« first day (1737 days earlier)      last day (3285 days later) » 

8:00 PM
@Hippalectryon I assure you I attended a lot of matrices when I prepared myself to enter Polytechnic University (200/200 points).
 
200/200 lol. Those kind of scores would be so weird in France.
 
@Hippalectryon Well, I'd like to see how those professors from France that give poor marks to students (as you probably suggested) try to solve a problem like this one.
14
Q: Calculate in closed form $\int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{dxdy}{1-xy(1-x)(1-y)}$

Chris's sisCan we possibly compute the following integral in terms of known constants? $$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{dxdy}{1-xy(1-x)(1-y)}$$ Some progress was already done here http://integralsandseries.prophpbb.com/topic279.html but still we have a hypergeometric function. What's your thou...

 
@Chris'ssis but have you done serious linear algebra (inner products, etc) and topology? if you want, you can do those after you finish writing your books.
 
@Chris'ssis It's not giving poor marks for poor mark's sake.
 
@Hippalectryon indeed, i agree.
"deep" is relative too. You'd expect that when a high school student first learns calculus, he'll call it "deep mathematics", but when he graduates, he'll call "topological quantum field theoretic conformality" or whatever more deeper than calculus :p
hi @Pedro
 
8:08 PM
@Hippalectryon I was the only one in 400 students that reached the maximum number of points. Well, yeah, that might mean nothing as you suggested. But I wanna see how many professors in France manage to pass that test with 200/200 points. I turn them into my idols.
 
@BalarkaSen Hey there.
 
@Chris'ssis I'm just saying that it's funny from me, who just passed competitive exams, which are not supposed to be totally do-able at all
 
@evinda Nothing gréât

@evinda Nothing great
 
@PedroTamaroff How's your day? What kind of mathematics have you been thinking about?
 
@BalarkaSen Homological algebra yesterday, real analysis today.
 
8:11 PM
@Hippalectryon ^^^
 
@PedroTamaroff nice. I have been doing some linear algebra (billinear forms, etc, the stuff I haven't thought about) to make up for my ignorance. Guess I'll do multivariable calculus afterwards.
 
@BalarkaSen Sounds like a plan.
 
@Hippalectryon I doubt those guys will ever forget me, one of the professors there said he was totally shocked for the score (after I finished the second test in a pretty short period of time).
 
@PedroTamaroff yeah, I have been planning to do differential topology sometime this year, so I gotta know those first thoroughly to make sure I understand difftop.
 
Anyway, who cares? I dropped that uni ... (I actually dropped more)
 
8:16 PM
Can't study cohomology without knowing differential topology.
 
@BalarkaSen Well, that depends on the cohomology theory you're studying, of course.
 
Well, Hatcher talks about singular cohomology, but I think I should get the geometric intuition behind before studying it.
 
@Chris'ssis why ?
 
i.e., de Rham stuff.
 
The set $\{0\}\cup\{1,1/2,1/3,\ldots\}$ is closed and bounded, therefore compact. What kind of strategy can I use to show that every open cover of the set has a finite subcover?
 
8:19 PM
any nbhd of 0 of this set covers $X$ leaving finitely many points, @GBeau
and then you can use finitely many more open sets to cover the rest of the points.
the whole point is that the set clutters around $0$ to make things simple.
 
That makes sense, thanks
 
@Hippalectryon hard times that I wasn't prepare to manage.
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis corrected my calculations and put it up on my blog :) .. all my damn examinations are over now :D
 
showing it for closed intervals was much more complex, but my professor suggested this was easier
 
@r9m Hey! I was trying to write to you now. :-)
 
8:22 PM
@GBeau I don't think doing it for intervals is hard.
 
I'd be interested in hearing your explanation of an outline of an approach
 
@r9m Ooo, nice work! ::D
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis :) now I am dying to see your approach !!! :D ..
 
@GBeau It follows from Bolzano-Weierstrass, doesn't it?
 
@r9m All is marvellous there too! I'm sure you have no doubt about that. :-)
 
8:26 PM
It implies [a, b] is sequentially compact, and note that sequential compactness means compact in R.
of course, this is ad-hoc, but uses less machinaries.
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis booahaan! :'( when do I get to see it? :-)
 
hi @Kaj. Done with the exams?
 
