« first day (1755 days earlier)      last day (3267 days later) » 

user147690
11:00 AM
@SohamChowdhury I haven't done those chapters of aluffi, and he definitely approaches the subject from a unique perspective (e.g. category theory, which isn't taught at my uni)
 
DF doesn't cover them?
And I know around three pages about them.
@AlexClark Oh.
 
user147690
@SohamChowdhury I haven't consistently covered any algebra text except Cohn's first text(which I was only around 80 pages deep in at the time I left it)
 
You're doing DF, right?
 
user147690
@SohamChowdhury The ring theory section yep
 
Pinging @BalarkaSen for when he comes online: are free abelian groups vector spaces?
@AlexClark only that bit?
 
user147690
11:03 AM
@SohamChowdhury Well I will do all of it eventually I hope
 
user147690
@SohamChowdhury But I wasn't using D&F until recently
 
vector spaces over what?
what's the ring/field you have in mind?
 
Listen. I know nothing about rings or fields "properly" (aside from the first three pages of Axler). Look at this:
 
how can I answer your question if you don't know what your question means?
 
wait.
I guess vector spaces over ${0,1}$?
 
11:06 AM
Vector spaces over sets are nonsense.
 
ah.
so there's no connection?
look at the screenshot. that thing looks like a basis to me.
 
Yes.
That's because $\Bbb Z^n$ is a $\Bbb Z$-module.
 
user147690
@BalarkaSen You can define a vector space over a ring?
 
so I'll wait till next chapter.
for modules.
 
Module theory is all about that, yes.
 
11:08 AM
mmm
 
@Soham However, the connection is not really interesting. Every abelian group can be given a structure of a $\Bbb Z$-module, for one.
 
11:19 AM
Sarat Books says they can get me Aluffi for $90.
Goodness!
 
That's nice.
They've got a lot of books with them.
 
That's a lot of money, though.
How much do your books usually run you, on average?
I doubt they always have them in stock. You do a "special order", right?
 
Sometimes you do, but most of the times the books I want are there.
*I do
@AlexClark You're around?
 
user147690
11:40 AM
@BalarkaSen Yes, was just taking a break
 
Did you figure out that $\Bbb R[x]/(x^3 + 1)$ thingy?
 
user147690
@BalarkaSen Not yet, I was going to fully go through the relevant section in D&F to get it
 
There are better, easier ways to do it than what my hints lead you to. Just sayin'.
You're awake early, @Ted.
 
user147690
@BalarkaSen Oh?
 
howdy @Balarka @AlexC
 
11:50 AM
Fields have no zero divisors, @AlexC.
 
user147690
Hey @TedS
 
user147690
@BalarkaSen ahhh indeed
 
Well, in two days I need to be on an airplane at this time, and the airport is 1 1/2 hours away.
 
user147690
@TedShifrin Fair enough. Do some natural prep
 
So you're practicing waking up early?
 
11:51 AM
Plus, I'm about to switch time zones to three hours earlier ... Yes.
But, actually, I'm always up at this time; just didn't go on line when I was going to work.
 
Switching time zone can be a mess. US is a big place.
 
So is India.
 
user147690
So is Straya'
 
Well, now that we're done with that ...
 
user147690
Are we though?
 
11:56 AM
australian pronunciation rolls eyes
 
<--- likes 'Strayan accents. :P
 
user147690
We don't actually pronounce it like that lmao
 
user147690
@BalarkaSen You'll hear my lack of accent when I make a video for tropical geometry
 
Damn, Balarka. You've also learned eye rolling from me.
 
It took some practice, @Ted. Last time I tried to do it, one of the eyes popped out.
 
11:57 AM
You really do need to eat more, Balarka.
 
Dunno how you managed to roll all the 6 of 'em.
 
Oh oh, bananas is here.
 
TED!!
<3<3
how is retirement?
 
