« first day (2487 days earlier)      last day (2538 days later) » 

6:00 PM
@Ted, I wasn't saying you were. I just truly have no input besides that I like numbers and letters. :)
 
Especially since the math for physical science courses do count as a sufficient prereq to ODEs and maybe complex analysis? So there's definitely a path to do some math classes without having to go through Rudin
 
Demonark, I have to keep reminding you that if we ran math department major courses as UC does, we'd close down as well. You and Eric are in the top 1 percentile of math majors.
 
Physics cares more about Bessel functions than of proving convergence
 
Yeah, I mean, it's a model that only works here I guess
 
And at UGA only 15-20 people max finished my multivariable math class. Hardly a huge number.
 
6:00 PM
Or maybe a few similar places
Wait really? Hmm
 
This chatroom is very niche as well...
 
Princeton, Chicago, Harvard have very pie-in-the-sky major courses, but even they have students who can't survive them.
 
@TedShifrin If only I had gone there instead! I would have loved that class, even as much of a procrastinator as I am.
 
$\pi$ in the sky? :P
 
@Dami lul
 
6:01 PM
Well, Nate, we have plenty of people who come in to get help on very elementary stuff, but you're right for the most part.
 
@Fargle procrastinators unite!
 
@Dami: we'll get around to it...
 
@Fargle: Perhaps I would have motivated you to be more motivated. Perhaps not.
 
Zee
I once watched motivational videos on YouTube to get motivated, ended up watching them for hours
 
Demonark: I've mentioned two students that I knew from GA whom UC chased out of math. Certainly Serge Lang chased my best friend from high school out of math at Princeton centuries ago. There are lots of stories like that.
 
6:03 PM
@TedShifrin Full disclosure, you have gotten me to be more fierce and focused on my self-study. Which reminds me, I should do notes for Artin chapter 4 and then work more on your chapter 3 exercises, while I've got a good day for it.
 
@Fargle Procrastination is all fun and games until it's not.
 
@Daminark Vodka for you comrade!
 
@Dodsy I wrote that show tune.
 
Well, I'm glad to help a bit, @Fargle.
 
@TedShifrin I find that disheartening.
 
6:04 PM
Which, Nate?
 
@Dodsy See, the trick is, once you decide to work on not being procrastinated, you procrastinate on doing htat
Net result: DOOMED
 
Chat is an addiction that abets procrastination.
3
 
@TedShifrin "I've mentioned two students that I knew from GA whom UC chased out of math."
 
@Balarka Woo
 
I just hope I don't have a similar experience at whatever school I go to. Though I found on the UWO website that a teacher said "If you want to be one of my grad students because you're interested in my research, email me"
 
6:05 PM
How's the Jumble, everyone except Fargle?
 
which I haven't really seen before.
 
this room is constant meta lately no matg
 
You'll have to raise your game, Nate, for sure, to be successful in math.
It's the end of the school year and people are burnt out, @MikeM. But perhaps it'll be better when I'm gone for a month.
 
Yes :) I am hoping to do some studying in August and maybe complete a freshman calculus book.
 
fair enough
 
6:06 PM
begins going so meta as to talk about how meta the room is becoming
Lol jk
 
Oh, @Danu asked me for a resource. I don't have a great answer, but Springer's book on Riemann surfaces is a bit more concrete. But he does the usual Riemann-Roch stuff in the end.
 
@MikeMiller Any question I can answer would be better answered by someone else, and any question I could ask here is something that I should probably come to understand on my own.
 
@MikeM: I don't mean to get into all these philosophical discussions.
 
Along somewhat similar-ish lines, I wonder if anything is ever proven via induction on how many times you're inducting
 
But I do have opinions.
 
6:07 PM
@TedShifrin I've got time, the main thing is that I need to do very well in my courses, and do some supplemental learning on the side to broaden my knowledge base.
 
@TedShifrin Do you agree with the theory of existence as uttered forth in the public works of Puncher and Wattman?
 
LOL, huh? @Balarka
 
@BalarkaSen In spite of the tennis I resume.
 
How can you conclude that? They are refuted beyond all doubt by the works unfinished by Cunard et al.
 