Indeed @BalarkaSen
 
@r9m I wanna add that to my book. So, you need to wait a bit. :-)
 
Cool, @Kaj
 
8:28 PM
@BalarkaSen I'm reading back over the Bolzano section in my text
 
@KajHansen What kind of mathematics have you been planning to study, then?
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis _/_ @the BOOK!! bows twice with arms crossed on the back while replicating a cannibalistic dance from Central South American jungle :P
 
@r9m :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
 
@Incurrence: Do you still have a page with MathJax on Wordpress? I have slightly changed the bookmarklet and want to see if it works now. Let me know, please.
 
@r9m There is a fascinating integral, not sure you saw it, but I won't tell you where you may find a proof to it.
 
8:30 PM
rehi @Ted
 
rehi @Balarka ... past your bedtime again :)
 
@r9m take it when you're in a great mood. I love it totally!
$$\int _0^1\int _0^1\frac{1}{(x+y) \sqrt{(1-x) (1-y)}}dydx$$
 
@TedShifrin indeed.
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis got it!!
 
@r9m: I see you have removed your wordpress blog
 
8:31 PM
I need to review $p$-adic things @Balarka. We are apparently going to be working in Berkovich space this summer. I've received some preliminary material that I need to review over the next 3 weeks.
Hey @TedShifrin
 
@r9m It's a god amongst integrals. :D
 
@KajHansen oh, cool.
 
heya @Kaj. Finally done agonizing over grades ... But a woodpecker decided to gnaw a huge trough in one of my porch plank boards this morning ... wonderful for selling the house ... So I've had mishap after mishap trying to get to work on fixing it.
 
r9m
@robjohn I changed the address to zerocollar.wordpress.com (it's still there but I'm not updating new posts into it anymore)
 
sorry about this, but i burst out laughing after hearing that.
 
r9m
8:33 PM
@Chris'ssis :D
 
yeah, it sounds very funny, @Balarka ...
 
I'm sorry to hear that @Ted. Hopefully you won't run into much difficulty in selling it
 
@r9m let me see if my updated bookmarklet works
 
But when I spilled a quart of red stain all over the walkway to my house, barely saving a few drops for tomorrow to stain my repair ... it got much less humorous.
hi @robjohn
 
uh-oh
 
8:33 PM
On the bright side, I got an A in topology this semester. Still waiting on Athena for my other courses though.
 
Did Pete tell you, @Kaj?
 
Yeah, @TedShifrin. He sent grades over email with our 810 numbers in place of names.
 
@r9m I added one character to the bookmarklet and it works there now.
@TedShifrin Hey, Ted!
 
Whoa, he shouldn't have done that, @Kaj, but ... not my problem.
 
r9m
@robjohn :O lemme check now! :D
 
8:34 PM
@r9m You don't have the new one yet...
 
@robjohn: I still can't get Chrome on my iPad to load your bookmarklet. I mean, it's sitting there, but I can't activate it. Works fine on my desktop and Safari everywhere.
 
I don't have much of a problem with that @TedShifrin. E.g. it's not much different than you releasing the grade distributions on exams?
 
r9m
@robjohn o_0kay
 
Well, doing it by codenames would be ok, @Kaj, but we're not supposed to send 810 numbers by email, in general, any more than socials.
 
@r9m There was some problem with https, and either MathJax or SE and I don't want to break anything. It works on chat here and on your wordpress blog, so perhaps things are fine.
 
8:36 PM
Did he give all A's, @Kaj?
 
@Kaj You should also do the number theoretic stuff surrounding around $\mathbf{Z}_p$. It's way more fun that it's topological properties.
 
Oh interesting @Ted. And no, slightly less than half were A's, which I think is understandable given how many strong people were in that class -- Alex, John B., etc, etc.
 
r9m
@robjohn wp has issues with allowing javascripts it seems! :o
 
@TedShifrin did you make the bookmark as suggested using the source? You need to open the bookmarklet from the page you want to render.
 
I suspect he'll be learning it all this summer, @Balarka.
 
8:38 PM
@r9m it worked for me just a minute ago
 
I can't get to the bookmarklet in Chrome that way, @robjohn ... there is no "banner" with bookmarks.
Maybe I'll do a bit more web research on this.
 
