« first day (1 day earlier)      last day (4339 days later) » 

12:00 AM
is there something like posting rules for this site specifically?
 
what do you mean?
 
@goldPseudo I know there is the faq, but what I man is a seperate page where it lists rules on how we post questions and answers specifically for our site no other
 
We'll be able to customize the FAQ page for our site as we develop.
The one we have now is just the "default" FAQ page that all betas start with.
 
ok
 
just for the sake of example, the judaism.SE FAQ looks like this:
 
12:10 AM
Yes this is what I am talking about
or the type of faq
 
one of the 7 Essential Questions is "What should our FAQ contain?", so there will be plenty of opportunity to discuss it in meta.
 
@goldPseudo do you think it would be time to ask such a question? or should it wait a while?
 
i think it can wait until we've got a better idea what is and is not on topic. There's still plenty of discussion going on on that front.
since that would be a significant chunk of the FAQ in and of itself.
 
how about we deal with what is on or off topic here , over the chat, and than we will post answers to the meta
 
better to deal with it on meta.
 
12:16 AM
yeah
 
there's a lot of users who don't log into the chat
 
@goldPseudo should I ask another question like what is on or off topic? because I see the existing question is dealing with one question
 
and chat doesn't really have the voting abilities of meta, so there's no real way to judge a 'good' idea from a 'bad' idea democratically.
right now, i think the best course of action would be to deal with the questions as they come up.
 
@goldPseudo Ok :)
 
If there's a posted question that you're not sure should be on-topic, bring it up. But we've already defined a lot of the "will this be allowed" issues during the commitment phase, so we mostly have a good idea where we stand.
And if you have a question you want to ask that you're not completely sure is on-topic, it's better to just ask it and let everyone have their vote.
If and when people disagree as to it's on-topicness, that's the time to bring it up on meta.
 
 
10 hours later…
10:38 AM
@ashes999: Please approve my edit islam.stackexchange.com/questions/305/…
What's the point of these edit wars?
I don't get it. People fight when we try to improve their posts.
I'll post a meta question.
 
 
1 hour later…
@Gigili Already did. :P
 
@Dynamic Thank you, little user!
 
12:43 PM
> There's none so blind as those who don't want to see.
 
@Gigili Where is that from?
 
Umm, not sure. Just remembered the quote.
Not a religious person, for sure!
 
:-) Yeah
I guessed that
 
Oh God, look.
> @Bahribayli about your verse. it says that the time of Judgement day is not in business of prophet. OK. so what? usually when people asked a question, prophet waited for angel Gabriel to deliver the answer form God. this verse not mean prophet talked from himself. – Ahmadi 1 hour ago
> There are so many examples like this in Qur'an that I can't accept that any word from Prophet (pbuh) is from Allah. BTW there is no logic to include some words of Allah in Qur'an and leave some out. – Bahribayli 1 hour ago
 
1:05 PM
Hi @Ershad, welcome!
 
1:18 PM
So...
I think we need to have a discussion about this sunni/shia thing @Gigili
I mentioned in a comment about 60 seconds ago -- there's no need to label every answer as "sunni" or "qadiyani" or anything like that. If it's general and acceptable to all groups, sure, leave it unlabelled
We don't want to create a site that has "silos" of opinions from different groups; commonality is a win for us. For example, Qur'an.
 
That makes some sense.
 
I posted a meta about it
0
Q: How to Cite Answers

ashes999In one of Gigili's answers, I realized that we haven't really talked about the best way to cite sources. I believe we need a clear, strong, common way to cite sources. Islam is pretty vast; we already have sunni vs. shia vs. sufi vs. ahmadi sources cited across the site. That's okay, because we ...

 
@ashes999 You want me to link to Qur'an for a Hadith? That's odd.
I can take a photo of a book, if you think that helps.
 
