« first day (1353 days earlier)      last day (3660 days later) » 

r9m
12:07 AM
@Chris'ssis We use $[\frac{x}{2}] + [\frac{x+1}{2}] = [x]$ .. and it telescopes :D
 
@r9m Yeah, this is what I said.
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis yeah .. I just understood it .. thanks :)
 
@r9m Welcome ;)
wow, it's so late here
 
1:14 AM
In how many ways can one or more of 5 letters be posted in 4 mail boxes if any letter can be posted in any of the boxes?
I think the answer should be $4^5$
Am I right? PLEASE CONFIRM!
 
1:28 AM
@r9m, am i right?
@DanielFischer, In how many ways can 5 prizes be given to 3 boys when each boy is eligible for 1 or more prizes?
 
Each of the prizes can go in one of three places, so $3^5$.
 
@DanielFischer, so what is meant by 1 or more ?
Also Sir, please confirm this have I done correctly?
 
Oh, that is a problem. How do we interpret that? I just thought it meant all boys could get prizes. If it means each boy must get at least one prize, things change.
 
OK!
 
@Sush Since there not all letters need to be posted, there are more possibilities.
 
1:40 AM
Oh!
 
@Daniel If a domain has fundamental group $\Bbb Z$, is it homeomorphic to an annulus?
 
How do you define domain @Mike?
open, connected subset of the plane?
 
yes
 
Then I think the answer is yes, but I don't know it.
 
@Mike: This may help
 
1:47 AM
I'd kind of like to see a full classification of topological surfaces.
 
They characterize them up to homotopy-equivalence though
 
@DanielFischer, for the letters problem, is the answer $5^5-1$?
 
I'd also like to see a classification of complex curves
 
@Sush If the letters are distinguishable.
 
@DanielFischer, OK!
 
1:50 AM
@Mike: There's a new BADBADNOTGOOD album
I think you liked them
 
On the other hand, compact complex curves are already hard enough to distinguish up to conformal equivalence.
@Nando Send it to me later
I'll be up for some irony later tonight
 
2:03 AM
Hi all
I need help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
                        why am I so bad at probability !?
                                                   why???? the other math topic is ok, but just so bad at probbility
 
bizarre
 
2:31 AM
Could I call this a reasonable lower bound?
$$-\frac{2}{5x} \le \log (x)$$
 
2:59 AM
$$-\frac{2}{5x} \le \log (x) \le x-1$$
to be more specific
 
Has anybody ever seen $\tilde{\infty}$ used to denote $\infty$ in complex analysis?
 
3:16 AM
@DanielFischer No
 
Who is teaching probability in such a manner that this question makes sense? math.stackexchange.com/questions/758610/…
 
@DanielFischer Decides to take the question literally so as to be unhelpful. I'd say yes. Somebody has seen that before. In all likelihood you have even seen it not too long ago, hence your mention of that notation.
 
What does it mean to toss five dice that are indistinguishable, as opposed to distinguishable? There is no sense in which the answer given makes any sense as a problem about tossing a group of five dice.
 
@KarlKronenfeld Good guess. Have a cookie.
@ThomasAndrews Weird.
 
3:33 AM
But I've seen it before, and it seems to be something that comes up in probability a lot. There are times when distinguishable and indistinguishable affects probability, but the problem as states is nonsensical. The answer give of 0.4 is some probability on some probability space, but it has nothing to do with rolling five fair indistinguishable dice.
 
Right. And whether they are distinguishable or not is completely irrelevant.
Wasted opportunity. The answer should have been "Absolutely!".
 
@DanielFischer That's the spirit!
 
3:56 AM
@DanielFischer The answer is yes, by the way, to the question about domains with fundamental group $\Bbb Z$ because we have an even strong classification of bounded planar domains: ever planar domain is biholomorphically equivalent to the unit disc with finitely many closed arcs removed, where each arc is part of a circle centered at the origin
 
@Mike You forgot at least the condition of finite connectivity.
 
