« first day (1226 days earlier)      last day (3157 days later) » 

5:24 AM
Hola
What does word chalcogens mean?
I know elements of group 16 are call chalcogens, but what does that word mean?
 
chalk- bronze, ore (from Greek chalkos) + -gen; from the occurrence of oxygen and sulfur in many ores
fascinating
So it seems like chalcogen is used to mean an ore-forming element
just like (hydro)(gen) is a water-forming element
 
 
1 hour later…
6:43 AM
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Massacre!
 
 
7 hours later…
1:52 PM
hi @Martin-マーチン
 
 
2 hours later…
3:37 PM
@chipbuster Yes, In one of book I read. Chalcogens mean "ore forming elements" as most of them are available in form of oxide and sulphide!
 
hi @Freddy
 
hola
 
how you doing?
 
3 days holiday. So Great
What about you?
( ͡ᵔ ͜ʖ ͡ᵔ )
 
not too bad - been driven strangely and slightly mad though, by a question at 24 votes
 
3:46 PM
Which question?
 
24
Q: What causes the old book smell?

santiagoI have a collection of old books (all 80+ years old), recently, I received a British Chemistry text from 1903 (intro page below) - this being the oldest book of my collection (112 years old at the time of writing this question): One thing I notice is that there is a distinct smell that comes ...

 
So why it is driving you mad? Currently Reading answer
That's your best question
 
its at 24 votes, 1 off a silver badge
only driving me slightly mad
 
Good Question: Question score of 25 or more
 
yup, that's the one
and that book smells nice!
 
3:55 PM
Yes, I like that smell too.
Most of books in my school library sells like that!!
 
it enhances the experience of reading old texts
 
nods
@diff Hola
 
hiya @diffracteD
 
need to go. See you all later.
 
catch ya later
 
4:01 PM
What a booooooooooooooring day.
 
awww
 
How's the Table today?
@ToddMinehardt Epic edit on that HW dump!
 
i am going slightly mad
 
Weren't we all mad?
 
possibly
so, why are you bored?
 
4:14 PM
Doing household chores.
 
come over, and do my household chores
 
ಠ_ಠ
– =͟͟͞͞ =͟͟͞͞ ヘ( ´Д`)ノ
 
what is that?
 
Scared and running.
 
yes, yes you should
 
4:18 PM
Does it look that bad?
 
nah, only about an hour's work to clean
 
4:35 PM
cool, an old Mythology answer got upvoted
 
5:11 PM
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M wrote an answer on SO
 
5:38 PM
Hey Square!
 
bon
Hello
 
How're you doing?
 
that's how i roll, @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M
 
On the floor?
 
hi @bon @santiago
re: homework dump :)
 
5:43 PM
hiya
 
hey hey
 
am still going slightly mad about my +24 question
 
@santiago - saw that. i already had upvoted once, wish i could help out...
 
lol
 
even tried twice, but they take away the votes! sucks
 
5:45 PM
#MadSantiagoFTW
 
maybe you can lobby ivan :)
 
nah
 
school start again for you guys?
new semester?
 
In 17 days.
 
tick-tock
 
5:48 PM
ಠ_ಠ
 
i might be writing another SO answer in a moment
rarely do I post on SO
am not in school though
where did everyone go??
scared everyone away!
 
6:05 PM
Where did everyone go . . . go . . . go . . . go . . .
Echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . ech‌​o . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . ‌​. . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . ‌​echo . . . echo . . . echo . . .
 
indeed!
 
6:43 PM
Hello :D
 
Hullo! Long time no see!
 
Yep :P
I'm stuck on a stupid titration problem :c
 
My condolences.
 
Basically I'm titrating $H^+$ (concentration .01 M, volume 2 mL) by some $CO_3^{2-}$ and I wanna find the volumes at which pH=pKa for $H_2CO_3$'s two pKas
But I can't manage to find those :( got an idea ?
 
Well I'm a bit busy.
Lemme turn on Mathjax.
 