1:37 PM
@Gigili Qur'an and hadith are FOR SURE available everywhere on the internet, reliably. Quran.com and sunnah.com are a good start.
 
i disagree. there are plenty of hadith that i've not found good online sources of.
 
@ashes999 I was referring to your meta question.
And I cannot find it online even though it's a popular one.
 
the two Sahihs are easily linkable, but beyond that there's a lot of stuff that's hard to find good links to.
 
I mean, not a reliable resource. Google yields lots of resources and the one I posted was the best.
 
@goldPseudo you can always google to find out "it's collected in X," like the Musnad of Imam Ahmad
 
1:39 PM
It doesn't look fake or something, at least.
 
@Gigili which collection is it? My Arabic is pretty rusty.
 
@ashes999 Collection? The one I cited in my answer.
 
Yes.
Which book, collection of hadith, etc.
 
And then there's a lot of fatawa which refer to hadiths vaguely, rather than quoting. Finding an authoritative source of those is not particuarly easy since there's no real search strings to work with.
 
@goldPseudo quoting a fatwa is okay too. That's a valid source.
I'm not asking anyone to do great amounts of research and correlating.
Just look up your sources online and include them.
 
1:42 PM
@goldPseudo That's the problem about some question, like the one posted recently on sexual relationships.
 
Don't be like me and say "I heard it in some class on Islamic Finance," look up the hadith and fatawa you talked about in class and cite them.
Oh, I still didn't answer that question yet :/
this seems to be a different question
 
Hi, @Gigili
 
@Gigili I think that question was answered quite nicely with Qur'an and hadith, actually
 
Okay, Now I understand the purpose of Chatroom. You guys are fast.
 
:)
 
1:47 PM
depends on who's here at the time.
 
salam @ ershad
wait a few hours and see, it'll pick up more :)
 
theres a sort of sweet spot where everything's fast and productive. too many people, and it ends up as aimless chatting with everyone talking to everyone else.
 
On which SE site were you active other than Islam, @gold?
I'm too lazy to look at your profile!
 
walaikkum assalam wa rahmatullah @ashes999 I am trying to understand this website. There is quite a lot of dynamics around.
 
@Gigili, mostly boardgames these days. but i've been on the Trilogy pretty much since they started.
 
1:50 PM
@Ershad is this your first Stack Exchange site you're participating in?
 
@goldPseudo I see. Interesting.
 
@ashes999 Yes, I use SE only when I need to look up something in latex or programming or physics. Was too lazy to sign up. Never posted or involved in anything else. I recently signed up for the Islamic group and one more on fluid dynamics.
 
mashaAllah, welcome
 
Asalamu wa alaikum
 
wa'alikum as-salaam
 
1:56 PM
@ashes999 Jazakallahu khayraa. @AlUmmat Wa`alaikkum assalam
 
@goldPseudo: The OP could edit the question to ask only one question, no close-vote was needed really.
 
@ashes999 Checked out deengames.com. Maa`sha Allah. Liked find the harf, could be very useful.
 
I don't really encourage changing questions to that extent. Especially if someone answers before the edit is made, then the answers and the questions don't really synch up anymore.
Splitting a question into (up to) five posts is a fairly significant change.
@AlUmmat, I would normally leave them up, since other people may upvote it again later.
If a post is still in the negative after a week or so, when everyone would've had a chance to vote who is likely to vote, then I'll reconsider if it actually is a good answer to the question and worth keeping.
If someone leaves comments as to why they downvoted, then editing the post to account for those is usually a good idea to get a downvote removed.
 
@goldPseudo Well, in other SE sites, mods edit the question to make it one per post. Also, last time I checked there was no answers.
 
afaik, mods can pare the question down to one question per post, but there's no real tool available to branch the other (up to) four off to separate posts.
short of asking a new question on the original poster's behalf, which is a suboptimal solution at best.
10
Q: What do we do with "multiple question" questions?

ire_and_cursesIt's generally agreed that asking multiple, weakly related questions in the same question is not a good idea. What is the recommended action in this case? gnostradamus recommends voting to close, with a reason. That sounds reasonable. However, in this particular case the user is new and inexperi...

