« first day (762 days earlier)      last day (4264 days later) » 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

6:02 PM
@MichaelGreinecker,Thanks! I will keep that in mind. It seems my basic stuff can be learnt from Abbott's Understanding Analysis
 
@Sabyasachi That is certainly a nice book to start with and very readable.
 
looks like I have to run. bye.
Thanks again
 
@JohnJunior: You afraid to leave my smiley? >8(
 
No, Sir.
$\Huge\text{>8(}$
 
6:12 PM
«Vowels are people too» is the funniest thing I've read on MSE ever
 
I once read a suggestion that since the Czech language seems to be short of vowels and Irish seems to have too many, there might be a business opportunity - smuggling vowels from Ireland to the Czech Republic :)
 
What will they think of next?
>8(
 
6:31 PM
@robjohn Thanks, it's been done already.
 
@Matt Okay. Sorry to take so long.
 
6:47 PM
Hello
Can $2y\sqrt{20}{5}$ be reduced any further?
arrrg That's supposed to be the fifth root of 20
 
@robjohn Can we repeat the game though? I don't see why this has 3 votes as "off topic". Seems very on topic to me.
 
7:03 PM
How do you solve this? $\sqrt{n} + 1 = 4$
 
@DantheMan first, subtract 1 from both sides. What do you get then?
 
$sqrt{n} = 3$
* $\sqrt{n} = 3$
 
@DantheMan Good, now you can square both sides of the equation (right?). What do you get then?
 
You can square both sides?
 
@Dan Yes!
 
7:05 PM
Ahhhh
n = 9
 
but you must square the whole side! and you must do the same thing to both sides (you knew that one already, probably).
@DantheMan And that's the answer. Plug it back into the original equation to see if it works out right.
 
Awesome! Thanks
 
@Dan YW. glad I could help
 
Just to make sure... In $\sqrt{x + d^2} = c$
...Solving for $x$ gives $x = c^2$ ?
Wait... that's wrong
$x = c - d^2$ ?
 
$\sqrt{x+d^2}=c\implies x+d^2=c^2\implies x=c^2-d^2$.
 
7:14 PM
Right... Duh! >.<
I hate making simple mistakes in Algebra
Here's another
$\sqrt{m+4} = 4 - \sqrt{m-4}$
 
@DantheMan that's a little more complicated now. If you try to square both sides of the equation, you will get a more complicated problem (have you tried that?).
 
Yes... It didn't work.
 
squaring both sides for that equation is also very error prone. Do you see a way to simplify that equation before squaring both sides?
 
Isolating the variable?
 
@Dan oh, wait. Is one of the radicals $m+4$ and the other one $m-4$?
 
7:21 PM
Precisely
 
@DantheMan good thought, but you won't be able to isolate the variable since it is under the radical sign.
ok. hold on a sec then (although anon might do this equation quickly for you, but i have to think about it a sec).
 
Hah alright
Can't I just add $\sqrt{m-4}$ to both sides?
 
@Dan that's what i'm thinking of trying. And then one side is $\sqrt{m+4}+\sqrt{m-4}$. Then square that side. But I want to see what happens before I told you to do that.
 
Hmmmm
Ah, when I square both sides...
I will get
$(\sqrt{m+4}) = (4-\sqrt{m-4})^2$
So the left side will have to be FOILed, right?
*right side, that is
Alright let me try
 
@Dan I retract that statement. You're way worked out easier!
 
7:30 PM
$m=2$ ?
 
@DantheMan yes, RHS will have to be foiled. Also, don't forget to square the LHS (you forgot to type the exponent).
 
Ah cool!
 
plug $m=2$ back in. I think you made a mistake somewhere.
 
Hmmm.. I got $m=2$ with your method
What did you get using my method?
 
I'm not tellin' (yet). :D Show me the first step using my method.
 
7:33 PM
haha ok
 
you shoudl have squared $\sqrt{m+4}+\sqrt{m-4}$, right?
 
Ahhh I went off there
 
@Dan is this homework? I will make you do at least a little work before giving a straight out answer.
 
