« first day (278 days earlier)      last day (2957 days later) » 

3:00 AM
Greetings!
 
 
2 hours later…
4:48 AM
@snailboat The reports of whom's death now? Did I appropriately ateriskize?
 
 
2 hours later…
6:25 AM
Do you know where Carlos is?
Does that sentence have a subordinate clause? If so, what is it?
 
Hi Jim, hope u have been a peaceful vegetarian :P
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds Yes
 
Anonymous
> Do you know [ where Carlos is ___ ] ?
 
Anonymous
Carlos is over there.
 
Anonymous
The subordinate clause looks similar, except the complement of is is missing and instead we have where, which seems to have been moved to the front of the clause.
 
Anonymous
6:36 AM
Doesn't it seem like that?
 
Anonymous
> Carlos is over there.
 
Anonymous
> Carlos is where?
 
Anonymous
> [ where Carlos is __ ]
 
Anonymous
Know seems to be taking an interrogative content clause as a complement.
 
Anonymous
What are your thoughts, @JimReynolds?
 
6:41 AM
The bracketed constituent is subordinate?
 
Anonymous
Yes.
 
Anonymous
where Carlos is isn't a complete sentence, so I didn't capitalize it or give it final punctuation.
 
@snailboat How about: Where is Carlos, you know?
 
Anonymous
Where is Carlos? Do you know where Carlos is?
 
Anonymous
Where is Carlos? doesn't have the form of a subordinate clause. It has subject-auxiliary inversion, which happens in main clause interrogatives, not subordinate.
 
Anonymous
6:44 AM
Whatever the thingy you know is at the end, Where is Carlos? doesn't appear to be embedded under it.
 
I thought the same initially, with respect to my initial question and your response. But I then thought that where Carlos is contains the essential meaning of the sentence, and my brain started a-quiverin.
But I see now. It was malodorous cogitating on my part.
Do you know (st) is the essential meaning.
And I conflated a perspective on what seemed important with the basic structural way to analyze the sentence.
@snailboat It's interesting that you have mentioned a few times that it troubles you that so many people are not self-motivated learners.
 
Anonymous
Verbs like know, ask, wonder, determine and so on often take subordinate interrogative clauses as complements. where Carlos is is the subordinate counterpart of Where is Carlos?
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds Well, I think self-motivation is the difference between learning and not learning.
 
I understand, I think, and I believe I empathize to an extent, or strongly at times, but then another idea occurs to me: Why should we expect people to enjoy what we enjoy?
 
6:57 AM
That's a different question
 
Hmm... Does motivation really just arise in the self? I'd think it's multifactorially determined in a complex social-ecological system.
Well, I just thought, sometimes we experience negative feelings because people or things violate expectations that we create or adopt, perhaps not always rationally.
Should global warming upset me when it might be an expression of human nature?
Meditates for a moment, ensuring his perfect ease with the Oneness is maintained.
O.O
Elaborate on self-motivation being necessary to learning.
I think I'm not badly learned in some aspects, largely though because my childhood was relatively bleak and barren (hold your tears if you can) and I had nothing else to do but read 20% of our small town's library!
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds You are in a restaurant.
 
Anonymous
You need 2000 calories today.
 
Anonymous
You have a choice.
 
Anonymous
Do you order:
 
Anonymous
7:08 AM
① Two thousand calories of your favorite food?
 
Anonymous
② Or two thousand calories of your least favorite food?
 
Anonymous
It seems like it'd be easier to make yourself eat that, doesn't it? You enjoy eating it.
 
Anonymous
If you order the other stuff, you won't want to finish it. You'll want to stop eating partway through.
 
Anonymous
It'll be hard. You know you need those 2000 calories to stay healthy, but it's really hard to make yourself do it.
 
Anonymous
7:10 AM
One behavior is pleasant, one behavior is unpleasant.
 
Anonymous
You're motivated to do one, you're motivated not to do the other.
 
Anonymous
Now imagine studying something you love, versus studying something you couldn't care less about.
 
Anonymous
You just eat up the former, page after page.
 
Anonymous
The latter? You keep going, but you keep wanting to take breaks because you don't care.
 
Anonymous
Who needs this stuff anyway? No one will ever use ${SCHOOL_SUBJECT} once they're out of high school.
 
Anonymous
7:12 AM
It has no bearing on your life. You just can't see the point.
 
Anonymous
They're just trying to make you do it.
 
