« first day (2013 days earlier)      last day (3013 days later) » 

9:00 PM
Illustrated, explains problems in simple terms
 
If $A$ and $B$ are events with $P(A)+P(B)>1$, why is it that largest possible value of $P(A \cap B)$ is $ \min(P(A), P(B))$?
 
@I'manartist what is the qualifier for som1 to make a book ? having a rich history of mse answers ? having phd ? studying and reading too much ? just asking
 
usually you publish a book if you can put together lots of recent developments clearly and concisely
instead of having thousands of related research papers floating around, it's nice to publish a book that puts them together
 
i have 3 papes until now
 
@Idle001 Ramanujan didn't have a rich history of mse answers, neither phd, but he worked a lot on mathematics he liked, he really knew his mathematics and produced a lot of mind-blowing results.
 
9:03 PM
and thousands of softwares
 
yes but they dont have to be your papers @Idle001
 
@I'manartist ramanujan has inventions not books
well he has one in contribution with hardy
 
@Idle001 Ramanujan had enough stuff to write tons of books, but it seems he wasn't too willing to share all his knowledge with the others. Many of his results don't have a proof.
 
and a notebook (not sure if it is published when he was alive)
 
Like if I had to write a book, I'd write one about connectedness in topological spaces. And I could put together lots of interesting examples and theorems that have come out in the last 50 years.
a book specializing in connectedness
nothing like that exists really
 
9:07 PM
I've seen Ramanujan's notebooks. Frightening stuff!
 
Do it! I would buy it once my IQ becomes higher than that of a rock's.
 
lol your IQ is probably fine, you just need more studying
and they say IQ doesn't increase after age 20 anyway
 
Stop blaming IQ for anything. With a resonable amount of IQ points and extremely hard work, passion and patience, one can get absolutely amazing results.
Work hark, very hard on what you like, put passion, never give up, be stubborn for years if needed.
 
Oki
Can I ask a question
 
@ForeverMozart this s bullshit
 
9:10 PM
I am one Lemma away from a pretty cool result, but writing the proof is going to be hard...
 
Suppose $x$ is a vector in $\Bbb R^n$ and $x\cdot y = 0$ for all $y\in\Bbb R^n$. Prove that $x$ must be the zero vector.$
 
so I'm here procrastinating
 
Don't give me an answer
What is special about the zero vector?
 
Hello!!!
 
@Idle001 what is?
 
9:11 PM
iq doesnt increase
 
I don't think it does after a certain age
 
What is Applied Algebra about?
 
not significantly anyway
 
people told me before , u wont be that intelligent after ur 30s
that is crap
 
Oh ok I realized what it is
thanks anyways :)
 
9:13 PM
Hey @IlmariKaronen
Are you familiar with Coding Theory?
 
one can be relatively intelligent regarding how much he is informated
and brain is continuously evolving
 
@Idle001 I think the reason mathematicians accomplish more in their 20s and 30s is because they are more driven at that age. Driven to publish something original, get a reputation, get a job, etc. After they have that, most people will relax and not be quite as passionate.
 
just try to solve mathematical problems, and puzzles and stuff like that, u would guarantee ur mental tact
@ForeverMozart yes not passionate, but still creative
 
@TedShifrin Can it be an informal proof?
 
I feel much smarter now, but on my last IQ test I got 134, the same as when I was 17.
so I sort of believe it will not increase
 
9:17 PM
Is anyone familiar with Apostol's Calculus (volume II)? I wonder whether I can use it for multivariable calculus and linear algebra (and in that order). As I understand, it starts with linear algebra, but I'm not sure whether I can read the multivariable calculus part without going through the linear algebra part first.
 
and at social level, its recommended to keep in touch with real world, that would help to not detach one's mind from reality and cause a rupture in inner personna that would reflect on the inner unconscious
where uncounscious mind is a platform of conscious mind, and major part of decision making
 
@ForeverMozart what are some ways I can prove a theorem in general?
 
Hey @abel
Do you know what Coding theory is about?
 
@Michael you must learn the basics first. Study definitions and examples, then later on you can try proving theorems.
 
