« first day (2183 days earlier)      last day (2835 days later) » 

Huy
9:00 PM
@Krijn: and even more importantly, the drummer looks happy when he pulls it off, so to sum up, the teacher made the drummer happy.
 
That's how this abuse is supposed to work
That's why it's mental abuse!
 
Huy
but then I don't see the problem of it. it is only abuse in the very moment and for the non-involved observer. in the end, the abused drummer is happy.
 
ok, that's true, I see your point @Huy I still think the movie condemns the method even though it shows good results, for those who survive it at least
 
Most people in 1984 are also quite happy, and even Winston loves Big Brother, but the observer clearly sees that we should not go down that road!
 
Huy
@Krijn: but why is the observer supposed to be right? why does he have to intervene with a different person's life just because he thinks his way of life is so much better, even though the other person is completely happy?
 
9:05 PM
Ah, that's a fine philosophical point, @Huy, and one that we seem to disagree on.
 
heh, i googled: they put the j. jonah jameson guy as the abusive teacher? excellent fit
 
Huy
@Krijn: I could just never understand that point of view, because if I'm happy with my life, I don't feel like someone else should tell me "hey, you're doing it wrong, my way makes you way happier"
(and then forces me to do it his way)
 
Back.
 
"being happy with life" might be a controversial concept in itself
 
@Huy Hope you think the same about different attitudes you see here (or elsewhere) toward mathematics. That's perfectly fine.
 
Huy
9:08 PM
@user1618033: of course! :)
 
@Huy Cool! ;)
 
@Huy I get your point, I do!
 
Huy
I've always been the "whatever makes you happy as long as you don't hurt anyone else" kind of guy
 
@Huy What if your mathematical performance becomes annoying for a bunch of guys? Maybe they feel hurted by you.
 
Huy
@user1618033: ignore them and tell them to ignore you too, if they're bothered
 
9:10 PM
Of course, you struggle so much to be kind, but look, you don't manage to be (because some decided so).
@Huy Right! :-)
 
Huy
@Krijn: so are drums your only instrument?
 
@Huy No, my main instrument is a vibraphone. Drums are more of a side thingy (which, to be fair, I have neglected for some time).
 
Huy
@user1618033: just one thing: if you think some people are not mature enough yet to understand, just accept it and think "he/she is just a kid, one day he/she will understand". if you say it out loud, people will likely get offended and more drama will result.
@Krijn: oh, very interesting. for how long have you been playing the vibraphone?
 
@Huy I'd say at least 6 years, but I'm not entirely sure.
 
Huy
@Krijn: got any recordings?
 
9:15 PM
No proper ones, I'm not in it for that
 
Huy
you don't have to "be in it for that" to record yourself :P
 
Oh, I thought you meant professionally.
 
Huy
I have hundreds of recordings of myself just so I can listen to my amateur mistakes.
 
I did record myself sometimes, I think. I wonder where those went though
 
@Huy You're perfectly right. In general I suspect that some I had tougher discussion with are somewhat older than the usual students that come here, like 50-60. For instance, I suspect Balarka is over 40-50. If I knew 100% he's just 14 as he claims, then most probably I would have never argued with him. Just an example. Once again, I agree with what you said!
 
9:18 PM
lol
 
Then my style of doing mathematics is very different, I'm very enthusiastic about all my work and natural in my reactions. I express joy fully naturally when talking about mathematics.
 
Huy
maybe over 40-50kg, if he starts to eat properly
 
somewhat near 40, actually
 
Huy
:P
what's your height?
 
eh
i dunno, never measured my height.
 
9:20 PM
You should now approximately, right?
 
i don't have my centimeter scale with me right now. i lost it.
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen: ok, if you drop a pen from the height of your neck, how long does it take to reach the floor?
 
so i can't.
my guess without anything to compare with would be horrible
 
Give us a 10 cm interval that you'd surely fit
 
@Huy pretty quick, but i don't think that's because of my height
 
9:22 PM
For instance, @robjohn showed his age some years ago on the status, and that was very surprising to me, he's so young (in the sense of being energic and involved in the stuff) that I thought he's just 25-30 at the beginning. It's really cool to be so, and I hope to be like him when I'll be his age.
 
i think i am moderately tall
 
Some are just cool, apart from the side that I talked a lot with robjohn. robjohn is cool!
 
@BalarkaSen what
 
Anyway.
 
Don't they tell you at the doctor's
 
9:25 PM
BBL (to write some more on my stuff)
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen: if you're moderately tall, being somewhat near 40kg seems rather underweight
 
@Huy Just one question before returning to my stuff. Have you ever seen Balarka? Would you bet that he's not 50?
 