I just took off the radicals Lol
Lol yeah it's homework
 
@DantheMan <smh> lol
 
7:35 PM
<smh> ?
 
smh=shakes my head... it was done in good fun (with a smile) since you had already "lol"ed
:D
 
Hahaha
 
try again... but use your method. i'm trying my method now and i just keep getting deeper and deeper into non-simplifying equations)
 
Hmmm ok
 
Can I add my ideas?
 
7:38 PM
I can't even remember my method... LOL
@JohnSenior Yes please
 
We are trying to solve $\sqrt{m+4} = 4 - \sqrt{m-4}$ ?
 
Indeed
 
@JohnSenior of course.
 
OK - squaring both sides gives $(\sqrt{m+4})^2 = (4 - \sqrt{m-4})^2$
 
@Dan your idea was to square both sides right away. (mine was to move the radicals to the same side - mine made the problem more complicated).
 
7:39 PM
Ah right.
 
which simplifies to $m+4 = 16 - 8\sqrt{m-4} + (m-4)$
 
Right
 
now move the square root to one side and everything else to the other side
and get $8\sqrt{m-4} = 8$
or $\sqrt{m-4} = 1$
 
Yes!
 
so $m-4 = 1$, and finally $m=5$ - then check that this works by substituting back into the original equation
 
7:46 PM
@John that's where I was going! :D (i just wanted to make him do most of the work, which takes more time) :D
 
Awesome
@Jeff Hey!
 
as an aside: does the square root sign look funny today?
 
@DantheMan - now you need to do a few more of the same type to make sure you can do the whole process yourself
 
@JohnSenior Yeah
@Jeff ???
 
you will find there are a few quirks in some examples that look similar, due to the fact that squaring both sides of an equation might introduce extra solutions which do not satisfy the original equation
 
7:48 PM
is the top of the square root symbol sagging on your monitor?
 
@Jeff No?
 
Looks fine here - but some people have reported problems with some browsers/OSes
 
@JohnSenior Ah ok
 
I'm using Chrome/Win-doze.
 
7:57 PM
@JohnSenior Thanks
 
@DantheMan Have fun - and remember always to check your solutions
 
Does anybody know about percolation theory here??
 
@JohnSenior Yeah
 
8:18 PM
@Jeff In chrome, I get many issues with sqrt bars.
 
that's too bad. cuz i like chrome so much better than the other browsers
 
Me too; well, I used to. I have found it to be very slow lately when going through my firewall at the office. I worried about the information it was sending out.
I've yet to find a decent replacement, though.
 
@Ed re: your last statement. that's the bottom line. there are no good browsers (just like politicians). you use the least bad.
 
How do I find this?
Which is greater, $\sqrt{3}$ or $\sqrt{3}{5}$ ?
Wait...
How do I do cubed roots in MathJax?
 
@DantheMan ${x}^{1/3}$?
@JohnSenior I have an important announcement to make.
Gather around everyone.
 
8:32 PM
@PeterTamaroff But not with exponents...
 
@DantheMan $\sqrt[3]{x}$
 
$$\root {like} \of {this} $$
 
Thanks
Alright, so which is greater? $\sqrt[2]{3}$ or $\sqrt[3]{5}$ ?
No using calculators
 
If $y > x$, then $y/x > 1$.
 
@PeterTamaroff sounds interesting - I am gathered round :)
 
8:35 PM
@Peter me too
 
Then, $\sqrt[3]{5} / \sqrt[3]{3} = \sqrt[3]{\frac{5}{3}}$
 
@ed he had different roots
 
Yeah.
$\sqrt{3}$
 
Oh, that makes more sense, I couldn't see that. Need new glasses.
 
@PeterTamaroff Logarithms?
 
@DantheMan No, elongated wooden sections.
 
@PeterTamaroff -_____-
 
Ask for "the Elder".
Old fella knows his maths.
 
I'm going to save this chat session, and the next time I teach high schoolers and they ask me, "what do mathematicians actually do?" I'm going to show them this. The field of math will never see a greater influx of new talent.
2
 
8:40 PM
@JohnSenior Little help here!
 
