« first day (1354 days earlier)      last day (3682 days later) » 

9:00 PM
All you need is trigonometry.
 
@Mike WAT
 
Kids these days learn integration at 13?
 
Sab
Not parametric equations?
 
@FernandoMartin Seems so.
 
Sab
I do it for fun.
Oh any good books for learning how to prove?
 
9:01 PM
How to prove what?
 
Sab
Like root of 2 is irrational
 
That's too broad of a question.
 
Sab
Or All cars are red
 
Do you mean proof-writing?
 
Sab
ya
 
9:02 PM
Then there is, I think.
 
Sab
Contradiction, induction
 
But I don't know of one.
Never read.
 
Sab
Oh okay
I thought math needed loads of proofs
I can't do one
 
Proof-writing is not really that much mumbo-jumbo.
 
Sab
But to write them in a proper way is
I can't write them without knowing how
 
9:04 PM
That is a matter of understanding.
 
Mathematicians these days mostly integrate increasingly bizarre functions. Nobody's proven things since a few decades ago, with the advent of formal proofs.
 
Sab
Advanced mathematicians can write a proof in 2 lines for advanced mathematicians to read
 
Read a lots of proof. That's all.
 
@Sab How do you learn to write good essays? By reading other good essays, or books.
 
Sab
but a beginner in math won't understand
 
9:04 PM
(As in, computers that prove things for you)
 
@Sab Give it a try.
Come back with results.
 
Sab
I should
 
Yes.
Go now.
 
Sab
Well it makes sense
I just read about root 2 is irrational
 
Sab
9:05 PM
Seems easy
By the same principle we can say that root of 5 is irrational
and prove it by contradiction.
Wow. I'm going to prove it. Brb
 
Why would you bother? You can get a computer to prove that for you.
 
Sab
No you can't
 
Ignore @Mike. He's trying to be funny, but it might be hard to tell, depending on your English skills.
 
You can.
 
Sab
You can never check to infinity even with a computer
infinity is not a number
 
9:07 PM
@Sab Why do you need infinity here?
 
Sab, all proofs are finite - a computer can check any proof a human can write.
 
Sab
How can a computer check that root of 2 is irrational?
 
Root of x^2 - 2.
Rational root thm.
QED.
 
Proofs are (formally) finite strings of symbols
Computers can check that
 
(Besides, you can do well by diophantine approximations)
 
9:08 PM
By providing the same proof that a human could provide, @Sab.
 
modern computers use that.
 
Bel
Hi, can anyone help me to answer my question here: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/755241/set-geometry-and-inclusion
I have posted that since 4 days ago so I opened a bounty of 50 points
 
Sab
There too much being slapped on me right now.
Googling diophantine approximation
 
@Pedro Today, someone gave me primers on hyperbolic geometry and I learned how to prove independence of the 5th postulate of Euclid.
@Sab Mr. Google is a very bad person.
 
Sab
I know, Mrs. Wikipedia is worse.
I was trying to implement the L-system in Python today and Mrs. Wikipedia didn't have a clear explanation.
 
9:11 PM
You get to know mathematics very superficial by googling everything out.
 
Sab
That's why I asked for a book on proofs.
 
Don't do it.
@Sab I don't understand if proof-writing is what you want.
 
Sab
I want to understand how it's done.
 
You don't get a book of collection of all proofs in math you know.
 
Sab
I want to get the how to think part of it.
 
9:12 PM
@Sab First read on some solid topic.
Choose out one of two - geometry, algebra
Then learn.
 
Sab
Obviously a book can't have all the proofs. But a book can have the method of proving.
That's what I need.
 
@Sab There is no general method for all proofs.
Hilbert's problem is answered negatively.
 
Sab
The forward-backward method is the only method I know
 
(Of course I am talking about diophantine equations)
 
Sab
And how are graphs made?
 
9:14 PM
@Pedro Today, someone gave me primers on hyperbolic geometry and I learned how to prove the independence of 5th postulate of Euclidean geometry from the others.
 
Sab
Let's say I slap a parametric equation, can it's graph be done>
?
 
@Sab I don't understand that question.
Graphs from what?
 
Bel
Hey folks, I need help in algebric geometry and set inclusion
 
Sab
The shaped-graphs
 
@Sab Oh. Depends on what the shape is.
 
Sab
9:15 PM
How do you know equation X will be a heart?
 
Ellipse and circles.
 
@Bel Those two terms are quite far from each other.
 
Or just circles.
 
Sab
Let's say you didn't know the equation and you decide to make an equation to draw a heart>
?
 
24 secs ago, by Balarka Sen
Ellipse and circles.
 
Sab
9:16 PM
What would you do with elipses and circles?
 
Bel
@PedroTamaroff Yes I know but this is how I can discribe my problem
 
You just need to know the shape of well-known geometric objects.
 