Ah, yes, you're right.
Any bounded planar domain whose fundamental group is finitely generated, then. But that's good enough for me.
Krantz's complex variables book directs me to [AHL]
So I guess I need to get a copy of Ahlfors eventually.
Huh, how do harmonic measures play in here? I didn't expect to see that.
 
4:25 AM
 
Hey guys.
 
4:49 AM
hi
 
@skullpatrol I love it
 
@Mike :D
 
5:19 AM
They have split meta.stackeoverflow into meta.stackoverflow and meta.stackexchange Announcing The Launch Of Meta Stack Exchange.
2
 
meta.SE looks way better
+42
 
It seems that redirects are working. (For the links to meta.SO, which have now been moved to meta.SE.)
At least the one I have tried does work.
 
Wait.. people have accepted answers within 20 seconds?!(meta.stackexchange.com/a/44099)
 
@KarlKronenfeld OH WAO
@KarlKronenfeld Dis.
 
Oh, it is just the time after creation of the question that the accepted answer was posted.
 
5:33 AM
@KarlKronenfeld what kind of scale are they using on the graph?
 
@robjohn are you here. I need to bring something to your attention immediately
 
@PedroTamaroff Cool. I didn't know about Burnside's basis theorem, though I can certainly understand why it is true.
 
I'm not pleased with Meta.SE
 
lolwhy?
 
because there are now two MSEs
 
5:41 AM
twice the mods
 
Maybe we can take advantage of that, @Mike. :D
 
@AwalGarg Hey.
 
i'll get suspended twice as much...
hi @xiaodongjie how are you?
 
@Sawarnik i would now ignore you everywhere
 
@AwalGarg Ok.
 
5:46 AM
what happened to the NT kid?
 
tragic car accident
 
divided by 0?
 
>implying that was an accident
 
@skullpatrol Exams maybe. But I don't think he will disappear for that.
 
icic
 
5:48 AM
@FernandoMartin tragic car
 
tragically hip
 
maybe a nuclear attack?
 
seems unlikely
 
 
2 hours later…
7:29 AM
Is anyone there?
 
nope
 
lol :D Can you please check out this question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/758854/…
 
7:54 AM
@Sawarnik are you here? can you chat now?
 
@Hawk Yea!
@Hawk Do you want to you pin your location in the map? :D
 
@Sawarnik Where?
 
And don't give the exact location!
 
@Sawarnik Why?
 
@Hawk So that i don't reach your house front gate :P
 
7:58 AM
@Sawarnik By mistake, I changed robjohn's location on my map!
And it is being shown that the location has been changed!
 
Whoa!
He is in the middle of Canada.
 
I made a guess at where it was before
 
Infact, on the edge of a tiny island within a river.
 
Leave it, this thing is really tough, and very microscopic, and I am messing things up...
Wow, he lives at such a beautiful place!
 
@Hawk Yup! You gave him such a nice plcae :)
He ll be happy, I think!
 
8:06 AM
@Sawarnik no, i am talking about west hills!
 
@Hawk Oh!
 
But, where did I put him?
Not in the ocean I hope!
 
0
Q: Prove for all $ n \in N,gcd(2n+1,9n+4)=1$

usukidollQuestion: Prove for all $ n \in N,gcd(2n+1,9n+4)=1$ Attempt: I want to use Euclid's Algorithm because it seemed to be easier than what my book was doing which was manually finding the linear combination. Euclid's Algorithm states that we let $a,b \in N $. By applying the Division Algorithm repe...

 
I don't think he will be happy! I have made him a remote islander!
 
8:07 AM
you ll find a scenic place! Really, scenic.
@Hawk Haha.
 
@robjohn I apologise for unintentionally changing your pinned location to some island! I am sorry for the trouble!
 
chill out, it's been fixed
or close to it
 
helloooo!!! ^^
 
@Mike thanks for sorting it out!
 
@usukidoll Your first fraction should probably be the other way round, $\frac{9n+4}{2n+1}$, but looks right.
 
8:14 AM
@Hawk Mark yourself.
 