@DantheMan with the roots question?
 
yeah. Which is greater, $\sqrt[2]{3}$ or $\sqrt[3]{5}$
 
calculate the log value for both
 
I would put $a = \frac{\sqrt[3]{5}}{\sqrt{3}}$ and then work out $a^6$
$a^6 = \frac{5^2}{3^3}$ which is clearly less than 1
so $a^6 < 1$ and hence $a < 1$
 
$$\eqalign{
& {3^{1/2}} > {5^{1/3}} \cr
& {3^{3/2}} > 5 \cr
& {3^3} > {5^2} \cr} $$
Note that follows because cubing and squaring are both increasing operations.
 
8:44 PM
@PeterTamaroff that is fine - if you put some "if and only if"s inbetween them
 
@JohnSenior =)
 
Awesome. thanks, guys
 
Another way is to write $27>25$ and take sixth roots of both sides
I hope we are not doing all of Dan's homework questions here ...
 
9:09 PM
@JohnSenior Why would a teacher care about the magnitude of roots?
 
@PeterTamaroff talking about that roots question we just did?
 
@JohnSenior Yup
 
@PeterTamaroff I would say that the magnitude is not the important thing - the main aims are to get students to understand the ideas of raising roots to various powers, and to understand that things like "squaring both sides" maintains inequalities
 
@Matt They think it should move to stats. I tend to agree.
 
@robjohn We should wait and see what the trend is!
 
9:13 PM
@PeterTamaroff I am not voting. I will wait for real votes :-)
 
@robjohn Link?
 
2 hours ago, by Matt
@robjohn Can we repeat the game though? I don't see why this has 3 votes as "off topic". Seems very on topic to me.
 
@robjohn What is it?
 
@PeterTamaroff Sorry, the link didn't copy right :-(
 
@robjohn Oh, I am so weak willed.
Voted to close.
 
9:17 PM
@PeterTamaroff I forget whether 5 votes migrates it automatically, or if it just flags for a mod to migrate.
 
@robjohn No ideas.
 
@PeterTamaroff mods usually ask the mods in the other site if they want a question. That doesn't seem possible if 5 votes migrates it.
 
@PeterTamaroff 30% increase in income wouldn't suck.
 
@robjohn Hahaha I can imagine! Just kidding, you know =)
 
9:25 PM
That's.... that's a terrible conclusion from that statistical analysis.
 
@EdGorcenski Make an über critical response video Ed! Do justice!
 
The people who said that money didn't matter at 18 also feel as though money didn't matter... therefore, income increases don't lead to increased happiness? What??? Mind = Blown.
Sometimes, I feel as though one should hold a License to Use Statistics.
 
@EdGorcenski I think it is silly to tell someone what makes him/her happy. You yourself might not even know, why try guess what others want?
 
hhh
Very elementary question about cross-product:

$<0,1,0>\times <x,-y,0>=<0,0,-x>$

Does this make sense also $<0,1,0>\times <x,-y,0>=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\sin(\theta)\hat n$?
(The first line is correct)
I think one needs to just decide which form to use in each case...
 
@PeterTamaroff I find it very pragmatic to attempt to guess what makes my better half happy; rather, attempting to guess what makes her unhappy, then avoiding doing that :D
3
 
9:36 PM
@EdGorcenski Hahahahaha
@hhh I usually use determinants for the cross product.
 
hhh
me too (with pen)!

A) I find the parametric form easier to read
C) the angle thing may work if you know the angle
...I mean the pen -rule, learnt it here :)
...but my point was that: is the angle -thing only useful when you know the angle?
 
@JonasTeuwen listening to Anouar Brahem - Le voyage de Sahar :)
 
hhh
Or can you somehow deduce the angle from the parametric form?
 
@hhh the version with the angle can be very useful if you want to calculate the angle
 
@hhh Well, or when you need to find it.
 
hhh
9:40 PM
Yes but my question is that can you get from parametric from into the angle form explicitly
The pen rule is here by @Blah.
(sometimes with wicked Integrals, I use the wrong form...
 