6:48 PM
I forgot to sat that the $CO_3^{2-}$ has the same concentration 0.1M
Yeah I know what the curve looks like already, I have the reaction's equations etc found already
 
What do you want to find out?
 
The volumes at which pH=pKa1, pKa2
Basically there's a first reaction $CO_3^{2-}+2H_3O^+=H_2CO_3+2H_2O$ with a constant $\frac{1}{K_{a1}K_{a2}}$ followed by $CO_3^{2-}+H_2CO_3=2HCO_3^-$ with a constant $\frac{K{a_1}}{K_{a_2}}$
 
Yes.
But I kinda forgot the lesson.
 
(btw, do you know any software to simulate such titrations ? I have one in French that's very good but for some weird reason it doesn't know carbonic acid)
 
@Hippalectryon Maybe 'cause carbonic acid hardly exists?
 
6:53 PM
what do you mean ? We use it here though
 
Lemme find a link.
 
The two pKas are 6.4 and 10.3 btw not 8.3 and 10.3 from what I have
 
I don't have anything here to do the calculations and my computer hangs when I use calculator. :\
 
:c what kind of computer is that xD
 
> The long-held belief that carbonic acid could not exist as a pure compound has reportedly been recently disproved by the preparation of the pure substance in both solid and gas form by University of Innsbruck researchers.
@Hippalectryon It's because of the latest win8 updates.
 
6:56 PM
Anyhow, will you be able to help later in the evening maybe ? :-D
 
It's night here.
 
Oh right xD
 
@pH13 may definitely be able to help, in case he enters the chatroom.
 
Ok. Do you have any idea for the kind of software I mentioned above though ?
 
I only use avogardo as chem software. :)
 
6:58 PM
Ah ok :P
 
7:16 PM
I'll be there later
 
7:26 PM
Ok great :D
 
 
1 hour later…
8:30 PM
meh
where do I need to start reading?
 
2 hours ago, by Hippalectryon
Basically I'm titrating $H^+$ (concentration .01 M, volume 2 mL) by some $CO_3^{2-}$ and I wanna find the volumes at which pH=pKa for $H_2CO_3$'s two pKas
 
me summons @Hippalectryon
 
If I'm right, I can get the first pKa by looking at the pH when we're in the middle of the second titration
But I have no idea how to get the second
 
what do you titrate?
with what?
 
See @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M's recap just above
 
8:39 PM
is it carbonic acid?
 
Yes (well, its basic form)
 
carbonate with acid
please ... exactly ...
carbonate with some acid, or acid with carbonate?
 
H2CO3
 
1 min ago, by pH13
carbonate with some acid, or acid with carbonate?
 
I don't get the question
 
8:42 PM
what is in your beaker and what in your burette? ^^
 
aah I see
H+ in the beaker
 
do you know the acid?
 
There's no acid in the burette though, as written above it's the basic form $CO_3^{2-}$ in the burette
 
do you know which acid is in the beaker or do you just somehow have to determine the concentration?
 
H+ is in the beaker. H3O+. Its concentration (0.1 mol/L) is given too
 
8:46 PM
there cannot be "pure" h+ resp. h3o+
 
It's 2mL of H+ in water at the concentration 0.01M
 
holy lord ;)
I think it does not matter anyway
@Hippalectryon do you know how to find the first and/or second point of inflection?
 
I have already determined the equations of the reactions, their constants, and the volumes at which the inflections occur
 
then pH=pK_a1 (the lower one) should be at half the volume of the first inflection point and pH=pk_a2 (the higher one) should be at 3/4 of the second inflection point resp. in the middle between the first and the second inflection point
 
The first reaction is not simply of the kind $A^{2-}+H^+=AH$, it's a bit more complex, hence that formula doesn't apply here
The first reaction has a constant $\frac{1}{K_1K_2}$ and the second has a constant $\frac{K_1}{k_2}$ where $K_1$ is the constant for $H_2A=H^++HA^-$ and $K_2$ for $HA^-=H^++A^{2-}$
 