Such a flirt ... :D
I'll let you know in six months or so.
 
good, make sure u keep frequenting this chat
 
user147690
12:00 PM
Where are you @ᴇʏᴇs? Weird you being gone for 4 days
 
@TedShifrin they're vile
 
LOL.
What kind of accent do you have, bananas?
 
i dont know, i never speak to people in real life
 
the kind of accent everyone has when they're chewing on bananas, of course
 
user147690
Can someone listen to some of this, these guys are a band near where I live, and their accents are pretty normal Australian youtube.com/watch?v=kUfCHA0hZwg
 
12:02 PM
no
 
You're mute, bananas?
 
people often tell me i speak like a robot because i speak very montonously
 
user147690
@BalarkaSen Not a song, it's an interview
 
@TedShifrin no, just dont have any friends
 
user147690
@iwriteonbananas Actually?
 
12:04 PM
cries
 
well, bananas, work on changing that. Even math geeks need friends.
 
im sort of joking, but i live in a new city and most of my friends live in another city
 
find another math geek.
 
user147690
@iwriteonbananas That's hard. You are a grad student though right?
 
But math geeks are a set of measure zero, @Balarka, except here.
 
12:05 PM
no, undergrad
@TedShifrin human population is a set of (lebesgue) measure zero
 
we're working on changing that, @Ted
 
oh, I thought you meant here here, @AlexC
 
user147690
Nah from my classes
 
user147690
Here it seems quite random
 
My closest friends through my life have not been math people, @AlexC, but I've had plenty of good friends who are.
 
12:07 PM
most people i know from uni i only talk about math with
 
user147690
@TedShifrin Yep I think that makes sense. You have a larger sample for generic friendship qualities from the general population with lower expectancy for competitivity
 
@AlexClark yeah, it sounds terrible
:P
 
user147690
@iwriteonbananas Really??
 
absofruitly
 
user147690
I can't really hear American or Australian accents
 
12:08 PM
It doesn't need to be competitive, @AlexC. My best math research has been collaborative with very good people.
 
give me a good algebraic topology question, @iwriteonbananas
 
user147690
@TedShifrin I personally am not competitive, since it seems unnecessary conflict - but some of my classmates seem to be
 
@BalarkaSen im looking for exercises regarding mayer vietoris
 
user147690
Well I will grab a coffee and get back to work, talk later guys
 
take care alex
 
12:09 PM
compute homology of two torii pasted via boundary with identity map
 
Good Mayer-Vietoris exercise: Take two solid tori and glue them together with a linear map $A\in M_{2\times 2}(\Bbb Z)$ on the boundary. Compute the homology of that identification space.
@BalarkaSen LOL, how funny. Mine's just a bit more general.
 
loll
okay
 
@TedShifrin the whole point of M-V is, of course, computing homology of 3-manifolds.
so no surprise that we've come up with similar exercises
 
"The whole point"? Very myopic view.
Mayer-Vietoris for deRham cohomology is very snazzy. You see everything explicitly (well, as explicitly as you can compute partitions of unity).
 
ok, most of the point.
 
12:13 PM
No, not most of the point.
OK, bubye for now.
 
@TedShifrin that sounds cool. can't wait to know about that stuff
 
bye ted
 
once you do my exercise, i'll teach you a way to cheat your way through
 
hint for cheating (not recommended for official use) : two torii pasted through the boundary by identity map is a known space.
 
12:17 PM
yeah im thinking about that right now
u mean solid torii btw. right?
 
don't. do it the hard way.
yeah
 
i cant recall what space that is anyway right now (although i think u told me like 1-2 days ago)
im trying to figure out how to do it the hard way
 
no, i don't think i did
 
once you do this, try computing homology of the space obtained from a solid torus with a tubular nbhd of a circle (also homeomorphic to a solid torii) chucked out, and the boundary of the removed nbhd identified with the boundary of the original solid torus using the identity map (non-official hint : this is also a known space)
 
12:21 PM
okok, gimme a minute
 
i have to run for now, will check in on you later.
 
ok, talk to u later
 
12:41 PM
Is it anything special if $G \times G \cong G$ for a group $G$?
 
user147690
 
Those are some weird constructions.
I know that $\mathbb{Z}^{\oplus \mathbb{N}}$ works.
 
user147690
$\oplus$?
 
user147690
oplus
 
user147690
@SohamChowdhury I don't know what this means
 
user147690
12:49 PM
Still don't know what that is
 
It's a "direct product of groups". I have a sort of vague idea of what that is atm, really.
You know what $\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}$ is?
 
user147690
It is $\Bbb Z\times \Bbb Z$
 
Yes, products and coproducts are isomorphic in $\sf{Ab}$.
 
user147690
$\Bbb Z \oplus \Bbb Z = \Bbb Z\times \Bbb Z$
 
Hello everyone. I need some help with linear algebra.
 
user147690
12:52 PM
@SohamChowdhury and $\bf{Vect}$
 
@AlexClark I'll be back in a while.
 