@TedShifrin no, you don't use a banner with Safari on the iPhone either. You just open it like a normal bookmark.
 
r9m
@robjohn okay! :) but I left wp 'coz its too boring if one has to click on the bookmark everytime they load a new page from my blog ..
 
right, but Chrome on iOS has no bookmarks bar.
There's something like a directory which is a repository of all one's bookmarks.
 
@r9m okay... I just wanted to test the new version to see if it worked.
@TedShifrin yes, and you choose the ChatJax bookmark from there.
 
8:40 PM
I tried that ... nothing happened.
 
@TedShifrin what does the location/address/URL for the ChatJax bookmark look like?
 
@Kaj What's the second quote you have in your profile, btw? I mean, who said it? Just asking since I get similar response from my prof and the postdoc fellows in the uni everytime I try to do that, lol.
 
Is (3a + 13b)^2 the same as (3a + 13b)(3a + 13b)
 
I correctly pasted in the stuff, @robjohn.
 
@TedShifrin does it start with "javascript"? not "http"?
 
8:43 PM
yes
 
@BalarkaSen, it's a post I saw on Reddit a while back, and it has no attribution since Reddit is itself pseudo-anonymous.
 
ah, i see
 
So I basically just have it enclosed in quotes to emphasize that it's not my line.
 
morning
 
goodnight, @Mike
 
8:45 PM
@TedShifrin and you are on this page (chat) and you select that bookmark (starting with javascript) as if you were going to a new page from this chat page.
 
remorning, @Mike
 
looks like I'll be back in business by tomorrow
feeling a lot better now
 
I can't get there without selecting a new tab, @robjohn
 
that sounds good.
 
@Balarka: When the **** do you sleep?
 
8:45 PM
@MikeM, you and Balarka get the award for most sickly in the chatroom
 
@TedShifrin you can't just go straight from one page to another using the bookmark list?
 
I think Balarka is so sickly because he chats when he should be sleeping.
No, @robjohn, you only get the bookmark list by choosing a new tab in the browser.
 
@MikeMiller um, probably near 2:30 AM.
hey, that's not a nice thing to star.
 
oh wait, @robjohn, I think I figured out how to do it.
 
eh, well, i guess i should be heading bed right now. nothing particularly nice to think about.
 
8:48 PM
@TedShifrin Hmm... that's odd... there is usually a way to open a new page in the same window
 
Let me put something in math here: $\int_0^1 \text{nonsense}\,dx$ is for high school.
OK, it works.
 
@TedShifrin Cool!
 
@TedShifrin lol
 
You have to type the bookmark name in the address bar while you're on the page.
Interestingly, changing the bookmark name on the iPad instantaneously changed it on my desktop, too.
@Balarka: Perhaps not such hidden meaning.
 
@Balarka: You don't have any problems in the back of your head? For shame.
 
8:50 PM
@r9m did you see it? I'd love so much to give you the bounty! :-)
 
This is cool, because Chrome will not make me sign in 3 times each time I want to chat, whereas Safari has been like that for months and months ever since iOS8.
 
@MikeMiller in my defence, I am sick.
ok, heading to bed.
 
@Ted: My iPhone makes me sign in to the main site again about once a day. It's annoying. Never for chat, though.
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis I have seen it :) but I couldn't make a scratch of progress beyond the obvious :}
 
Night, @Balarka.
 
8:51 PM
See ya.
 
So far, the iPhone works when iPad does not, @MikeM ... totally bizarre. But I really don't like to chat on the phone.
 
I don't mind it as long as I don't have to TeX. I cannot TeX on the phone.
 
Running the MSE app I don't have to repeatedly sign in, @MikeM.
 
Good point
 
I don't like typing lots on either the iPad or the iPhone. I'm too good a regular typist.
 
8:52 PM
@GBeau Here is a cute proof I have seen (assuming you have intervals are connected). $A$ is an open cover, define a function $f_A:[0,1] \to \{0,1\}$ where $f(x) = 0$ if $[0,x]$ can be covered by finitely many elements from $A$, and $f(x) =1$ otherwise. Certainly $\{0\}$ is compact, and if $f(x)=0$ then $[0,x]$ has a finite cover $B \subseteq A$, there is an element that covers $U \in A$ that covers $\{x\}$.
Every element in $U$ gets mapped to $0$ since $B \cup \{U\}$ is a finite set that covers. $f_A$ has to be continuous since on an open set it is constant $0$ or constant $1$. Since the function is continuous, $f_A$ must be constant since $[0,1]$ is connected.
 