 
2:11 PM
@Ershad jazakumullahu khayran :)
it was an experiment though...
inshaAllah next one will be better :)
 
@goldPseudo I'm saying this question could be edited to be one of them and the OP might post the rest as separate questions.
Oh I see. that meta post says something else.
Or maybe not
> closing the question without giving them a chance to fix it feels like the wrong signal to give.
 
that's regarding a new user on a public site. i feel that the committed users in private beta should be held to a higher standard (that may just be me though).
since we need to make sure everything is "just right" when we go public.
 
 
1 hour later…
3:27 PM
Asalamu wa alaikum @yasar11732
 
Ve aleykum salam
 
This is the third day of privet beta Alhamdulillah
 
Yes. I haven't been able to check site for some time, is something interesting going on?
 
well the meta is active, if you want to call that something interesting :)
yesterday we got 203 visits
 
That is good for a private beta I guess. That is almost all the commiters.
 
3:35 PM
yes it is
once it becomes public we will need 1500 visits
for it to be healthy
 
The Zakat question has been split up. We should probably close the original as 'duplicate' now so nobody else tries to answer it.
 
ok
I will vote to close
 
@AlUmmat I think that is easy, since Islam is very broad topic, and lots of people are interested in it.
@goldPseudo Could you send a link to question?
 
here
2
Q: Calculating Zakat

NasirZakat is normally calculated as 2.5% of any amount above the prevailing cost of Nisab. There are various clauses that are not fully agreed upon, and I will appreciate your time in helping clarification. I split up the question in smaller questions which are not referenced. Questions 4 and 5 are ...

should it be a duplicate or not constructive?
 
duplicate I guess?
 
3:38 PM
duplicate seems to be the most accurate.
 
@gold voted to close as NC.
 
actually, it's probably better as 'not a real question' now.
 
Duplicate of what?
 
since there's not really a single 'duplicate' to link it to.
 
I'd go for NC, too.
 
3:40 PM
I choose one of the split questions, and flagged duplicate.
I was too hasty again :/
Now I can't take that back.
 
we just need one more vote
 
I guess we need to vote to delete the answer.
 
how do you do that
 
@Gigili Why?
 
i wouldn't worry about the answer myself.
 
3:44 PM
That'd discourage people to not answer a question which is going to be closed.
And it's quite misleading.
 
can't answer a question that is closed. and there's no way to know in advance that it's "going to be closed" since it requires voting.
and even when it is closed, can be voted to reopen.
just upvote/downvote the answer like you would any other, should be sufficient.
 
We're were discussion it already and there were no answer.
We usually delete them on ELU.
 
you could bring it up on meta.
 
should Islam.SE be open to all languages?
 
I think it should be a seperate site for each language
for example:
343
Stack Overflow (in Turkish)

Proposed Q&A site for professional and enthusiast programmers in Turkish. Profesyonel ve meraklısı programcılar için önerilen Türkçe soru-cevap sitesi.

Currently in commitment.

 
3:50 PM
why?
 
yeah, that's the general practice on stackexchange. we don't want to split our userbase by having half the site speaking arabic and half the site speaking english.
since english experts wouldn't be able to answer arabic questions, and vice-versa. and translating everything would be tedious at best, and inaccurate at worst.
 
But I would have thougt that there only be one strong Islamic site on SE? what if there was a translator like google translate or something?
 
I don't think it would work out well.
 
Someone who does not know what the question is in another language can translate it and than answer the question and then translate the question into the language of the question or something like that?
 
ولكن كنت أود أن يكون thougt أن يكون هناك واحد فقط موقع إسلامي قوي على SE؟
(that is what google translate would get you.)
 
