sometimes I think that we should do some compromise while flagging a question for too broad. Atleast in math puzzles. The currently followed steps for flagging a math puzzle are as follows:
1. Read the question 2. See the number of answers (if they are above 5 then the question is eligible to be flagged) 3. (This is the most important step) If the OP has rep. higher than 4000 then don't flag. Else flag.
I know that "there can only be one accepted answer" but can't we do something like create a community wiki post and then copy paste the answers along with the credits given. That can be so cool. People working with team spirit. Math always had multiple ways to solve a problem. Some are hard to reach while others are easy. The ways will always increase with the passing years.
NOTE :- These are just my thoughts on math puzzles.
@question_asker 1) It's rough estimation. 2) We don't need to make exceptions about people with high rep. There already is. That's why said "The currently followed steps..."
Not here, yet, but... I've tired of taking the time to create a question just to have people be jerks, over and over, because they don't understand one part of a puzzle at first glance. Then tons of other people upvote the jerk questions. Bbl
I had quite a few things I considered responding, on my post, the nicest among them being "suspend your friggen disbelief, then" - after looking at it for about 10m, I just decided to flag it, instead.
If people are going to take the entire time they look at a puzzle to whine about the story, then I think any future puzzles I make are going to look like this.
kjsljdf k34jdsi i534oudlslf si3io5j sdkf Solve it.
@Khale_Kitha I definitely see a connection between that behavior and the urge to close every question for being too broad
at some point, all the nerds on the earth decided that they needed to pick apart anything that didn't directly pander to them in order to prove that those things are unworthy. I blame neil degrasse tyson
Ten decades ago, in a village, a worker lived with his owner. After service of about 25 years, his owner became ill and was going to die.
One day, the owner called his worker and asked for a wish, but just one. The owner gave him two days time to think about it.
The worker became very happy, went...
How would you make exactly four congruent equilateral triangles with just
six matches of equal length in two dimensions?
No other triangles may be created when you are done.
Matches may not be bent, torn, or separated into other matches.
Match ends do not necessarily have to join other match e...
I'm not mad, at all - I'm simply stating that there's no way to determine which answer is correct as none are better than the others. It's tantamount to a "puzzle" asking me which letters are in the alphabet.
Untrue. In almost every case there's a best answer on those sites.
That's been there for months now. Plenty of time to have been judged to be "too broad", and yet, there it sits. Why? Because, in this case, as in many others, multiple answers does not inherently entail too-broadness.
I would guess that you probably haven't had a lot of questions that qualify for that, though
manshu, did you even read what I just said
but @Khale_Kitha: You'd probably be safe deleting this one and starting over, if you really wanted to (again, can't state this enough: I'm not convinced that you need to, but it's your question so I won't stand in your way (couldn't if I tried, even)). As far as I can tell, you have an upstanding reputation here.
I was agreeing with the policy: if someone posts questions and deletes them a lot, that's effectively spamming (especially if they're deleting them just for getting downvotes, rather than letting the system weed them out)
Here is my very first puzzle, in the form of several smaller puzzles (around 10, can be changed) linked by a story. Here is the first part, a not-so-small introduction and the first puzzle.
You, a member of a previously rich family, found a few weeks ago a note from your grandfather which talk...
OK think about it like this: <3, interpreted the former way, would be [less than] and then [the number three]. interpreted the latter way would be [a sideways heart]
<3 is what I might call an "approximation" of a heart. so <C could be an approximation of some particular shape, or it could just be a less than sign and a C
I just tell command, "Hey guys, it's really me, you know, that thief guy you wanted to steal that thing? From the briefing? No really, I swear. Just tell me where the rebel base is in plain English so we can meet for dinner and not be dead. Thanks!!"