Nate: I had many students at UGA who loved math but who just had never had to be so self-motivated and disciplined in order to succeed in classes like mine.
 
6:08 PM
@BalarkaSen That we all live in the matrix?
 
OH WAIT THE JUMBLE CHECKS OUT
caps lock engaged
 
@Daminark: that took you a good minute.
 
Better than a bad minute @Fargle emirite?
 
@Fargle Of all sorts, of course.
 
ehehehehehehehe
 
6:09 PM
@TedShifrin Yes, I am hoping that I can buckle up my socks. I've never done well in a classroom setting, however I really want to succeed and I think I'll do whatever necessary to get to the point of having a good routine down.
One of the major distractors will be that in the math building there is also a bar.
 
@Ted a lot of pretty cool geometry questions posed by neves to me this morning
 
Good rid-dents
 
Ugh
 
I am not going anywhere Daminark.
 
Lel @Dodsy
 
6:12 PM
The idea of the hole puncher exists before the hole puncher exists.
Hey Sha.
 
hey Dodsy
 
What are you working on today?
 
Hey @Sha!
 
@Semi, can I ask you something real quick about waves? (the physics chat is dead once again:P) It's a tiny question!
 
hi @Sha.
 
6:13 PM
hey @Dami
hi @Ted
 
Cool, @EricSilva. Like what?
LOL @"it's a tiny question"
 
@Dodsy I'm about to read about the free particle (quantum mechanics), but I haven't had waves yet, so I have to review that:l
 
:|
 
Ok, I gotta leave for dinner now.
I didn't get any work done today. Go me.
 
Zee
6:14 PM
Good job
 
Good dinner, @Balarka.
 
maybe Walter Lewin can help me
I think he can
 
Now there's a controversial name. MIT actually took down his videos.
 
oh really?
 
Yup.
 
6:17 PM
I was about to watch his lectures on the wave equation
 
Well, he was convicted
 
I'm sure they're up there on YouTube somewhere.
 
yea they are
 
Rehi
 
It's sad. I'm not saying I disagree with MIT's actions. Not at all.
That was fast, @Astyx.
 
6:18 PM
Was it ?
 
Well, now that you're back, I should depart.
 
Sad, but true.
 
Zee
Wow talk about super hysterical reaction
 
sexual harassment online?
 
Yup.
 
Zee
6:19 PM
If that's what they did to him, I should be in prison for half the stuff I say online
 
Sexual harassement is no joke
 
pinches bridge of nose
 
See ya @Ted !
 
If you do any of this as a person in a position of power (grad student, faculty), you should be canned, @Zee.
 
Zee
Sure
 
6:20 PM
Now the world thinks they can get away with crap just because our idiot president does.
But I'm leaving before I get angry.
 
See you, @Ted.
 
Zee
But this is not similar
 
@Semi never mind btw, I think I've found a good resource.
 
Walter?
 
6:23 PM
well yea, academically speaking he's still good
 
Indeed.
 
@Ted finding a sequence of simple closed geodesics on $S^{2} \times S^{2}$ whose length blows up
estimating the Laplacian of distance functions
 
People are more than their academic achievements
 
finding eigenfunctions on einstein manifolds
and there's one about studying conformal changes of metric and what it does to scalar curvature
 
@EricSilva Is the picture somehow analogous to (p, q)-curves on S^1 x S^1 with larger and larger p, say?
 
6:30 PM
Let $x,y,g$ be elements in some group $G$. Is is true that $g \langle x,y, \rangle = \langle gx,gy \rangle$? Clearly $\langle gx,gy \rangle \le \g \langle x,y \rangle$, since the latter contains the former's generators. However, I am having a little trouble with the other inclusion I could use a hint, or a link to a solution.
 
I guess it's harder than that because that has a simple description in terms of lines in R^2.
 
@Balarka I haven't thought about these questions at all
well, except the Laplacian estimates :P
 
Oh ok
 
True @Astyx but, there's "information" and there's "too much information" :P
 
$S^{2} \times S^{2}$ is weird
 
6:32 PM
I wonder what the totally geodesic spheres in S^2 x S^2 are.
S^2 x S^1 in S^2 x S^2 are totally geodesic, right? Where S^1 is the equator of S^2 say. Because there's a reflection along it which is an isometry.
 
