« first day (358 days earlier)      last day (4577 days later) » 

2:07 AM
I thought some typeface & microtype geeks might like this: typographerryangosling.tumblr.com
 
 
3 hours later…
5:14 AM
@FaheemMitha "Finally, the first author wishes to thank the members of the StackExchange question-answer sites, especially stackoverflow.com, unix.stackexchange.com, and tex.stackexchange.com, for answering many questions in connection with this project. The members of tex.stackexchange.com were particularly helpful in helping with LaTeX issues." Cool!
@FaheemMitha What's wrong with the figures?
 
 
2 hours later…
7:13 AM
@herbert: Note that I moved the OP's "answer" to an edit of the question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/32211/…. You just commented on that post seconds earlier. You should re-add you comment to the question.
 
8:08 AM
@BrunoLeFloch : They're seriously fuzzy. Take a look at the pdf. Or the html for that matter. I was not very happy with this journal. Do you know it is their policy that they don't give the authors proofs of the article to check before publishing?
 
@FaheemMitha What is their reasoning for that?
 
And they're very popular. Just goes to show how screwed up the world of journal publishing is.
@AndreyVihrov Reasoning for no journal proofs? To do as little work as possible, I suppose, and maximize profit.
According to what I read, PLoS uses PLoS ONE as a "cash cow" (if that is the right term) to subsidize their more prestigious journals like PLoS computational biology.
Not just my opinion. Here is an article about it scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2008/07/07/…
That should be PLoS Biology rather than PLoS Computational Biology.
 
8:24 AM
I'm sure that is a duplicate, but I have to go now:
0
Q: How does one create, caption, label and refer to a subfigure?

EshwarSo its a fairly simple question to a problem people normally experience. I have a rough idea of what to do, but I am looking for the correct way of doing things. So in the solution I will include what would be the bare minimum requirements I think would get this problem solved. I am looking for f...

Could someone search for one and flag it appropriately.
 
 
8 hours later…
4:26 PM
Ack.
 
4:55 PM
@PauloCereda Hi Paulo! I was at the course for new referees: always teaching! :)
 
@egreg Hi egreg! Those referees are in good hands. You need to teach some rules, I'd love to learn! :)
 
5
Q: onlyitems? How to selected specific items from an item list

Yossi FarjounI have the following setup, I have a file with some definitions, one of which is a list of items: \newcommand{\mylist}{ \item first item \item second item \item third item } I want to use \mylist in two different ways, first \begin{itemize} \mylist \end{itemize} and second, \begin{itemize...

This got a bounty exactly one year after it got posted!
I saw the answers from Oct 25, overlooked the '10, and starting to check if the PC has the correct date! :-)
 
5:42 PM
@MartinScharrer I wasn't around here at the time; the answer seems quite easy.
 
6:00 PM
I look like the cookie monster here. Plenty of cookies yay!
 
 
1 hour later…
7:02 PM
Does anyone here has an account at careers.stackoverflow.com and can send me an invitation?
 
7:21 PM
@MartinScharrer I had no idea it's invite-only. :(
 
@PauloCereda I just figured that out as well.
But you can fill out a form and ask to get invited by them anyway.
 
Oh.
Friends, I need help on these English constructs:
- "A new version is available" or "A newer version is available"
- "Could you consider sending me an anonymous error report?" (is there a better way to say this?)
 
7:53 PM
22 votes for this answer. I can't believe.
22
A: How to get a good "divisible by" symbol?

egregI've never seen that symbol. But here's how you can define it \DeclareRobustCommand{\divby}{% \mathrel{\vbox{\baselineskip.65ex\lineskiplimit0pt\hbox{.}\hbox{.}\hbox{.}}}% } It's just an almost straightforward modification of \vdots.

 
@egreg Makes you wonder on what is the criteria used for some people to up-vote...
 
@GonzaloMedina If you compare with this
4
A: How to write larger \natural symbol?

egreg\newcommand{\bignatural}{\mathop{\mathchoice {\vcenter{\hbox{\LARGE$\natural$}}} {\vcenter{\hbox{\large$\natural$}}} {\vcenter{\hbox{\footnotesize$\natural$}}} {\vcenter{\hbox{\scriptsize$\natural$}}} }\displaylimits} Here are examples in the four styles (the \sum is for comparison; loa...

Nothing against Ian Thompson, who had his answer accepted; but that answer is clearly inadequate.
 