8:56 PM
there are exactly two steps you have to consider
$$\ce{H+ + CO_3^2- -> HCO_3^-}$$ and $$\ce{H+ + HCO_3^- -> H2CO3 -> H2O + CO2}$$
 
It's more complex imo
 
then tell me more
 
Basically the first two reactions you have written occur at the same time, which leads to a first reaction which is $CO_3^{2-}+2H_3O^+=H_2CO_3+2H_2O$
That one is then followed by $CO_3^{2-}+H_2CO_3=2HCO_3^-$
 
if they'd occur at the same time, how can there be two inflection points?
 
Because of the two reactions I have written
The first one is the sum of the two you have written; the second one is another one
 
9:02 PM
If you look closely at your equations, you will see, that your wrote the following:
wait a second
 
(remember, CO3^2- is in the burette)
 
$\ce{CO_3^2- + 2H^+ -> H2CO3}$
$\ce{CO_3^2- + H2CO3 -> 2HCO_3-}$
--------------------------------------------
$\ce{2CO_3^2- + 2H^+ -> 2 HCO_3^-}$
you can cancel out the "2"s and then this is your first (de)protonation step
 
But there is no meaning in summing those two
Those two reactions are successive, whereas the two first ones that make my 'first' reaction occur simultaneously
 
I cannot combine those reactions but you can combine my reactions? :D
 
Because as I said above, your reactions occur at the same time (since the pKas have a difference under 4), whereas mine occur one after another (since their pKa have a difference greater than 4)
 
9:08 PM
"Because as I said above, your reactions occur at the same time" ... then we will not come to a solution as I think that it is exactly the other way around
but I'm far from omniscient and so you might be right
 
What makes you think that the two reactions you initially wrote are successive ? The rule I know is that one can say that they are successive when their difference in pKa is greater than 4
You might have a different rule :P idk
 
He has a German rule.
 
my reactions cannot occur (more or less) simultaneously (then your reactions) as the hydrogencarbonate that the second reaction needs, need to be produced by the first reaction. the same is for your reactions, where you need the carbonic acid from the second step to be produced by the first step
 
Let me explain my point of view another way.
The first reaction that occurs is $H^+ + CO_3^2 = HCO_3^-$, we both agree on that one.
 
yep
 
9:20 PM
(wrong one)
25 mins ago, by pH13
there are exactly two steps you have to consider
$$\ce{H+ + CO_3^2- -> HCO_3^-}$$ and $$\ce{H+ + HCO_3^- -> H2CO3 -> H2O + CO2}$$
For that second reaction to occur, you don't need any additional $CO_3^{2-}$ from the burrette to be introduced; it occurs naturally right after the first one
Hence those two reactions will only correspond to one inflection in the curve
 
but that is an equilibrium that is dictated by the acid constant and the second reaction is not favored at any pH
 
It it, its constant is 10^6.4
 
I have to figure sth out
 
Are you familiar with pKa axis ? That's how I think usually
 
I'm not sure what you mean, I might know it ... but I did not learn this stuff in english, so I don't know all proper translations
 
9:27 PM
As you can see, the constant for the second reaction is 10^6.5>>1
 
so ...
I did the calculations for you
 
That's odd, I don't simulated it too and don't have the same results
My volumes are 1 and 2, not .5 and 1 (mL)
Wait, what's the unit of the X axis ?
 