Anonymous
It's torture!
 
Anonymous
But what if you could change the way you thought about it?
 
Anonymous
Try to find something interesting about the topic, 'cause you know you need to study it anyway.
 
Anonymous
You manage to convince yourself that such-and-such aspect is interesting.
 
Anonymous
7:14 AM
So you pick up the book, and you start reading something that the teacher didn't force you to read. All on your own.
 
Anonymous
And it turns out that is interesting, so you start reading some more. And more.
 
Anonymous
And suddenly you're learning about ${SCHOOL_SUBJECT}, but it seems fun instead of like torture.
 
Anonymous
And the more you learn, the more it starts to form a coherent picture.
 
What facilitates that?
Let's say, in you?
 
Anonymous
Soon, you go back to that stuff your teacher told you to read, and it seems easier and makes more sense, and you start doing better in class.
 
Anonymous
7:15 AM
@JimReynolds I don't know. I learned early on to figure out a way to take an interest in anything I had to study.
 
Anonymous
It's just a skill.
 
Role model?
What does the "just" mean, I'm wondering. That how or whether the skill develops in a person is unknowable, or maybe just not the focus at the moment. It's worth acknowledging its importance, whatever we may know, speculate, or learn about it?
 
Anonymous
Well, that's an awful lot of meaning for one little word :-)
 
Anonymous
I have limited insight into how the mind works.
 
Anonymous
7:21 AM
All I can do is share my experience and hope it strikes a chord.
 
I love this .... Let me find it.
 
Anonymous
I think making yourself interested in something is the best way to learn anything. The interest feeds into motivation, and the motivation makes it easy to learn. But I don't think other people can do that for you.
 
That can be read online for free, or downloaded. There is a more recent compendium of related material called How Students Learn.
When you wrote that it makes you sad (that people languish in classrooms), uninterested, unengaged, I just wondered more about it, such reactions, in you, in me.
It's all relative, no? There is always someone more highly engaged in something positive, productive, worthy, joyful. Compared to me or you, in some areas. I don't know how I feel about them feeling sad about my relative position.
It could be motivating for me to know someone wants more for me. Or it could be deflating.
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds There's a lot of tricky psychology that goes into actually motivating kids.
 
Anonymous
Like, you don't want to tell kids that they're smart.
 
Anonymous
7:34 AM
That's really counterproductive. People do it all the time, though.
 
Yes. It reinforces an idea that achievement arises from intrinsic, immutable factors.
 
Anonymous
When success comes mainly from hard work.
 
I hate that.
 
I love that.
 
Get back to work!
 
Anonymous
7:38 AM
I definitely don't go around telling people I feel sad they don't do such-and-such.
 
Oh, I didn't impute anything negative about it onto you.
It just stimulated some introspection.
 
@Jim I feel sad that you don't tell me to go write more answers to get more rep.
 
I don't want you to use that rep for evil.
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds Stop making Mister Triangle sad!
 
Is he a snail?
Oh.
 
Anonymous
7:41 AM
Someone called him Mister Triangle the day other day.
 
Chemicals are very frail
It was @John
 
This Mister Triangle! Good name for a snail, though.
 
He still is nicer and funnier than you.
 
Anonymous
I'll remember that :-)
 
Anonymous
I just named a snail Ella.
 
Anonymous
7:42 AM
You get N guesses as to why.
 
British for ELLer
 
Anonymous
Hey, I like that one!
 
Anonymous
I think I'll stick to that story.
 
Anonymous
Ella is eating lettuce as we speak.
 
I TOLD JOHN THAT I SAY THE FUNNY ONES IN HERE, DAMMIT!
 
7:43 AM
BBL got some studying to do
 
Because she'a (H)Ella cute?
 
Anonymous
She's a surprisingly large snail.
 
She doesn't sing jazz, does she?
Is she Ella big, and stuff?
She's eating our vegetation. We need that lettuce to scrub CO2.
 
Anonymous
But we need snails to eat our vegetation!
 
Anonymous
It's the circle of life.
 
7:46 AM
Why?
Oh. I guess sooner or later we end up eating their poop.
And them ours.
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds It means no worries for the rest of your days!
 
Circle of poop.
Hmm... I don't know how to see what you replied to there. But the answer sounds good!
 
Anonymous
If you're on a computer, you can move your mouse over the message.
 
Anonymous
There's also a little arrow at the left you can click.
 
