@terdon - you're right I did. That doesn't negate my last statement - anyone capable of speaking clearly on their own behalf would have said so themaelves , and would not have answered it first despite the previous statement: ' that's not "pretty clear" - that's 4 upvotes on a 4 year old question.
mikeservmikeserv
yst 19:13
That's pretty obscure. How can you argue that a sentiment expressed in a question representing a rate of one upvote per year should speak for the entire community?
You seem to argue that anybody with reputation enough to do so should be a censor first and a voting membe…