@Sawarnik No, leave it, I will mess it up again!
 
he did
lol
 
oh yeah!
 
wow D: really thanks ^^
I was major stuck on it because the book sucked
 
have I marked myself already?
 
8:16 AM
it was like find the linear combination and I tried but it was nasty, so I thought a bit and something lit up
 
@Hawk Yeakh, in the middle of Bay of Bengal! Hahaha!
 
like I was doing division a lot for gcd(158,36) and similar problems like that dividing over and over until I got the smallest non-zero number.
I thought to myself...hmmm what if I apply the same thing to the variables?
:O!
OH MAN! I just realized something FACEPALM!
 
@Hawk LOL.
 
@Sawarnik If you can, then sort it out!
 
I was supposed to prove that the results from gcd (2n+1,9n+4) is indeed equal to 1 and by using the algorithm I got that to happen ^^

gcd(n,1) = 1
1=1 ^^
 
8:19 AM
@Hawk I should mark in ISI, ok?
 
@Sawarnik I am not there yet, so not ok...
 
yayyyyyy ^^
 
So, you rectify it after a few months then...
 
But you are better in the middle of a sea, maybe you are a navy personell!
 
@usukidoll Finding the linear combination isn't so bad here, actually. You want to get rid of the $n$ terms, so you multiply both expressions with an integer to get the same coefficient for $n$ in both. The least common multiple of $2$ and $9$ is $18$, so $2\cdot(9n+4) = 18n+8$, and $9\cdot(2n+1) = 18n+9$. Subtract.
 
8:20 AM
:/
 
@Hawk Then I don't know where you live!
 
but I liked the long division way... I've seem to understand it with that approach
 
@Sawarnik Yes, leave me in Bay of Bengal now...
 
oh wow... that made it a bit easier when I saw the lcm part which I haven't learned yet
 
Put me in ISI when I get in!
 
8:21 AM
@Hawk Ok! Haha!
Which ship are you in?
 
@usukidoll Yeah, the long division way is good. If one doesn't see a short-cut (and for larger expressions one often doesn't), that works.
 
@Sawarnik I am below the ocean now...
 
I have another one... who wants to see ^^
 
i do
 
wait let me latex it first
 
8:23 AM
@Hawk Oh! How's are you having the internet connection?
 
@Sawarnik underwater SONAR wifi
 
How long do you plan to be in there? Oh, you may be in a submarine!
Nice.
 
@AwalGarg sorry, I am back, but I see that you are now gone.
 
Until I get in ISI.
 
@robjohn You were in the middle of scenic islands in Canada, for sometime!
 
8:27 AM
@Sawarnik I was wondering why I was so cold...
 
For all $n \in N, gcd(5n+8,3n+5)=1$

$\frac{5n+8}{3n+5}$
I can multiply $3n+5$ just once, so I would have $2n+3$ as the remainder

$(5n+8)-(3n+5) = 5n+8-3n-5 = 2n+3$

the linear combination would be $1 \cdot (3n+5)+(2n+3)$

for $gcd(3n+5,2n+3)$
$\frac{3n+5}{2n+3}$, I can multiply $2n+3$ once and my remainder would be $n+2$

$(3n+5)-(2n+3) = 3n+5-2n-3 = n+2$

The linear combination is $1 \cdot (2n+3) +(n+2)$

For $gcd(2n+3,n+2)$, I can multiply $n+2$ twice, but I am stuck with a $-1$ remainder. Since $-1 \neq 1, gcd(5n+8,3n+5) \neq 1$
o________O
 
@usukidoll Signs don't matter for $\gcd$. If you reach a $-1$ (or, hypothetically, $-4$), that's basically the same as if you got a $1$ (or $4$). But if you're not comfortable with that, $2n+3 = 1\cdot(n+2) + (n+1)$, then $(n+2) = 1\cdot (n+1) + 1$.
 
signs don't matter?!
but why is it that when I've reached that step, I only have $(2n+3)-(2n+4)$
wait a sec... if $(2n+4)$ and $(2n+3)$ were switched around $(2n+4)-(2n+3) = 2n+4-2n-3 = 1$... is that even legal?!
 