People like dots. :)
 
@PauloCereda Has anybody ever seen that notation? I don't.
 
@egreg Neither do I.
 
8:07 PM
@egreg I have never seen it.
 
@PauloCereda I would say "a new version is available" to announce it, but "a newer version is available" to somebody who's using the older one. Let's hear what Alan has to say.
 
I found references to b)a, a D b, a ÷ b, a __ b, a : b, and a / b, but no three dots.
And some crazy symbols as well. :P
 
@egreg Just to clarify, my previous comment didn't imply anything against the 22 up-votes; I like your answer (in fact; I was writing almost the same and you beat me!) and I myself up-voted it. It's more about the phenomenon (several times mentioned here) with the voting of some questions/answers.
 
@PauloCereda I don't feel any necessity for it: write "a | b" to say that "b is divisible by a". Of course it would be better if the commonest relation was the converse, so that 0 would be the minimum and 1 the maximum just as usual in lattice theory.
But it has a reason: a ≤ b can be defined as "there is c s.t. a+c=b", while a | b is "there is c s.t. ac=b". Just the same definition, changing the operation.
 
@egreg Ah I see. That reminds me of that great comment of yours about symbols. :)
 
8:21 PM
@PauloCereda I don't remember the comment
 
@egreg Let me find it (I have it here, I read it every time when I'm about to use a new symbol in a text).
"As a young aspiring mathematician I was fond of symbols and overused them; experience showed me that less symbols and more words may make the exposition clearer. In some papers one can find newly created symbols that are used only a couple of times: these are obvious signs of "symbol addiction". As another example, long descriptions of sets with X={x\in U:...} may almost always be improved by saying the set $X$ consisting of elements $x\in U$ such that ..." - egreg
 
@PauloCereda Ah, yes! "Symbol addiction syndrome". :)
 
@egreg SAS! :)
 
9:11 PM
The shame! I'm working on the features and leaving the bugs to the end of the process. :P
 
 
1 hour later…
10:14 PM
7
A: TeX Stack Exchange swag for top users

Stefan KottwitzHere you can see the swag package. I made the photo during the TeX Users Group Conference 2011 in India, where it's been arranged on a table in a room where we met for coffee breaks during the conference.

 
10:39 PM
Should we close this question?
1
Q: Google Books BibTeX export

AntonIs Google Books a reliable source of BiBTeX records? I've found a negative feedback back from 2008, and not sure it is sill valid. Unlike Lead2Amazon and Tungare's ISBN to BibTeX converter, Google Books relatively well understands Unicode and replaces it with control sequences. But are there fact...

At the moment it looks like either too-subjective or not-a-real-question (i.e. not well defined) or simply off-topic.
 
10:54 PM
Where are we in this graph!?:
Comes from:
11
A: Would the "General Reference" close reason be useful here on Programmers?

AaronaughtThis question got me thinking about a deeper issue on Stack Exchange - but first, let me answer the specific questions here: Should the "General Reference" close reason as outlined in this blog post and this Meta Stack Overflow answer be enabled here on Programmers? No, because those should...

Well, I would say we are pretty in the middle!
 
@MartinScharrer I was gonna say that!
Better, we are the universe surrounding this diagram, as we can easily achieve such diagram with Tikz! :P
 
11:18 PM
14
Q: LaTeX accessibility

David HammenDoes anyone know of any LaTeX modules that makes the pdf output generated by pdflatex Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)/Seciton 508 compliant? Specifics: With regard to math. One simple solution is to embed the latex equation as an alt tag. Simpler, and IMO better than translating ...

Since this question is on our front page again, I think it might be valid to mention this year's TUG presentation by Ross Moore, as Stefan pointed out:
Stefan Kottwitz on October 19, 2011

This year’s TUG conference, the 32nd annual meeting of the TeX Users Group, was held in Thiruvananthapuram aka Trivandrum, Kerala, India. It focuses on document production using TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, MetaPost, and related software and this year it’s hosted by River Valley Technologies.

A short time after Stack Exchange joined the TUG as institutional member, following an initiative on TeX.SX meta, I became individual TUG member. As Stack Exchange offered sponsorship for attending important conferences, I asked Stack Exchange if they would sponsor my travel to the TUG meeting. They ag …

 
11:57 PM
FunFact: @egreg now has more answers than me: 993 versus 991, we both are very close to 1k!
 

« first day (358 days earlier)      last day (4577 days later) »