9:52 PM
@hhh Can I add mine?
 
hhh
ofc
 
@hhh How do I make a matrix?
with determinant, actually
Got it
 
hhh
-
-
 
@hhh Mine is not that visual....
But I think it is cool.
@hhh Tell me what you think, I've posted.
 
hhh
@PeterTamaroff It is the same as the pen -rule?
 
10:01 PM
@hhh ?¿
 
hhh
You write them just as vertical
2
A: Visual Ways to Remember Cross-product in $\mathbb F^3$?

BlahI usually teach this (which requires no additional writing and avoids cyclic permutations, which are often confusing for students): $$ \left[\begin{array}{c} x \\ y \\ z \end{array}\right] \times \left[\begin{array}{c} u \\ v \\ w \end{array}\right] $$ 1) ignore $x$ and $u$ (that is:...

 
@hhh Yeah, kinda XD
 
10:25 PM
@Ben Hey there
 
@PeterTamaroff There was a minor war going on at night
 
@BenjaLim WAR???
 
8
Q: References on Linear Algebraic Groups/Lie Theory

BenjaLimI am currently doing a course on Lie groups, Lie Algebras and Representation theory based on Brian Hall's book of the same name. We should cover upto chapter 4/5 in this book by the end of the semester. Now for this course, our lecturer (Jarod Alper) has suggested that we come up with a final pro...

Read the comments here
 
Fight! Fight! Fight!
 
@JohnSenior Bastards that closed my question don't even know what a Lie groups is godammit!!
 
10:28 PM
@BenjaLim I don't see it closed
 
@PeterTamaroff Edit history
and read the comments
 
@BenjaLim If they close it again, I will vote to re-open - My understanding of Lie Groups is a bit vague, but I am sure they are worth asking about
 
@BenjaLim I'm not interested in gossip!
 
oh wait I wonder why Potato voted to close it
@JohnSenior I don't mean to be ad hominem here but they people that closed my question
 
@BenjaLim He's a vegetale Ben, and you eat it. It is only logical.
 
10:30 PM
Do not seem to have answered a lot of questions on lie groups
 
@BenjaLim Whatevs.
 
@BenjaLim I don't understand Gigili's comment at all
 
@JohnSenior I know. Exactly
I doubt a lot of people even understood the content of what I was saying
 
@BenjaLim What do you keep rubbing on that matter? I'd close a question on Stone Cech compactification if I think it has to be closed.
 
@PeterTamaroff Maybe I was just not happy that people jumped the gun too quickly
 
10:33 PM
@BenjaLim Maybe. But hey, it is open now! =D
 
yes
 
@BenjaLim Brocolli.
 
huh?
@PeterTamaroff I see you have not shaved
 
@BenjaLim So what are you learning now?
@BenjaLim I try to look 19 for as long as I can.
 
@PeterTamaroff Well I have a Lie theory exam on friday
that's basically what I have been doing
and looking at topics for my final project
 
10:36 PM
@BenjaLim Did you try with the Russians?
They are good on making people tell the truth.
If you can Lie to them, you're good.
 
I PUT IN GULAG
 
@BenjaLim What do you put?
 
YOU
 
@BenjaLim NO! Why me? Get brocolli and raddish.
 
huhuhuhuh?
 
10:38 PM
@BenjaLim What the hell?
 
What's with broccoli and raddish?
 
@BenjaLim I don't know.
 
@PeterTamaroff
 
@JohnSenior Excellent :-).
 
@JonasTeuwen It was a present from an Irish friend - and a surprisingly good one :) ... and how are things with you?
 
10:54 PM
@JonasTeuwen I changed my profile pic in FB.
 
(why does FB not have a dislike button?)
:)))
 
@JohnSenior It's on!
 
@PeterTamaroff My FB has no "dislike" button :(
 
FACEBOARD!
 
@PeterTamaroff lovely ...
 
11:00 PM
@JohnSenior Now you understand what I meant by "It's on!"?
 
@PeterTamaroff Yup
 
@JohnSenior Cool 8-). I am ill. I go to bed now. Bye!
 
@JonasTeuwen Get better.
 