@robjohn How can we prove using elipson-delta that the limit of f(x) as x as tends to a, is unique?
 
@usukidoll What definition of $\gcd$ are you working with (the explanation depends on that)?
 
8:34 AM
I have variables in it
prove that For all $n \in N, gcd(5n+8,3n+5)=1$
 
@Sawarnik Asking questions to me, when robjohn or danielfischer are here?
 
@usukidoll But how do you define "gcd"?
 
@Sawarnik I've now put the pin closer to where I am. It's in the park to which I take my dog.
 
@usukidoll Yes, $\gcd(a,b) = \gcd(b,a)$, so $\gcd(2n+3,2n+4) = \gcd(2n+4,2n+3)$.
 
greatest common divisor
 
8:35 AM
right, how do you define greatest common divisor
 
oh! isn't that a crud I know I've seen $\gcd(a,b) = \gcd(b,a)$ somewhere
that's a proposition in my book
 
@Sawarnik if the limit exists, then it is unique...
 
depending on your definition of gcd that proposition should be pretty much trivial
 
alright I see that it's 1 =1 ...
^^
 
@robjohn Yes, how can we prove it? Can you give some hints?
 
8:38 AM
-_- isn't $\gcd(a,b) = \gcd(b,a)$ a proposition or a definition? ughhh I can't find it
 
it's not a definition
you've yet to say what the definition of greatest common divisor is
 
@Sawarnik write down the definition. $\forall\epsilon\gt0,\exists\delta\gt0:|x-a|\le\delta\implies |f(x)-L|\le\epsilon$
@Sawarnik now suppose there were two limits $L_1$ and $L_2$. Set $\epsilon=\frac{|L_1-L_2|}3$
 
where do I find that flips pages
 
GCF
 
no ^
 
8:42 AM
LCD
 
too expensive, @skullpatrol
 
:D
LCM
 
would it be bef 2.5.3 Let $a,b \in Z$ with $a$ and $b$ not both $0$. Let $(D(a,b)$ be the set of common divisors of $a$ and $b$ that is $D(a,b) =[c \in n : c l a \land c l b$ The greatest common divisor of a and b, denoted $gcd(a,b)$ is the largest element of $D(a,b)$. We denote this element by $gcd(a,b)$. Thus $(\forall c \in D(a,b) [c \leq gcd(a,b)]$
next question what the heck is complex analysis lol my adviser recommended that course for me ... either that or number theory
 
calculus, but over the complex numbers
it's pretty cool
everything works out a million times better than it does in regular calculus
 
better^ than any adviser
imo
 
8:47 AM
haha now I gotta write my homework down..
oh wait maybe I could reverse the meaning for gcd(b,a)
let $b,a \in Z$ la la la
too bad latex is really horrible for long division
gcd def.... algorithm...
-.-
2.3.6i theorem
a l 0
1 l a
a l a
 
@robjohn i am back. hope you are still here
 
@AwalGarg yes. what's up?
 
@robjohn um, last night (according to my time), something weird happened
i wrote something which is not at all missappropriate but i got suspended for that
 
@AwalGarg in chat?
 
@robjohn yup
do you think this is missappropriate?
in the area where we type messages, there was a message stating - You have been suspended for 29 minutes for posting inappropriate content
the inappropriate content word was a link to the link i provided you.
and it was deleted. automatically
 
9:01 AM
@AwalGarg Don't let it bother you pal I have been suspended the most in this room :-)
 
@skullpatrol i just want to know why exactly that happened. being suspended for half an hour when I was going to bed is no big thing
@skullpatrol i thought @robjohn would be best to contact about this as he is the room owner
@robjohn u there?
 
@AwalGarg yes, I am looking at things.
 
@robjohn ok, thanks for taking it into consideration
 
@AwalGarg If enough people in chat flag your comments, you can be put on a chat time out. It is not something that requires moderator intervention.
 
@robjohn how much is enough?
 
9:09 AM
So enough people flagged that comment that you were suspended temporarily. It could be that they were annoyed by more than that comment and just flagged that comment.
 