@Astyx then $A$ is closed ?
 
No
 
not closed sorry
 
It should be easier to understand geodesics in S^2 x S^1; lift to S^2 x R.
 
Yes
 
6:35 PM
Yeah I'm pretty sure you can produce geodesics like that which "twists around" a lot.
 
@Balarka I was thinking along these lines when I glanced at it
 
But I really have to go now.
@EricSilva Yeah I think sthing like this should do it.
 
Wow! nice artsy discussion in the hbar @BalarkaSen :P
 
Blah. I think I should give up, it's impossible to study once in two weekends or so only.
 
@TedShifrin Called UWO and they said two weeks before a decision, so you may never find out!
 
6:45 PM
wha r we doing?
 
Hey Mikey.
 
Ya, why so long? @Studentmath
 
@user314159 Just can't the rest of the time. Not for the next half a year or so, at least.
 
@Mike I'm trying to think about conformal changes of scalar curvature
 
All I have to finish up in this two months is some advanced functional analysis course, then I can start my graduate in half a year. But I get stuck on some basic issues/questions and every little bit of delay means I just can't make it.
 
6:48 PM
ah good good, that's one of my favorite equations
 
I worked out the formula for the change in sc under conformal change in metric, now trying to work out that you can't take nsc and find a conformal metric where's it's nonnegative
 
where can i find @Semiclassical?
 
ehhhhhh I'm mixing two problems
 
is constant nsc rigid? I think Neves was saying something about this
kind of a vague question I guess
 
Can someone help me with [number 27](http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/REU12/puzzles.pdf)? I have no idea how to do this.

27. (Irreducibility over finite fields) Let $p$ be a prime and $n$ a natural number.
(a) Prove that there is an irreducible polynomial over $\Bbb F_p$ of degree $n$.
(b) Prove that if $p^n$ is large then roughly a $1/n$ fraction of all monic polynomials of degree $n$ over $\Bbb F_p$ are irreducible.

(Ted said to use the sieve of Eratosthenes, but I'm not sure how.)
 
6:58 PM
hmm ok
 
i mean, are you willing to think of surfaces?
oh, i'm reading things so wrong toda
remind me the formula for a conformal change of the scalar curvature (in dim > 2)?
s(e^{2f}g) = e^{-2f}(s(g) + \Delta_g f + (n-1)(n-2)|df|/2)$ or something like that up to a sign, but there's a better formula
it's in Besse
 
The one Neves is having me consider for this problem is on a $3$-manifold, if $u^{4}g = g'$ then, $s(g') = -8u^{-5}\Delta_{g}u + u^{-4}s(g)$
which is kind of a weird one
@Mike isn't the one you gave the one in Besse
I have it open in the other tabh and they look basically the same
 
7:14 PM
look further down the page
they have one in terms of a different (but obviously equivalent) conformal change that gives a more useful eqn
 
ah yeah ok
this is what I wrote
 
what's their formula for general n?
but yes, once you fiddle with coefficients a bit this becomes almost precisely the Kazdan-Warner equation
 
If $g' = u^{4/(n - 2)}g$ then $u^{(n + 2)/(n - 2)}s' = 4 \frac{n-1}{n-2}\Delta_{g}u + su$.
 
perfect, thanks
now check Salomon Appendix D to see what I'm calling the Kazdan-Warner equation
 
$\Delta u + e^{u}h = f$
 
7:27 PM
aw fuck I'm doing the wrong one :x
 
ahahhaa
 
this is not my day, man
 
don't worry about it lol
btw have you ever read moore's notes on SW stuff
 
yeah they're good
 
Neves recommended it to me this morning
 
7:28 PM
I walked away with the best undersanding when I finally worked through a lot of Salamon
But Moore was probably the first thing I read
 
right, Salamon is long and extensive
 
i think its a very easy read tbh
 
it looks that way at a glance
I guess I could read both at once
that usually helps me
 
the other canonical text is Morgan
lectures on
 
do you have a source of exercises?
or are the ones in Salamon enough
 
7:38 PM
are there some in salamon?
 