@Krijn I am probably over 5ft, but less than 6ft. Can't tell you exactly were, probably a bit over 5+1/2ft.
 
What's that in Freedom Units
 
Huy
@user1618033: not in person.
 
9:26 PM
80 pounds? 90?
100?
 
@0celo7 Nope, only weight.
 
@Huy OK
 
40Kg is 88 pounds
now, if only I knew how many centimeters 5ft are...
 
Huy
@Alessandro: don't you ever measure your feet?
 
@Balarka, you are definitely underweight then...
 
9:27 PM
88 is underweight unless you're 5 feet, probably.
 
Huy
@Krijn: unless he's pretty much 5'
 
I know.
That's not a news.
 
...eat more?
 
5.5ft is 167cm, I wouldn't describe that at moderately tall here, but average heights varies around the globe
@Huy I ony know they are big and a hassle when I need shoes
 
Huy
yeah, 5.5 for a guy should be roughly below average
 
9:28 PM
He can still grow a lot though
 
Huy
@Alessandro: haha, what's your shoe size? :D
 
He's like 7 though
 
@Huy 45, sometimes even 46 depending on the manufacturer, in European sizes, which is 12-13 in US sizes according to the first chart i pulled on google
 
Huy
ok, that's quite large
 
speaking of, I need new shoes.
 
Huy
9:30 PM
I'm like 39-41 depending on the manufacturer
but I'm also only ~165cm
 
45 here also, you should go to the Netherlands, they are prepared for that
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen: there's a maths student frequenting the maths library at my university who doesn't wear shoes. not even in winter.
 
hah
 
uhm I haven't measured myself in a while, but I should be almost 180cm, like 178 or something like that
 
i don't actually wear shoes tho. just some sort of slippers.
if that's what you call 'em
 
9:33 PM
@Huy there was a guy like that in another high school in my city too! He was actually great at math competitions, I wonder what he's doing now
 
Huy
it's always the math guys.
 
i mean, what do they wear, then?
 
Nothing, I'd say?
Just bare feet
 
that's weird, even i wouldn't do that
 
9:36 PM
even in the winter tho
 
@Alessandro ah, my kind of guy
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen you should try this
 
I wore those to uni yesterday!
 
Huy
and yes, they're bare feet
 
he often went barefoot inside buildings
 
9:37 PM
i should try barefoot.
seems appealing
 
Huy
please don't.
barefoot and not showering on a regular basis aren't a good combination
 
@BalarkaSen you don't shower?
 
i do, but not as frequently
 
...not daily?
 
Huy
@0celo7: did you put me off ignore? :o
 
9:39 PM
@Huy Yes
 
Huy
why?
 
Don't remember why I ignored you.
 
Huy
I do. :P
 
I do too
 
Good for you
I know you bullied me
But I couldn't find it in the chat log
 
Huy
9:39 PM
@0celo7: I'm not a bully. I used to be one, in high school.
 
You said something to piss me off. But it couldn't have been that bad because I've forgotten what it was.
 
Huy
ok
so how are you enjoying Apple Music?
 
Amazing
 
Huy
glad you like it
 
I need a new phone
128GB
 
Huy
9:40 PM
why, which do you have?
 
64 ain't shit
 
Huy
I have 64
what do you store that takes up so much space
 
I have like 70 gigs of music
 
That's quite a lot
 
Huy
why not just stream it via Apple music?
 
9:42 PM
whenever i hear "bully", I think of the following.
 
I don't have unlimited data and wifi coverage isn't 100%
 
Huy
ah, ok
 
But I have a 5S, it's time for an upgrade anyway
 
Huy
true.
7's just around the corner
 
Yeah, I'll get that
 
Huy
9:43 PM
same here
 
(whoa, that's way too long, i only intended to refer to the first 2 or 3 minutes of the video)
 
Going to attempt some Hirsch exercises.
 
i wish you luck
 
Thanks.
 
which exercises, out of curiosity?
 
9:45 PM
My advisor said we'll "discuss" them, I don't think he expects me to actually solve any
@BalarkaSen I'll tell you in a bit.
Have to pack my bag and make my way to the library
Right next to the geometry and topology books
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen: any idea who I could ask about the residual finiteness of rings?
 
@Huy Tobias, probably.
He'd know.
 
Huy
good idea.
@BalarkaSen: BTW, why aren't you sleeping already?
 
Dunno. Maybe I'll bunk school tomorrow.
 
