@DanielFischer There are a few that regularly do very well, but alas, most of the assignments are tedium, so there's generally nothing interesting for students to write.
@TedShifrin I did the math, and I need an 18% average on my final paper and final in sociology to pass the course... now I need to determine if I think I did a 36% job on the paper.
@TedShifrin Please don't call me narrow minded. I signed up for this class because I was interested in the subject matter and I was excited to learn. The professor managed to make it painful to even attend.
There's a society at my university, I think it's some flavour of religion. They call themselves "Quakers" and dress in a style found in Robin Hood films from the 70s
They HATE gays, and I was sat there trying not to laugh at their views and they started really laying into them, really saying horrible things about how they anger god. Now .... religion in the UK is very mild compared to the Christian Middle East that is the US, so I asked the person next to me "I can't believe they'd say that, you think that's wrong right?" and I could tell that people were shocked....
It was weird, but me being the attention whore that I am, I stood up and said "Stop loathing gay people and let them teach you how to dress"
I like to watch scenes that are sapphic with adult content that's graphic they lead me to misuse hand lotion and tissues and build up my internet traffic
@NikolajKyed ---> ~B Means, if A is True Then ~ B is True. If A is False Then ~A Holds. Therefore, either ~A Holds or Else ~ B Holds. Thus ~ A \/ ~ B Holds, where ~ A \/ ~ B Means "Not A or Not B"
@Alraxite I see. I'm trying to figure out that one as well. Because the question is to show that, that statement is logically equivalent to C -> (\forall xC -> ~(\exists xD)). Looking at this and then the previous one. Is it really any different in proof?
@DanielFischer you're usually superb at this, so I ask: I a question worth 6 marks (usually "state" = 2 marks, 3 at most!) for "State the exact definition of differentiability at $(0,0)$ for "$f:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$" what does it want!?
