« first day (1794 days earlier)      last day (3228 days later) » 

2:01 PM
@TedShifrin I picked up your DG notes (which are wonderful, by the way, thank you) and I think there's a missing 's' on the page with Green's theorem: "We will have plenty of occasion to use [...]" It's pretty trivial, but ... I can't help myself.
 
@Balarka, sorry, I was away.
$v_p(x+y) \geq\min(v_p(x),v_p(y))$.
 
yes, but that's stronger than what I asked you to prove :)
 
it follows from there, since then $|x+y|_p \leq\max(p^{-v_p(x)},p^{-v_p(y)})\leq p^{-v_p(x)}+p^{-v_p(y)} = |x|_p+|y|_p$.
 
sure, true.
 
so that's a metric.
 
2:07 PM
right. so we have a new metric space $(\Bbb Z, |\bullet, \bullet|_p)$
 
@pjs36 I'm not sure "occasion" can't be used as a "mass noun" or "uncountable noun".
But this is a math chat, I'd better not say "uncountable" that way.
 
so one might say : why should I care about this stupid metric space?
 
why, indeed?
 
for that, we need to know the algebraic side of the story.
 
because it sounds wacky is good enough for me :P
@BalarkaSen okay.
 
2:09 PM
In algebraic number theory, one thing you always want to do is to "enlarge" your domain of integers so as to get more information about your diophaintine equations.
 
like the Christmas theorem uses Gaussian integers?
 
For example, consider the Fermat's equation for $n = 3$. $x^3 + y^3 = z^3$.
 
hmm
wait, are you going to tell me a proof?
makes excited noises
 
If you enlarge $\Bbb Z$ to $\Bbb Z[\zeta]$ where $\zeta$ is the $3$-rd root of unity (one of the solution to $\zeta^2 - \zeta + 1 = 0$), $x^3 + y^3$ factors as $(x + y)(x + \zeta y)(x + \zeta^2 y)$
 
hey, Sayan :)
@BalarkaSen yes. go on.
 
2:12 PM
@BalarkaSen Is that the p-adic metric
hey @Soham
 
@Soham No, I am not going to tell you the proof. But the general idea is to factor it up into pieces like I wrote down above, and develop a notion of primes in ring of integers of an algebraic number fields (e.g., $\Bbb Z[\zeta]$) and exploit unique factorization.
 
oh, all those ideals and stuff.
anyway, go on about p-adics.
 
At least, that's what Kummer did (which worked for a restricted class of primes $p$).
 
@SohamChowdhury You're right, I definitely see phrases like "on occasion", but this seemed different. Ted definitely knows his grammar, I'm sure he'll set me straight if I need set straight :)
 
Anyway, so algebraic number theorists always want to "expand" their domain to get more information.
 
2:15 PM
regular primes, yes. I looked up the defs, pretty weird, especially the links with $B_n$s.
@BalarkaSen yes.
@Balarka, still there?
 
Now here comes the (algebraic) definition of $p$-adic numbers : $\mathbf{Z}_p$ is the ring $\{(a_0, a_1, a_2, \cdots) \in \prod \Bbb Z/p^k\Bbb Z : a_{i+1} \mod p^{i} = a_i\}$
I hope I have got the indices right.
 
oookay. explain that to me.
 
Right, let me explain that beast.
Consider the equation $x^2 + 1 = 0$ in $\Bbb Z$. This has no solution.
 
right.
 
However, this has a solution in, say, $\Bbb Z/5\Bbb Z$. It's $x = 2$
 
2:20 PM
oh, sure
 
@Soham Yes, but that's the classical approach. We won't take the route (I'll explain why later)
Anyway, to it has a solution in $\Bbb Z/5\Bbb Z$.
Now we want to find a solution to $x^2 + 1 = 0$ in $\Bbb Z$ that is of the form $2$ modulo $5$
 
So plug in $x = 2 + 5k$, from which you get $25k^2 + 20k + 5 = 0$.
 