Huy
I'll report you.
 
9:51 PM
He is a bully.
 
Huy
no, I'm a teacher. that's my duty.
 
For what? Students are allowed to not attend school.
Civil rights.
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen: but not to not sleep.
 
@Krijn Being a bully and a teacher at the same time is not a helpful combination
Not at all.
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen then why did I get such a good evaluation from the headmaster :>
 
9:55 PM
some bullies are skillful about bullying
 
Huy
:o
 
Ok, let's see which exercises
Chapter 6
Sect. 1: 2,4
Sect 2: 5, 9
Sect 3: 6
ah, yes, 1.4 is a good problem
 
Oh Morse theory. OK, not interested right now.
 
@BalarkaSen I'm doing Morse theory in my reading course, so yeah
 
Mike thinks an interested student can learn Morse theory later on, so better not to include in a differential topology course that he'd prefer, so I'm following his advice.
 
10:03 PM
ok
Time to get to work
 
Well, not a "differential topology" course, but a "smooth manifolds" course.
 
@BalarkaSen What's the difference?
I guess Hirsch doesn't assume $C^\infty$
 
nah, nah, not those horrible details about $C^{1 + \epsilon + \epsilon^2}$ etc. There's more geometry to smooth manifolds.
But I guess you're already familiar with a large chunk of it
 
C^k is pretty horrible.
@BalarkaSen I don't think it's "geometry" until you have something besides the smooth structure.
i.e. a Lie group structure, Riemannian metric, symplectic form, etc.
 
Yes.
 
10:08 PM
Lee is a mixed bag of topology and geometry in my mind
 
@0celo7 C^k is equivalent to C^infty for k > 0, I think
 
@BalarkaSen I guarantee the proof of that is revolting :P
 
Me too.
 
One day I want to read Chapter 2 of Hirsch.
Not now.
 
Why is $\Bbb Z_4 + \Bbb Z_2$ not a free $\Bbb Z$-module?
I'm having a hard time understanding why
 
10:18 PM
$+$ means direct sum? $(1, 0)$ is a torsion element, e.g.
 
Yes, + is direct sum.
What is a torsion element?
Is that a zero divisor, i.e. (1,0) * (0,1) = (0,0)?
 
What is your definition of a free module
 
An elt $g$ in your Z-module is torsion if there is some nonzero $n$ such that $ng = 0$.
@aras Yes, but that's not relevant.
The important point is free modules cannot have torsion elements (do you know why?), whereas this one does.
 
ah
The definition given of free module was a module that has a basis.
 
Yes, but a basis needs to have linearly independent elements
 
10:23 PM
A free module cannot have a torsion element because if it would, then there would be multiple distinct linear combinations for the same element, right? i.e. if g is torsion s.t. $ng = 0$, then $g = (n+1)g = ...$?
 
So take any element $(a,b)$ in your supposed basis, then $4\cdot (a,b) = 0$
And $4 \neq 0$ in $\mathbb{Z}$
 
@aras Right. Also, listen to @Krijn, he's got a shorter proof.
Essentially the same, but said in a neat way.
 
OK, but does this mean that Zp is also not a free Z-module because $p \cdot 1 = 0$?
 
Yep.
No cyclic group ever is a free module over Z.
Side-question: Does that tell you what the finitely generated free modules over Z are?
 
Hm, well Z(a) for an algebraic element a is a free module I believe.
 
10:27 PM
Or more in general, try to understand the structure of all $\mathbb{Z}$ modules!
@aras That's just isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}$, right?
 
^
We're asking you to understand what they are upto isomorphism.
You need to know a more or less nontrivial theorem, which I am not sure if you're aware of.
 
Two theorems, actually
 
Are you referring to decomposition of abelian groups?
 
@aras Yes!!
 
ok so then perhaps every Z-module would be only isomorphic to Z^n, because multiplying by any Z/pZ would add torsion elements to the group?
 
10:30 PM
Every free Z-module
 
Oh yeah sorry every free Z-module.
 
You need to say finitely generated there for the fundamental theorem of f.g. abelian groups to apply though.
What about non-finitely generated ones?
 
OK.
 
@BalarkaSen Good lord, the proof of this one thing involves submanifold geometry...
Principal curvatures, etc.
Hirsch is insane
 
@0celo7 :P
 
10:32 PM
Would that be an infinite product $\Bbb Z \times \Bbb Z \times ...$?
I don't know much about infinitely generated groups
 
@aras Yes.
 
Great, thank you for the help!!
 
Well, infinite direct sum, not product actually.
 