Bel
I would say it's more set inclusion problem
 
Sab
Aha.
But with a circle and an ellipse, how would I turn it to a heart?
 
Bel
@PedroTamaroff: I have posted my problem here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/755241/…
 
9:17 PM
@Sab Uh... superimpose? By clever piecewising?
 
Sab
I don't have the knowledge to make this. I need to learn it S:
It's so interesting but I don't know where to go after circles and ellipses
 
@Sab See examples.
 
Sab
ok
 
OK, gotta goes.
Bye.
 
That's not algebraic geometry.
 
9:19 PM
I'll come back moday next week.
 
Sab
Bye
I won't be trolling when you come back next Monday.
I got a dissertation to prepare.
 
@Sab On?
 
Sab
Ellipses
 
Ah.
Good luck with that!
 
Sab
It's a basic assignment for 10 marks.
 
9:21 PM
@PedroTamaroff In right mood to try out a nice elementary math excercise?
 
Sab
Oh it's not a university dissertation(if you were thinking so)
Just high school stuff.
 
@Sab I know that. You're just 13.
 
Sab
I realized I used the wrong word.
 
Bel
@PedroTamaroff I know that algebraic geometry is about polynomial equations but when I say set of matrices I think it is about algebra and I said geometry because a set of matrices could have some shape
 
@Bel It's not.
Who told you so?
 
Bel
9:23 PM
it's just a personal interpretation of the problem
 
@Bel This is not algebraic geometry. :) "Polynomial equations" is a vast simplification.
 
Algebraic geometry is not about polynomials.
what @Mike said.
Reading first lines of wikipedia articles only gives one a superficial idea.
 
Bel
@all: sorry guys my last class in algebra was in 2008 but at least I can still fully understand when I read about it :)
 
Prove elementarily that $$\int_0^{\pi/2} \log(\sin(x)) \ dx $$ is convergent. (I've found a funny way of proving that)
 
What's the word for all points of $X$ are within distance $d$ from subset $A$?
Denseness or no?
lol @BalarkaSen
 
9:32 PM
@EnjoysMath No.
 
Can the linearity of integration be used to find closed forms for some sums?
For finite sums $$\int \sum = \sum \int$$
 
You can call it $B(d,A)=\{x\in X:d(x,A)<d\}$.
 
I call that a $d$-neighborhood of $A$
 
I wouldn't call it much anything.
 
@Mike Yes, we know you're not a name caller.
 
9:36 PM
@Pedro "...fuckface"
 
this is awesome
 
@FernandoMartin why?
 
I find it amusing that the fact that $\emptyset$ has 2 covers is actually relevant for something non-trivial
 
Ah, true. I don't understand all that comes after "This comes up when using the Grothendieck ..." =P
 
Thanks @PedroTamaroff
 
9:45 PM
I don't either
Grothendieck stuff scares me
 
@EnjoysMath What for?
YouTUBE was making me watch it.
 
I didn't see @robjohn active in the last "many"hours ...
 
@Fernado I like the thing in the comments. "An integral domain is one in which the $0$ ideal is prime. But the definition of prime forbids the $0$ ring from having any."
 
@Mike Death to the zero ring.
 
everyone knows the zero ring is not a ring
 
9:56 PM
@FernandoMartin DIS
 
@chris'ssis Asymptotics
 
I have that answer upvoted already
haha
praise be to Bourbaki
 
@GabrielR. $$\left|\int_0^{\pi/2} \log(\sin(x)) \ dx\right|=\left|\int_0^{\pi/2} \log\left(\frac{\sin(x)}{x}\right) \ dx +\int_0^{\pi/2} \log(x) \ dx \right|<\infty \rightarrow \text{Q.E.D.}$$
 
@FernandoMartin We should ask FCEYN to open a Bourbaki prayer room.
 
The deposit works as one
 
10:00 PM
Oh, wonderful place.
 
That's where people go if they've been good in their lifetimes
 
Hey guys...
 
@chris'ssis it's an overkill
 
I have a weakness for hardcover GTM books
dat yellow
 
10:02 PM
@PoliTolstov Comrade.
@FernandoMartin I think that section should have half a dozen armored guards.
One day I might lose it and steal 'em all.
 
hey
 
PREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEECIOUS.
 
r9m
@PedroTamaroff golum
 
@GabrielR. what do you mean by an "overkill" here?
 
Bourbaki is as dead as God.
 
10:06 PM
you break a' ma' heart, son.
 
shun the non-believer
 
@Mike: Maybe that's because you don't read it in French?
 
@Pedro do you know why Bourbaki stopped writing books?
 
@chris'ssis there's simpler
 
10:06 PM
@Mike he wrote enough?
 
hi hi
 
Hello @5space
 
Oh man. Best joke ever coming up...
 
