that deep tex behaviour.
 
9:26 PM
@DavidCarlisle More :) Okey, so, since the problem is just the unicode em-dash in xelatex. The only problem is finding a suitable definition. The only answer that offers something (cfr's isn't a general solution, so it doesn't work) is JLDiaz's. But, as seen in the comment, there was problem with his definition.
Javier Bezos proposed one new definition \newunicodechar—{% \leavevmode\nobreak\hskip0pt\hbox{---}\nobreak\hskip0pt\relax \futurelet\esptestnext\esptestdo} \def\esptestdo{\ifcat\esptestnext\space\allowbreak\space\ignorespaces\fi}. But since he didn't post an answer, and nobody said if it was good or not… it was left there.
So that might be a solution. But I need someone to post it as an answer (and understand that it does work in any case).
 
@DavidCarlisle @Manuel It was one of the reasons why I wrote newunicodechar: a friend had to use prosodic marks for Latin, so vowels marked ăĕĭŏŭ āēīōū, but the utf8 option only recognizes ă.
So one doesn't need to chase for the code and just do \newunicodechar{ū}{\=u}
 
9:41 PM
@egreg I was looking for the single glyph in a font, more than the character. But \newunicodechar is definitely useful :)
@DavidCarlisle Last one (or you will consider it spam). The main point in the solution in xelatex is that it does work with microtype's protusion.
If one does
\SetProtrusion
  {
    encoding = *,
    family   = *,
    shape    = *,
  }
  {
    \textemdash = {   ,500},
  }
It should protrude half the em-dash (just an example). And I think that's all. I will forget about that question until forever from now.
 
@Manuel VVV
\usepackage{ifxetex,newunicodechar}
\ifxetex
  \newunicodechar{—}{\ifhmode\kern0pt\fi—\kern0pt }
\fi
@Manuel But this has the problem Javier mentions.
 
@egreg Yep, 2:0. :) Good game. :)
 
yo'
9:56 PM
@PauloCereda that thing with the oversized fullerene again? :D
 
@yo' :)
 
yo'
good night now.
 
@Manuel You should raise the issue in the XeTeX mailing list. The behavior of the em-dash is really wrong.
 
@cfr now I really wish I hadn't run out of comment upvotes for today... :-)
 
@egreg that was my thought, but was going to think about it in the morning:-)
 
10:11 PM
@DavidCarlisle \parbox{0pt}{—\nobreak,} has a line break nonetheless.
 
@egreg \mbox{—}, in your newunicodechar definition?
 
@DavidCarlisle Maybe. The strange thing is that if I \showbox a box with —, there's no \discretionary, but it appears before the penalty if I have —\nobreak,
@DavidCarlisle That seems good!
 
@egreg well in theory, since yesterday I have a working xetex build system so i can investigate the sources and fix it.....
 
@DavidCarlisle Probably Jonathan wanted to emulate the effect of --- in standard TeX; with the mapping mechanism, --- is transformed into U+2014 before boxing, so the em-dash received the same property of the hyphen as far as adding discretionaries are concerned. It was an error by Knuth to begin with (but possibly with some justification).
 
cfr
@PaulGessler ;)
 
10:24 PM
@egreg yes sounds about right, not sure what to do about it, luatex just doesn't follow tex but in general xetex does try to stay closer so probably behaviour of --- at least is hard to change
@cfr thanks for the thought, but I decided to let it go, after all I could have made an answer (but wasn't sure if that was really what the OP wanted)
 
@DavidCarlisle But that doesn't allow hyphenation in the word that follows the em-dash. :(
 
cfr
@DavidCarlisle It was more really for information for the OP, to be honest.
 
@cfr I'm calling it right now: there will be a comment posted to the effect of "but I don't want to write (angle:distance) for polar coordinates, I want to write (distance:angle)." ;-)
 
@egreg \nobreak\hskip instead of kern at the end?
@cfr yes understood
 
@DavidCarlisle This disallows line breaks if a space follows the em-dash
 
10:31 PM
@egreg use Word?
 
@DavidCarlisle :)
 
@egreg too late to think about this, something seems wrong though, it ought to be easy even at this time (and an hour later for you:-)
 
Jasper?!
 
@PauloCereda Hi, yes. I think I won't come to this room anymore, nothing much for me here. Take care!
I will still be in rooms 36 and 168 though.
 
cfr
@WillHunting You aren't fond of ducks?
 
10:36 PM
@cfr Not really, lol.
 
cfr
@WillHunting Sometimes we have cats, too?
 
@cfr Oh, I am not fond of animals in general, lol.
Actually I am kind of against the idea of having pets, unless one is a vegetarian.
 
cfr
 
I find it hypocritical to keep a dog or cat and then to eat a fish or chicken.
 
cfr
@WillHunting I'm vegan, though my cat is not. I no more eat fish or chicken than I do cat or guinea pig!
 
10:38 PM
@cfr Good for you, bye!
 
cfr
@WillHunting Hwyl!
 
10:55 PM
@WillHunting :(
 
11:07 PM
@cfr I wub these cats. <3
 
11:21 PM
@cfr: No examples of the species Linneus Duckus Tikzus? ;-)
 
Am I the only one who thinks the posts' font as bold (in relativity to comments and other texts)?
 
Yay, one of my songbook projects is done!
@egreg, @DavidCarlisle: thank you gentlemen, I couldn't have done without you. :)
 
@PauloCereda :)
 
@PauloCereda: Looks very nice. Most impressive
 
@egreg No ducks, sadly. :)
@ChristianHupfer Thanks! It will be in A5, 100 pages. Then I'll submit to the printing house.
 
11:30 PM
@PauloCereda: Some private project, just for 'fun' or with support from your local community?
 
@ChristianHupfer Let's say it started as a private project, then people liked the idea, and now the community will help paying for the books. :) We will use them during masses, available for free for every person who wants to sing the songs. :)
 
@PauloCereda: You need viral marketing... Let's share it throughout the web.... ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer :) I will make a blog post about the whole process, including the final "product", if you guys think it's an interesting subject.
user image
2
@egreg: ^^ imakeidx :)
 
@PauloCereda: Definitely!!!!! Sometimes I feel we have too few 'non' - science/technical LaTeX products, here and throughout everywhere
@PauloCereda: Amazing
 
@ChristianHupfer Thanks, but these gentlemen here make the dreams come true. :)
 
11:36 PM
@PauloCereda: Well, that's pretty true. So much beautiful packages ... I learned a lot during the last 15 months here
 
@ChristianHupfer And ducks. :)
 
@PauloCereda: Ah yes, that duck thingy ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer <3
 
@PauloCereda: I never thought that I would have the possibility to 'talk' to living legends such as David and Enrico, Heiko Oberdiek etc. And ducks of course ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer It's very nice indeed. I remember the first time I got an email from Heiko. :)
 
cfr
11:51 PM
@ChristianHupfer :(
We're not worth talking to, because we're not legends? Very nice!
@Qrrbrbirlbel Dunno. I can hardly read the main site since they improved it. It hurts my eyes.
@PauloCereda Very cool work for a duck ;).
 
@cfr Thank you. :) I can send to you (and @ChristianHupfer) the final result, if you want to take a look.
 
cfr
@PauloCereda Yes, please!
 
@cfr: Of course you and many,many others are very, very worth to talk to too (a lot of 'to' and sound-alikes in there ;-))
 
cfr
Does it feature ducks?
 
@cfr I wish I could hide one. :P
 
11:56 PM
@PauloCereda: Sign it please! And bring it to me personally :-P
 
cfr
@ChristianHupfer ;).
 

« first day (1630 days earlier)      last day (3305 days later) »