We should bake @AlexW a happy-last-day-of-work cake :) Since he's promised to send me a retirement cake :)
 
I can't bake.
I have some brownies in the freezer... I could give him one of those. :P
 
I can ... better than repairing woodpecker damage to my house.
Hmm, 20 days 'til I'm on the west coast lookin' ...
 
I don't understand where you'll be staying between here and house. Friends?
 
@r9m: okay, I've uploaded the new https bookmark. You can try it out on wordpress.
 
r9m
8:56 PM
@robjohn okay :) .. Hoorah!!!! It works!! :D
 
@r9m great! It just took the addition of one character
 
I don't follow, @MikeM. I'll be coming back to GA to stay in my house until I actually move.
 
r9m
@robjohn awesome! :D
 
I guess this is @robjohn's day for success :)
 
@TedShifrin It is fitting since it is my birthday, too ;-)
2
 
9:01 PM
awww, happy birthday!! I'll have to make you a birthday torte, as I did for @Pedro :P
 
Oh, you're flying out once to look at houses then coming back?
 
@GBeau An interesting exercise it so see where the case $[0,1)$ and $(0,1]$ fail for that proof.
 
Yup, @MikeM
 
@TedShifrin send it overnight... the 2-week saver rate usually ruins stuff
 
LOL ... Perhaps I'll aim for next year instead, @robjohn, and either invite you down or invite myself up :)
 
9:03 PM
@PaulPlummer cute
 
Hello!! Could someone take a look at my question:
0
Q: In what direction does the altitude increase faster?

Mary StarWe assume that a mountain has the shape of the elliptic paraboloid $z=c-ax^2-by^2$, where $a$, $b$ and $c$ are positive constants, $x$ and $y$ are the geographical coordinates (east-west, north-south respectively), and $z$ is the altitude above the sea level (the $x$, $y$, $z$ are all measured in...

 
One word, @MaryStar. Gradient.
 
??
 
$\nabla f$
 
@r9m OK :-)
 
9:05 PM
So is what I have done correct?? @TedShifrin
 
I haven't looked.
I just responded to the title of your question.
 
@MaryStar your thinking is right and that is the correct direction.
@Chris'ssis I wish you luck on that, but my guess is that if there is a solution, it will be very complicated.
 
So do we say that the direction is $-2a \overrightarrow{i}-2b\overrightarrow{j}$ ?? @robjohn
 
@MaryStar what is wrong with $(-a,-b)$? That is the direction. Do you need to use $\vec i$ and $\vec j$?
 
@robjohn Possible.
 
9:13 PM
so we don't need the 2 at (-2a,-2b) ?? Can we just say (-a,-b) ?? @robjohn
 
@MikeMiller I thought so, I have never really looked into much but I think this would be the type of argument one would do in "real induction" that Pete is a fan of but, @TedShifrin not so much
 
I just don't like it for people beginning to learn mathematics, @Paul. And, honestly, I don't object to enunciating the least upper bound axiom.
 
@robjohn For instance, I don't think this one is anything easier without the proper approach. $$\int _0^1\int _0^1\frac{1}{(x+y) \sqrt{(1-x) (1-y)}}dydx$$ @robjohn I also admit I might be wrong.
 
Really? This sort of argument is fairly common; another way of saying it "find the inf of the places it's not 1, and then see that that's not actually the inf"
The arguments are the same
I always thought real induction was another name for transfinite induction
 
No, Pete's using it in $\Bbb R$, @MikeM, basically a mechanisms for avoiding the lub arguments I think it's important for students to master.
 
9:15 PM
where you assume something is true for an ordinal $\omega$, and then prove it's true for $\omega+1$; and assuming something is true for every ordinal $< \omega$, $\omega$ a limit ordinal, then proving it for $\omega$
I see
 
he's not doing ordinals and limit ordinals, that I know of, anyhow.
 
transfinite induction is actually interesting and useful :P I agree that Pete's thing is not anything special, just sort of cute.
 