They ?
 
@PedroTamaroff Surely Bourbaki books aren't that valuable?
 
10:07 PM
@5space Is that sarcasm? :P
 
@Mike no I love this joke.
 
they have a shelf like that in my local math library too
 
@GabrielR. Well, it's just a way that came to mind suddenly .... It requires no effort. I know what you mean, but this is just another way.
 
@Pedro They found out Lang was one person.
 
Lang deserves all the respect in the world.
 
10:08 PM
Maybe not all the respect.
 
To be fair, at least the bourbaki books are better written than Lang's. :-P
At least what I've read.
 
@Mike Why?
 
I've tried reading Algebra and Calculus of Several Variables by Lang
I found Algebra to be impenetrable and only good for reference
 
@Pedro He was a bit of a braggart.
 
CSV was alright
 
10:09 PM
@JackM His Algebra is nice, it just take time.
@Mike I approve.
 
And not the best writer.
 
I've heard is complex analysis text is decent.
*his
 
I don't see why one wouldn't just use Ahlfors.
 
But surely there are betters in any subject :-P
 
@PedroTamaroff I'm not sure why I should give time to a book that introduces the definitions for normal subgroups, quotient groups, and short exact sequences within about two pages, all without the slightest attempt at giving any intuition or motivation
 
10:10 PM
@chris'ssis it does : well-definedness of sin(x)/x at 0 and convergence of the integral of log at0. But well this is "elementary" ;)
 
I didn't give it much of a chance, though
 
@JackM It's not supposed to be a book for a first read.
 
That's what I mean - it's probably good for reference
 
@JackM Well, or for a second read. =D
 
Or perhaps to be read at all.
What's up @5space?
 
10:12 PM
@GabrielR. :-)
 
@Mike No mucho. Doing homework.
 
What for?
 
Galois theory and topology
 
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/751410/prove-f-infty-a-infty-rightarrow-b-infty-is-a-bijection

there updated
 
Fun stuff, @5space
 
10:17 PM
@chris'ssis are you interested in series of functions?
 
@Mike, I agree. But I'm not so into Galois theory this quarter. I'm drowning in topology :-P
 
I'm drowning on my own stuff D:
 
I like topology a lot more.
 
Who's teaching it?
 
@GabrielR. limits, series, integrals ...
 
10:19 PM
@chris'ssis is that a yes?
 
@GabrielR. Sure.
 
Haesemeyer is teaching algebra. Gilmore is teaching topology. And Liu is teaching algebraic topology.
 
Bel
@SamiBenRomdhane Est ce que vous pouvez m'aider à résoudre un problème en Algèbre. Au fait j'ai étudié à l'IPEIT 2006-2008 MP mais je me rappelle plus des noms des profs qui m'ont enseigné :)
 
I dunno which courses you mean by the latter two. But fun. What's AT covering now?
 
The latter two are (respectively) introductory topology (ugrad) and algebraic topology is the graduate one.
 
10:21 PM
Ah, gotcha.
 
We are starting to talk about complex projective plane.
And recently we were talking about CW complexes.
 
What year are you?
 
Technically junior. I transferred here this year. But I'm taking two more years after this.
 
Yeesh.
 
??
 
10:24 PM
I wish I was as well-prepared as you my junior year.
 
Well, before this year I had only taken lower-divs. So I don't have that many upper-division units.
This is my first grad class.
 
@Bel Salut @Bel oui je ferais mon mieux sinon tu peux bien sûr poser la question à math.SE
 
You are, nonetheless, taking a grad class in your junior year. :)
 
Truth.
I want to do their bachelors/masters concurrent degree, so I have to take 8 grad classes before I graduate.
 
Bel
@SamiBenRomdhane Merci bien pour m'avoir répondu. Au fait j'ai posé ma question sur ce lien: math.stackexchange.com/questions/755241/…
 
10:28 PM
Nice.
 
Are you taking any cool classes your last term?
Most of my friends who are graduating are taking only GE's!
 
ge's? general education?!
 
@usukidoll Yes.
 
XD liberal arts stuff
 
Mostly, yes.
 
10:31 PM
like where in the help wanted job listings does it say need a BA in liberal arts XDDDDDDDDDD
useless degree x)
 
That's the only good thing about transferring. I got all of my GEs done in advance!
 
I'm only taking two math classes. One is C* algebras, the other is more algebraic to
topology. Cohomology and some hodge theory.
 
$C^\ast$ algebras sounds cool.
 
have you done your ges through community college @5space
 
@usukidoll Yes
 
10:31 PM
same here
 
It's work.
 
boy that saves a lot of $$$$$
one of my classmates just went straight uni after high school..now he has over $25,000 in student loans
 
Yeah. And I am low income, so community college was free anyways!
 
same
but you didn't use all of your pell grant eligibility did you?
 