Taiwan's green tomatoes maybe? Speaking of, I'm off to the gym!
 
Anonymous
7:50 AM
Yay!
 
Anonymous
Enjoy!
 
Yes. I'm motivated by how cute I think I must look on the weight machines.
Best to let me just keep my mental picture.
 
You call my name and I appear.
 
Anonymous
Ooh, quick, which number conditional is that? :-)
 
8:22 AM
No type of conditional is that. Zero.
Hi @John (icily)
XD
But it might not be a conditional, mightn't it . . . not?
If he didn't mean every time?
 
Number XCKDLSLDXII
 
Anonymous
8:37 AM
@JimReynolds It's technically ambiguous, but I think the default interpretation is conditional.
 
Aww, not icily. :(
Mightn't it?
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds If tag formation seems too hard, go for right? :-)
 
Anonymous
But it might not be a conditional, right?
 
@snailboat Or mustn't it.
 
I don't see why you wouldn't just use mightn't at every available opportunity.
It's one of those wonderful words that should be used everywhere, like conglomerate and pulchritudinous.
 
8:41 AM
@John is having an epiphany, like me.
@JohnClifford No, petaloso is better. ಠ_ಠ
 
Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis?
 
Anonymous
In search of perfect cromulence.
 
@JohnClifford Incurable
 
0
Q: Subject-verb agreement with metric units of measurement

Trinka About 500 cm3 of the Herschelite was hydrated at 80% RH. About 500 cm3 of the Herschelite were hydrated at 80% RH. Could someone advise me about which of the two sentences have the correct verb agreement and why? Also, what is the subject of the sentence--is it "500 cm3" or "Herschelite"?

 
Anonymous
I'm a fan of tmesis.
 
8:42 AM
Was my comment here correct do you think?
 
@JohnClifford Only @Snail is correct around here. We're just practicing.
 
Okay. Did I practice right?
 
@JohnClifford You was right
 
Anonymous
500 cm³ of is not actually an attributive noun. See, there's more than one word there, and the last one is a preposition.
 
How would you describe it then, non-homeless slug transportation device?
 
Anonymous
8:52 AM
Just call it a quantifier.
 
Done.
The rest was right then, I take it.
 
Just wondering - now that ELL has established its identity and moved out of Beta, is it time to stop the systematic migration of questions from ELU to ELL? — Lawrence Mar 19 at 7:01
O_o
 
Anonymous
Oh, I only need one more vote to make it into the top four! I'm so excited! :-)
 
We...only migrate the ones that are simple enough that they should have been posted there in the first place?
Only one vote for what to make it into the top four of what?
I'll vote for you!
 
Anonymous
8:55 AM
56
Q: A friendly reminder: ELL is not EL&U's trash can

snailboatWe've been getting a lot of migrations to ELL lately. That's actually fine by me – I think a lot of them are okay on ELL, even if they're not suitable for EL&U. The two sites have different standards, and that's okay. But we've also been getting migrations like this: When someone wanna tal...

 
Top four ELU meta posts.
 
Anonymous
It's my first meta question on English.SE.
 
Anonymous
Ooh!
 
Upvoted.
 
And dammit she's an upvote magnet
 
Anonymous
8:55 AM
You should read it and make sure you actually want to upvote it first.
 
I've read it before, I do.
 
Anonymous
Oh! Yay! :-)
 
Not sure why I didn't upvote it the first time I read it TBH.
 
Anonymous
See, now it's in the top four.
 
Does it have downvotes BTW?
 
Anonymous
8:56 AM
The 四天王 of EL&U meta!
 
Can you see downvotes on your stuff?
 
Anonymous
@IͶΔ It had one, but it mysteriously vanished when a certain user deleted their account.
 
Anonymous
@JohnClifford Once you get enough reputation, you can click the number to break the score down into upvotes and downvotes.
 
@snailboat The windows and curtains of ELU meta?
 
Oh!
Wow, I feel drunk with power now.
 
8:57 AM
Comes with 1k rep.
Click on the score to expand.
 
Aww, my question about the im in immigrate has one downvote. :(
 
Let's take over the world
 
(not surprised honestly)
Gonna look at all my answers and see if anyone's downvoted them now. :D
 
Anonymous
Can you link to the question?
 