yeah
I think at the end of every section
maybe that's just for preliminaries though
 
i dont at all remember them
you're reaching the point where you start to make your own exercises, or reading the next section is the exercise that requires you to know the previous
you probably want some basic exercises for the spin geometry though to get a feel for it
 
hmm ok I see
yeah actually looking through it it might just be prelim stuff that has exercises
 
that should be fine
prelim includes spin geometry?
 
spin stuff is in part 2 i believe
 
7:41 PM
darn
 
starting around page 100
I think I could maybe get through the first hundred pages before my summer vacation starts
 
the fuck's in the first 100?
 
well i know the stuff in the first 50 pages basically, the 50 after that is complex stuff I don't know that well
and spin geometry is after that
 
gotcha
the kahler stuff is nice and important because it drastically simplifies the SW eqns
 
cool cool
man summer cannot come fast enough
 
7:55 PM
Are you in high school?
 
Nah
 
Summer will come too fast for me.
And in an instant be gone.
 
I just wanna do cool math man
 
i don't taech this summer which will be nice
but i also don't teach right now
i basically need to write like crazy for 2 months
 
Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee / with a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade / and went on in sunlight into the Hofgarten / and drank coffee, and talked for an hour.
 
7:57 PM
In the mountains, there you feel free.
 
Once I'm done my schooling I can study math for fun guilt free.
 
I read, much of the night, and go south in the winter.
 
Right now even talking to you guys makes me feel guilty.
 
(insert german here that I can't remember)
 
lol
 
7:58 PM
Guten Tag
Du bist Schlau
 
i only remember "echt Deutsch"
 
I figured out "du bist"
and now everytime I learn a new word I just slap it on the end
 
I think the quote means "Not Russian, but German"?
I forget, though.
 
I figured out the german word for guard the other day
"Bewatchen"
 
yeah I don't know
 
7:59 PM
"du bist" just means "you are"
 
And I'm annoyed to say I don't remember what the next line is, leading into the desert part.
 
What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow out of this stony rubbish?
 
(there we go)
Son of man, you cannot say or guess
 
Son of man, you cannot say, or guess, for you know only a heap of broken images where the sun beats
This is my favorite part
well, all of the poem is literally my favorite
 
Yeah, I dig that part of it
eh.
I have a harder time appreciating sections 2-4
 
8:01 PM
Oh T.S Elliot.
 
there are a bits I like, sure, but
 
You guys are poets.
 
My favourite of his is "The love song of J.alfred prufrock"
 
the first and last sections are my fav bits.
 
Come in under the shadow of this red rock, and I'll show you something different / from either your shadow at morning, striding behind you / or your shadow at evening, rising to meet you
I will show you fear in a handful of dust
brilliant
 
8:02 PM
Wow you guys are my kind of people, I'll tell you that much.
 
@Dodsy That's very good too.
@Semiclassical you don't like a game of chess?
 
We have lingered in the chambers of the sea
By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown
Till human voices wake us, and we drown.
 
Friesch veit der vint der heimahtzu/ mein irisch kinde woe veilest du? (that's a guess and partially phonetic, mind)
@BalarkaSen Eh, it just doesn't jump out at me as much.
 
e. e. cummings was my fav
 
@BalarkaSen Is that another poem?
 
8:03 PM
Same with the Fire Sermon (though the last few lines are great)
All part of The Waste Land @dodsy
 
Ah, I have not read it myself
 
@Dodsy The Waste Land is like an epic divided into chapters
 
Only the love song and another one
 
you should def read it
 
And the fourth bit isn't as long.
 
8:04 PM
or listen to Jeremy Irons (and another person I don't recall) reading it.
 
I've read pretty much all of his poetic works (including a few of his plays)
 
Oh the Hollow Men.
The hollow men is one of my all time favourite poems
 
fantastic, that one
 
I'll check out the waste land one.
 
The Hollow Men is one of those poems I can't say I love, mostly because it makes me shudder a bit
 
8:05 PM
Yes!
Me aswell
 
Which I guess makes it very effective.
 
