« first day (1606 days earlier)      last day (3191 days later) » 

2:21 AM
@Paulster2 : I'm not asking people to vote for it, just making a casual observation - you never know where your street cred will come from
 
2:41 AM
@NickAlexeev : You could check if SAE has some standards
 
@Zaid - Get over it buddy! I upvoted it for you!
 
2:58 AM
@Paulster2 : I'm fine, don't worry!
 
:D
You still up?
(obviously)
lol
 
I just woke up
 
Sorry, I didn't mean to wake you :D
 
Lol. As my daughters would say, "the sun is awake" here
This just in. Looks like EE.SE reopened my question and actually answered it!
0
A: How do brushless motors provide more torque and longer battery life to cordless drills?

Bruce AbbottA drill manufacturer claiming higher torque and efficiency from their brushless motor is probably telling the truth - however that doesn't mean being brushless is the only reason for the improvement. They could put a really bad brushless motor in there that's no better than a high quality brushed...

 
Did you have to massage it to get it opened?
And for you music lovers out there, play the video which is at the top of this FB page ... my daughter is playing the viola to the left (stage right) in the skirt. facebook.com/cvtvnetwork
 
3:10 AM
I followed David Winslow's advice and removed the last paragraph
 
I don't think they have it posted to youtube ...
Oh, gotcha ... I don't remember what was in the last para, so ... oh well :D I wouldn't have asked it closed in the first place anyway.
I wish more sites were like this: motuk.co.uk/manual_370.htm
 
Hey, at least now I know that brushless motors can spin up to 50k rpm now
That I some serious speed
 
I guess the ones in the Dyson motors which spin up to 110k rpms must be of super-duper standard or something special ...
 
Have you heard of burst velocity?
 
@Zaid As far as I understand, the main advantage of brusheless is higher reliability and higher rpm.
 
3:14 AM
I wonder if that factors into what the limit is
 
@Zaid - I get the higher reliability (less wear parts), but forgive me for being skeptical of the higher rpm.
 
Reliability comes from 2 places: (1) brushless is easier to cool, because the windings are on the stator near the outside of the motor. (2) No brushes that slow things down and require replacement.
 
I'm sure it's easily proven ... I just haven't looked at the tech enough to understand it.
I guess I can get faster actually ... it was the efficiency which I was thinking ... sorry.
Less drag on the motor (from the brushes)?
 
@Paulster2 Higher rpm, because (1) brushes don't get in the way, (2) easier to cool, so can be driven harder.
[and if I use sloppy language like that in EE.SE chat, rotten eggs and tomatoes would be inbound by now]
 
Yes, I think material limitations would explain such a large difference. Going brushless alone might not
Hahahaha
@NickAlexeev : I take it you're an EE.SE frequenter
 
3:18 AM
@Zaid But I don't buy the argument about higher torque. It's hard to compare apples to apples in case of brushless and brushed DC.
@Zaid Kind of (if being a mod on EE.SE counts as frequenter)
 
@NickAlexeev - Uh, I think that would put you in the "frequenter" category, lol!
 
Oh, i didnt know that (i'm on my phone atm)
Let me think about the torque argument a little
 
@NickAlexeev - Haha, we're just glad you stopped by for some sanity ;-)
 
:)
 
@Zaid have chimed in on my question, which I have posted earlier in chat. That's why I'm here.
 
3:22 AM
I think higher torque stems from better efficiency
 
I was just reading up on the Dyson digital motor. It can spin at 120,000 rpm actually. If it were to have just 1 lb-ft of torque at that speed, it would be putting out 22.85hp ... that's pretty awesome!
 
@Zaid But how much higher? Factor of 2x, of just 20% higher.
20% can be easily lost in other variations of the design.
 
Totque won't change much
 
Torque won't either ... ;-)
 
I doubt efficiency will change so drastically
 
3:24 AM
haha, I know ... on your phone.
You guys are talking EE which is way over my head (in most cases) ... I guess that's why I don't frequent that site much, lol.
 
@Paulster2 : Power = torque x speed will still hold true
 
I know ... just getting punchy because it's late. Brain not working at the moment.
 
I was looking at specs of brushed vs brushless
 
ayup
:D
 
Brushed cordless will be something like 60 Nm
Brushless around 67-70 Nm
 
3:28 AM
@Zaid I would guess that the torque of the motor itself would be about the same between DC and BLDC (all things being equal). But BLDC can run at higher RPM, and it can be geared down with a greater ratio.
But you should get much better longevity from a brushless, even if what they say about torque is a gimmick.
 