1
Q: The im- prefix in the word immigrate

John CliffordSo I know that, generally speaking, the prefix "im-" means "not" or "the opposite of" which is fine in words like immobile, impolite, impossible etc. However, while helping my wife with her uni work I came across an interesting one: immigrate. My research into my original query (whether emigrate...

I missed a line in the definition when I looked that would have answered the question for me quite handily, so my bad on that one.
 
Anonymous
9:02 AM
It's not negating.
 
Anonymous
@JohnClifford Do you have a public library card? You should be able to access the OED online with it.
 
I do, yes.
 
Anonymous
The OED should be your first stop for this sort of question.
 
Anonymous
(Not to be confused with the dictionaries available at oxforddictionaries.com!)
 
D'aww, one of my answers has two downvotes. ;_;
 
Anonymous
9:09 AM
Which answer is that?
 
Though it also has 31 upvotes so not bothered. :P
 
Anonymous
Sometimes I get downvotes.
 
29
A: Is there an informal term for the "best company in an industry"?

John CliffordI would go with top dog for this. As defined by dictionary.com a person, group, or nation that has acquired a position of highest authority. I would posit that a company can be considered a group, and therefore the term could be applied to one. Forbes and rt.com support this usage of the t...

 
Anonymous
Maybe it was because you echoed the OP's redundant phrasing, as the comments pointed out. That doesn't really seem like a good reason to downvote, though.
 
Anonymous
That isn't what they were asking about.
 
Anonymous
9:11 AM
And anyway, it is grammatical.
 
Anonymous
Single word requests can be pretty subjective, I think. I don't really know why people vote the way they do.
 
Anonymous
Like, maybe someone felt top dog was too informal.
 
Anonymous
They asked for an informal alternative, but the voter might not have noticed that.
 
Anonymous
The top-voted answer says market leader, which doesn't strike me as an "informal or slang" expression.
 
Anonymous
So I'm guessing quite a few people voted without really reading the question.
 
9:14 AM
Probably.
It seems like I've answered more than 80 questions on this site. I feel like I've been here for years. XD
 
Anonymous
Fun!
 
Anonymous
I kind of want to get my rep to 10k so I can see deleted posts.
 
I'm gonna try to get to 4k by the end of today.
 
Anonymous
I have 57 answers.
 
Depends on how many questions get posted though obviously.
 
9:22 AM
I'm around everyday on three sites for a year, yet I haven't reached 100 posts in any of them.
 
Anonymous
(On EL&U, I mean.)
 
Anonymous
And I'm at 5432 rep, so I'm more than halfway there! :-)
 
Yay!
 
Your answers are probably way higher quality than mine. :)
 
Serial-upvotes @Snail
 
Anonymous
9:24 AM
@IͶΔ Noooo!
 
My upvote record so far is 57.
 
Anonymous
Oh, that's very good!
 
118
A: How do we encourage edits to obsolete/out of date answers?

IͶΔMy vote is for Obsolete answer. As you have stated, the sorting would stop the new answer from being on top, which means the obsolete info is what the curious guy with the same question will face. This is a big con of adding a new answer, as I've seen lots of better newer answers not getting mor...

 
I get addicted too easily to media structured like this. Every time I get an upvote it's like a little stroke to the ego.
 
Anonymous
9:27 AM
93
Q: How did 7 come to be an abbreviation for 'and' in Old English?

snailboatAccording to A History of the English Language: Revised Edition by Elly van Gelderen, p.53, in Old English the numeral 7 was used as an abbreviation for the word and: Abbreviations are frequently used, e.g. 7 stands for and … The same book includes various Old English passages with exampl...

 
Eats @John's ego
 
Aw.
loses all interest in contributing to EL&U, becomes a hobo
 
@JohnClifford Welcome to meta.ELU
 
There was a saying I was going to ask about the origin of earlier and now I've forgotten what it was.
Would have made a good question as well I think.
Oh well.
 
Anonymous
Maybe it'll come back to you :-)
 
9:29 AM
I hope so.
 
Anonymous
@JohnClifford There are people who feel nothing when they get little green numbers.
 
I pity those people.
 
Anonymous
I don't understand how it's possible, but it's true.
 
Oh, incidentally snailboat, what's your opinion on using "very" as an adverb when the adjective following has a non-quantifiable meaning, like "seamless" or "fixed"? This came up in a question earlier.
 
@JohnClifford It'll come back to you next time you're waking up
 
Anonymous
9:32 AM
I would say: using intensifiers with words that are usually non-gradable. They're often called "absolute" adjectives, to express that they're either 1 or 0, nothing in between. Very pregnant is a classic example.
 