3:53 PM
it does not have to be google translate I know google translate is not good
doesn't SE have apps?
 
translation is more art than science. that's why there are so many interpretations of the Qur'an in English, not all of which agree with each other.
 
or something
doesn't SE have apps?
 
google translate is best there is, and you know how it sucks.
 
right now, i think if an arabic (or turkish, or urdu, or somali) speaker wants to use the site, they can translate their own posts into English without a problem.
rather than changing the site to do it for them. in most cases, i would trust a manual translation by the original poster over an automatic translation.
 
I am making up questions to build some source before the public beta by the way, is it still ok to make up questions?
 
3:56 PM
i think we've got enough "real" question flow right now.
keep asking questions, but they should be questions you honestly want to ask and know the answer for, rather than "this question might look good on the site".
 
ok, I am keeping my last question than :)
 
or ask-and-answer your own questions, if it's a question you asked before and actually did the research to find the answer for.
Jeff Atwood on July 01, 2011

The FAQ has contained one key bit of advice from the very beginning:

It’s also perfectly fine to ask and answer your own question, as long as you pretend you’re on Jeopardy! — phrase it in the form of a question.

So …

if you have a question that you already know the answer to

if you’d like to document it in public so others (including yourself) can find it later

it is OK to ask, and answer, your own question on a relevant Stack Exchange site.

To be crystal clear, it is not merely OK to ask and answer your own question, it is explicitly encouraged. …

 
@yasar11732 Umm, not sure if it's useful. Should I add it to the list?
 
list of what?
 
4:10 PM
0
Q: Removing some tags

GigiliGoing through tags, I noticed there are some tags that don't make much sense. I list them here so that we can avoid using them and they'll be automatically deleted: sin-or-not: I fail to see what's the point of this tag, since there's sin. bad-nicknames: I don't think anyone is going to ask qu...

 
Yes, I think you should add it to list.
 
4:23 PM
Is this correct way to call second ayat in Arabic -> Ayat'ul bakara ?
 
4:37 PM
16 avid users now. our numbers are still looking pretty good, and with not even half the committed users active yet.
 
Awesome :)
 
I wonder what it would look like if all of the committed users became active?
:)
 
a few users are getting close to the 1000 rep milestone.
 
Wow, I am getting jeaolus :)
 
look at this question guys:
0
Q: What is the meaning of Arabic letters in the begining of some suras?

yasar11732For example, Al-Baqara begins like this: الٓمٓ ﴿١﴾ ذَٰلِكَ ٱلْكِتَـٰبُ لَا رَيْبَ ۛ فِيهِ ۛ هُدًى لِّلْمُتَّقِينَ What is the meaning/purpose of letters like الٓمٓ of Al-Baqara, that don't correspond to any known Arabic words.

 
4:40 PM
Is it bad?
 
no it is just one of those questions where the answer is Allah knows best
 
this type of question might be worded better. e.g., asking about scholary research into the subject rather than asking what God meant by the letters (the knowledge of which is with God alone).
 
Should I edit and question and ask, what are different opinions about this subject?
 
I think there is some study of scholars on this, but i could have answered the question more if the letters were Yaseen.
 
@AlUmmat I can edit the question if you want.
@goldPseudo You can edit the question if you want, making the wording as you like.
 
4:45 PM
@yasar11732 ok thank you
 
I don't like changing the meaning of other people's questions.
I'm merely making a suggestion.
 
What was the yaseen's sura number? I am trying to find a source to copy it to my question.
 
@goldPseudo Thanks
I have changed the question a little bit.
15 questions per day considered a good beta, we have made 45 question per day so far :)
 
by the way @AlUmmat, DVs means you need to make your answer better. Don't delete it, try to improve it
 
4:58 PM
@ashes999 Yes thank you for telling me :)
 
the only time i tend to delete my own post is if i find i've written something that's actually wrong, or if someone else has answered the question in pretty much the exact same way, except significantly better.
 

« first day (1 day earlier)      last day (4339 days later) »