@MikeMiller replied on main
 
2:23 PM
We look for solutions mod $5^2$.
 
probably it will be much later if I read Farb that I will understand most of the answer
 
We see that $k = 1 \pmod{25}$ does the job.
 
@BalarkaSen so are we working in Z or Z/25?
 
Thus, $x = 2 + 5\cdot 1 = 7 \pmod{25}$.
@Soham We were working with Z, then we worked with Z/5Z, then we are in Z/5^2Z
 
@BalarkaSen yes.
oh, I think I see where this is going.
 
2:24 PM
So in a sense, we are "localizating" more and more, shortening our domain as we move along.
 
localizing?
 
BTW @Balarka you just need to read the third component (the one with the picture) in my one answer to visualize braid groups, the second component was just addressing the OP's specific hangup and giving a low-tech proof valid for n=2, and the first component was apologizing for the original answer being incorrect.
 
@Soham We are not adjoining anything to Z, but quotienting Z by it's prime ideals.
 
Dunno what prime ideals are :(
@BalarkaSen aren't we actually increasing the size of the domain? Z/25Z is bigger than Z/5Z, for instance.
 
2:26 PM
well, quotienting by normal subgroups, then.
@Soham by cardinality, sure.
 
@Stan: I consider vectors to have their tails at the origin. Of course, for drawing pictures for vector addition and subtraction, we are allowed to move them ("free vectors").
 
but I am not talking about cardinality :)
 
so how are we "shortening our domain"?
 
People, why fractals always concern topology?
 
@SohamChowdhury OK, forget about it, it'll take some while to explain. The point is that instead of adjoining something to Z, we look at Z/p, Z/p^2, etc.
 
2:30 PM
Got that.
 
That's the kind of thing you do when you want to prove that a diophantine equation has no solution say. If it has no solution mod p, say, then it has no solution in Z.
 
(but not conversely)
 
got both of you.
 
But, it turns out we can "path-up" these "local" informations to get something larger than Z.
Here goes :
 
2:32 PM
$x^2 + 1 = 0$ has solution $x = 2$ mod 5, $x = 7$ mod 25, etc.
 
hi @anon @Balarka @Soham
 
Hi @Ted
 
oh, heya @Fargle
 
hey, @Ted.
 
@BalarkaSen the local-global principle can be a bit fragile - e.g. it works for quadratics (i.e. minkowski's theorem) but not cubics (e.g. selmer's counterexample)
 
2:32 PM
So simply write the infinite tuple $(2, 7, \cdots) \in \prod_k \Bbb Z/5^k\Bbb Z$. This is a solution to $x^2 + 1 = 0$ in the "$5$-adic numbers"
 
hi ted
 
$$\bigcup_{x,y\in \text{chat}} \rm{hello}(x,y)$$
whenever anyone enters the chat :P
@BalarkaSen okay.
 
Hi Professor @TedShifrin, did you get your results from the medical yet?
 
@Soham If you have followed me so far, see if the definition makes sense
17 mins ago, by Balarka Sen
Now here comes the (algebraic) definition of $p$-adic numbers : $\mathbf{Z}_p$ is the ring $\{(a_0, a_1, a_2, \cdots) \in \prod \Bbb Z/p^k\Bbb Z : a_{i+1} \mod p^{i} = a_i\}$
 
I hope all is good.
 
2:34 PM
(ps : the ring operation is just termwise addition and termwise multiplication)
 
Thanks for asking, @skull@skill ... So far so good, but waiting for some biopsies.
 
@BalarkaSen yup
seems the op is well-defined as well. don't ask me to verify this is a ring :P
 
That's why we care about $p$-adics : it gives us a very simple technique of extending $\Bbb Z$ by looking at it's "localizations" at various ideals, and then taking the "projective limit"
 
ah, category theory.
 
So, anyway, how the heck does this relate to the topological thing we talked about before?
 
2:36 PM
what about the metric?
@BalarkaSen how?
 