@robjohn thats ok. but what about that message? it said that that message of mine was inappropriate.
i don't think a computer can automatically decide that
 
@AwalGarg well, several people thought that calling someone that was not appropriate.
 
@robjohn ok, but i double checked the transcript. i didn't find anything from me worthy flagging
@robjohn really? you got to be kidding man
 
@AwalGarg no computer decided that. It was flagged by a number of people.
 
@robjohn anyways, is it possible to dispute a flag
 
9:12 AM
@AwalGarg as I said, it could be the accumulation of several comments, and that comment tipped their flag.
 
old means, not a 120 year lady. i meant, that she did not enjoy the thing. so the message
@robjohn ok, but i double checked the transcript. i didn't find anything from me worthy flagging
(i am just discussing that, no offense :) )
 
@AwalGarg this comment was also flagged, but not by enough people to get you suspended from chat.
 
yeah. that one. i had permissions from enough people to post that
 
@AwalGarg the comment is deleted when flagged as inappropriate by enough people
 
Greetings
 
9:15 AM
@Chris'ssis hey super sis
 
@robjohn but then, don't you think there should be a placeholder for that saying (removed)
 
@robjohn Hello! I think I just created a marvellous question
Prove that
$$\int_0^{\pi/2}\int_0^{\tan(x)}\frac{\arctan(t)}{t} \ dt -x \log(\tan(x))\ dx=\frac{7\zeta(3)}{8}$$
 
and history should also reveal that (if any)
 
@AwalGarg there is until it gets put into the transcript. Only mods see the (removed) in the transcript
 
Forget about it @AwalGarg you just live and learn on the internet pal.
 
9:17 AM
@robjohn so do you see anything? you are the room owner...
@skullpatrol its not the point buddy.
 
@AwalGarg I see what you said as would any mod or community team member
 
@skullpatrol i should be aware of things (and specially norms)
@robjohn so, did you find anything that might be considered inappropriate?
 
@AwalGarg I see the comment that was flagged and deleted.
 
@robjohn you mean, the original text of the comment is now inaccessible by anyone
 
@AwalGarg no, it is visible to mods and community team members
 
9:20 AM
@robjohn and may i know what it says?
 
@AwalGarg you told meer2kat not to be an old woman.
 
:-O
HOW could you @AwalGarg say that to a woman???
 
@robjohn ok... i am waiting for the inappropriate part
 
@AwalGarg It is a WOMAN
 
@skullpatrol she told me she was she (a few days ago)
 
9:23 AM
5 mins ago, by Awal Garg
@skullpatrol i should be aware of things (and specially norms)
 
@AwalGarg hey, several people flagged it. As in making a court appeal, deference is given to the people who were there at the time.
@AwalGarg which means that it may not be only the one comment, but a reaction to several comments.
 
@robjohn ok, so to sum up, a few people (mistakenly) got me wrong, maybe because of my wrong way of stating what i meant in english (i am indian, not so good at english)
 
Then be more careful @AwalGarg
 
@AwalGarg If you want to complain, you need to go to the "contact us" link at the bottom of most main site pages to contact the community team.
@AwalGarg I can do little about this other than look to see what happened.
 
@robjohn that ain't going to happen, i assure
 
9:27 AM
OK, let's move on please...
 
@robjohn that is enough for this small a case. thank you for your time.
:)
@skullpatrol i would, indeed
 
:-)
 
i think it would be very wrong to say indians are poor at english
please do not pass on such sort of messages
 
@Hawk poor is an exagerration. but i reckon i am not fluent at it.
 
@Hawk I bet there are millions of Indians who are poor at English. Almost as many as are good at it.
 
9:29 AM
@DanielFischer yes, it is amost that case... but I also bet, those millions who are poor at it, 85% of them are not on internet
 
@DanielFischer yes, but generalisation of indians being poor or 'not fluent' is not appropriate i guess
 
@Hawk Certainly. I have met a number of Indians who could shame most British with their excellent English.
 