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang, but with a whimper
 
My english teacher read poetry like the most amazing thing I've ever heard.
That ending is so amazing :)
 
Next big one after that is Ash Wednesday
 
He sadly had a heart attack :C (my english teacher)
he did smoke like a fiend though.
 
8:06 PM
at which point you're getting a different sort of poetry from Eliot.
 
yup
 
@Mike it's looking like the summer project I do under Neves might be some kind of geometric flow thing
bc other people involved seem to be interested
 
The eyes are not here
There are no eyes here
What other poets do you guys like?
 
@Semiclassical re the middle parts of The Waste Land, although I can't recite it to you, I think I quite like A Game of Chess.
 
I like Keats too.
 
8:10 PM
I think we are in rats’ alley
Where the dead men lost their bones.
@Dodsy I like Eliot a lot but he's not my favorite poet.
 
Whoever linked those puzzles from Laci, thanks, those are really neat.
 
I guess I'd go 5>1>2>4>3?
 
Who's your favourite?
 
I think I solved the Erdos-de Bruijn one.
 
my all time favorite is hands down Arseni Tarkovsky
note that "favorite" doesn't have much to do with how good he is, or how well-recognized, or seminal his works are
 
8:11 PM
I forgot that you loved russian writers (even more so than I)
 
Russian work in general
 
yeah that
 
:)
Can you speak any russian.
 
nope :P
 
I'm trying to think what language I should learn in school next year.
I'm between Chinese, German, or Russian.
 
8:13 PM
@Semiclassical Not a bad selection
go for Russian :P
 
:D
 
oh here's the recitation i was speaking of earlier by the way. i didn't hear all of it but i felt it was very good
 
@Semiclassical $\binom{23}{0}-\binom{23}{1}+\binom{23}{2}-\binom{23}{3}+\dots -\binom{23}{23}=0$ How can i prove this?
 
That's equal to $(1 + (-1))^{23}$.
 
I'm dumb.
Ignore whatever I say.
 
8:20 PM
@EricSilva is there a formula for this?
 
binomial formula
 
where $1, -1$ comes from?
 
that's like the point of the binomial formula
 
oh, i got it
 
There's probably an inclusion-exclusion interpretation as well.
 
8:22 PM
$(x + y)^{n} = \sum_{k = 0}^{n} x^{n - k}y^{k} \binom{n}{k}$
probably
 
i tried an inclusion-exclusion but don't know if it is same with your's @Semiclassical
@EricSilva exactly.
 
yup yup
 
binom(23,k) = binom(23,23-k). If k is even 23-k is odd, you get opposite signs and stuff cancels out
 
@EricSilva cool
find a geometric flow for me that optimizes that inequality in that paper i liked
 
@BalarkaSen oh, this is the simplest one i think :)
 
8:28 PM
@Semiclassical that is inclusion-exclusion for $A_1=A_2=\cdots=A_n$ all of size $1$.
 
@AbdullahUYU They're all the same proof in the end.
 
yeah, but observing it from different points of view is so impressive
@BalarkaSen binom(6,k) = binom(6,6-k) doesn't work for (6,0)-...+(6,6)
 
Yeah I know. It was specific to 23 being odd.
 
@Semiclassical A circle that have equation $x^2+y^2-4x+2y+n=0$ intersects with $y$ axis at points $A,B$. Find $||\vec{OA}+\vec{OB}||$.
 
$O$ is the origin?
 
8:38 PM
oh, sorry $O$ is the center of the circle
 
Ah.
Do you know how to find O,A,B?
 
$O=(2,-1)$
$A=-1+\sqrt{1-n}, B=-1-\sqrt{1-n}$
right? @Semiclassical
 
Well, not quite. But presumably you mean $A,B=(0,-1\pm \sqrt{1-n})$.
So what's $\vec{OA}$?
 
$\vec{OA}=(-2,\sqrt{1-n})$
similarly
$\vec{OB}=(-2,-\sqrt{1-n})$
 
Right. So what's their sum, and what's the length?
 
8:49 PM
$(-4,0)\rightarrow lenght=4$
thanks
 
right-o
 

« first day (2487 days earlier)      last day (2538 days later) »