Well, others would say it's because you can do analysis (metric space type) and avail yourself of such techniques.
 
Right. So it turns out you can give $\Bbb Z_P$ a topology : $\Bbb Z_p \subset \prod \Bbb Z/p^k\Bbb Z$. Give the $\Bbb Z/p^k\Bbb Z$s the discrete topology, and give the product the product topology, and finally give $\Bbb Z_p$ the subspace topology.
This makes $\Bbb Z_p$ into a topological space. Turns out that this is precisely homeomorphic to the metric completion of $(\Bbb Z, |*, *|_p)$
 
hmm, like R is the metric completion of Q?
 
The idea, @Soham, is that given an unknown integer x (positive for simplicity), the bigger a number n that you know x's residue mod n for, the closer you are to knowing what x is. by the chinese remainder theorem, its residue mod n is essentially the same information as its residue mod a bunch of prime powers, so let's just pick one prime. what happens if we specify an integer's residue mod every power of a prime?
well, the sequence of residues (represented by least positive integer representatives, LPR, mod p^k) will eventually be constant, once p^k is bigger than x is. and these residues will be "compatible" in the sense that the residue mod p^k is obtained from the one p^(k+1) in the obvious way. but what happens if you have an infinite collection of residues which is "compatible" in this sense but whose LPRs are not constant?
then you have a sequence of things that are "approximating" a nonexistent thingie "to arbitrary precision," exactly as a cauchy sequence of rationals approximates irrationals to arbitrary precision. just as one can construct the reals by identifying them with (classes of) cauchy sequences, (i.e. pi by 3, 3.1, 3.14, 3.141, 3.1415, ...) we can construct the p-adics by identifying them with these "compatible" sequences of residues mod powers of p.
 
interesting. very interesting.
 
2:41 PM
I will say that I just woke up so I'm not taking all this in very well, but this is perhaps the best set of explanations of what the p-adics are, @Balarka and @anon
 
@anon yes, it feels like the bigger an $n$ you know the residue mod $p^n$ for, the more you know about the number.
 
bows, @Fargle. But I know very little about them.
@anon is out resident p-adic analyst/algebraist/number theorist
 
so if its not an int, the residues don't have to constant out. wow, this seems trippy.
 
@anon: I responded. You should feel free to conflate $\text{Homeo}(\mathcal S,n)$ and $\text{Diff}$ for surfaces, if one or the other improves your intuition. I tend to think of the latter because I have more tools when working with it.
 
of course, residues mod p^k have a base-p expansion with digits in {0,1,...,p-1}, and notice that the residue mod p^(k+1) will have the same base-p expansion but will have a new p^k digit. if we continue on indefinitely, this means we can identify a p-adic number (the sequence of compatible residues) with an infinite power series expansion in p!
 
2:41 PM
I do too. I'd like to find a textbook for it, rather than Wikipedia and webpages.
 
so what else will you tell me about these things, @Balarka?
what's cool about the top. space of the p-adics?
 
If you can prove an Earle-Eeles theorem for surfaces with marked points, tell me. It shouldn't be too hard, probably just a simple extension of the standard proof of Earle-Eeles.
 
I don't plan to tell any more right now. p-adics are places for all kind of fun.
 
@MikeMiller there is a part of my brain that is scared about homeos instead of diffeos (things like everywhere-continuous-nowhere-differentiable functions scare me, and exotic differential structures make me think there can be disconnects), but I am good at ignoring my conscience.
 
hmm. what kinds?
 
2:43 PM
Goodnight, @Mike. Imagine my surprise to see you here.
 
@anon: I've only read the book up to about chapter 4. There's surely plenty of content later but the thing I'm saying there is just the obvious generalization of the Birman exact sequence.
 
what can you prove with p-adics?
 
you can take the fraction field of $\mathbf Z_p$ to get the field $\mathbf Q_p$. people do "local" number theory all over in that field.
 