@NickAlexeev if the power input is the same to both, the fact that the speeds are geared down in the drill to a fixed speed (say 3000 RPM) it will mean that efficiency is the main actor here
I don't mean just motor efficiency... More overall system input-to-output efficiency
So things like gearbox efficiency etc. included
Interestingly, there is one user complaint with the brushless cordless drill that maybe wasn't thought of. When doing metal work, iron/steel filings/shavings tend to stick to the permanent magnet. Apparently they're not easy to remove (think compressed air)
 
Check the edit:
4
A: Is it safe to overload the roof rails?

Bob Cross Would this be safe? tl;dr: No. It's hard to say exactly how unsafe or how bad the consequences might be. Assuming the rails themselves weigh on the order of 5-10 kg, you're talking about almost doubling the advised load on the whole system. From reading that advisory, it's hard to say e...

Kayak + roof rails lying in the middle of the road on my way home last night. Exciting!
 
3:45 AM
Lol
 
4:22 AM
@BobCross You have to love anecdotal evidence :D
 
 
6 hours later…
10:02 AM
0
Q: x3 bmw latest model has a diesel knock, opened the top one piston not reaching tdc

erasmusI have an x3 diesel latest model bought it at an auction. Now it had a heavy diesel knock sound. So I decided to open the top. When I did, I saw neither visual damage on my injectors nor the cylinder head. But one piston is not reaching the highest level of tdc. What could have caused this? Secon...

How do you just "open the top" and determine piston travel?
 
 
2 hours later…
 
1 hour later…
 
2 hours later…
3:13 PM
@Paulster2 Actually in this case, I was a primary source demonstrating that, no, it's not a great idea to overload those rails.
 
3:56 PM
@BobCross - Oh, snap. Sorry for your loss (and stupidity).
@BobCross - I had roof rails on my '04 Suburban. They said you could put up to 300lbs (I think??) on them. I don't think I ever really used them because they looked flimsy as all get out. If it didn't fit in the cargo area, it was getting towed by a trailer.
@Zaid - If you turn the crank and one of the pistons is not coming up all the way, it can be pretty easy to tell if there is a difference, depending on how much of a difference there is. If there was hydrolocking going on, it could surely have made a pretzel out of the con-rod. Other than that, you can use a dial indicator directly on the piston and get an idea of travel or lack there of.
 
@Paulster2 : Something doesn't feel right about that question, just can't put my finger on it. If that is a bot-generated question then hats-off
 
He's going to have to pull the engine, no way around it.
That would be one heck of a bot, eh?
@Zaid - I'm in the middle of watching your Binky video ... holy crap ... funny thus far.
@Zaid - Brit humor ... A bit cheeky if you ask me.
@RoryAlsop - Wazzup!
 
4:30 PM
@Zaid - @21:37, they are talking about making an adapter on the lathe to fit both the steering side and the spherical rod end. Why didn't they just get the proper nuts, one for each side, cut a piece of tubing and weld the two nuts to that. Would have taken about 10 minutes to fab and not all of the machining. I'm a mathematician at heart ... always take the easy way out.
 
4:40 PM
@Paulster2 afternoon! Just sitting in a garden watching gliders taking off over my head, drinking lager and Pimms. It's a hard life
 
@RoryAlsop - Well, since I don't drink, you have my permission to have one for me :D
 
4:58 PM
Apply for this question:
0
Q: What would cause the cam carriers to shatter on my BMW 3 Series (2011)

Ciaran The timing chain has stretched and the cam carriers have shattered after only 72,000 miles. What could cause this? I have found out that the car was mapped/chipped by the previous owner. Have no idea about cars. PLEASE HELP. The car needs a new engine. If the re mapping caused this, then I'm hopi...

I know the one design from BMW had some issues with timing chain stretch, which it appears this engine falls within. I'm not sure if the "N47d" applies for this or not, though. It is in two 300 series models.
I'm wondering if those are diesel models.
 
5:37 PM
@Paulster2 : You won't be too surprised if you watch the rest of the series. These guys love to fabricate
 
@Zaid - I gathered that, lol. They do a mighty fine job of it as well. Did you watch the video all the way to the end? A little Easter egg for you, lol.
 
Yes I did. The wheel offset is a bit too much :)
 
5:58 PM
I noticed that our people do not like to upvote or generally vote at all. Comparing sites like aviation where you get a minimum of 10 votes, ours is like bargaining with a Chinese person you get nothing.
I personally Vote a lot but i think everybody should do the same. votes on our answers a pathetic.
 