Anonymous
As long as we can find a relevant gradable meaning for the word, even if it's not the usual meaning, it's generally possible in informal English, but the precise meaning might not always be clear.
 
Anonymous
Usually not acceptable in formal English.
 
I saw a lady that was 2 millimeters pregnant the other day.
 
The problem I have here is that "very" as an adverb is used to emphasise the degree to which an adjective applies, but fixed and seamless don't have variable meanings. Fixed means "predetermined and unable to be changed" so what you end up saying is in effect "she lives on a predetermined and unchangeable income to a greater degree than people on predetermined and unchangeable incomes usually do." Which is obviously utter nonsense. Very is not suitable for either of these sentences IMO. — John Clifford 2 hours ago
Er.
0
Q: Technical proper grammar

jl1989Consider the following two statements. ON what grounds might a grammatical purist object to them? She lives on a very fixed income. It seems very seamless to the community.

 
@JohnClifford Edit the title to say "grammer"
 
Anonymous
9:34 AM
So with pregnant, it's easy to come up with a related meaning that's gradable, which gives you an obvious interpretation for very pregnant.
 
I agree with that, but I don't think you can do the same thing for "seamless" or "fixed".
 
Anonymous
But if you can't come up with an interpretation easily in context (very seamless? What context would that appear in?), then it probably doesn't work.
 
So in these specific cases it seems silly.
 
@JohnClifford You can do the same thing for almost all of them.
 
Anonymous
We should judge specific examples in context. We use context to come up with the relevant meanings.
 
9:36 AM
I'm all 'bout silly. (/¯◡ ‿ ◡)/¯ ~ ┻━┻
 
Anonymous
An example that seems like nonsense out of context might actually work if we can come up with the right context.
 
The only context I can think of where "very fixed" would apply is if you're emphasising the degree to which an object is stuck in place.
But in the context of monetary "fixed" there isn't a way to grade it, IMO.
 
1
A: The adverb to complete the sentence

Maulik VI think the situation is quite similar to Cricket batting where the batsman is asked to play not aggressively/powerfully. We use the term steadily. I mean this could be one of the options. So, John, kick the ball steadily steadily here means in a controlled way, steady way. Another term...

I don't think this is what the question is asking for.
Dammit. People are so fast in answering and even faster in upvoting crap.
If I answered like this I would've had moderation tools on ELL by now.
 
Anonymous
Another way you can be more specific than adverb is to call them degree adverbs. Or degree modifiers, if you like.
 
Anonymous
I say intensifier out of habit.
 
Anonymous
9:41 AM
@JohnClifford You could post that comment as a competing answer.
 
Anonymous
Oh! You did.
 
I just did.
 
@IͶΔ I'd use Go easy on the ball!, but that's not what the OP is asking for. Then again, I think the OP may like it. It's hard for our users to ask a question to get the right answer they're pursuing, I think.
 
Anonymous
Sweet.
 
Anonymous
Could you not kick the ball so hard?
 
Anonymous
9:43 AM
Stop kicking the ball so hard! It's down to three hit points!
 
When an OP frames their sentence in a specific way and forces us to find a missing piece, it's almost always the case that the resulting sentence is perhaps not the best way to phrase it, because of the fixed parts.
 
"Ball deflates. John gains 5XP and half a cheese sandwich!"
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I think that might be one reason they sometimes have such a hard time answering it themselves.
 
Good morning, eveyone! (in UGT)
 
9:44 AM
Hi!
 
Balls have feelings. Be gentle. ಠ_ಠ
 
Anonymous
Do I say good morning back in UGT?
 
@snailboat nods
 
Anonymous
Good morning back in UGT!
 
@snailboat Yes, in Universal Greeting Time, it's always in the morning when someone comes in. :-)
 
9:45 AM
@DamkerngT. Mroing
Spammer on SU. @Snail tell your snail to behave.
 
Anonymous
;_;
 
@snailboat I've started posting more answers than comments now since I was chewed out for technically posting an answer as a comment, but I still hold back from doing so when I can't be 100% sure of what I'm saying.
 
p_p
 
Apparently not being sure isn't a good enough reason not to post an answer.
 
Anonymous
@JohnClifford Sure. Do what you think is best.
 
9:46 AM
I can see the point she was making, comments are harder to moderate.
 