Hi @KarimMansour
 
decide what font you're gonna use for Z/Q/R, man.
@BalarkaSen what apart from NT?
 
2:44 PM
@MikeMiller What is Earle-Eeles? Did a cursory google and got a paper reference that I shelved following through on.
 
@anon: These groups can be very different for higher-dimensional manifolds. For surfaces they're homotopy equivalent. The answer I gave should carry over almost identically, though I haven't looked to see if so.
@anon: The components of $\text{Homeo}(\Sigma_{g,k})$, $g \geq 2$ or $k \geq 1$, are contractible.
 
@MikeMiller ah, so when you combined those two facts you were just able to use your knowledge of diff groups :-)
 
Right
 
@SohamChowdhury well, they are made for number theoretic purposes, so most of the interest is number theoretic.
 
The proof in the paper I linked (ignore the rest of it, just look at appendix B) is elementary except for the disc, where you just use Smale's theorem, which is less elementary but very cool
 
2:45 PM
but I guess people do dynamics with them too
 
@TedShifrin I'm responding to a ping.
 
@BalarkaSen even then. they seem crazy interesting.
 
@MikeMiller I assume it suffices for the connected component, i.e. ones isotopic to the identity
 
Haha @MikeM
 
hello @Ted, @Mike, @anon
 
2:46 PM
right
 
the presence of $k\ge1$ should mean some rigidity (things can be "pulled back" to identity around it), but it's interesting $g$ must be bigger than $1$ as well, which leaves the 1-punctured torus as an interesting case
 
@SohamChowdhury p-adic numbers are interesting.
 
very :)
 
the "point" of $g \geq 2$ is to restrict to hyperbolic things - I think the punctured torus is hyperbolic, but Ted should correct me
 
oh, ps : p-adics are homeomorphic to cantor set.
 
2:47 PM
at least, in my intuition - not so much in the proof
 
aight
 
not that it's interesting, just gives you a way to visualize them.
 
@anon: In general homeo and diff are very different. There are simply connected smooth 4-manifolds for which the kernel of the map $\pi_0 \text{Diff}(M) \to \pi_0 \text{Homeo}(M)$ is infinitely generated
 
@BalarkaSen that's actually where the connection to symbolic dynamics i was saying earlier comes in
 
@BalarkaSen as if what you'd said wasn't enough, haha
 
2:48 PM
For $n \leq 3$-folds the inclusion Diff -> Homeo is a homotopy equivalence - Cerf proved this
 
@Semiclassical i see.
well, I'd have to go now. bye, everyone.
 
@MikeMiller that's crazy
 
Bye @Balarka
 
yeah, it comes from a great paper by Danny Ruberman
it's probably a 4-dimensional phenomenon. you'll have to ask the high-dimensional people if there are finiteness results (ie that kernel is finitely generated) for higher-dimensional $M$
 
your third comment missed a golden opportunity to say that working smoothly works more smoothly
we aren't friends anymore
 
2:53 PM
darn
 
Hi @skillpatrol
how are you doing
 
See, @MikeM, you and anon are on the same page now.
 
well, I'm getting there
BTW @Mike I think any choice of nbhd around $n$ points (in $X$) that is homeomorphic to $Y$ induces a group homomorphism $B_n(Y)\to B_n(X)$
 
a question re: the algebraic discussion of the p-adics given above
 
it should
configuration spaces are functorial
 
2:58 PM
Fine thanks @KarimMansour how are you?
 
namely, that it's related to looking at a sequence of quotients of the integers by normal subgroups
 
ping me if you have other questions
 
hi @Semiclassic
 
morning @ted
 
good just about to go pay bills then come and study @skillpatrol
 
2:59 PM
does that construction generalize to sets other than $\mathbb{Z}$?
 
hi @TedShifrin @Semiclassical
 
hi @Karim
 
hi @karim
 
@Semiclassical yes: inverse limits
 
3:00 PM
so, it generalizes to categories that have them
in particular, AbGrp, Grp, Rng, TopGrp, TopRng, Top, R-Mod, etc.
 