@Anarach : How many people are active on Aviation compared to mech.SE?
It is rare to hit 10 upvotes on any answer here :/
 
6:15 PM
Not sure how to find that out but i can see they have around 3500+ questions
 
@Paulster2 : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_N47 shows that it did suffer from chain stretch buy we're not sure if that is the one in the OP's car. They need to clear that up
 
6:43 PM
@Paulster2, read the edit. I saw the debris on the road. Matched the original picture almost exactly!
 
7:02 PM
i vote
 
7:19 PM
I joined the pre-beta of woodworking.SE ... the questions there are very slim ... >2.5qpd. I have my highest voted post over there, which is 22 upvotes, I think. Absolutely crazy we don't have more voting going on here. We have the traffic, but nobody wants to sign up to vote. Even those who do sign up to ask a question don't do that much voting. Pretty crazy the highest voted question here hasn't even hit 50.
 
we need to work on getting answers accepted too
 
@BobCross - Yah, what I've read today points to the diesel engines ... I thought there were issues with the petrol engine around the same time as well. I haven't read anything today which points that way, but for some reason .... Clarrifying the question would help.
 
have any of you guys built a test stand for your engine ?
 
@DavidWinslow - The best we can do for that is to remind the OP to accept, but beyond that not much we can do. Cannot force a person to accept an answer.
@DavidWinslow - I've never built one (never had enough room to use one), though I saw some plans for one a while back. What are you thinking?
 
i know, maybe we should have a "please remember to accept an answer" copypasta
well, i know my motor had overheated at one point. ive been dealing with a hesitation for a long time
 
7:23 PM
LOL! Not a bad idea, though, not hard to type, either ;-)
 
can't find any vacuum leak, EFI has been totally fixed up, etc
 
Test stands were pretty easy for carb'd engines ... with modern fuel injection, it is pretty hard.
 
i guess i want to test it before i put it back in the car
 
I cannot say as I blame you.
 
my boss had his own shop as a mechanic before he went into machining
 
7:25 PM
Diagnosis of that type of issue can be a true PITB.
 
he said most people just build their own
ive replaced every sensor and vacuum hose
 
yes, that is true. It's the electronics which it takes to run the engine which becomes the issue.
 
im more confident with that than my mechanic skills lol
 
the stand itself is easy-peasy if you know how to weld.
What I'm getting at with the electronics is that you either have to tear the stuff out of your car or you have to purchase a separate unit to run the engine.
That's what I mean by PITB.
And for every different engine you have, you have to have a different setup.
The electronics themselves are not an issue for me either. I like EFI over carb any day of the week.
As for as voting goes or accepting answers ... look at this question and its answers:
3
Q: water leak under the car

ben hollandI noticed coolant leak coming out under my car right in the center next to my. I notice a hole which looks like an overflow outlet and coolant comes from it. what can the cause be? It is a Mazda 3 2007.

The person asked the question and has never came back.
No acceptance. Nothing.
 
yeah ive been watching that one
common question
 
 
1 hour later…
9:07 PM
@DavidWinslow - I realize it's a pretty common question, but really not my point. I'm getting at the fact the OP came the day of, signed up, asked the question, and has never been heard/seen again. Seems like a common occurrence around this site.
@DavidWinslow - I'll tell you, if nobody else will ... thank you for voting. I think it goes a long way to helping the site improve.
People aren't coming to the site to look at new Q/A ... they are coming to solve a problem with their vehicle. Only us diehard motorheads (petrolheads for you Brits!) stick around and answer questions. If there are only a handful of us here to answer questions, you know there are only a handful of people who are willing to vote.
BTW ... I think petrolheads just sounds wrong, and not because I prefer motorheads ... To me, the term petrol means gas, which when put together says gas-heads, which to me sounds like you are someone who is huffing the fumes.
Just me being me, though.
Motorhead would seem more universal ... but, each to their own.
 
9:28 PM
Guys, question for you DIY'ers
Why is it that the tool you need goes missing when you need it to proceed with whatever work you're doing?
 
 
2 hours later…
11:54 PM
@Zaid ... I used to call that "my son" until he moved out, which after that things stopped going missing but the damage was already done. He loved to borrow my tools and leave them lie where ever. All sorts of things came up missing.
 

« first day (1606 days earlier)      last day (3191 days later) »