I don't have volumes, as they are neglected ... but that's not the point
 
Ok, I agree with the curve then :P
 
the X axis is the "degree of titration"
it is cB/cS
I can show you the calculations behind this
and if you want it, I will build in the volumes .... but I bet, they will not change anything
 
9:41 PM
Well I made a slight error before btw in the numerical constants it's concentrations of 0.01M not 0.1M but it shouldn't change much
And yeah, I agree with the shape of the curve anyway
 
I entered 0.01 as the acid's concentration
 
Ok good
 
but if you don't argue about the curve, then you know the volumes of the inflection points and you also know where pH=pka
and those are the two points, that I told you
or not quite ... as I see from my graph ... lol
 
My reactions system predicts one inflection point at 1mL and another at 2mL, which is what happens on my simulation
 
tau = 0.25 and tau = 0.75
 
9:43 PM
The value of the pHs are also consistent
 
is the carbonate concentration also 0.01 M?
 
wait for it ... volumes make everything ugly
 
9:55 PM
ok .. somewhere I'm making an error but I don't see it. maybe tomorrow ;)
 
ok :P
 
gosh ...
found it
holy ...
so ... it's exactly the same as yours
 
and you see, that my reaction scheme is right ... because this yields those both inflection points
 
But you can definitely see that pK1 and pK2 aren't the pH in the middle of the titrations
My reaction scheme yields both the inflections point too :(
 
10:01 PM
ok, I got your problem now
did take some time
in this case you have to "look" at it from the end ... think of it as being the carbonate that is titrated with hydrochloric acid ... then the graph would be mirrored at 1.5 mL about the Y axis
pH = pKa is right now at 1.5 and 2.5 mL
at least at 1.5
 
I knew 1.5 already xD
The problem was with pK2
 
the other one is not detectable
it's like with the last proton of phosphoric acid
not detectable
 
Well from the curve one can say that, but we're not supposed to have the curve and I see no way of showing that we can't using the equations
 
and here the last pH = pKa will not occur as there is no buffer region
so no henderson hasselbalch and then no pH = pKa
 
But we haven't proven that we can't have pH=pKa2
 
10:06 PM
my image proves it ;D ... I know what you mean
how are you supposed to prove that it is not there?
 
Well actually using really big volumes there's theoretically an answer since the pH will go to 14
 
but using really big volumes makes fancy stuff with titration curves
I have to search for an answer
 
I know :( which is why I'm stuck and came here xD
 
you don't have big volumes here
5
A: Why is a theoretical titration curve higher than a practical one?

pH13One thing that that has already been mentioned in the comments is the impact of $\ce{CO2}$ on the equilibrium. If you look at the following figure you can see the pH diagram of carbonic acid. The equilibrium between $\ce{CO2}$ and $\ce{H2CO3}$ $$\ce{CO2 + H2O <=> H2CO3}$$ depends very much on ...

my last graphs
bottom right
 
Btw how did you get your curves ?
 
10:17 PM
10 mL 0.1 M HCl with 0.01 M NaOH
@Hippalectryon establishing analytical equations and then with mathematica
 
O_o k
 
ok ... does not look nice here :D
that's the equation for V_B(pH)
vs is your acid's vloume, x is the proton concentration and needs to be replaced by 10^-pH
the upper .01 is the acid's concentration and the lower .01 is the base's concentration
the version without volume is easier
but not so fancy
cS and ks stands for the acid ... acid in german is "Säure" ... I usually don't write a for that ^^
 
ok :P
 
so ... did you look at "10 mL 0.1 M HCl with 0.01 M NaOH"?
 
It's half past midnight here and I wake up before 7 so I'd rather go to sleep now:c I'll look it up tomorrow
 
10:26 PM
this last thing
look at it ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)
 
uh ok
 
the big increase in volume makes the hydrochloric acid look like if it would be a weak acid
weak or middle strong ... or whatever you'd call it
there is this buffer area that is typically uncommon for hydrochloric acid
and that is what I meant, when saying that big volumes turn titration curves into funny things
 
ok I read it :D
Yeah I see what you meant now
 
you just have to look at the picture, the answer itself is not helpful for you ... I guess
 
Not helpful, but interesting :-)
 
10:29 PM
then read all my pH-related answers ;D
(tomorrow)
 
Ok :P
See you
 
cya
gn8
 
Thanks for everything
 
no problem
good night @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M
good morning @santiago ?
 
10:51 PM
hiya
 

« first day (1226 days earlier)      last day (3157 days later) »