@Hawk i don't think i generalised it. the wordings still refer to me
anyways, talking even excellently in english is no very big thing. it would not increase your value. atleast not to me...
 
It may not increase your value, but it could increase your income.
 
@DanielFischer @robjohn could you please provide some help on this problem? math.stackexchange.com/questions/758890/…
 
9:35 AM
@685-252 hmm, certianly in many cases. not everywhere
 
just in general...
 
Fluent at English? Hehe, I did no minute of English language during the school, and all I know I learnt on my own. I hope you understand if sometimes I don't properly use it! :-)
@robjohn The integral I posted above is simply mind-blowing, too beautiful to be true.
 
9:50 AM
@Hawk So you're looking for the smallest number $k$ such that $2002^{2002}$ is the sum of $k$ cubes?
 
@DanielFischer Yes, exactly!
 
@robjohn Did you enjoy that Castle?
: )
 
10:12 AM
@Hawk Where did you get that question?
 
@Sawarnik From the internet...but don't remember from where.
 
10:32 AM
If $g(\pi-x) = -g(x)$ why does this imply $\int_0^\pi g(x) \,\mathrm{d}x=0$ ?
I think I get it, but I do not see the symmetric argument
 
r9m
@N3buchadnezzar The substitution $x \mapsto \pi -x$ ?
 
@r9m That is the I get it part, but I was trying to visualize it
 
r9m
10:48 AM
@N3buchadnezzar how about $g(\frac{\pi}{2}+t) = -g(\frac{\pi}{2}-t)$ , for $t \in [0,\frac{\pi}{2}]$ ?
that gives $\displaystyle \int_0^\frac{\pi}{2} g(x) \,\mathrm{d}x = -\int_\frac{\pi}{2}^{\pi} g(x) \,\mathrm{d}x$ .. with $x = \frac{\pi}{2} - t$
 
Yay you are using $\mathrm{d}x$ wop wop =)
 
11:06 AM
Hi @GabrielR. my black seems to be darker than yours, lol.
 
Hello
 
11:22 AM
@WillHunting admittedly!
 
11:46 AM
@MattN. whivh one?
 
12:11 PM
@robjohn Since I was unable to sign up at Politics Stack Exchange with my WordPress identity, used in all of the remaining accounts, I had to use my Google+ account. Do you know whether it is possible to merge my Politics Stack Exchange account politics.stackexchange.com/users/2877/americo-tavares with all my other SE accounts, the main being the Mathematics SE one? (math.stackexchange.com/users/752/americo-tavares). Do you know who I should contact?
 
@AméricoTavares can you go to "my logins" in your Politics profile and add your other login?
that should connect the accounts, I think.
 
@robjohn I will try. Thanks!
 
@robjohn The episode you watched yesterday.
 
@MattN. there were many episodes on yesterday. They went from 4-11 PM
 
Gezzzz, there is a flood of identities in my house now. :-)
 
12:22 PM
@robjohn Oh? Which ones were on? I assume season 6?
 
I just derived another mind-blowing result.
 
@user127001 Me trolling? No, that was a real problem from my calc book
 
$$\int_0^{\pi/2}\int_0^{\sin(x)}\frac{\arcsin(t)}{t} \ dt \ dx=\frac{7\zeta(3)}{8}$$
hehe, I have so fun here!
 
@MattN. I don't remember which ones. One was in Paris going after his daughter...
 
@robjohn That's season 5. It's ok but not the best : )=
I thought the one where he had a skiing accident and gets binoculars for his b-day was amusing.
 
12:27 PM
@MattN. the Rear Window episode?
 
@robjohn Yes, exactly that.
 
12:38 PM
@robjohn Hey, how is it going ?
 
@robjohn Now I have two Politics SE accounts: the new one (with 100 rep) I've just created with my WordPress identification politics.stackexchange.com/users/2922/americo-tavares and the old one (with 1 rep) politics.stackexchange.com/users/2877/americo-tavares, which I had created with my Google+ identification.
 
@AméricoTavares adding your wordpress login to your Politics.SE account didn't work?
 