I did.
 
10:33 PM
Enjoyable, but some of the proofs come out of nowhere.
 
damn what happens afterwards @5space?
like if you used all of your pell grants, then...is it just loans afterwards?
 
The cool thing about my community college was that I could take math classes at a local university for the same as community college tuition (for me free)
Oh, I got a merit scholarship when I transferred.
 
my community college was too dirt cheap to have calc 3 and 4 so I transferred
and I'm still stuck on that damn bijection question. how the heck does each hint take 2 lines a piece?
 
@Bel C'est une très belle question et je pense qu'elle mérite un bon temps de réflexion. Est-ce que je peux savoir qu'est ce que tu fais (étude) maintenant?
 
@usukidoll You might explain the notation in your question. I'm not sure what $f_\infty$ and $f_+$ mean, for instance.
@Mike, I'd like to take functional analysis.
But you have to take the grad analysis sequence here as prerequisite.
 
10:36 PM
what the ?! I've put the def for infinity
$f_\infty$ is the restriction of f with the codomain and domain restricted @5space
 
Oh, I see it at the bottom.
 
ok that just means that I'm in a certain area
 
@5space To say things that aren't just real analysis again, you need a lot of background.
 
You might put the definitions at the beginning. Otherwise, people might stop reading because they don't know what's happening.
@Mike Yeah. And I'm weak in analysis :-(
 
Not to mention one calls back to results from Rudin 2 all the damn time.
@5space Become strong in analysis, then! :D
 
10:38 PM
bangs head
 
Bel
@SamiBenRomdhane Je fais un master en automatique et conception des systèms
 
That's my plan over summer. Tons of analysis. So I can attempt the grad analysis next year and take functional analysis my third year!
 
Good luck! I think one doesn't need too much to be ready for grad analysis... just a good background. Baby Rudin totally suffices.
But that stuff hits like a tank.
 
I was going to work through Pugh's book. My friend did that and killed grad analysis.
 
done I've put the def on top
 
10:40 PM
Lots of Berkeley prelim problems in the book supposedly.
 
I don't know Pugh.
 
It looks a lot like Rudin, with more topology, more explanations, and more pictures (and way too many exercises lol)
I read about 5 chapters of Rudin while I was at community college, but I haven't done any analysis in about a year.
 
lol, I just received a very nice problem, that is actually a tricky problem. In fact, it's a question well-packed in another one that is not really straightforward. (I laught a bit when I saw it)
$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\sin((2n+1)x)}{\sin(x)} \frac{dx}{1+x^2} \ dx=\frac{\pi}{2} \coth(1)$$
This is good for fun. Really!
 
@5space Well, you seem like a smart fellow. I have the utmost faith in you. :D
 
Thanks :-P
I might be doing some analysis related research project over the summer, so that will help too.
 
10:49 PM
What on?
 
Not sure yet.
Hopefully something related to topology or diff. geometry.
 
That's barely analysis!
 
Supposed to get it sorted this coming week.
I know, but it's going to be something more analytic.
 
I'd love to hear about it. You've got me email, so hit me up when you know.
My typos make me sound like a pirate.
 
Aaargh.
Are you doing the prelim/basic exam preparatory class over the summer?
 
10:51 PM
Yeah, they pay me to.
 
Cool. I am doing it too!
 
Most of it shouldn't be too new... but review isn't bad, and neither is money.
 
Exactly! It will definitely help my analysis.
And then hopefully I can pass the basic exam in the fall.
 
You have to take that because you're a masters student, I assume?
 
Well, because I want to get a masters with my bachelors.
 
10:54 PM
Right.
 
Not technically a masters student. But yeah, basically :-P
 
I'll be working on an analysis project this summer, too.
 
Oh, crazy!
With someone from here or your current school?
 
All the research I've done is analysis. Which is funny. Because I don't intend to do analysis. :P
My current school.
 
You're into alg # theory right?
 
10:57 PM
I'm into disparate shit.
 
That's okay. It's early!
 
It's been a while since I've studied any number theory so I'ge lost a bit of the starry-eyed feel.
I'm interested somewhere on the geometry-algeraic geometry-arithmetic geometry continuum. But there's the one word in common, regardless of where I end up.
 
The grad algebra sequence here next year will be good for that. The prof who is teaching it is into algebraic geometry, algebraic number theory, and K-theory.
 
Haesemeyer, yes? To be honest, I'm hoping to pass the qual.
 
Yes.
 
10:59 PM
@seaturtles
I meant to say the group $\Bbb Q/\Bbb Z$ is torsion, and it is infinite. Hence, it cannot be finitely generated.
 
Passing the qual would be great.
 

« first day (1354 days earlier)      last day (3682 days later) »