are there some useful examples of such? (other than p-adics)
 
one can get extensions of p-adics by doing the same thing with rings of integers of number fields with respect to powers of prime ideals
plus there's absolute galois groups which are inverse limits of galois groups of finite galois extensions
 
where i guess i mean 'useful' in the same way as p-adics are useful for diophantine equations as alluded to by balarka above
i suppose i'm looking for an example outside of number theory
 
the formal power series ring is an inverse limit (K[x] mod powers of x)
 
hmm, okay
 
3:06 PM
the idea (for a linearly ordered inverse system of groups) is that an onto group homomorphism $G\to H$ means that $H$ is a "collapsed" version of $G$, one we get by squinting our eyes and blurring anything in the same coset of $H$ to be blurred into the same pixel. so if $G_0\leftarrow G_1\leftarrow G_2\leftarrow \cdots$ is a sequence of onto maps, the idea is that they are all collapsed versions of some limiting object, the inverse limit $\varprojlim G_i$.
 
which i think can actually sort of translate into a physics language: the fock representation of bosonic states is the direct sum of 0-particle states, 1-particle states, 2-particle states, etc.
not saying it's a useful translation, mind :P
 
I don't quite understand what you said, but be careful: infinite direct sums are direct limits of finite sums, and infinite direct products are inverse limits of finite direct products.
 
The Fock space is an algebraic construction used in quantum mechanics to construct the quantum states space of a variable or unknown number of identical particles from a single particle Hilbert space H. It is named after V. A. Fock who first introduced it in his paper Konfigurationsraum und zweite Quantelung. Informally, a Fock space is the sum of a set of Hilbert spaces representing zero particle states, one particle states, two particle states, and so on. If the identical particles are bosons, the n-particle states are vectors in a symmetrized tensor product of n single-particle Hilbert spaces...
 
oh yeah, hilbert spaces use different direct sums
not sure if they're inverse limits
 
3:09 PM
i heard about this from my physics prof
 
the main reason i made that connection is that formal power series in one variable provide a nice analogy for states of a quantum harmonic oscillator, with a sum $x+x^3$ corresponding to a superposition of a first excited state and a third-excited state
and then adding more oscillators just amounts to adding more variables in the power series
i don't want to force the analogy, though
thinking back to what was in my head when i asked my initial question, i think what i'm really looking for is an example with differential galois theory
i.e. extensions of differential fields
 
I am not sure how inverse limits could show up there, but I know next to nothing about the field
 
@BalarkaSen bye, thanks for all the sweet stuff about p-adics. I'll write a blog post about that.
 
i really don't either, but the analogy sounded right
 
3:50 PM
I just finished another question in the spirit of Ramanujan (yeah, glad and proud to say that).
 
Proud?
 
@skillpatrol proud of my performance :-)
 
Hello@skillpatrol
 
Hi pal @Rememberme how are you?
 
4:06 PM
Fine.. How about ya?@skillpatrol
 
Fine thanks @Rememberme
 
@Semiclassical do you see a neat way of calculating this integral without using complex numbers at all? $$\int_0^{\infty } \cos(x) e^{-a x^2} \, dx$$
 
well, obviously if you do use complex numbers it's pretty trivial, but without...hmmmm
 
Why don't you like using complex numbers @Chris'ssistheartist?
 
@skillpatrol I love them! I'm just curious about real approaches.
 
4:14 PM
ok
 
i think i'd go at it like so. let $f(a,b)=\int_0^\infty \cos(b x)e^{-a x^2}\,dx$
then, denoting partial derivatives by subscripts, one has $f_{bb}(a,b)=f_a(a,b)$
 
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist I'm in shambles .. I can't figure out how to get the $\operatorname{Li}_3\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)$ here
 
so $f(a,b)$ must solve a PDE. additionally, one can compute $f(a,0)$ exactly since it's just a gaussian integral.
 