Pretty new to it so I'm struggling a bit.
 
user147690
@nTuply Shoot
 
@AlexClark It'll take me some time to know that.
 
user147690
@SohamChowdhury Have fun!
 
12:52 PM
Oh, I'm having loads.
 
user147690
@SohamChowdhury Haha probably not, you are sprinting through this stuff
 
@AlexClark I'm trying to figure out whether a set is a vector space or not/
 
user147690
@nTuply A set?
 
I understand the general idea of what a vector space is and I understand the axioms/
However I find it hard to solve such problems. Lemme give you an example.
 
user147690
Ok
 
12:55 PM
$V = \{p\in P_{4}[x] : p(0) + p(1) = 0\}$
 
user147690
So polynomials of degree 4 such that $p(0)+p(1)=0$?
 
yes
 
@AlexClark I just go over things until they click. Which is sort of the canonical way to learn math, I guess.
But I intend to finish this chapter this week.
 
user147690
@SohamChowdhury What do you eat?
 
@AlexClark ?
 
user147690
12:56 PM
@nTuply Taking values from where?
 
user147690
@SohamChowdhury Just wondering what you eat since what you eat says a heap about your energy levels and focus
 
What values? This is the only thing that's given and I have to determine whether is a vector space or not
 
user147690
@nTuply I mean what is your field
 
@AlexClark Rice, fish, chicken, the occasional veg if I must. Standard Bengali fare.
@AlexClark You're confusing him. (or maybe not)
 
@AlexClark the Real numbers
 
user147690
12:57 PM
@nTuply So it's a set with the field $\Bbb R$
 
Yes
 
@nTuply Try checking if it satisfies all the axioms.
 
How to render latex in the chat btw?
 
user147690
So already we don't just have a set, which is good. Now you know all of the axioms?
 
Do you have ChatJax? @nTuply
 
12:58 PM
@Soham nop
 
It's off the starboard, shit.
 
user147690
 
Okay I got it from Google was on a UCLA site
 
Yeah, do what it says.
 
Okay my Latex works now
 
12:59 PM
Cooleo
p(x) is a function, right?
 
@nTuply check if it satisfies all the axioms, one-by-one
 
@Soham I understand that but how? I mean what does $p(0) + p(1) = 0$ mean in that case?
 
user147690
@nTuply Important to note what $P(0)$ is and you will know
 
$p(x)$ is a function, @nTuply.
p(0) is its value at 0.
 
1:01 PM
$p(0)$ is a polynomial of degree at most 4, where we replace all the x by 0 so this one satisfies the equation
 
user147690
So what does $P(0)$ look like?
 
now for $p(1)$ it's going to be just the sum of the coefficients of the linear combination
how can the be equal to 0
 
Take $p(x) = x^4+x^3+x^2+x^1-4$
 
ok
 
user147690
$P(0)=a\in\Bbb R$
 
1:02 PM
Makes sense.
 
$p(1) = 4 -4 = ?$
 
But what about $x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x^1 - 1$
In that case it fails.
 
So essentially the problem says that for $p(x) = ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 + dx + e$, $p(0) + p(1) = a + b + c + d + 2e$ (check why that's true, simple substitution).
Do all such polynomials form a vector space? That's what you have to show.
 
Makes sense.
Yes. Because all obey vector addition and scalar multiplication and 0 is in the set
 
And are all linear combinations also in the set?
 
1:05 PM
But what about cases where the values don't equal to 0?
Yes.
 
@AlexClark help him out, gotta run to get some stuff from the store
 
For example say a random tuple a to e (-1,2,3,4,1)
That' will not be equal to zero although it obeys all the other axioms/
 
Then . . . ?
Is zero in the set, as you say?
 
no
 
@BalarkaSen is $H_2(X) \approx \Bbb{Z} \approx H_1(X)$ ?
 