@TedShifrin Maybe I should have put " :P " at the end. And I tend to agree that there probably isn't much purpose to that line. Although it is fun to see a different way of stating the same things.
 
Agreed, totally, @Paul. Let's just say that Pete and I don't always see eye-to-eye on pedagogical matters. :)
But I respect him supremely.
 
Induction on $2^{\aleph_0}$ would be a "small" amount of transfinite induction, (even though $2^{\aleph_0} $)can be pushed arbitrarily large). @MikeMiller
 
9:20 PM
I've survived my entire math career knowing almost no set theory. I'm not going to deal with it now :P
 
friend of mine used it recently to show a non-separable metric space must have an uncountable discrete subset, or something like that
 
That sounds believable. It takes transfinite induction?
 
That's how he could manage it.
 
Definetly
I could see it
 
@Chris'ssis I got a good amount done on that this morning. I should try and finish it up.
 
9:24 PM
@robjohn Nice.
 
I think I got $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\sum_{k=0}^n2^{1-n}\binom{n}{k}\frac1{(2k+1)(2n-2k+1)} =\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac1{2^{n-1}(n+1)}\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}{k}\frac1{2k+1}$$
 
@TedShifrin That is too bad, it is nice stuff. Although I was "raised" by set theorists
 
If my introduction to math had been logic, I would have gone to physics or something else.
I mean, I'm fine with the foundational stuff, but ...
@Paul: What was your former name?
 
@TedShifrin Disciple of Barney
 
oh, you were Wilma :P
I actually don't know that much of your math background, my apologies.
 
9:27 PM
That is fine, I don't have much math background :P
 
I dunno about that.
 
the only thing i find sad about logic is that it's one of the few fields that's really very disjoint from the rest of mathematics
model theory is (well, was) being used to do stuff in number theory, but I hear that's essentially done now; one occasionally has to think about set theory so that one can be rigorous in defining some stuff in algebraic geometry; I think that's about it
 
@MikeMiller Yah, it is sad, although I think that might be because not too many, non set theorists are interested in set theory. I have a sort of intuition, that ideas from descriptive set theory could be used in interesting ways outside of descriptive set theory, but I am not totally sure. It does come up in general topology, like showing things about "how" complex a metric space can be
 
@Chris'ssis I can get a hypergeometric for it, but nothing cleaner yet
 
well, general topology $\subset$ set theory nowadays :p
 
9:33 PM
True :D
 
@robjohn The form you got is nice.
 
I will say that I heard a colleague give a lecture on forcing around 1981 or so, and found it totally fascinating. But I don't remember anything.
 
There is a sort of small group of people who do things that connect descriptive set theory, and combinatorial/ geometric group theory. Here is a blog that has quite a bit of that stuff: jaywillmath.wordpress.com
 
@TedShifrin Was that at a Sociology and Mathematics convention?
 
1981 was 14 years before I was born, so I don't really remember much from that time either
 
9:36 PM
@SamuelYusim you're not making points with that attitude...
 
was this offensive in a way I didn't realize?
 
LOL, no, @robjohn, an MIT lecture.
 
it was just a little joke
 
@Samuel: Most of our inhabitants here are way younger even than you.
 
@Ted: You need to do me a favor and learn symplectic topology, so I don't have to wait until tomorrow to ask Jacob my questions. :P
 
9:38 PM
@SamuelYusim No... just kidding... there are a few of us that were out of college in 1981
I started grad school in 1981
 
How much interest do you have in physics? I know that low dimensional topology and geometry tends to have a big intersection with some parts of the physics community. @MikeMiller
 
I'm very interested in what Ed Witten tells me is true, but actually getting into what they're talking about and 'understanding' it from my physics knowledge - $\approx 0$ - is very difficult. Given all the other things I have to learn, it's not even on the backburner.
 
Is Jacob now becoming a pro? That's great. @MikeM
 
but e.g. I guarantee you that one can give a gauge theoretic interpretation of Khovanov homology, even if we haven't written down proofs yet, because Witten told me so.
 