@r9m :-))))))))) Think some more, don't give up. :-)
 
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist I can't get rid of the $\operatorname{Li}_3\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)$ term :(
 
4:19 PM
@r9m Does it appear in Lewin's book? Or in other source (you're aware it)?
 
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist not in that form .. :( I have no idea
 
oh, and for $b>0$ one has $f(a,b)=f(a/b^2,1)$ via $x\to x/b$ substitution
 
@r9m Maybe you might like to ask sos ....
 
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist don't do that to me ... I've had enough trashing from my professors this week ..
 
probably don't need that $b>0$, actually
 
4:20 PM
@Semiclassical or we might use series representation of $\cos(x)$.
 
eh, where's the fun in that :P
 
:-)
@r9m Really? No vacation there?
 
i would like to work out a differential equation route, though
 
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist vacation?!! they are not going to give me a degree because I performed poorly in a computer science course .. :(
 
@Semiclassical That way should work too.
 
4:23 PM
and while it's equivalent, it's probably easier for me to think in terms of the integral $\int_0^\infty \cos(bx)e^{-x^2}\,dx$
 
@r9m Ah, sorry. How would you fix that?
 
Summer school?
 
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist no fixes ,,, I have to stay back for another year and repeat the whole course .. (while I hate the guts of that subject ,,, it has nothing to do with pure maths .. )
 
:O
Must have been an important course.
 
@r9m This should have been your last year there?
 
r9m
4:25 PM
@Chris'ssistheartist yes ,, :((
 
Which programming language?
 
r9m
I must have been born with some kind of wretched luck ...
 
@r9m No worry, you're a very clever person. You'll do it! It's not the end of the world. I had to give up many universities, but in your case things are far different. :-)
 
r9m
@skillpatrol mathematical logic course .. :|
 
r9m
4:28 PM
@Chris'ssistheartist well I did get an offer to join another nice place meanwhile .. now it's totally ruined
@skillpatrol :P well I'm a dumb student .. can't help it :P
 
@r9m Well, believe me, in life a lot of other bad things may happen. I think you're fine, you have all you need to excel in your uni. :-)
@r9m No need to discourage yourself, keep your optimistic mood! :-)
 
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist I hope I'll make it out of this place next sem .. it's torturous to me when I'm forced to study stuff that I don't like :((
 
You're just not interested in it yet pal @r9m give it time.
 
@r9m I have exactly the same problem! I simply cannot learn what I do not like.
 
@r9m you got owned by the computer science pro
f
 
4:32 PM
Who are you @BenDover?
 
r9m
@skillpatrol that's what I told myself ... but I can't see how that course is going to be of any use to me with regards to what I really wanna study ,, (its like an additional burden to me)
 
i guess i coud ask you the same question @skillpatrol
 
Askaway pal :-)
 
@r9m I don't know how your professors consider you, but I see in you a little genius, and I'd recommend you to never give up, never lose your trust in you.
You can excel if you really want to.
 
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist genius is too much of an adjective for me to handle .. I can't stand in a planet with that kind of gravity :P
 
4:35 PM
@r9m you need to develop what they call a "well rounded" education by being able to learn anything thrown at you :-)
 
@r9m Well, it's up to me the way I wanna see things. ;)
 
r9m
@BenDover :-)
 
Back in 30 min.
 
r9m
@skillpatrol well I can handle any math course they dish out to me .. I was never interested in comp science (neither was I given much of a choice in that regard)
 
Hey @Semiclassical
 
4:39 PM
hey
 
But that's not what being an educated person is about. @r9m
 
r9m
@skillpatrol perhaps what you are saying is true .. but it's almost akin to me as being forced to sit in a history lesson
 
ah, r9m. you had Haskell too, I guess?
 
r9m
@SohamChowdhury ya! well I passed that :P (that was not that bad)
 
not bad?
Haskell is love, Haskell is life
 
r9m
4:43 PM
@SohamChowdhury I liked complexity and that part .. so I was okay with it :)
 
@Semiclassical yep, projective limits of things.
all sorts of categories are closed under those
 
@Soham you're welcome. hopefully I have been able to give a good enough survey so as to intrigue you about number theory.
 