1:14 PM
what is $X$?
 
two solid tori glued along their boundary via identity
 
then yes
and higher homologies are?
 
i get that $H_3(X) \approx \Bbb{Z}$ but i think it should be 0
 
it is 0
 
what decomposition do you use for mayer vietoris?
 
1:16 PM
$U$ is the first torus plus bit of the other torus
and $V$ is the second torus plus bit of the first one
 
yeah that's what i did
$U,V\approx S^1$
and their intersection is a torus
 
yes
the intersection is a torus
 
i just said that :P
 
i am doing too many things at once, so i didn't see that
 
1:19 PM
what's the sequence you get at $H_3$?
 
the problem is figuring out what the maps do
 
right, do it.
 
ok
also, is this space just $S^2 \times S^1$?
 
indeed : how did you find out? :P
 
i read it somewhere sometime...i think mike once told me
when we were talking about exercise 2.1.7
 
1:22 PM
But not when you throw in my general $A\in M_{2\times 2}(\Bbb Z)$. Then you get all sorts of interesting things.
 
right, let me tell you how to visualize it :
 
he remarked that the space u get from gluing two solid tori along their boundary depends a lot on the homeomorphism, it could be $S^2\times S^1$ or lens space
or many other things
 
take two solid torii. take two circles at the same position in the boundary of the two torii.
 
when you glue by the identity map, you're gluing these two circles on the boundary of the torii.
 
1:24 PM
yea
 
but the interior is left unidentified, right? so think about two disks bounded by each of the circles, and you're gluing the boundary of the two disks.
 
@Balarka: Am I taking a circle that is nullhomologous or the one that generates $H_1$ of the solid torus?
 
this gives you a sphere at every point, and doing this globally brings back $S^2 \times S^1$
@TedShifrin the nullhomologous circle
 
You'd best have said that? :)
 
yeah, my bad.
 
1:26 PM
Yeah, you're doing $D^2\times S^1$ and talking about $\partial D^2$.
BTW, in preparation, goodnight @MikeM.
 
@iwriteonbanana but, as @Ted says, this gets gradually impossible to visualize when your gluing maps are wildly complicated.
 
Well, what if you glue by reversing orientation, @Balarka? Let bananas think about that one.
 
take a wacky 3-manifold and it's heegard decomposition, for example.
 
Yeah, 3-manifolds people think about Dehn twists and can visualize it fine.
 
good problem, @Ted
oh?
 
1:29 PM
i dont really understand your visualization. so you take nullhomologoous circle on each solid torus, then do the gluing. that is, you're gluing two disks along their boundary which gives $S^2$
 
right. and you do this for each pair of circles at the same position.
so you're sticking an $S^2$ at each point of the circle : that gives you $S^2 \times S^1$
@TedShifrin i'll be interested to listen if you can elaborate on dehn twists.
 
ok, i guess
what's $S^2$ with antipodal points on the equator identified?
 
you want to know the cell decomposition?
 
yeah
@TedShifrin is that $S^3$?
 
no.
 
1:35 PM
ok
 
@iwriteonbananas $e^0 \cup e^1 \cup e^2 \cup e^2$ with $e^2$s pasted to $e^1$ via degree 2 maps.
 
ok
trying to figure out what we get if we glue by reversing orientation
 
$S^3$ is two solid torii identified to each other via gluing the nullhomologous circle of one to the non-nullhomologous circle of the other.
how is that map $x \mapsto -x$?
 
yeah, my bad, that's true
@BalarkaSen can you help me understand how $H_1(X)$ is computed w/ mayer vietoris?
we have the sequence $H_1(S^1\times S^1) \to H_1(S^1) \oplus H_1(S^1) \to H_1(X) \to H_0(S^1\times S^1) \to...$
i.e. $...\to\Bbb{Z}^2 \to \Bbb{Z}^2 \to H_1(X) \to \Bbb{Z}\to...$
what's the map $\Bbb{Z}^2 \to H_1(X)$?
i guess it's $(x,y)\mapsto x$
the generators of each circle are homologous in $X$
 

« first day (1755 days earlier)      last day (3267 days later) »