Damn, @robjohn, I started in 1974. You're a young'un :P
 
9:42 PM
@TedS: He's been working with Ko on a project for a while now, about writing down the cobordism functoriality of embedded contact homology without just saying "UHhhh it's isomorphic to Seiberg Witten, so let's use their functoriality"
 
Haha, okay. I had a professor who did stuff in knot theory but was very interested in some quantum stuff. In a funny way physics is what got me re-interested in math
 
That sounds interesting
 
Although I know basically no physics
 
Jacob doesn't communicate that much, @MikeM, but I hope to see him on one coast or the other this summer.
 
Quantum algebra is very different than what I'm talking about above.
 
9:43 PM
@TedShifrin I guess... but these kids who were born in the 90's make me feel otherwise.
 
If you hear "gauge theory", think PDE and differential geometry. If you hear "quantum invariants", think Lie algebras and representation theory.
 
LOL, @robjohn, I'm teaching kids who were born in ... um ... 1997 or 1998 or ...
 
people born in the year 2000 are in high school
 
Did you know, this year's incoming class was born the year the Spice Girls made their debut album. What??!
 
@Ted: I find him very communicative, when I'm about 10 feet away.
 
9:44 PM
Not so good at 3 feet?
 
People just need to stop being born.
 
anyone know complex coordinates
 
<--- only knows simple things
but not groups
 
haw haw
 
At least I can remember the turn of the millenium...
 
9:44 PM
@TedShifrin: I think he does fine there, too.
 
glares @Kaj
 
Oh, cool, I'm TAing this summer.
 
What course @MikeMiller?
 
isn't that pretty short notice
 
hi guys
 
9:45 PM
Hmm, I have an awful memory, don't remember much in the past
 
hi @TedShifrin
 
ughhhhhhh all I can get out of it is that the rotation is 90 degrees and $ a \in C$ meaning a belongs to a set of complex numbrs
 
Hi @PaulPlummer
 
hi @Karim
 
Probability theory II.
 
9:45 PM
wow, @MikeM ... you might learn something.
 
Fun!
 
@KarimMansour Hello
 
@Samuel: The session I TA in is in August.
 
That course should get past what I covered in my one-semester course.
 
@Ted: yeah, after I get back from Canada I'm probably going to spend some time learning probability...
 
9:46 PM
I'll send you my final exam for practice, @MikeM.
 
Hey @TedShifrin !
 
heya @Stan :)
 
That's not your real name.\
 
I forgot all stuff I took in my first semester of stat
 
9:46 PM
I'll have to think back to when I took this as an undergrad.
 
@StanShunpike, that's not your real name.
 
Oh, that's the MIT book. I have some .pdf version of it. I stole one or two exercises from them.
 
I am gonna take in the fall statistical mechanics I think it will be fun
 
" Unfortunately, solutions to all of the other problems are freely available on the book?s web site. Additional problems (with no posted solutions) are available at athenasc.com/prob-supp.html";
 
there's a midterm two weeks before the final?
 
9:48 PM
despite the name, two midterms per quarter is common
 
The guy who taught graduate complex here gave his midterm something like 3 weeks before the final ... and that's in a 15-week semester.
 
that's the worst thing in the world
 
You can give exams whenever the hell you feel like it
 
I normally aim for mid-semester if there's only one, or otherwise approximately 1/3, 2/3.
 
meh
 
9:49 PM
well, waiting until the course is 85% done doesn't give much feedback in any useful time frame.
 
anyway that'll be nice for my funds
 
Or maybe I just get power hungry when I teach a class...
 
@SamuelYusim I had 2 quizes two weeks before my final of my linear algebra
 
I think more math majors should take probability, @MikeM ... I've totally changed my viewpoint.
 
True, @Ted, but sometimes things can get messed up
Like the year with Hurricane Sandy
 
9:49 PM
@KarimMansour like, what kind of quizzes?
 
Well, sure, acts of God are unavoidable, but most math professors are too disorganized, IMHO. :D
 
@TedShifrin, not gonna argue with you on that one.
 
we did quizes instead of assignments it was 50 min quiz @SamuelYusim
 
LOL @Jessy
 
I took probability last fall but hated it
 
9:50 PM
we covered topics like change of basis etc
I hate probability
 
I like the course I taught ... and I learned it as I taught it ;P
 
my brain doesn't think in that direction
 
I only like probability when it overlaps with measure theory
 
@KarimMansour wow that sucks
 
Half my students learned a lot.
 