@robjohn If I try to add my WordPress identification to my first Politics.SE account (with 1 rep) I get the following message: OpenIdIdentifierRequired.
 
12:58 PM
@AméricoTavares did you use the button for WordPress i.stack.imgur.com/FkbPL.png
 
@robjohn Yes, I did.
 
@AméricoTavares Hmm... that is odd.
 
... and the new account doesn't show the "meta user" link, while the old one does have it.
@robjohn ... and the new profile page doesn't show the "meta user" link, while the old one does have it.
 
r9m
1:19 PM
I am having problem with a strange limit $\displaystyle \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \ldots \int_0^1 \sin \bigg(\frac{x_1+x_2+\ldots+x_n}{n}\bigg)\,dx_1 \,dx_2 \ldots \,dx_n$ .. so far I have no idea even how to start thinking with this problem ..
 
1:36 PM
May I ask what is the elementary solution to the problem @Chris'ssis asked: \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \frac{1}{i+j} ? I don't see how to find the limit with high school knowledge only... Great question though! :)
 
@r9m I'm guessing you could try and compute the first 2 or 3 integrals to see if there's some form of recursion ...
That's a really strange question.
@r9m Also, would I be correct in assuming that $$ \int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{1} x_1 x_2 \text{ d}x_1 \text{ d}x_2 = \int_{0}^{1} \left( \int_{0}^{1} x_1 x_2 \text{ d}x_1 \right) \text{ d}x_2 $$
 
r9m
@Shisui ya .. I guess
 
@mirgee make use of the Stolz–Cesàro theorem :-)
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis objections your highness .. the cesaro-stolz is not taught in highschool everywhere :P
 
@r9m Maybe you're right.
 
1:42 PM
How do I get a job with wolfram research?
 
@MickLH Bust into their HQ and proclaim that you've solved Riemann.
$$ \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \frac{1}{i+j} $$
 
I'm considering it lol
An old invention of mine, something from years ago that I couldn't afford to manufacture and didn't really have much relevance
A computer processor architecture design, really becomes extremely efficient and effective when you apply some of the core concepts from "A new kind of science" to it
 
How to apologize to meer2kat? Her room got deleted due to me :(
 
@r9m This one should work with a bit of complex analysis. But I don't wanna use that ...
 
I've got a semiconductor lattice pattern that can provide 16 teraflops of compute power, and 60 terabytes of bandwidth, at a modest 1Mhz clock rate! but it's nearly impossible to write programs for in the classical sense, the reason it's relevant all the sudden is because I had insight into how to apply nearly the entire power to problems which can be stated as rules for cellular automation
 
1:47 PM
@Sawarnik Make a meer2kat appreciation soc.
 
@Shisui What is a appreciation soc?
 
@Sawarnik An appreciation society, haha!
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis I accept all analysis machinery except Random variable (user China Math just posted this in comment to my question in main) .. I don't understand random variables
 
@Shisui First of all, why did you completely change your identity!
 
@Sawarnik You're all under my Kotoamatsukami. My ocular jutsu is unrivalled in the Shinobi sekai :P
 
1:51 PM
Oh no, due to this silly Naruto.
 
@r9m Yeah, the answer seems to be $\sin(1/2)$.
 
@Sawarnik Silly Naruto? I don't want to pull out my Kage Bunshin no Jutsu and render you totally useless with my Tsukuyomi, whilst charging up a Gudoudama!
@Chris'ssis Is that the answer to the multiple integral limit?
 
@Shisui Yeah.
 
@Shisui Naruto is silly. Lets see you can do with your Kage Bunshin no Jutsu.
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis should I delete the question from the main ? (there is already two close votes)
 
1:54 PM
@Sawarnik This is my shadow clone typing. I'm actually eating a banana and my other shadow clone is trying to compute the multiple integral limit.
 
@r9m I'd like to see a way that doesn't involve the probabilistic trick.
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis okay :D
 
@r9m I think you should mention that you don't want such a way, because otherwise your post will be closed soon.
 

« first day (1353 days earlier)      last day (3660 days later) »