@ForeverMozart what are some definitions I need to know for this proof: Suppose $x$ is a vector in $\Bbb R^n$ and $x\cdot y = 0$ for all $y\in\Bbb R^n$. Prove that $x$ must be the zero vector.
 
9:23 PM
evinda, no.
 
that's my approach anyway. I read a new definition, think of some examples where it applies, look at properties of those examples, and then see if maybe they are related to the new term by a theorem.
@Michael Know the definition of $\mathbb R ^n$, the dot product, and zero vector.
Now apply some logic.
What if $x$ is not the zero vector?
can you find $y$ such that $x\cdot y\neq 0$?
 
no
well
if y is a zero vector
 
right you need $y$ to be nonzero obviously
do you see how I am trying to prove the statement?
 
Yep
I'll go review some definitions and I will be right back
@ForeverMozart thanks:)
 
Guten Abend @TedShifrin
Do you maybe know what Coding theory is about?
 
9:28 PM
Guten Abend, @evinda. Nope.
 
Ok... Neither Applied Algebra?
 
@user276387 The point is that to do multivariable calculus "right," you do need some linear algebra (not all of it). The whole point of calculus is to approximate general (differentiable) functions by linear functions, so we need to know what linear functions $\Bbb R^n\to\Bbb R^m$ are and how to use them.
@evinda: Mostly no.
 
A ok... No problem... @TedShifrin
 
@TedShifrin I already have a semester's worth of linear algebra. Not sure if that's sufficient to skip the linear algebra and do multivariable calculus, though.
 
@TedShifrin are there some books you recommend that I read as I go through your lectures?
 
9:43 PM
@JeSuis is $n$ fixed? If so, then $A(P)=P(1)=\sum\limits_{k=1}^na_k\le n^{1-\frac1p}\left(\sum\limits_{k=1}^n|a_k|^p\right)^{1/p}=n^{1-\frac1p}\|A\|_p$
 
10:02 PM
@robjohn I finally ask the question here math.stackexchange.com/questions/1645027/…
 
@JeSuis So $n$ is not fixed.
 
@robjohn yes
 
LOLLLLLL, you have to see that
Here is the test I took: arealme.com/iq-2016/en
 
@I'manartist ;)
 
If you try it, take it only one time and be honest, don't cheat. Of course, I don't have that score, but this is the score I received from them.
 
10:10 PM
I legitamtely don't know what the first question wants me to do
 
Let me know the scores you get. This is more of a joke although the questions are pretty hard, but nice at the same time.
 
Is it timed?
 
@Michael No. I did it in 15 min, 20 cute questions.
 
oki
AM I allowed to use papers?
 
265 is not possible on a real IQ test
 
10:17 PM
Not unless ur @I'manartist
I remember doing a test that gave me 60 iq -.-
 
I think 160 is the highest
 
i just read an article about most desastrous people who caused massive murders , a major part of them are motivated by a closet passive grudge that grew with age
 
@ForeverMozart You should also get a huge IQ points on that test (since you get a lot on a real test). Just give it a try and see. :-)
 
lol ok
what the hell
 
ikr?
How on earth do you do the first question
 
10:25 PM
lol :-)
Think a bit of the colours of the points. :-)
 
sleepy, gonna hit the bed
see ya
 
isn't A because the small arrow is too advanced :p
 
By the way, what is the meaning of nerd in the context above? nerd has many meaning.
 
Someone who likes integrals
 
@Michael lol
 
10:31 PM
Someone help I still can't
It looks like D
 
10:46 PM
Is any done with the IQ test?
Let me know the scores you get, it is just for fun. I'm working on the 2016 test version, I'm at the last 2 questions.
 
probably should have spent more time
and I totally guessed on the first problem
but it was fun, some good problems
 
11:05 PM
I didn't get the one with the box, and the one that was find X
 
how do you see which ones you missed?
aw hell I already closed the window
pretty sure I missed the first one... thought it was a joke
 
me 2
@ForeverMozart Does the order matter when multiplying two vectors in $\Bbb R^{n} $?
oh
 
you mean dot product?
 