9:51 PM
@Ted: That seems standard.
 
yeah @SamuelYusim I prefer assignments too
 
the half, you mean, @Mike ... or is it standard to expect that I can't teach ? :D
 
my favourite courses are usually the ones with assignments every second week
 
I am planning to go waterloo btw @SamuelYusim for grad school
 
The half.
 
9:52 PM
you told me your in waterloo
 
@KarimMansour, great program!
 
@Samuel: I have discovered that once a week is better for inhibiting procrastination. In my diff geo class, I did every week and a half, and most students waited way too long to start.
 
@KarimMansour neat, for what kind of subject?
 
mathematical physics
 
9:52 PM
I'm going back and starting a PhD program myself this fall
 
I can't find the list of faculty on Waterloo's math page.
 
@TedShifrin that's true but I find that at a certain point you sort of stop learning and start slogging through it without thinking if there's too much work
 
I procrastinate no matter the circumstance...
 
@MikeMiller which department of the math faculty?
 
well, @Samuel, after 40 years of teaching, I am a firm believer in demanding homeworks, regularly assigned.
 
9:53 PM
I'm just at the main page. Here.
 
LOL, yeah, @Paul, as do most students and faculty.
 
Now that you pointed out there are different departments, I found it.
That's frustrating. I've never seen another university's website set up like that.
 
there's different faculty lists for pure math, applied math, combinatorics & optimization, statistics, actuarial science, etc
each of these departments has like 30 profs or something
 
big
 
cs is another department
 
9:55 PM
applied math program has really really nice grad courses
 
It is always strange to see someone who does not procrastinate, they are sort of sad creatures
 
I know McKinnon, but that's about it
 
I'm very sad, @Paul.
 
@Paul: That's an awful perspective :(
 
When it's important, I don't procrastinate.
 
9:56 PM
I return exams, graded, the next class ... without fail. (Well, let me rephrase ...)
 
@MikeMiller he's teaching groups and rings this summer, but I've never had him for any of my own courses
 
Oh, I used to ... :P
 
how is the average @TedShifrin ?
 
on what, @Karim?
 
9:56 PM
@Ted: Homeworks came in yesterday. I assure you I did not get them back for the students today.
 
of your final
 
I never expect a grader to return stuff the next class, @MikeM. That's ridiculous. I did in diff geo this year, but half the time I had the weekend.
 
actually no, I know Park, he had a remarkable paper fairly recently
infinitely many smooth structures on $S^2 \times S^2$
 
@Karim: The average was something like 58%. Disappointing.
 
@TedShifrin I have a question. So let's suppose I have a quadratic function of two variables. In this example, it is a utility function. They call this a bliss point where you essentially have closed curve level sets with a peak where the first order partials should be zero.
Now, the function in question is solvable with the method of Lagrangian multipliers, but if you have a large enough budget, the tangent between the indifference curve and the budget line will be past the bliss point and so you end up having negative values for the first order partials at points beyond the peak.
 
9:57 PM
what !!
very disspointing
 
Well, @Karim, in fairness, I write hard exams where the average is usually under 70%.
 
You have graders!
 
hangs head in shame
 
oh I see
 
@Stan: Something doesn't make sense there.
 
9:58 PM
@TedShifrin My professors lecture notes said this problem "isn't solvable using the method of the lagrangian multipliers". Does that mean that economically it fails because it can't reach the peak even though mathematically it is valid?
 
I like hard exams they are nice
 
@Kaj: Why are you hanging your head in shame? You were last year.
 
Lucky guy - I never had graders. And now I'm going to be somebody else's grader in the fall. Damn, if I had had graders...
 
haha, it's a delayed hanging @TedShifrin
 
hmm... googling says there's a serious flaw in it. uh-oh
 
9:59 PM
I'm not following, @Stan. But I do have an excellent economics/Lagrange multipliers problem to send you.
 
Yay!
I could use more practice
 
@JessyCat what field of math btw ?
 
This is more conceptual/theoretical, @Stan.
Using implicit function theorem, in fact.
 
Operator Theory & elliptic PDEs
 

« first day (1737 days earlier)      last day (3285 days later) »