Anonymous
@JohnClifford The software isn't designed to have any comment answers for any reason.
 
Anonymous
But they're widespread on some SE sites, outright banned on others, and yet other sites are somewhere in between.
 
I usually use comments for my opinion, which I don't consider constitutes an answer. In that particular case I was in the wrong though, as I was definitely posting a definitive answer with references.
I just wasn't 100% certain what I was saying was right, but as she pointed out that's what upvotes/downvotes and editing are for.
 
Anonymous
Comments have these interesting traits:
 
Anonymous
1. They can be upvoted but not downvoted.
 
9:48 AM
10
A: Commenting versus Answering

IͶΔCommentators comment because they comment! They usually have their own reasons, but the reasons usually boil down to this: They're requesting clarification Without some context, it might be hard for us to help you. Could you provide a link to the source of the data or something similar? A ...

 
Anonymous
2. They're permanently featured above all answers, no matter how highly upvoted.
 
Anonymous
3. They are effectively permanent and can only be deleted by moderators in most situations.
 
True.
 
Anonymous
It's common on ELL for people to post comment answers that are wrong, and yet will remain forever the first thing people see when they land on ELL from Google.
 
Anonymous
Seeing a bad answer first is bad pedagogy.
 
Anonymous
9:50 AM
Unlearning is much harder than learning.
 
Anonymous
And in language learning, the most important thing is to expose learners to correct language.
 
Anonymous
If you expose them to something incorrect and then something correct, and even explain that the first one is incorrect, they might end up remembering that one down the road anyway.
 
Anonymous
One popular opinion on the English sites is that an answer without references and detailed explanation should be posted as a comment.
 
Anonymous
That is, it's no answer at all.
 
I'd be inclined to agree with you on that.
 
Anonymous
9:52 AM
But if it answers the question, that seems patently false to me. If an answer isn't good enough to be posted as an answer, it shouldn't be promoted to comment status.
 
1
Q: Punctuation: comma in this sentence?

ascenatorI am wondering whether this sentence is correct: The scenes consist of about 400 images showing a non-moving ball at various locations while the rest are sequences of a moving ball. ...or if there has to be comma: The scenes consist of about 400 images, showing a non-moving ball at vari...

 
Notes for the LL proposal
 
I want to say for this one that technically you don't need a comma, but to avoid it being a run-on sentence I'd actually put one before while if I put one anywhere.
 
Anonymous
If we think something isn't good enough to be an answer, why feature it above every "real" answer and prevent it from being downvoted?
 
Anonymous
But my view is not popular, and ELLers will do as they will.
 
Anonymous
9:53 AM
And the moderators encourage answer comments and use comments for answers themselves, and even convert awful answers to comments.
 
The overriding thing here is that we're all only human and we're not always going to use things for their intended purpose every single time. Everyone will slip up occasionally.
 
Anonymous
@JohnClifford That sounds good.
 
@JohnClifford They've told me that a lot in meta.ELL.
Funny enough, it's not often said in other metas.
 
I do have a tendency to post comments if I'm on my phone and then post them as answers when I get my laptop turned on.
 
All this comment stuff is pretty much like the .io domain name. :-)
 
9:55 AM
There's a difference between throwing out rules and slipping.
 
Anonymous
@JohnClifford Well, that's certainly true, but a lot of people also disagree with me about how they should be used. That's okay, too. I'm not in charge, after all :-)
 
@snailboat Was "that sounds good" directed at my purported answer to the question I linked or my commentary on everyone being fallible when it comes to following the rules? :P
 
Anonymous
You can tell by moving your mouse over my message if you're on the desktop interface.
 
Oh!
I learn so much.
 
Anonymous
There's also a little arrow at the beginning of the message which you can click. That's useful for messages that are replies to older messages, no longer on the screen.
 
9:57 AM
Am I right in saying that putting the comma there works because the clause following is related to the main one but doesn't rely on it?
 
Anonymous
To link your reply to a specific message, move your mouse over the message and click the arrow at the far right.
 
Anonymous
@JohnClifford Well, the following clause has the form of an independent clause.
 
Anonymous
Is that what you mean by "doesn't rely on it"?
 
I'm not a comma guy, but I feel like the sentences read differently with and without the comma. One is showing modifies images; the other is showing modifies the scenes (or the whole main clause).
 

« first day (278 days earlier)      last day (2957 days later) »