@r9m Edward Witten attended the Park School of Baltimore (class of '68), and received his Bachelor of Arts with a major in history and minor in linguistics from Brandeis University in 1971.
 
My mouse stopped working :(
 
4:47 PM
you don't need mouse to chat, @Paul :P
i just got myself glasses. feels weird.
 
what i'm curious about is what the applications of that construction would be, in analogy with your point re: diophantine equations
e.g. an application of projective limits outside of number theory
 
Yup, although it is a pain to reply or navigate. Need to figure out how to the the vim-like commands working without a mouse @BalarkaSen
 
@Semiclassical inverse limits? well, inverse limit of things in Grp are called profinite groups, and there's the whole load of theory about those
as i said, inverse limit of things in Top are useful in dynamics.
 
r9m
@skillpatrol I knew you'd say sth like that .. I meant some subject that probably has very little connection wrt what someone wants to do .. like making a musician attend a marine training camp .. or a jujitsu practitioner attend a kickboxing gym :P
 
@PaulPlummer oh yeah, fair enough.
yikes
 
4:51 PM
Inverse limit of finite groups are profinite
 
right. sorry. finite, discrete groups.
wacky topologies won't give you profinite groups either
 
For some reason I thought that finite groups could only have the discrete topology, maybe that was just $S_n$...
 
Hello@PaulPlummer
 
any topology on a finite group is discrete modulo a normal subgroup (the connected component of the identity). meaning, the open sets are all unions of cosets of said subgroup. see this MSE question.
 
Do you think History and Linguistics has anything to do with string theory @r9m?
 
4:54 PM
Hello @Rememberme
 
off-topic : I visualize inverse limits as seeing a chain of things (your inverse system) from far off. The analogy works wonders.
 
r9m
@skillpatrol perhaps .. I'm simply not knowledgeable enough to see such connections
 
Have you read his Wikipedia page @r9m?
 
r9m
@skillpatrol nope .. wait I will ..
 
5:09 PM
@r9m I also wonder if all this happened to you because of spending too much time in the area of integrals and series. At least you did what you liked. :-)
 
r9m
@Chris'ssistheartist perhaps :P but it happened by my choice ,, so I accepted every f***** consequence of that :P
 
We all do what makes us happy.
 
5:25 PM
@skillpatrol not sure about that
 
@anon Ah thanks, I must have heard that finite groups did not have Hausdorff topology other than the discrete topology, but forgot the Hausdorff part
 
Why not? @LeGrandDODOM
 
@skillpatrol when you're in school you're merely compelled to study stuff you don't necessarily like
 
True, that's why most students don't try their hardest, right?
@LeGrandDODOM
Among other reasons :P
 
5:52 PM
Hopefully later on with some luck you get to do what you like :D
 
That's ^ the spirit
Short term pain for long term gain.
 
6:17 PM
@Semiclassical I have a physics doubt .... Willing to take a look?
 
willing to hear it out, sure
 
I have a problem with the definition of mass and matter @Semiclassical
 
My book says:
Matter is anything that occupies space and has mass
Definition of mass: The amount of matter present inside a body....

Why are the two definitions interlinked.....?
Now if someone asks me while defining matter define mass.... The I cannot use the term matter again in the definition of mass @Semiclassical
 
That definition of mass seems poorly worded to me
 
6:21 PM
that is circular, yes
 
Wiki's definition is much better
 
though i wouldn't say i know a good definition of it; it's a largely philosophical point, and one i don't worry about too much
 
6:45 PM
high school physics in india = philosophy
cross out "physics" with "any science in general"
 

« first day (1794 days earlier)      last day (3228 days later) »