Oh ok
$\Bbb Z \oplus \Bbb Z \oplus ...$
 
It's probably worth trying to come up with a torsion-free Z module which is not free.
You saw this cannot happen in finite dimensions.
So any example would be infinite dimensional.
 
10:37 PM
Also, @Balarka, have you seen this one? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
 
Mhm.
It's primary decomposition, isn't it?
 
@BalarkaSen I have to go now but I'll think about that question
 
Sure, sure.
 
also thanks @Krijn
 
Np.
There's so much I'd like to read if only I had the money :(
 
10:41 PM
For me it's time more than money: I can't even get the time to read the books my money can afford.
Let alone get more books, for which I obviously don't have money.
 
I should really be reading right now
Remind me to start reading before the full hour
 
@0celo7 Given two oriented submanifolds intersecting transversely inside a big oriented manifold, how can I tell which point has intersection number +1 and which -1 immediately?
Just from seeing the picture?
@Krijn I'll have to run to bed soon though. Get an alarm clock.
@0celo7 Nevermind, pretty easy to do that.
 
@BalarkaSen I don't have a good intuition for that. I think you take a basis of the tangent space of the first one, then start adding vectors from the second one until you get a basis of the whole manifold. Then you look at the orientation of that
The order is important
 
Right, just look at basis of $T_p(X)\oplus T_p(Z)$.
And what the sign of that is, relative to the orientation on the big manifold.
 
Wow, you have to relate the critical points of the Morse function to the curvature of the submanifold
Hirsch, you madman
How is anyone supposed to solve this
 
10:49 PM
with a pen and a paper, most likely
Pushing forward orientations by path is a useful idea. I have used that in the past but now it's much clear what happens.
Should keep it in mind
 
Woow I made it. I am reading.
 
hey people. quick question
does cross product return the cosine of the angle between two vectors or the sin of the angle between two vectors?
 
use google
 
I did, I'm still confused.
 
10:59 PM
explain your confusion
 
well, It says that it is calculated with sin.
However, my dad once told me it was cosine of the angle
and it doesn't say anything about what it returns
 
Length of the cross product of two unit vectors is sine of the angle between them.
 
ok, thanks
 
@BalarkaSen Length of the cross product.
 
that is all I wanted to know
 
11:00 PM
Just remember $|| a \times b || = || a || \cdot || b || \cdot \sin \theta$
 
@Ashwin It tells you about area spanned by the two vector.
 
Does anyone actually prove that?
 
Area of a parallelogram with sides $a,b$ is $ab\sin(\theta)$.
 
okay
 
@0celo7 Huh?
 
11:01 PM
@BalarkaSen I don't think I've ever seen a proof of @Krijn 's formula, but I haven't looked.
 
well TBH I don't know much Trig. I've taken Geometry, haven't taken Algb2/Trig yet. I know basic stuff like law of sins, law of cos, sin area formula, etc.
 
I did once, in a homework exercise @0celo7
 
I just needed to know because I'm programming lighting.
 
@0celo7 It's the definition, to me. :)
 
@Krijn Is there a trick or is it a boring computation?
@BalarkaSen Of what?
 
11:02 PM
Cross product.
 
The cross product is the wedge composed with the Hodge star.
 
@0celo7 There's a small trick, I believe
 
Orthogonal to $a, b$, with length the signed area of the parallelogram they span.
 
It was almost 4 years ago so I wouldn't know
 
@BalarkaSen + right hand rule for the sign.
 
11:03 PM
You can translate that into determinant thingy
Note that area of the parallelogram $a, b$ span is the same as volume of the parallelpiped $a, b, n$ span where $n$ is the unit vector orthogonal to $a, b$.
Then that's $\text{det}(n, a, b)$.
That is all there is to it.
 
@BalarkaSen Yeah, I imagine that's how the proof would go.
 
OK, gotta sleep.
 
bye
 
11:19 PM
Hello, I'm facing difficulty in formally proving that a function is onto function. If it is not onto function, then the proof is easier because I can show a range of output for which there is no possible input. But if it is a onto function, then how to prove it?
Take a look at this please: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1872214/how-to-formally-prove-whether-this-function-is-onto-or-not-kx-x-2-where
 
11:31 PM
@0celo7 hey, can you help me with this question? I assume that it boils down to basically proving that every non negative real number has a square root that is non-negative in itself.
@Krijn
@Semiclassical can you help me with this ? :)
 
Existence of square roots is a nontrivial theorem in analysis
 

« first day (2183 days earlier)      last day (2835 days later) »