Here my second result
 
look at how dot product is defined
 
11:09 PM
In mathematics, the dot product or scalar product (sometimes inner product in the context of Euclidean space, or rarely projection product for emphasizing the geometric significance), is an algebraic operation that takes two equal-length sequences of numbers (usually coordinate vectors) and returns a single number.
 
removed in case someone else wants to try the test
 
you beat me you bastard
 
Can females be bastards?
 
11:10 PM
female?
 
wait
I thought I'manartist was a woman
 
I could have done it perfectly, but I'm pretty tired now.
@ForeverMozart what did you score?
 
scroll up and see
my triangle is isosceles
 
@ForeverMozart Nice!
@robjohn take some nice iq tests above for fun. They are very nice. :-)
 
It doesn't seem like order matters
 
11:12 PM
right it doesnt matter
 
@ForeverMozart I wonder what is the meaning of those scores in a real test.
 
Suppose $x$ is a vector in $\Bbb R^n$ and $x\cdot y = 0$ for all $y\in\Bbb R^n$. Prove that $x$ must be the zero vector.
 
I dont know. On the real test there are many more problems, and it is divided into three sections if I remember correctly
they put blocks on the table, show you a picture for a few seconds, and then make you recreate the image from memory
I remember that part
 
hmm, is y not a vector?
 
@Michael suppose $x$ is NOT the zero vector.
can you find a vector $y$ such that $x\cdot y\neq 0$?
(yes)
 
11:17 PM
yep
 
ok, so what can $y$ be?
 
anything but the zero vector
 
@ForeverMozart there should be a connection though with the real scores I suppose, not sure how strong. Also in real tests there are such questions.
 
$(1,1)\cdot(-1,1)=(0,0)$
 
11:18 PM
According to the last test logic and number areas are perfect. At the visual part I did all in a hurry, but I could have done it perfectly.
 
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh
 
what can $y$ be?
 
gimme a sec to collect my thoughts
im sorry
 
$x\neq 0$, find $y$ such that $x\cdot y\neq 0$
come on man!!!
 
I think I am just missing some definitions
ahh
ok ok ok
y is an element of the reals?
 
11:22 PM
$x$ and $y$ are vectors
like if $n=2$, $x=(x_1,x_2)$, $y=(y_1,y_2)$
 
yep
 
so by $x\neq 0$ I mean $(x_1,...,x_n)\neq (0,...0)$
 
Yep
 
what can $y$ be?
 
a zero vector
 
11:26 PM
then the product is $0$
I want $x\cdot y\neq 0$
 
@ForeverMozart did you take the other test?
 
given that $x\neq 0$
@I'manartist no I dont think so
 
Well y can't be the zero vector, I know that now
 
@ForeverMozart this one, and it is even nicer arealme.com/iq-2015/en. Very appealing questions.
 
I feel like I am missing a definition or a theorem
 
11:29 PM
ok I will do it a little later
 
Given that x is another vector, I need y to be a vector that can prevent the dot product from equaling zero
 
given that $x\neq 0$
 
yep
I honestly can't I am so sorry
I don't know enough properties of vector spaces
 
what is $x\cdot x$?
It is a sum of squares, right?
 
11:33 PM
oh that is the part of the lecture that I couldn't see
 
so if $x$ has a nonzero coordinate...
you get $x\cdot x>0$
 
Yah that makes sense
 
that's the proof
 
uh
so multiplying two vectors can never make a negative answer?
 
it can
but not if you multiply a vector by itself
cause then dot product is sum of squares
 
11:37 PM
In mathematics, the dot product or scalar product (sometimes inner product in the context of Euclidean space, or rarely projection product for emphasizing the geometric significance), is an algebraic operation that takes two equal-length sequences of numbers (usually coordinate vectors) and returns a single number. This operation can be defined either algebraically or geometrically. Algebraically, it is the sum of the products of the corresponding entries of the two sequences of numbers. Geometrically, it is the product of the Euclidean magnitudes of the two vectors and the cosine of the angle...
Should I look at the geometric definition?
 
$x\cdot y=\sum_{i=1} ^n(x_i\cdot y_i)$
that is definition
 
Why is there nothing below the series
Oh no index
Ok I will review some definitions, I need to understand what the question is asking before proving :)
Thanks for sticking with me
 

« first day (2013 days earlier)      last day (3013 days later) »