@JonasTeuwen get well soon!
 
Thanks. Bye!
 
user19161
11:09 PM
@JonasTeuwen Ding ding ding!
 
Any ideas as to what this question is really asking?
 
@JohnSenior Are you sure it is asking smething?
 
@MichaelGreinecker silly me! - I assumed that someone posting a question was actually asking something :))))
5
(I never learn!)
 
Do we have a troll?
 
11:25 PM
@peoplepower Oh - I think we have several of those :)
 
@JohnSenior Gauss is really clear in his Disquisitiones.
 
@PeterTamaroff absolutely - clear and concise - I admire his presentation
 
@JohnSenior I'd like to study from it sometime.
 
@JohnSenior He's asking whether his pares are homogeneous.
 
@PeterTamaroff I would leave it for now - it is really good to look back at it from my age, when I don't have to study for anything in particular - but it is probably not a good book to study when you are young and aiming to master modern treatments :)
 
11:30 PM
@JohnSenior Yep, I guess so.
 
@HenningMakholm pares?
 
@JohnSenior "pares" translates literally to "pairs"!
 
@PeterTamaroff Ah ok!
 
@JohnSenior A few months ago we had a troll who asked nonsensical questions about "pares", and made a show of "showing research" by copy-and-pasting random text from the Wikipedia article about pears.
This one's copy-and-pasting random text about linear functions reminded me of that.
 
@HenningMakholm Ah - wonderful! - did he get bored eventually
or did he get banned? :)
 
11:41 PM
Bored, apparently. He was unregistered, so it probably would have made little sense to ban him.
 
I voted to close as "not a real question". Has this label ever applied better?
2
 
@MichaelGreinecker Sure
 
What does it mean for mathematical objects to be equal?
 
@peoplepower Depends on the context, but in most cases it means that they are the same object.
 
I had the belief that I was not posing a real question.
 
11:48 PM
@HenningMakholm I guess MSE doesn't have the W|P system of banning IP addresses
 
user19161
@JohnSenior OP is very confused. He should not be asking this question even.
 
He shouldn't be asking it odd either.
 
@WillHunting he has certainly confused me :)
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Those ancient texts are all unreadable today.
 
I think I will go and sleep ...
 
11:49 PM
@WillHunting I'm reading it now, in Spanish =)
 
user19161
@HenningMakholm That is clearly a troll.
 
@WillHunting Vote to close!
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff OMG! With the time you dedicate to math, I think you will make great progress if you just focus on modern mainstream texts.
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Not me, I only have 2k, unlike the great Pedro!
 
@WillHunting and leave the old masters to old guys like me :)
 
user19161
11:50 PM
@JohnSenior No, I think you should read the modern texts too. Leave the ancient math texts to historians instead.
 
@WillHunting Oh, well!
 
@WillHunting but my interest in number theory IS at least partially historical :)
after all - I am not going to discover anything new at my stage :)
 
user19161
But it is true that reading from the original masters can be very illuminating. It can even show how the concept originally arose.
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff What pic is this? I want to see!
 
@WillHunting That is my interest - for instance, I would be fascinated to find out how the "old guys" discovered that elliptic integrals were actually inverse functions of doubly periodic functions
 
11:56 PM
@WillHunting We're still in debt, Jasper/Will/Clark, whoever you are!
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Oh yeah.
 
user19161
You know a small nasty thing happened. I was using something to remove something from my ear, but it seems it got deeper inside, so now I can't hear too well.
 
@WillHunting What was inside your ear?
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Well, just cleaning it out.
 
user19161
Well, maybe I will ask my doctor friend for some advice.
 
11:57 PM
@WillHunting Well, then just get ear drops that dissolve wax.
 
user19161
@moshe I see your new pic!
 
user19161
I am such a busybody, ain't I? I love to see everyone's pics.
 
How can I simplify a number with a negative exponent?
 
user19161
@Moshe Example?
 
216^(-1/3)
 
11:59 PM
Goodnight all
 
user19161
@Moshe That is 1/6.
 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

« first day (762 days earlier)      last day (4264 days later) »